Normal Patterns and Pitfalls of FDG Uptake in the Head and Neck

The diagnostic value of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET-CT in differentiating medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw and metastasis to the jawbone

INTRODUCTION

Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) and jaw metastasis might share similar clinical and radiographic characteristics, with both demonstrating F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET-CT. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET-CT is used to demonstrate prostate cancer dissemination. Unlike FDG PET-CT, PSMA PET-CT is more specific to cancer than to inflammation. Therefore, we hypothesized that it might be a useful tool to differentiate between MRONJ and jaw metastasis.

METHODS

All files of prostate cancer patients diagnosed with MRONJ and with available PSMA PET-CT studies were retrieved. A similar number of solid cancer patients with MRONJ and with available FDG PET-CT studies served as a second study group. All studies were reviewed by 2 blinded co-investigators (L.D. and M.F.).

RESULTS

Seventeen patients who underwent PSMA PET-CT (24 studies) and 15 patients who underwent FDG PET-CT (29 studies) met the inclusion criteria. All patients with FDG PET-CT studies showed pathological uptake at the site of MRONJ in at least one of their studies versus only 23.5% of patients in the PSMA PET-CT group (P < .001). FDG PET-CT studies showed pathological uptake in 89.6% of the studies compared with only 20.8% in the PSMA PET-CT group (P < .001). The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the mean uptake volume in the FDG PET-CT group were significantly higher compared with the PSMA PET-CT group (P < .001 and P < .005, respectively). The interclass correlation coefficient for all parameters was higher than 0.95.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA PET-CT is useful to differentiate between MRONJ and jaw metastasis.

Surgical margins in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A narrative review

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a prevalent and frequently recurring malignancy, often necessitates surgical intervention. The surgical margin (SM) plays a pivotal role in determining the postoperative treatment strategy and prognostic evaluation of HNSCC. Nonetheless, the process of clinical appraisal and assessment of the SMs remains a complex and indeterminate endeavor, thereby leading to potential difficulties for surgeons in defining the extent of resection. In this regard, we undertake a comprehensive review of the suggested surgical distance in varying circumstances, diverse methods of margin evaluation, and the delicate balance that must be maintained between tissue resection and preservation in head and neck surgical procedures. This review is intended to provide surgeons with pragmatic guidance in selecting the most suitable resection techniques, and in improving patients' quality of life by achieving optimal functional and aesthetic restoration.

Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and PET/CT in Cervical Lymph Node Metastasis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

(1) Background: In oral cancer staging, ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) are routinely used in clinical practice. The present study is a retrospective examination of the diagnostic accuracy of cervical lymph node metastasis using US, CT, MRI, and PET/CT, with histopathological diagnosis as a reference, to compare the different diagnostic imaging modalities. (2) Methods: The participants included 16 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent US-, CT-, MRI-, and PET/CT-based preoperative diagnostic imaging and simultaneous primary lesion resection and neck dissection, including 82 level regions and 424 lymph nodes. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of each imaging modality based on the imaging results and the pathology results of metastasis. (3) Results: Of the four diagnostic imaging modalities, PET/CT exhibited the highest sensitivity but the lowest specificity and accuracy. US, CT, and MRI had high specificities. Comparing each level region and lymph node showed that differences were observed in PET/CT. (4) Conclusions: PET/CT to diagnose lymph node metastasis requires a comprehensive evaluation because it produces more false positives than other diagnostic imaging modalities. Using US, CT, and MRI, which have excellent spatial resolution, improves diagnostic accuracy at the lymph node level.

Direct co-registration of [18F]FDG uptake and histopathology in surgically excised malignancies of the head and neck: a feasibility study

PURPOSE

Recent technical advancements in PET imaging have improved sensitivity and spatial resolution. Consequently, clinical nuclear medicine will be confronted with PET images on a previously unfamiliar resolution. To better understand [18F]FDG distribution at submillimetric scale, a direct correlation of radionuclide-imaging and histopathology is required.

METHODS

A total of five patients diagnosed with a malignancy of the head and neck were injected with a clinical activity of [18F]FDG before undergoing surgical resection. The resected specimen was imaged using a preclinical high-resolution PET/CT, followed by slicing of the specimen. Multiple slices were rescanned using a micro-PET/CT device, and one of the slices was snap-frozen for frozen sections. Frozen sections were placed on an autoradiographic film, followed by haematoxylin and eosin staining to prepare them for histopathological assessment. The results from both autoradiography and histopathology were co-registered using an iterative co-registration algorithm, and regions of interest were identified to study radiotracer uptake.

RESULTS

The co-registration between the autoradiographs and their corresponding histopathology was successful in all specimens. The use of this novel methodology allowed direct comparison of autoradiography and histopathology and enabled the visualisation of uncharted heterogeneity in [18F]FDG uptake in both benign and malignant tissue.

CONCLUSION

We here describe a novel methodology enabling the direct co-registration of [18F]FDG autoradiography with the gold standard of histopathology in human malignant tissue. The future use of the current methodology could further increase our understanding of the distribution of radionuclides in surgically excised malignancies and hence, improve the integration of pathology and molecular imaging in a multiscale perspective.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05068687.

High-Resolution 18F-FDG PET/CT for Assessing Three-Dimensional Intraoperative Margins Status in Malignancies of the Head and Neck, a Proof-of-Concept

The surgical treatment of head and neck malignancies relies on the complete removal of tumoral tissue, while inadequate margins necessitate the use of adjuvant therapy. However, most positive margins are identified postoperatively as deep margins, and intraoperative identification of the deep positive margins could help achieve adequate surgical margins and decrease adjuvant therapies. To improve deep-margin identification, we investigated whether the use of high-resolution preclinical PET and CT could increase certainty about the surgical margins in three dimensions. Patients with a malignancy of the head and neck planned for surgical resection were administered a clinical activity of 4MBq/kg ¹⁸F-FDG approximately one hour prior to surgical initiation. Subsequently, the resected specimen was scanned with a micro-PET-CT imaging device, followed by histopathological assessment. Eight patients were included in the study and intraoperative PET/CT-imaging of 11 tumoral specimens and lymph nodes of three patients was performed. As a result of the increased resolution, differentiation between inflamed and dysplastic tissue versus malignant tissue was complicated in malignancies with increased peritumoral inflammation. The current technique allowed the three-dimensional delineation of ¹⁸F-FDG using submillimetric PET/CT imaging. While further optimization and patient stratification is required, clinical implementation could enable deep margin assessment in head and neck resection specimens.

PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Head and Neck Cancers Including Thyroid Cancer

PET/CT imaging is a dual-modality diagnostic technology that merges metabolic and structural imaging. There are several currently available radiotracers, but ¹⁸F-FDG is the most commonly utilized due to its widespread availability. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a cornerstone of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma imaging. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TOC is another widely used radiotracer. It allows for whole-body imaging of cellular somatostatin receptors, commonly expressed by neuroendocrine tumors and is the standard of reference for the characterization and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. The normal biodistribution of these PET radiotracers as well as the technical aspects of image acquisition and inadequate patient preparation affect the quality of PET/CT imaging. In addition, normal variants, artifacts and incidental findings may impede accurate image interpretation and can potentially lead to misdiagnosis. In order to correctly interpret PET/CT imaging, it is necessary to have a comprehensive knowledge of the normal anatomy of the head and neck and to be cognizant of potential imaging pitfalls. The interpreter must be familiar with benign conditions which may accumulate radiotracer potentially mimicking neoplastic processes and also be aware of malignancies which can demonstrate low radiotracer uptake. Appropriate use of structural imaging with either CT, MR or ultrasound can serve a complimentary role in several head and neck pathologies including local tumor staging, detection of bone marrow involvement or perineural spread, and classification of thyroid nodules. It is important to be aware of the role of these complementary modalities to maximize diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The purpose of this article is to outline the basic principles of PET/CT imaging, with a focus on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA PET/CT. Basic physiology, variant imaging appearances and potential pitfalls of image interpretation are presented within the context of common use cases of PET technology in patients with head and neck cancers and other pathologies, benign and malignant.

Comparison of 18F-FDG-PET and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the diagnostic performance in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUNDS

We performed a meta-analysis to compare F-FDG-PET and F-FDG-PET/CT for the diagnostic performance in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology by Bethesda classification.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase databases were searched for eligible studies from the earliest available date of indexing through September 2019. Only studies with clearly stated histopathology confirmation were included. Publication bias was assessed by Deeks funnel plot. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic odds ratio was determined by random-effect analysis, respectively. All diagnostic estimate indexes were determined separately for PET alone and PET/CT and were compared pair-wisely using Z-test.

RESULTS

We included 214 patients from five PET alone studies and 420 patients from 8 PET/CT studies in this meta-analysis. The range of the prevalence of malignancy was 11% to 27% for PET alone studies (Median, 20%) and 4% to 50% for PET/CT studies (Median, 24%). The sensitivity (0.95 vs 0.73, P < .01), negative likelihood ratio (0.20 vs 0.53, P = .04) and negative predictive value (0.99 vs 0.91, P < .01) of PET alone are significantly better than those of PET/CT. For PET/CT, Fagan nomogram indicated that when the pre-test probability was set at 24%, the negative post-test probability could decrease to 12%.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis reveals that in evaluating thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology by Bethesda classification, the rule-out performance of F-FDG-PET is significantly better than F-FDG-PET/CT, although the latter represents a more objective and accurate technique. We hypothesize that the lack of precise localization of suspicious FDG uptake in the neck region may have contributed to this overvaluation for PET alone studies, and advocate that future studies be performed with PET/CT rather than PET alone to avoid misinterpretation and overvaluation in this scenario.