The role of embolic protection in peripheral arterial atherectomy

Safety and effectiveness of the Phoenix Atherectomy System in lower extremity arteries: Early and midterm outcomes from the prospective multicenter EASE study

Objectives

To evaluate the novel Phoenix Atherectomy System as percutaneous treatment of de novo and restenotic infrainguinal arterial lesions.

Methods

This prospective, multicenter, nonrandomized investigational device exemption trial was conducted across 16 US and German centers between August 2010 and April 2013. Intention-to-treat enrollment was 128 patients (mean age: 71.8 years, 59% male) with 149 lesions (mean length: 34 mm, mean diameter stenosis: 89.5%), and the primary analysis per-protocol population consisted of 105 patients with 123 lesions. The primary efficacy endpoint, technical success, was the achievement of acute debulking with a post-atherectomy residual diameter stenosis ≤50% (before adjunctive therapy). The primary safety endpoint was the major adverse event (MAE) rate through 30 days.

Results

For the primary analysis per-protocol population, the rate of lesion technical success was 95.1% (117/123), with the lower limit of the 95% CI 90.6%, meeting the prospectively established target performance goal of ≥86%. After post-atherectomy adjunctive therapy, residual stenosis was ≤30% for 99.2% (122/123) of lesions (mean final diameter stenosis 10.5%). Improvement of ≥1 Rutherford class occurred for 74.5% of patients through 30 days and for 80% through six months. MAEs were experienced by 5.7% (6/105) of patients through 30 days (with the upper limit of the 95% CI 11.0%, meeting the target performance goal of <20%), and 16.8% through six months. Six-month freedom from TLR and TVR was 88.0% and 86.1%, respectively.

Conclusions

Based on the high rate of technical success and the low rates of MAEs through six months, the Phoenix Atherectomy System is safe and effective for the debulking of lower-extremity arterial lesions.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01541774

An Algorithm for the Use of Embolic Protection During Atherectomy for Femoral Popliteal Lesions

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to identify an algorithm for the use of distal embolic protection on the basis of angiographic lesion morphology and vascular anatomy for patients undergoing atherectomy for femoropopliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND

Atherectomy has been shown to create more embolic debris than angioplasty alone. Distal embolic protection has been shown to be efficacious in capturing macroemboli; however, no consensus exists for the appropriate lesions to use distal embolic protection during atherectomy.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease treated with atherectomy and distal embolic protection were evaluated to identify potential predictors of DE. Plaque collected from the SilverHawk nose cone subset was sent to pathology for analysis to evaluate the accuracy of angiography in assessing plaque morphology.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in lesion length (142.1 ± 62.98 vs. 56.91 ± 41.04; p = 0.0001), low-density lipoprotein (82.3 ± 40.3 vs. 70.9 ± 23.2; p = 0.0006), vessel runoff (1.18 ± 0.9 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9; p = 0.0001), chronic total occlusion (131 vs. 10; p = 0.001), in-stent restenosis (33 vs. 6; p = 0.0081), and calcified lesions (136 vs. 65; p < 0.001). In simple logistic regression analysis lesion length, reference vessel diameter, chronic total occlusion, runoff vessels, and in-stent restenosis were found to be strongly associated with macroemboli. Angiographic assessment of plaque morphology was accurate. Positive predictive value of 92.31, negative predictive value of 95.35, sensitivity of 92.31, and specificity of 95.35 for calcium; positive predictive value of 95.56, negative predictive value of 100, sensitivity of 100, and specificity of 92.31 for atherosclerotic plaque. Thrombus/in-stent restenosis was correctly predicted.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic total occlusion, in-stent restenosis, thrombotic, calcific lesions >40 mm, and atherosclerotic lesions >140 mm identified by peripheral angiography necessitate concomitant filter use during atherectomy to prevent embolic complications.

Distal Embolization During Percutaneous Subclavian Artery Intervention

Distal embolization due to atherothrombotic debris during subclavian artery interventions is extremely rare and can usually be managed conservatively. Herein, we describe a case of acute hand ischemia due to massive distal embolization during balloon angioplasty and stenting of a left subclavian artery chronic total occlusion. This limb-threatening complication was effectively treated with rescue surgical thrombectomy.

The role of atherectomy in the treatment of lower extremity peripheral artery disease

Background

The incidence of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (LE-PAD) continues to increase and associated morbidity remains high. Despite the significant development of percutaneous revascularization strategies, over the past decade, LE-PAD still represents a unique challenge for interventional cardiologists and vascular surgeons.

Method

Typical features of atherosclerosis that affects peripheral vascular bed (diffuse nature, poor distal runoff, critical limb ischemia, chronic total occlusion) contribute to the disappointing results of traditional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). New technologies have been developed in attempt to improve the safety and effectiveness of percutaneous revascularization. Among these, atherectomy, debulking and removing atherosclerotic plaque, offers the potential advantage of eliminating stretch on arterial walls and reducing rates of restenosis.

Conclusions

This review summarizes the features and the current applications of new debulking devices.