Diabetes mellitus in Tassin, France: remarkable transformation in incidence and outcome of ESRD in diabetes

High-Intensity Hemodialysis: The Wave of the Future?

Various modalities of high-intensity hemodialysis are gathering increasing popularity. Some of the advantages of these new dialysis regimens are presented. Time and the increasing use of these novel approaches will ultimately determine their role in the overall management of patients with end-stage renal disease.

Clinical outcomes and quality of life in hemodialysis diabetic patients versus non-diabetics

Background

Diabetes is the leading cause of end stage renal disease (ESRD) worldwide.

Objectives

We compared the clinical outcomes in diabetic patients on hemodialysis (HD) with non-diabetics.

Patients and Methods

Adult maintenance HD patients (N= 532) from 9 HD facilities were enrolled to this prospective cohort study in September 2012. Causes of death, hospitalization, and HD exit were recorded in a median 28 months follow up period.

Results

Forty-one percent of patients were diabetic. Diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics had significantly higher age (62.2 ± 11.2 versus 53.1 ± 16.7 years), lower dialysis duration (median: 23 versus 30 months), more cardiovascular comorbidities (64% versus 28%) , higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (median: 3.80 versus 2.25 mg/L), lower serum albumin (3.86 ± 0.35 versus 3.93 ± 0.35 g/dL), lower intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) (median: 272 versus 374 ρg/mL), higher serum triglyceride (167 ± 91 versus 139 ± 67 mg/dL) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) (82.5 ± 24.5 versus 77.5 ± 23.8 mg/dL), and worse short form health survey (SF36) score (45.7 ± 20.9 versus 52.7 ± 20.5). Annual admission rate was higher in diabetics (median: 0.86 versus 0.43) and diabetic foot involved 16% of their admissions. Transplantation rate was 4 and 9 per 100 patient years in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Death rate was two folds higher in diabetics (24 versus 12 per 100 patient years). Cardiovascular diseases ( ± infections/other causes) comprised 80.5% of death in diabetics and 54.5% in non-diabetics. In Cox regression proportional hazard multivariate analysis, hazard risk of death in diabetics was 1.9 times higher than non-diabetics.

Conclusions

Clinical outcomes and health related quality of life (HRQOL) are much worse in diabetic compared to non-diabetic HD patients mainly due to more frequent of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).

Predictive value of serum NT-proBNP levels in type 2 diabetic people with diabetic nephropathy

OBJECTIVE

The serum N-terminal fragment of pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level in type 2 diabetic subjects with or without diabetic nephropathy (DN) is still unclear. We aimed to evaluate the relationship between serum NT-proBNP levels and different stages of diabetic nephropathy, and identify probable factors predicting serum NT-proBNP level.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This cross-sectional study included 20 normoalbuminuric (Group-I), 28 microalbuminuric (Group-II), 20 macroalbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients (Group-III), and 20 healthy volunteers (Group-IV). Serum NT-proBNP levels were measured with highly sensitive and specific immunoassay.

RESULTS

Mean NT-proBNP levels were 32 ± 55, 91 ± 95, 331 ± 297, 42 ± 34 pg/ml for Groups I-IV, respectively. When patients with LVH were excluded, mean logNT-proBNP was still significantly higher in Group-III than all other groups. The three diabetic groups were similar in age, BMI, HbA1c, fasting serum glucose, and GFR. In a multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for factors significantly correlated with NT-proBNP levels, the patient group, presence of LVH, and hemoglobin remained as an independent predictor of serum NT-proBNP. These variables explained 68% of the variability of NT-proBNP (adjusted R(2)=0.683).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean serum NT-proBNP level of macroalbuminuric diabetic patients was higher than normoalbuminuric and microalbuminuric diabetic patients, and healthy control subjects even after exclusion of LVH. NT-proBNP may be a useful and predictive marker of diabetic nephropathy.

Difficulty in improving malnutrition and low-grade inflammation in diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis

Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is commonly used for renal replacement therapy in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. We investigated the changes of peritoneal transport characteristics, nutritional status, and adequacy and inflammation parameters in diabetic CAPD patients (N = 17) compared to non-diabetic patients (N = 23). Peritoneal equilibrium testing, nutritional, biochemical, and anthropometric parameters and adequacy were prospectively assessed at 1 (baseline), 6 and 12 months after initiating CAPD. The levels of several nutritional parameters were lower and did not change in DM patients over time (P < 0.05) and significantly improved in the non-DM patients over time (P < 0.05). Total weekly creatinine clearance and residual renal function exhibited a rapid decline (P < 0.05) and inflammation parameter levels were higher in DM patients (P < 0.05). Our results showed the difficulty in improvement of nutritional status and inflammatory parameters in diabetic patients during at least the first year of CAPD compared to non-DM patients.

A French cost-consequence analysis of the renoprotective benefits of irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension

OBJECTIVES

We performed a cost-consequence analysis in a French setting of the renoprotective benefit of irbesartan in hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients over a 25-year period.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A previously published Markov model simulated progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease and death. Three treatment strategies with analogous blood pressure control were compared: (A) control--conventionally medicated antihypertensive therapy (excluding angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, other angiotensin-2-receptor antagonists and dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) initiated at microalbuminuria; (B) early irbesartan--(300 mg daily added to control, initiated with microalbuminuria) and (C) late irbesartan--(300 mg daily, initiated with overt nephropathy). Probabilities came from the Irbesartan in Reduction of Microalbuminuria-2 study, Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial and other sources. Clinical and economic outcomes were projected over 25 years. Annual discount rates were 3%.

RESULTS

Compared to control, early use of irbesartan added (mean +/- standard deviation) 1.51 +/- 0.08 undiscounted life years (discounted: 0.94 +/- 0.05 years), while late irbesartan added 0.07 +/- 0.01 (0.04 +/- 0.01) years/patient. Early irbesartan added 1.03 +/- 0.06 discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), while late irbesartan added 0.06 +/- 0.01 QALYs. Early and late irbesartan treatments were projected to save 22,314 +/- 1273 euro and 6619 +/- 820 euro/patient, respectively versus control. Sensitivity analysis showed that even over short time horizons both irbesartan treatments were superior to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In France, early irbesartan treatment improved quality and length of life and reduced costs in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria. Late irbesartan therapy is beneficial, but earlier irbesartan leads to better outcomes.

Cost-consequence analysis in a French setting of screening and optimal treatment of nephropathy in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

Forty percent of hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients develop nephropathy (microalbuminuria/overt nephropathy), indicating end organ damage, increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), and death. In France, screening rates and nephropathy treatment are suboptimal. We assessed the health economic impact of nephropathy screening in hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes followed by optimal antihypertensive/nephroprotective therapy in those who have nephropathy in France.

METHODS

A Markov/Monte Carlo model simulated lifetime impacts of screening for albuminuria (microalbuminuria/overt nephropathy) using semi-quantitative urine dipsticks in a primary care setting, and subsequent addition of irbesartan 300 mg to conventional therapy in hypertensive type 2 diabetes patients identified as having nephropathy. Progression from no renal disease to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) was simulated. Probabilities, utilities and costs of CVD events, medications and ESRD treatment came from published sources. Cumulative incidence of ESRD, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and direct costs were projected. Second-order Monte Carlo simulation accounted for uncertainty in multiple parameters. Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3% annually.

RESULTS

Screening and optimized treatment led to a 42% reduction in the cumulative incidence of ESRD from 10.1 +/- 9.9% without screening to 5.8 +/- 5.7%, improvements in life expectancy of 0.38 +/- 0.59 years, improvements of 0.29 +/- 0.32 QALYs, and decreased costs of Euro 4,812 +/- 7,882/patient over 25 years. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results were robust. Screening was most beneficial when performed in younger patients.

CONCLUSION

In hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes, screening for albuminuria followed by optimal antihypertensive/nephroprotective treatment improves patient outcomes and leads to cost savings in France.

Cost-effectiveness of irbesartan in diabetic nephropathy: a systematic review of published studies

BACKGROUND

To review published studies on the cost-effectiveness of the use of irbesartan for treatment of advance overt nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension.

METHODS

Articles were identified based on a search of the PubMed databases using the keywords 'irbesartan', 'ESRD', 'cost-effectiveness', 'nephropathy' and 'costs', and by personal communication with the authors. Only studies published in the last 10 years were included. All costs data from the cost-effectiveness studies were inflated to 2003 Euros using published governmental conversion tables.

RESULTS

Seven published studies were identified, spanning the following country settings: the US, Belgium and France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Spain, and the UK. In each, the same pharmacoeconomic model was adapted using country-specific data to project and evaluate the clinical and cost outcomes of the treatment arms of the Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial (IDNT) (irbesartan, amlodipine or standard blood pressure control). Mean time to onset of ESRD was 8.23 years for irbesartan, 6.82 years for amlodipine and 6.88 years for the control (values were the same for Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy and Spain as transition probabilities for progression to ESRD were all derived from the IDNT). Mean cumulative incidence of ESRD was 36% with irbesartan, 49% with amlodipine and 45% with control treatment. Treatment with irbesartan was projected to improve life expectancy compared to both amlodipine and control in all seven published studies. Analysis of total lifetime costs showed that irbesartan treatment was cost saving compared to the other two treatment regimens, due to the associated reduction in ESRD cases. Cost savings with irbesartan became evident very early; after 2-3 years of treatment in most settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Modelling studies based on the IDNT published to date suggest that irbesartan treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension and advanced nephropathy is both life- and cost-saving compared to amlodipine or control.

Development and progression of nephropathy in type 2 diabetes: the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS 64)

BACKGROUND

The progression of nephropathy from diagnosis of type 2 diabetes has not been well described from a single population. This study sought to describe the development and progression through the stages of microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, persistently elevated plasma creatinine or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and death.

METHODS

Using observed and modeled data from 5097 subjects in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study, we measured the annual probability of transition from stage to stage (incidence), prevalence, cumulative incidence, ten-year survival, median duration per stage, and risk of death from all-causes or cardiovascular disease.

RESULTS

From diagnosis of diabetes, progression to microalbuminuria occurred at 2.0% per year, from microalbuminuria to macroalbuminuria at 2.8% per year, and from macroalbuminuria to elevated plasma creatinine (>or=175 micromol/L) or renal replacement therapy at 2.3% per year. Ten years following diagnosis of diabetes, the prevalence of microalbuminuria was 24.9%, of macroalbuminuria was 5.3%, and of elevated plasma creatinine or RRT was 0.8%. Patients with elevated plasma creatinine or RRT had an annual death rate of 19.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, 14.0 to 24.4%). There was a trend for increasing risk of cardiovascular death with increasing nephropathy (P < 0.0001), with an annual rate of 0.7% for subjects in the stage of no nephropathy, 2.0% for those with microalbuminuria, 3.5% for those with macroalbuminuria, and 12.1% with elevated plasma creatinine or RRT. Individuals with macroalbuminuria were more likely to die in any year than to develop renal failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of patients with type 2 diabetes who develop microalbuminuria is substantial with one quarter affected by 10 years from diagnosis. Relatively fewer patients develop macroalbuminuria, but in those who do, the death rate exceeds the rate of progression to worse nephropathy.

Diabetes education and care management significantly improve patient outcomes in the dialysis unit

BACKGROUND

The incidence of diabetes mellitus, particularly type 2, is increasing in the general population. Similarly, the incidence of patients with diabetes mellitus who develop end-stage renal disease has increased concomitantly in the dialysis facility to 44% of patients starting dialysis therapy with diabetes mellitus as their primary diagnosis. The aim of this study is to determine whether intensive education and care management of diabetes could improve glycemic control, alter patient behavior, and reduce complications in the setting of the dialysis unit.

METHODS

Eighty-three patients were allocated to either the control group or study group based on their day of dialysis treatment. All patients were followed up for a year. Patients in the study group underwent a diabetes education program and were followed up by a care manager who provided self-management education, diabetes self-care monitoring/management, motivational coaching, and foot checks.

RESULTS

The control group baseline foot risk category worsened from 2.7 to 3.3 (P < 0.05), whereas it was unchanged in the study group (2.2 to 2.0). There were no amputations in the study group versus five amputations in the control group (P < 0.05). Ten patients in the control group were hospitalized with diabetes- or vascular-related admissions versus one patient in the study group (P < 0.002). Hemoglobin A(1c) levels declined from 6.9 to 6.3 in the study group, whereas results of the control group were unchanged (P < 0.005). Diabetes-related quality-of-life scores increased in the study group from 76 to 86 (P < 0.001 versus the control group). There was a significant improvement in self-management behavior in all six categories evaluated in the study group versus the control group. Dialysis centers were recognized by the American Diabetes Association to provide diabetes education.

CONCLUSION

A program of intensive diabetes education and care management in a dialysis unit is effective in providing significant improvements in patient outcomes, glycemic control, and better quality of life in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Malnutrition in hemodialysis diabetic patients: evaluation and prognostic influence

BACKGROUND

This work aimed to evaluate the role of malnutrition in the increased mortality rate of hemodialysis diabetic patients from a French cooperative series.

METHODS

Body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, prealbumin, cholesterol, and pre-dialysis creatinine, normalized protein catabolic rate and lean body mass (LBM) were measured in 734 diabetic and 6389 non-diabetic patients (aged 63.4 +/- 12.2 and 62.0 +/- 15.9 years; 1.01 male to 1.40 female ratio). The outcome of 1610 of these patients, including 170 diabetics, was assessed during a 30-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Diabetic as compared to non-diabetic patients showed a significant (P < 10-4) increased BMI (25.9 +/- 5.2 vs. 23.1 +/- 4.3) and cholesterol (5.5 +/- 1.6 vs. 5.3 +/- 1.5 mmol/L), and decreased albumin (37.8 +/- 5.4 vs. 38.9 +/- 5.3 g/L), prealbumin (317 +/- 91 vs. 340 +/- 94 mg/L), creatinine (711 +/- 184 vs. 816 +/- 217 micromol/L) and LBM (76 +/- 18 vs. 87 +/- 21%). Normalized protein catabolic rate was similar in the two groups (1.11 +/- 0.31 vs. 1.13 +/- 0.32 g/kg/L). One and two-year survival was 83.7 +/- 2.9% and 65.5 +/- 3.8% in diabetic patients versus 90.3 +/- 0.8% and 79.9 +/- 1.1% in non-diabetics (relative risk 1.26, P < 0.01). Independent predictors of survival were age, albumin and prealbumin in non-diabetics and only age in diabetics.

CONCLUSION

Diabetic patients compared to non-diabetics were characterized by an increased incidence of protein malnutrition and decreased survival. However, the higher death risk associated with diabetes was not related to malnutrition.