1
|
Milne B, Gilbey T, Kunst G. Perioperative Management of the Patient at High-Risk for Cardiac Surgery-Associated Acute Kidney Injury. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:4460-4482. [PMID: 36241503 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common major complications of cardiac surgery, and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery-associated AKI has a complex, multifactorial etiology, including numerous factors such as primary cardiac dysfunction, hemodynamic derangements of cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass, and the possibility of a large volume of blood transfusion. There are no truly effective pharmacologic therapies for the management of AKI, and, therefore, anesthesiologists, intensivists, and cardiac surgeons must remain vigilant and attempt to minimize the risk of developing renal dysfunction. This narrative review describes the current state of the scientific literature concerning the specific aspects of cardiac surgery-associated AKI, and presents it in a chronological fashion to aid the perioperative clinician in their approach to this high-risk patient group. The evidence was considered for risk prediction models, preoperative optimization, and the intraoperative and postoperative management of cardiac surgery patients to improve renal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Milne
- Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research Academic Clinical Fellow, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom Gilbey
- Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; National Institute of Health Research Academic Clinical Fellow, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gudrun Kunst
- Department of Anaesthetics and Pain Medicine, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; School of Cardiovascular Medicine and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, British Heart Foundation Centre of Excellence, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pajares MA, Margarit JA, García-Camacho C, García-Suarez J, Mateo E, Castaño M, López Forte C, López Menéndez J, Gómez M, Soto MJ, Veiras S, Martín E, Castaño B, López Palanca S, Gabaldón T, Acosta J, Fernández Cruz J, Fernández López AR, García M, Hernández Acuña C, Moreno J, Osseyran F, Vives M, Pradas C, Aguilar EM, Bel Mínguez AM, Bustamante-Munguira J, Gutiérrez E, Llorens R, Galán J, Blanco J, Vicente R. Guidelines for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery. Consensus document of Spanish Societies of Anesthesia (SEDAR), Cardiovascular Surgery (SECCE) and Perfusionists (AEP). REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION 2021; 68:183-231. [PMID: 33541733 DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
The ERAS guidelines are intended to identify, disseminate and promote the implementation of the best, scientific evidence-based actions to decrease variability in clinical practice. The implementation of these practices in the global clinical process will promote better outcomes and the shortening of hospital and critical care unit stays, thereby resulting in a reduction in costs and in greater efficiency. After completing a systematic review at each of the points of the perioperative process in cardiac surgery, recommendations have been developed based on the best scientific evidence currently available with the consensus of the scientific societies involved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Pajares
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España.
| | - J A Margarit
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari de La Ribera, Valencia, España
| | - C García-Camacho
- Unidad de Perfusión del Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar,, Cádiz, España
| | - J García-Suarez
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - E Mateo
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - M Castaño
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España
| | - C López Forte
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - J López Menéndez
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, España
| | - M Gómez
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari de La Ribera, Valencia, España
| | - M J Soto
- Unidad de Perfusión, Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari de La Ribera, Valencia, España
| | - S Veiras
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, España
| | - E Martín
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, España
| | - B Castaño
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, España
| | - S López Palanca
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - T Gabaldón
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - J Acosta
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - J Fernández Cruz
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari de La Ribera, Valencia, España
| | - A R Fernández López
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, España
| | - M García
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - C Hernández Acuña
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari de La Ribera, Valencia, España
| | - J Moreno
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, España
| | - F Osseyran
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - M Vives
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, España
| | - C Pradas
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari Dr. Josep Trueta, Girona, España
| | - E M Aguilar
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, España
| | - A M Bel Mínguez
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| | - J Bustamante-Munguira
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, España
| | - E Gutiérrez
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiaca, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, España
| | - R Llorens
- Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Hospiten Rambla, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España
| | - J Galán
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, España
| | - J Blanco
- Unidad de Perfusión, Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca, Murcia, España
| | - R Vicente
- Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Margarit JA, Pajares MA, García-Camacho C, Castaño-Ruiz M, Gómez M, García-Suárez J, Soto-Viudez MJ, López-Menéndez J, Martín-Gutiérrez E, Blanco-Morillo J, Mateo E, Hernández-Acuña C, Vives M, Llorens R, Fernández-Cruz J, Acosta J, Pradas-Irún C, García M, Aguilar-Blanco EM, Castaño B, López S, Bel A, Gabaldón T, Fernández-López AR, Gutiérrez-Carretero E, López-Forte C, Moreno J, Galán J, Osseyran F, Bustamante-Munguira J, Veiras S, Vicente R. Vía clínica de recuperación intensificada en cirugía cardiaca. Documento de consenso de la Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor (SEDAR), la Sociedad Española de Cirugía Cardiovascular y Endovascular (SECCE) y la Asociación Española de Perfusionistas (AEP). CIRUGIA CARDIOVASCULAR 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.circv.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
|
4
|
Florkiewicz P, Musialowicz T, Hippeläinen M, Lahtinen P. Continuous Ropivacaine Infusion Offers No Benefit in Treating Postoperative Pain After Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:378-384. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
5
|
A Review of Perioperative Analgesic Strategies in Cardiac Surgery. Int Anesthesiol Clin 2018; 56:e56-e83. [PMID: 30204605 DOI: 10.1097/aia.0000000000000200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
6
|
Douzjian DJ, Kulik A. Old Drug, New Route: A Systematic Review of Intravenous Acetaminophen After Adult Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2017; 31:694-701. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.03.134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2016] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
7
|
Qazi SM, Sindby EJ, Nørgaard MA. Ibuprofen - a Safe Analgesic During Cardiac Surgery Recovery? A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res 2015; 7:141-8. [PMID: 26702342 PMCID: PMC4685279 DOI: 10.15171/jcvtr.2015.31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Accepted: 11/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative pain-management with non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs has been controversial, due to related side-effects. We investigated whether there was a significant difference between an oxycodone-based pain-management regimen versus a slow-release ibuprofen based regimen, in a short term post-cardiac surgery setting. Particular attention was given to the rate of myocardial infarction, sternal healing, gastro-intestinal complications, renal failure and all-cause mortality.
Methods: This was a single-centre, open label parallel design randomised controlled study. Patients, who were undergoing cardiac surgery for the first time, were randomly allocated either to a regimen of slow-release oxycodone (10 mg twice daily) or slow-release ibuprofen (800 mg twice daily) combined with lansoprazole. Data relating to blood-tests, angiographies, surgical details and administered medicine were obtained from patient records. The follow-up period was 1 to 37 months (median 25 months).
Results: One hundred eighty-two patients were included in the trial and available for intention to treat analysis. There were no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05) in the rates of sternal healing, postoperative myocardial infarction or gastrointestinal bleeding. The preoperative levels of creatinine were found to increase by 100% in nine patients (9.6%) in the ibuprofen group, resulting in an acute renal injury (in accordance with the RIFLE-criteria). Eight of these patients returned to normal renal function within 14 days. The levels of creatinine in patients in the oxycodone group were not found to increase to the same magnitude.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that patients treated postoperatively, following cardiac surgery, are at no greater risk of harm if short term slow release ibuprofen combined with lansoprazole treatment is used when compared to an oxycodone based regimen. Renal function should, however, be closely monitored and in the event of any decrease in renal function ibuprofen must be discontinued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saddiq Mohammad Qazi
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Eske Jesper Sindby
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Martin Agge Nørgaard
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22 9000 Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Daglar B, Kocoglu H, Adnan Celkan M, Goksu S, Kazaz H, Kayiran C. Comparison of the effects of lornoxicam versus diclofenac in pain management after cardiac surgery: A single-blind, randomized, active-controlled study. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH 2014; 66:107-16. [PMID: 24672117 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/27/2005] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inadequate pain management after cardiac surgery may result 10 in increased morbidity and length of hospital stay. Although opioids are the mainstay of postoperative analgesia, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be used instead to avoid the adverse effects (AEs) associated with opioids. Lornoxicam is a newly developed NSAID, the use of which is increasing. However, lornoxicam has not been studied for use in pain management after cardiac surgery. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability 10 of lornoxicam and diclofenac sodium, an NSAID well established for use in pain management after major surgery, in pain management after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS This single-blind, randomized, active-controlled study was conducted 10 at the Gaziantep University Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey. Adult patients scheduled to undergo valve or CABG surgery for the first time were included. Patients were premedicated with diazepam 10 mg PO at 10 PM on the evening before surgery. General anesthesia was induced using fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol, and maintained using fentanyl and isoflurane in pure oxygen. After extubation and when they stated that they felt pain, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: lornoxicam 8 mg IM q8h or diclofenac 75 mg IM q12h, for 48 hours. Meperidine 1 mg/kg IM was given for additional analgesia when needed (rescue medication). Pain relief was assessed using an I1-point visual analog scale (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) immediately before the first injection (baseline), and at 15 and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 48 hours after the first injection. Sedation was assessed using a 5-point scale (0 = awake and alert to 4 = deep sedation) at the same time points. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring of AEs using patient interview and laboratory analyses. RESULTS Forty patients were enrolled in the study (30 men, 10 women; 10 mean [SD] age, 54.4 [11.1 ] years; 20 patients per treatment group). The demographic and clinical characteristics and mean baseline pain relief scores were statistically similar between the 2 treatment groups. The mean pain relief scores at 15 and 30 minutes were statistically similar to baseline values in the 2 treatment groups. However, the mean pain relief scores at ≥1 hour after the first injection were significantly lower compared with baseline values (both groups, P < 0.05 at time points ≥1 hour). No significant between-group differences in mean pain relief scores were found at any time point. The overall mean pain relief scores were statistically similar between the 2 treatment groups. The mean sedation scores were significantly higher at 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after the first injection in the diclofenac group compared with the lornoxicam group (all, P < 0.05). No AEs were observed. The need for rescue medication was statistically similar between the 2 treatment groups (lornoxicam, 2 patients; diclofenac, 3 patients). CONCLUSIONS In this study of adult patients who underwent CABG, the efficacy 10 of lornoxicam and diclofenac were similar in postoperative pain management. Both study drugs were well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahadir Daglar
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University,Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Hasan Kocoglu
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, GaziantepUniversity, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - M Adnan Celkan
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University,Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Sitki Goksu
- Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, GaziantepUniversity, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Hakki Kazaz
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University,Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Celalettin Kayiran
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, School of Medicine, Gaziantep University,Gaziantep, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Roediger L, Larbuisson R, Lamy M. New approaches and old controversies to postoperative pain control following cardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2006; 23:539-50. [PMID: 16677435 DOI: 10.1017/s0265021506000548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/15/2006] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effect of postoperative pain control in cardiac surgical patients on morbidity, mortality and other outcome measures. BACKGROUND New approaches in pain control have been introduced over the past decade. The impact of these interventions, either alone or in combination, on perioperative outcome was evaluated in cardiac surgical patients. METHODS We searched Medline for the period of 1980 to the present using the key terms analgesics, opioid, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cardiac surgery, regional analgesia, spinal, epidural, fast-track cardiac anaesthesia, fast-track cardiac surgery, myocardial ischaemia, myocardial infarction, postoperative care, accelerated care programmes, postoperative complications, and we examined and discussed the articles that were identified to be included in this review. RESULTS Pain management in cardiac surgery is becoming more important with the establishment of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fast-track management of conventional cardiac surgery patients. Advances have been made in this area and encompass specific techniques, such as central neuraxial blockade or selective nerve blocks, and drugs (opioids, sedative-hypnotics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs). Ideally, these therapies provide not only patient comfort but also mitigate untoward cardiovascular responses, pulmonary responses, and other inflammatory and secondary sympathetic responses. The introduction of these newer approaches to perioperative care has reduced morbidity, but not mortality, in cardiac surgical patients. CONCLUSIONS Understanding perioperative pathophysiology and implementation of care regimes to reduce the stress of cardiac surgery, will continue to accelerate rehabilitation associated with decreased hospitalization and increased satisfaction and safety after discharge. Reorganization of the perioperative team (anaesthesiologists, surgeons, nurses and physical therapists) will be essential to achieve successful fast-track cardiac surgical programmes. Developments and improvements of multimodal interventions within the context of 'fast-track' cardiac surgery programmes represents the major challenge for the medical professionals working to achieve a 'pain and risk free' perioperative course.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Roediger
- University Hospital of Liége, Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ketorolac is an injectable nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug that is often used as a transitional short-term analgesic to treat moderate pain and to decrease opioid use. There is a paucity of literature documenting the safety of using ketorolac in neonates and infants after cardiac surgery. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed which identified all patients <6 months of age who received ketorolac after cardiac surgery. Patients' demographic, surgical, and dosing data were collected. A Student's t-test was used to identify significant differences in renal and hematologic laboratory values at baseline and at 48 h of treatment. RESULTS A total of 53 children <6 months of age received at least one dose of ketorolac after cardiac surgery. Eleven of 53 children (21%) were <1 month of age. The blood urea nitrogen/serum creatinine (SCr) levels increased from baseline at 48 h of therapy in all infants, but stayed within normal limits. The largest increase in SCr level from baseline on any day of ketorolac therapy was 26 micromol x l(-1) (0.3 mg x dl(-1)) which occurred in two neonates. Four patients (three infants and one neonate) had minor episodes of bleeding while being treated with ketorolac. There were no clinically significant changes in hemoglobin, hematocrit or platelet count. None of these episodes caused hemodynamic instability nor required transfusion of blood products. CONCLUSIONS Ketorolac was used safely in neonates and infants who have had cardiac surgery at our institution. Ketorolac was not associated with any adverse hematologic or renal effects. Prospective investigation is warranted to further assess the safety and effectiveness of ketorolac in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S Moffett
- Department of Pharmacy, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fayaz MK, Abel RJ, Pugh SC, Hall JE, Djaiani G, Mecklenburgh JS. Opioid-sparing effects of diclofenac and paracetamol lead to improved outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2005; 18:742-7. [PMID: 15650984 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study assessed the analgesic efficacy, side effects, time to extubation, and oxygenation of 3 analgesic regimens after coronary artery bypass surgery using diclofenac, paracetamol, and placebo suppositories. DESIGN Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. SETTING Referral center for cardiothoracic surgery at a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS Sixty consenting adults scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). INTERVENTIONS Patients were divided into 3 groups postoperatively: diclofenac/paracetamol: diclofenac, 100 mg rectally, and paracetamol, 1 g rectally. Diclofenac was repeated after 18 hours and paracetamol every 6 hours for 24 hours; diclofenac: diclofenac as in diclofenac/paracetamol, with placebos replacing paracetamol; and placebo: 2 placebo suppositories at same times as diclofenac/paracetamol. All patients received morphine patient-controlled analgesia. RESULTS Twenty-four hour morphine consumption with diclofenac/paracetamol was 12 +/- 6 mg, diclofenac 22 +/- 13 mg, and placebo 37 +/- 15 mg (diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0159 compared with placebo). Patients in the placebo group had significantly greater pain scores at 12 and 24 hours compared with diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac. Extubation time was significantly prolonged in the placebo group compared with the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups (mean [SD] minutes diclofenac/paracetamol, diclofenac, and placebo 478 [150], 487 [257], and 710 [326], respectively). Oxygenation following extubation was significantly lower in the placebo group compared with the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups (mean [SD] mmHg: diclofenac/paracetamol, diclofenac, and placebo 175 [44], 157 [43], and 117 [22], respectively). Episodes of nausea and vomiting were significantly less in the diclofenac/paracetamol and diclofenac groups than in the placebo group (46% and 51% reduction, respectively). all groups had similar blood loss and change in serum creatinine. CONCLUSION Diclofenac alone or with paracetamol has a significant opioid-sparing effect after CABG, producing more rapid extubation and better oxygenation.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Acetaminophen/administration & dosage
- Acetaminophen/adverse effects
- Acetaminophen/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/adverse effects
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
- Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/adverse effects
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use
- Coronary Artery Bypass/methods
- Diclofenac/administration & dosage
- Diclofenac/adverse effects
- Diclofenac/therapeutic use
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Humans
- Intubation, Intratracheal/methods
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pain Measurement/methods
- Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy
- Postoperative Complications/prevention & control
- Prospective Studies
- Suppositories
- Time Factors
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed K Fayaz
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stephens JM, Pashos CL, Haider S, Wong JM. Making Progress in the Management of Postoperative Pain: A Review of the Cyclooxygenase 2–Specific Inhibitors. Pharmacotherapy 2004; 24:1714-31. [PMID: 15585440 DOI: 10.1592/phco.24.17.1714.52339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Postoperative pain is one of the most common forms of acute pain. Optimal pain management decreases the stress response to surgery, reduces complications, improves recovery time, and results in improved economic and quality-of-life outcomes. A preoperative, multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia can be achieved through a combination of therapies that continue beyond the immediate perioperative time frame. This multimodal approach provides superior analgesia with opioid-sparing effects and reduced opioid-related adverse events. Although the use of nonspecific nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs in a surgical setting has been limited owing to concerns of renal and gastrointestinal complications as well as platelet dysfunction, cyclooxygenase (COX)-2-specific inhibitors appear to be safe and effective alone and in combination with opioids for a variety of surgical procedures. The COX-2-specific inhibitors may have an important role in extending the use of balanced, multimodal analgesia to a broad surgical population, thus ultimately improving patient outcomes after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M Stephens
- Abt Associates Clinical Trials, Health Economic Research and Quality of Life Evaluation Services (HERQuLES), Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Immer FF, Immer-Bansi AS, Trachsel N, Berdat PA, Eigenmann V, Curatolo M, Carrel TP. Pain treatment with a COX-2 inhibitor after coronary artery bypass operation: a randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75:490-5. [PMID: 12607659 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(02)04311-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate analgesic medication is mandatory after cardiac operations. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors represent a new therapeutic option, acting primarily on the response to inflammation. METHODS We compared a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor (etodolac) with two traditional drugs: a nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitor (diclofenac) and a weak opioid (tramadol) on postoperative pain and renal function in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass operations. Sixty consecutive patients were randomized into three groups: (1) group A patients who received tramadol; (2) group B patients who received diclofenac; and (3) group C patients who received etodolac. For measurement of analgesic effect, the visual analogue scale was assessed up to postoperative day 4. Creatinine-clearance was determined before and at the end of study medication, and serum creatinine and urea were monitored daily for renal effects. Study medication was given on postoperative days 2 and 3. Side effects and additional pain medication were recorded. RESULTS The visual analogue scale was lower in group C (p < 0.05) from postoperative days 2 to 4 and in group B (p < 0.05) from postoperative days 3 to 4 compared with group A. Amount of additional pain medication and incidence of side effects were significantly less in group C compared with group A. We observed a short-lasting elevation of serum creatinine and urea in groups B and C compared with group A (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS At the doses analyzed, etodolac and diclofenac produced better postoperative pain relief with less side-effects than tramadol. A short-lasting impairment of renal function was found in patients treated with etodolac and diclofenac.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franz F Immer
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Division of Pain Therapy, University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|