Case 1---2002---a patient with severe peripartum cardiomyopathy and persistent ventricular fibrillation supported by a biventricular assist device

Anesthetic management of peripartum cardiomyopathy

INTRODUCTION

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a rare idiopathic cardiomyopathy frequently presenting with heart failure secondary to left ventricular systolic dysfunction towards the end of pregnancy or in the months following delivery. Within the published literature, there are case reports extolling the safety of both regional and general anesthetic interventions in PPCM. However, there is an absence of high-quality evidence to define a suitable paradigm for peri-operative care. In the absence of a large prospective case series or clinical trials, the synthesis of clinical data from published case reports provides an opportunity to distil published clinical data and explore the effect of clinical interventions.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic search of English articles English language case reports published between 1986 and 2020 within multiple databases. Clinical data was extracted and aggregated into a database for analysis.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Gestational hypertension and pre-eclampsia were pre-partum risk factors. 403 case reports provided 466 individual cases from 48 countries. Neither regional nor general anesthetic interventions in the peripartum period have a discernible impact on the outcome of patients with PPCM. Rapid unpredictable deterioration in the peripartum period, requiring mechanical cardiac support or heart transplantation is described. The mortality of PPCM is 5-6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PPCM are at risk of rapid unpredictable decline. Management within specialist centers should be considered. Although the data is unsuitable to provide a comprehensive paradigm for the anesthetic and critical care management of PPCM, the observations provide a direction for future clinical audits and trials.

A Case Report of Recurrent Severe Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Complicated by Factor V Leiden and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1: A Management Conundrum

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of peripartum death in the United States during pregnancy. The presence of concomitant diagnoses may complicate or conflict with the management of the primary cardiovascular diagnosis and further complicate pregnancy and delivery. We describe the management of a 29-year-old, gravida 5, para 1 woman with severe peripartum cardiomyopathy during this and a previous pregnancy complicated by multiple endocrine neoplasia type and factor V Leiden thrombophilia, limiting therapeutic options and contributing to considerable perioperative management challenges.

Arrhythmias in peripartum cardiomyopathy

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is a complication of late pregnancy and the early postpartum period characterized by dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Approximately half of women fail to recover left ventricular function. Standard management of heart failure is indicated, with some exceptions for women who are predelivery or breastfeeding. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are reported in PPCM, but the frequency of arrhythmias in this condition is not well characterized. Management of PPCM-associated arrhythmias may include antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, and wearable or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Further research is needed on the prevalence, natural history, and optimal management of arrhythmias in PPCM.

Acute and critically ill peripartum cardiomyopathy and 'bridge to' therapeutic options: a single center experience with intra-aortic balloon pump, extra corporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices

INTRODUCTION

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) patients refractory to medical therapy and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation or in whom weaning from these therapies is impossible, are candidates for a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) as a bridge to recovery or transplant. Continuous-flow LVADs are smaller, have a better long-term durability and are associated with better outcomes. Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used as a temporary support in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mechanical support in acute and critically ill PPCM patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective search of the patient database of the Ghent University hospital (2000 to 2010).

RESULTS

Six PPCM-patients were treated with mechanical support. Three patients presented in the postpartum period and three patients at the end of pregnancy. All were treated with IABP, the duration of IABP support ranged from 1 to 13 days. An ECMO was inserted in one patient who presented with cardiogenic shock, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and a stillborn baby. Two patients showed partial recovery and could be weaned off the IABP. Four patients were implanted with a continuous-flow LVAD (HeartMate II, Thoratec Inc.), including the ECMO-patient. Three LVAD patients were successfully transplanted 78, 126 and 360 days after LVAD implant; one patient is still on the transplant waiting list. We observed one peripheral thrombotic complication due to IABP and five early bleeding complications in three LVAD patients. One patient died suddenly two years after transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

In PPCM with refractory heart failure IABP was safe and efficient as a bridge to recovery or as a bridge to LVAD. ECMO provided temporary support as a bridge to LVAD, while the newer continuous-flow LVADs offered a safe bridge to transplant.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy

Peripartum cardiomyopathy is a rare and potentially lethal cardiac complication of pregnancy occurring in the final month of pregnancy through the first 5 months after birth. It is characterized by the development of congestive heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, in previously healthy women with no other identifiable cause for heart failure. The etiology of peripartum cardiomyopathy is not well understood. Potential causal mechanisms include infection, autoimmune disease, and abnormal response to the hemodynamic stresses of pregnancy. There is significant risk of reoccurrence in subsequent pregnancies. The purpose of this article is to review the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, prognosis, and nursing implications of peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Recognition and management of maternal cardiac disease in pregnancy

Heart disease is a leading cause of maternal death. The aim of this study is to review the most common causes of cardiac disease, highlight factors that should be recognized by the clinician, and address recent advances in the anaesthetic management of these patients. Incipient cardiac disease, including peripartum cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction and aortic dissection, accounts for approximately one in six maternal deaths. The keys to successful diagnosis and management of incipient disease are: a high index of suspicion, particularly in women with known risk factors for cardiovascular disease; a low threshold for radiological investigations; early cardiology input; and invasive monitoring during labour and delivery. Echocardiography is a safe, non-invasive test, under-used in pregnancy. Management of pregnant women with pre-existing cardiac problems should be undertaken by multidisciplinary teams in tertiary centres. In women with pre-existing cardiac disease wishing to proceed to term, cardiac status must be optimized preoperatively and planned elective delivery is preferable. Vaginal delivery is preferable, and with careful incremental regional anaesthesia is safe in most women with cardiac disease. The presence of adequate systems for early detection, appropriate referral to specialist centres, and timely delivery with multidisciplinary support can minimize the serious consequences of poorly controlled heart disease in pregnancy.

Management of acute cardiogenic shock

The present state of the art in mechanical cardiac assist technology has permitted application of machines to a variety of conditions that confound the cardiologist and cardiac surgeon alike. Decades of research and development have allowed the present devices to be used as bridges to native heart recovery and bridges to transplantation. We are now entering the era in which devices are being placed for permanent assist or replacement. Although the acute cardiogenic shock patient remains problematic, we now have at our disposable a variety of tools that have enabled us to salvage more patients than ever before. The experience with these systems continues to grow, with leading centers and investigators contributing meaningful information toward the application and development of the latest technologies. It has been said that mechanical therapies precede biological therapies. We are at the crossroads in which a combination of biological therapies with mechanical therapies is underway. Current research is investigating the role of mechanical cardiac support while biological therapies are introduced into the failing heart. In the meantime, the role of mechanical cardiac assist and replacement has matured into an effective means of treating acute cardiogenic shock of any variety.