Pro: standard percutaneous coronary intervention is the procedure of choice for myocardial revascularization

[Stenting or coronary artery bypass surgery for triple vessel disease?]

This review was undertaken to objectively analyse the cumulated medical literature on techniques of myocardial revascularization (angioplasty, bare metal stenting, drug eluting stenting, coronary artery surgery) in multivessel coronary artery disease. Randomized trials, meta analyses and registries comparing these treatment modalities show a short and long term advantage of surgery over percutaneous techniques for angina recurrence and need for repeat revascularization, although mortality and myocardial infarction rate do not seem statistically different. Diabetes mellitus, chronic renal failure and female gender represent high risk subgroups. Data on drug eluting stents are to date limited to the short term; however, it does not seem that drug eluting stents have resolved the need for repeat revascularization. Stenting addresses focal lesion whereas future revascularization occurs on other coronary sites by progression of coronary disease. Cardiologists should objectively inform the consenting coronary multivessel disease patient on the risk of repeat revascularization inherent to percutaneous techniques and on the weight of actual data favouring surgery in multivessel disease.