Osteotomy for malunited fractures of the distal radius: a comparison of structural and nonstructural autogenous bone grafts

Comparative Analysis of Radial Corrective Osteotomy and Sauvé-Kapandji Procedure for Malunited Distal Radius Fractures in Older Adults

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures frequently occur in the older population, posing a dilemma in selecting ideal management for symptomatic patients. Radial corrective osteotomy (RCO) and the Sauvé-Kapandji procedure (SK) have been used to treat this challenging condition. However, it remains unknown which approach is better for the older population. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of RCO with those of SK for the treatment of symptomatic distal radius malunion in older adults.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients aged ≥60 years, with malunited distal radius fractures, were randomized to be treated with either RCO or SK and followed for a minimum of 2 years. The primary evaluation parameter was grip strength, and secondary outcome parameters were surgical time, range of motion of the wrist, exercise-related wrist pain assessment using visual analog scale scores, radiographic results, patient-reported outcomes evaluated using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH), and Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) scores.

RESULTS

The average follow-up duration was 36.7 ± 10.2 months. The grip strength was significantly higher in the RCO group. The surgical time was shorter in the SK group than in the RCO group. The postoperative wrist range of motion and visual analog scale scores for exercise-related pain alleviation were similar in both groups. The ulnar variance decreased in both groups and was similar when compared with the postoperative images. The DASH and PRWE scores were similar between the RCO and SK groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Radial corrective osteotomy and SK surgeries have similar clinical and functional outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years. Grip strength is higher in the RCO group than in the SK group. However, the operating time to accomplish SK is shorter than RCO.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

A meta-analysis comparing complications of anterior versus dorsal osteotomy and plating for distal radial malunions

This systematic review and meta-analysis compare the incidences of complications, reoperations and hardware removal between anterior and dorsal plating after corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radial malunions. A total of 403 patients were included; 253 patients underwent anterior corrective osteotomy and 150 underwent dorsal corrective osteotomy. Mean follow-up was 30 months. Anterior plating was associated with fewer reoperations (9% vs. 28%), less hardware removal (3% vs. 18%) and comparable major complications (5% vs. 6%) compared to dorsal plating. The adjusted model showed a significant reduction (approximately 85%) in the odds of reoperation and hardware removal in the anterior group. There was no difference in major or minor complications between the groups. Surgeons should be fully aware of the increased risks when using dorsal plate fixation after corrective osteotomy for dorsally angulated distal radial malunions.

Managing the Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

Distal radius fractures are common injuries. Satisfactory outcomes are typically achieved with appropriate nonoperative or operative treatment. A proportion of these injuries develop symptomatic malunions, which may be treated surgically with distal radius corrective osteotomy. A thorough understanding of the anatomy, biomechanics, radiographic parameters, and indications is needed to provide appropriate treatment. Factors, including surgical approach, osteotomy type, use of bone graft, fixation construct, management of associated tendon and/or nerve conditions, soft tissue contracture releases, and need for ulnar-sided procedures, should be considered. A comprehensive evaluation is necessary to guide understanding for when salvage procedures may be preferred.

[Carpal Malalignment in Malunited Fractures of the Distal Radius]

PURPOSE

To evaluate and classify carpal alignment in malunited fractures of the distal radius.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

On standardized lateral radiographs of the involved wrist of 72 patients with a symptomatic extra-articular malunion of the distal radius, 43 with a dorsal and 29 with a palmar angulation, radius tilt (RT), radiolunate (RL) and lunocapitate angle were measured. Malposition of the radius was defined as RT plus 11° in dorsal malunion and RT minus 11° in palmar malunion. A palmar tilt of the radius was marked with a minus sign. At the time of corrective osteotomy 9 dorsal malunions underwent for different reasons evaluation of the scapholunate ligament with 4 having a complete scapholunate ligament disruption.

RESULTS

With respect to the RL-angle, carpal malalignment was categorized as follows: type P with a RL-angle less than -12°, type K with a RL-angle between -12 and 10°, type A with a RL-angle more than 10°, but less than the malposition of the radius, type D with a RL-angle greater than the malposition of the radius. All types of carpal malalignment were found in both, dorsally and palmarly tilted malunion. Type A carpal alignment was identified as the leading type in dorsal malunion (25 out of 43 patients), whilst in palmar malunion colinear subluxation of the carpus (type C) was the dominant type (12 out of 29 patients). To return the hand to a neutral position the rotation of the lunate was compensated by a contrarotation of the capitate in the dorsal malunion. In the palmar malunion a dorsal extension of the capitate returned the hand to a neutral position. In 4 of the 5 patients with type D carpal alignment, who had scapholunate ligament evaluation, a complete ligament tear was found.

CONCLUSION

In this study four different types of carpal alignment in malunited extra-articular fractures of the distal radius were identified. Based on this data we suspect that type D carpal alignment in dorsal malunion may be associated with a scapholunate ligament tear. Therefore, we recommend wrist arthroscopy for this group of patients.

Nascent Malunion of Distal Radius Fractures Treated with Fixed Angled Volar Plates without Using Bone Grafts

Purpose

Malunion of the distal radius is a common complication. Using bone grafts is common to restore the bone to an acceptable level. This study aimed to verify if it is necessary to use bone grafts in nascent malunion of distal radius fractures treated with fixed angled volar plates and which radiographic parameters are essential to obtain satisfactory outcomes.

Methods

This single-centered prospective study included 11 patients who underwent corrective osteotomy of the radius for malunion. Patients with a metaphyseal, extraarticular osteotomy stabilized by a volar fixed angle plate within 3 months after the fracture are included. Patients underwent a standard radiological evaluation at postoperative 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. Radial inclination, radial height, ulnar variance, and palmar tilt were measured. Wrist ranges of motion are measured throughout follow-up with a goniometer. Grip strength is measured using a Jamar Hand Dynamometer. The function is evaluated via the Gartland-Werley (GW) score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score.

Results

The mean age of 11 patients, 9 (81.82%) males, included in the study was 41.45 ± 14.89 years. The mean post-fracture admission time is 39.3 ± 15.1 days. Radial inclination, radial length, and ulnar variance improved significantly after surgery (p = 0.0023, 0.0002, 0.0037). Radial inclination values are within normal limits for all patients at admission. The radial length was in the normal range for 72.73%, the ulnar variance was in the normal range for 72.73%, and palmar tilt was in the normal range for 100% of the patients. Extension 54.55%, flexion 72.73%, radial deviation 81.82%, ulnar deviation 63.64%, pronation 90.91%, and supination 72.73% were achieved after surgery. GW average was 3.09 ± 3.24 DASH score average was 12.24 ± 13.48. The mean grip strength was 29.27 ± 7.21 on the operated side, while it was 34.91 ± 5.32, on the healthy side, with a significant difference (p = 0.0108).

Conclusion

It is possible to get good results without using bone grafts in corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunions.

A comparison of early fixation of distal radius fractures versus late corrective osteotomy of distal radius malunion

BACKGROUND

Fractures of the distal radius are common. Closed reduction and moulded casting is often the first line treatment. Malunion after casting is not uncommon and can lead to discussion on acute surgical fixation versus delayed corrective osteotomy if symptomatic. However, it is unclear if late surgery will provide similar outcomes as early intervention.

METHODS

We performed a single centre, age matched, case series comparison study, comparing outcomes of patients who had undergone early fixation (ORIF) versus those who had undergone late corrective osteotomy (CO) following distal radius fracture.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were available for review, 13 in each group. Fracture patterns were similar. Reviewing CO versus ORIF; patients achieved a mean DASH; 22 versus 18 (P = 0.355), PRWE; 35 versus 26 (P = 0.237), and VAS 2 versus 2 (P = 0.490). Grip strength was significantly better in those who had undergone ORIF; 2% versus -22% (P ≤ 0.001). Range of motion was generally better with primary fixation but of doubtful clinical importance, reviewing CO versus ORIF; Flexion 46° versus 60° (P = 0.045), extension 55° versus 64° (P = 0.137), pronation 73° versus 85° (P = 0.078), supination 84° versus 84° (P = 0.747), flexion/extension arc 101 versus 124 (P = 0.017), ulnar/radial deviation arc 42° versus 59° (P = 0.01), pronation/supination arc 157° versus 168° (P = 0.118). Ulnar variance was significantly improved in the ORIF group; +0.5 mm versus +2 mm in the CO group (P = 0.023). Radial inclination, radial height and volar tilt were not significantly different between either group.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that patient measured outcome of corrective osteotomy is not inferior to early internal fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III (Case Series Comparison).

Clinical Features and Surgical Strategies of Distal Radius Posttraumatic Deformity

Objective

To investigate the clinical features and surgical strategies of distal radius posttraumatic deformity.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on the data of 30 patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity treated by osteotomy and orthopedic surgery in the department of orthopedics, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, from February 2016 to November 2018. All the patients underwent preoperative anterior and lateral X-ray plain scanning of bilateral wrist joints, showing different degrees of radius shortening, inferior ulnar and radial mismatch, palmar angle, and ulnar deviation angle, among which 11 patients had an uneven joint surface. After a full evaluation, osteotomy and orthopedic surgery were performed to restore the original anatomical structure, plaster fixation was performed for two weeks after surgery, and regular outpatient follow-up was conducted. The function of the wrist was evaluated by the MMWS (wrist joint improvement) scoring scale before and after surgery, and the changes in the wrist joint-related treatment parameters were evaluated according to X-ray.

Results

All 30 patients had no neurological symptoms after surgery, and all wounds healed within the first stage. All patients were followed up for 6–12 months, with an average healing time of 3.5 months. There was no reduction loss, internal fixation loosening, or fracture in the regular postoperative review. Postoperative MMWS (wrist joint improvement) score scale data were significantly higher than those before surgery, and there were differences between groups (P < 0.05). Postoperative treatment parameters of wrist joints such as palmar inclination angle, ulnar deviation angle, radius height, and lower ulnar and radial matching were significantly improved, and there were differences between groups (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

The patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity have the clinical characteristics of shortening of radius, mismatch of lower ulnar and radius, an abnormal inclination of palm, and ulnar declination. For patients with distal radius posttraumatic deformity, osteotomy and orthopedic surgery can effectively improve wrist function and improve patients' quality of life, which is worthy of clinical reference.

Simplifying the Volar Distraction Osteotomy for Distal Radius Malunion Repair

Background  Extra-articular fractures of the distal radius are often treated with a trial of nonoperative management if radiographic parameters are within an acceptable range, especially in the elderly population. Unfortunately, some malunions become symptomatic or become grossly misaligned during nonoperative management which require corrective surgery to restore the normal osseous anatomy and restore function. Description of Technique  We describe correction of a distal radius malunion utilizing a distraction-type volar osteotomy, a volar plate specific distraction device, and a novel resorbable calcium phosphate bone cement (Trabexus) designed to withstand compressive loads. Patients and Methods  Twelve patients with 13 distal radius fractures were included in this study. The average patient age was 60.9 years and average time from injury to corrective osteotomy was 96.3 days. Radiographic measures (radial inclination, volar tilt, and ulnar variance) and clinical assessment (wrist/forearm range of motion and grip strength) were done pre- and postoperatively and compared. Results  The average time from corrective surgical osteotomy to final clinical follow-up was 375.8 days. After surgical intervention, there was a statistically significant improvement in mean volar tilt (-19.8 vs. +0.5 degrees) and mean ulnar variance (+2.8 vs. -0.4 mm). Improvements were also seen in grip strength (1.7 vs. 43.6 lb), wrist flexion (30.5 vs. 48.3 degrees), wrist extension (33.3 vs. 53.8 degrees), forearm pronation (75.0 vs. 88.8 degrees), and forearm supination (53.8 vs. 81.3 degrees). On average, 56.0% of Trabexus bone substitute remained on final clinical radiographs. Conclusion  This simplified technique of distraction corrective osteotomy after distal radius malunion results in improved clinical and radiographic outcomes for patients.

Distal radius fractures

The management of distal radius fractures has evolved considerably in the last two decades. Techniques and hardware have improved so much that the surgeon can usually assure good results in these debilitating fractures. Yet no one method can be used for all injuries, as the personality of each fracture demands a customized approach. Furthermore, what works in one age group may not work in another. For this reason, every available treatment has its own space in our options. The need for surgeons to be well versed in all techniques is critical. We offer a concise update of important evolutionary and current treatment guidelines for this common fracture.

Risk Factors for Distal Radius Osteotomy Nonunion

BACKGROUND

Osteotomy-site nonunion after distal radius corrective osteotomy is a detrimental complication. This retrospective study aims to identify patient and surgical factors associated with nonunion risk to help mitigate this. The authors hypothesize that patient factors and potentially modifiable surgical factors are contributory.

METHODS

Thirty-three patients who underwent corrective osteotomy of the distal radius for prior fracture malunion were identified. Radiographs and patient records were reviewed for demographics, comorbidities, nutritional status, plate position, angle and length of osteotomy correction, and graft used. The primary study outcome was osteotomy nonunion. Descriptive and bivariate statistics were used to identify covariates relevant to nonunion. Backward, stepwise logistic regression was applied to investigate the multivariate effects on outcome, and regression analysis was adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

Seven patients (21 percent) experienced nonunion after initial corrective osteotomy. Risk factors associated with nonunion included correction length of osteotomy of 5 mm or greater and prior treatment with open reduction and internal fixation. Autograft use was protective against nonunion. History of osteoporosis showed a trend toward increased risk. Angle of osteotomy correction, nutritional deficit, age, diabetes, smoking status, and obesity were not identified as risk factors by the multivariate model.

CONCLUSIONS

Distraction length at the osteotomy site, graft selection, and prior internal fixation were significant risk factors for distal radius osteotomy nonunion, but other factors traditionally associated with nonunion did not appear to impact risk. The authors recommend using autograft bone augmentation, particularly when distracting the osteotomy beyond 5 mm or after prior internal fixation.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, III.

Common Complications of Distal Radial Fractures

Distal radial fractures are associated with good outcomes; however, although they occur at low rates, complications can significantly impair treatment success. Therefore, the treating surgeon should be aware of potential complications associated with each treatment type and how to best prevent them. Although certain patient-specific and fracture-specific factors may increase the risk of adverse outcomes, most are nonmodifiable risk factors at the time of presentation, so it is imperative that every effort is made to mitigate these risk factors to prevent long-term morbidity. Patients should be well-informed about these complications and potential symptoms so that they can be addressed expeditiously.

Distal radius malunion in adults

Distal radius malunion (DRMU) consists in a non-anatomical consolidation of a distal radius fracture. The resulting alteration of the articular or extra-articular radial anatomy impairs wrist function to a greater or lesser degree: Restricted ranges of motion, loss of strength, pain. There may also be nerve or tendon involvement. Adaptive carpal malalignment and ulnar-carpal impingement are also possible. Imaging assessment should at least include X-ray and CT; CT-arthrography is essential in intra-articular DRMU, which regularly progresses toward radiocarpal osteoarthritis. Surgical indications are guided by clinical assessment. Restoring distal radial anatomy requires osteotomy, according to type of DRMU: anterior or posterior opening or closing wedge. Bone or bone-substitute graft may need to be associated. Computerisation has improved planning and should be implemented, whenever possible. Ulnar osteotomy may be performed, isolated or associated to distal radial osteotomy. Palliative partial fusion or bone resection is possible in case of joint involvement or in patients with low functional demand.

Distal Radius Malunion

Malunion remains the most common complication of nonsurgical treatment of fractures of the distal radius and represents a common clinical entity. Symptomatic treatment often involves corrective osteotomy. Surgical correction is a challenging problem with unpredictable clinical outcomes. Prevention of malunion of a distal radius fracture is the best course of action. With maintenance of volar cortical contact and the use of volar fixed-angle devices, bone grafting may not be necessary in certain cases of malunion correction. New technologies such as 3-dimensional modeling and computer-generated osteotomy guides are likely to have a positive impact on the outcomes of surgical treatment.

Interpreting Patient-Reported Outcome Results: Is One Minimum Clinically Important Difference Really Enough?

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are the gold standard for reporting clinical outcomes in research. A crucial component of interpreting PROs is the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) is a disease-specific PRO tool developed for use in distal radius fractures. The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of injury characteristics, treatment modality, and calculation methodology on the PRWE MCID in distal radius fractures. We hypothesize the MCID would be significantly influenced by each of these factors. Methods: From 2014 to 2016, 197 patients with a distal radius fracture were treated at a single level I trauma center. Each patient was asked to complete a PRWE survey at preoperative baseline, 6-week postoperative, and 12-week postoperative dates. The MCID was derived utilizing 2 distinct strategies, anchor and distribution. Anchor questions involved overall health anchor and mental and emotional health anchor. Patient variables regarding demographics, injury characteristics, and treatment modality were collected. Results: The MCID was unique between analytical methods at all time points. The distribution MCID presented commonality across assessed variables. However, the anchor MCID was unique by AO/OTA fracture classifications, treatment modality, and time points. Conclusions: Our study found the MCID was heavily influenced by assessment time points, analytical method, treatment modality, and fracture classification. These results suggest that to accurately interpret PRO data in clinical trials, an anchor question should be included so that the MCID can be determined for the specific patient population included in the study.

Complications of Corrective Osteotomies for Extra-Articular Distal Radius Malunion

PURPOSE

Osteotomy of the distal radius for a fracture malunion is a challenging procedure. The purpose of this study was to review a series of osteotomies to determine the type and risk of complications.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed, including all Kaiser Permanente Southern California patients who were aged 18 years or older between January 1, 2007, and September 25, 2015, and underwent osteotomy for an extra-articular distal radius fracture malunion. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, comorbidities, osteotomy type (hinged vs distraction), implant, and bone graft type. Complications including infection, nonunion, loss of reduction, implant failure, nerve injury, tendon injury, and complex regional pain syndrome were recorded.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients who underwent extra-articular osteotomy of the distal radius for malunion during the study period. The mean age was 54 years (range, 21-83 years). There were 24 distraction-type (intervening bone graft) and 36 hinge-type (volar cortical contact maintained) osteotomies. Twenty-five of 60 patients had complications related to the procedure requiring 13 subsequent procedures. There were 7 nonunions and 3 cases of delayed healing at the osteotomy site. One extensor carpi radialis longus tendon laceration resulted from the use of an osteotome. There were 3 delayed extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon ruptures after surgery. The distraction-type osteotomy was associated with a greater risk of major complications including nonunion and delayed union.

CONCLUSIONS

A complication rate of nearly 50% was observed in distal radius osteotomies. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of injury to, or delayed rupture of the EPL tendon associated with these procedures. The risk of nonunion or delayed union is higher in distraction-type compared with hinge-type osteotomies. Low surgeon volume with this procedure may be a contributing factor to the high rate of complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Intramedullary nailing and plating osteosynthesis in the correction of post-traumatic deformity in late-diagnosed distal radius fractures: a retrospective comparison study

BACKGROUND

Various surgical modalities are available for correction of deformity in late-diagnosed distal radius fractures. This study compared surgical outcomes between intramedullary nailing and plating osteosynthesis in open-wedge osteotomy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 47 unilateral distal radius fractures that underwent open-wedge osteotomy at more than 4 weeks after injury between 2006 and 2011. A locally resected exuberant callus was used as the bone graft. Two types of fixation were used: intramedullary nail in 22 patients (group A) and locking plate in 25 patients (group B). Radiographic analysis including radial height, radial inclination, and volar tilt were performed preoperatively and 2-year postoperatively. The Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS) was used for functional evaluation and a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) for residual pain assessment. Patient satisfaction was self-reported as a 5-point scale. Radiographic data, functional outcomes, and surgical complications were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

All fractures achieved bone union without major complications. The MMWS averaged 84.8 ± 9.7 in group A and 85.2 ± 8.4 in group B, without significant differences (p = 0.436). Instead, significant differences were found in mean wrist flexion (73.6 ± 7.9 vs. 69.6 ± 7.8 degrees; p = 0.042), patient satisfaction (3.6 ± 1.1 vs. 2.9 ± 1.2; p = 0.034), postoperative radial height (11.6 ± 2.6 vs. 10.2 ± 3 mm; p = 0.039) and inclination (20.8 ± 2.8 vs. 17.7 ± 4.1 degrees; p = 0.004), and implant-related complications (9% vs. 36%; p = 0.03). There were no significant differences in other assessment items including postoperative grip strength, pain scale, supination/pronation/extension, volar tilt, correction angles of all three parameters, and general complication rate. Four patients in group A (18%) and 2 in group B (8%) experienced postoperative paresthesia of the surgical hand; no significant difference was noted. All except one patient in group B had full recovery of neurological symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Open-wedge osteotomy with either an intramedullary nail or locking plate fixation yielded encouraging radiographic and functional outcomes. Intramedullary nail fixation may facilitate restoration of radial height and inclination with better wrist flexion, less implant-related complications, and greater patient satisfaction.

Best Approaches in Distal Radius Fracture Malunions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Malunion remains a common complication in the treatment of distal radius fractures. The purpose of this review was to discuss the various approaches in planning and surgical management for extra- and intra-articular distal radius malunions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have reported good results with surgical correction of distal radius malunions utilizing a number of preoperative planning methods and surgical approaches. Three-dimensional models and custom cutting guides have recently become more popular, but their benefit in comparison to other methods remains unclear. Regardless of preoperative planning method or surgical approach, good results can be achieved with correction of distal radius malunion with careful attention to patient selection, indications, and surgical technique.

Corrective Osteotomy with Autogenous Bone Graft with Callus after Malunion of Distal Radius Fracture

Corrective osteotomy with callus filling at fracture site for malunion after distal radius fracture is a rare technique, but it achieved a favorable postoperative outcome. The patient, 66-year-old female, visited our hospital 4 months after distal radius fracture. Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius was planned aiming at improving the wrist joint function, and was performed using a volar locking plate, then the bone defect was filled with callus as autogenous bone grafting. At 12 months after surgery, left wrist joint pain and the range of motion have improved, and the Mayo wrist score was excellent. To our knowledge, there has been no study on the treatment of bone defects by filling with callus. Since favorable bone fusion was achieved with callus, this treatment method may overcome the disadvantages of autogenous bone graft, such as pain at the donor region.

Intramedullary nailing for correction of post-traumatic deformity in late-diagnosed distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic deformity of the distal radius may lead to multiple sequelae and severe functional impairment. Intramedullary fixation is a novel technique for treatment of distal radius fractures. The present study aimed to evaluate the functional and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary nailing for correction of post-traumatic deformity in late-diagnosed fractures of the distal radius.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2009 to February 2011, 16 patients with late-diagnosed displaced fractures of the distal radius were included. Eligible inclusion was extra-articular fracture for more than 4 weeks. Surgical correction and internal fixation with intramedullary nailing was performed for treatment of ten AO type A2 and six AO type A3 fractures. All patients were followed up radiographically and clinically for an average of 20.3 months.

RESULTS

All fractures achieved bone union without major complications. Functional status and radiographic alignment significantly improved postoperatively. There was no significantly secondary displacement comparing early postoperative and final radiographic parameters. The functional results according to the Mayo wrist scoring system were good or excellent in 94 % of patients. The mean score was 83.8.

CONCLUSION

Surgical correction and internal fixation with the intramedullary nail is a feasible and less invasive technique with few complications in the treatment of post-traumatic deformity of the distal radius.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

[Are there any indications for surgery of distal radius malunion in elderly patients?]

Malunions of the distal radius are associated most of the time with disturbances of the distal radioulnar (DRU) joint. While a corrective osteotomy of the distal radius is a well-known procedure in younger patients, manual workers and active patients, is it justified in independent elderly patients above 70 years of age? These techniques improve function, reorient the articular surfaces, protect against complications such as degenerative osteoarthritis and stiffness of the wrist, and they improve DRU balance. Osteotomies performed with bone or artificial grafts have comparable outcomes. Either a volar or dorsal approach can be used depending on the orientation of the carpal articular surface of the radius and the need to lengthen the radius. If the patient is active and independent, the clinical benefit is higher when an osteotomy is done for significant malunions; urgent treatment of these older patients brings about additional costs and unclear benefits.

Locking Plates for Corrective Osteotomy of Malunited Dorsally Tilted Distal Radial Fractures: A Biomechanical Study

The purpose of the study was to compare the biomechanical properties of five different palmar fixation plate designs in a distal radius osteotomy cadaver model. A 1 cm metaphyseal osteotomy gap was made to simulate a corrective osteotomy and the osteotomy plated. Axial load was applied to the distal end of each construct by a material testing machine under control of a motion analysis video system. The specimens were arranged into five implant groups of eight specimens each. No test group developed deformity and movement of the fracture gap greater than 2 mm with a load of 100 N. Increasing the load to 250 N revealed statistically significant differences in stiffness and failure load between the different plates. Axial failure strength and stiffness were greater for the radial correction plates than for the other implants. The former may provide enough stability for corrective osteotomy of dorsally angulated distal radial malunions, even when the osteotomy gap is only filled with cancellous bone graft instead of cortical bone graft.

Minimally invasive osteotomy for distal radius malunion: A preliminary series of 9 cases

The rate of malunion after distal radius fractures is 25% after conservative treatment and 10% after surgery. Their main functional repercussion related to ulno-carpal conflict is loss of wrist motion. We report a retrospective clinical series of minimally invasive osteotomies. The series consisted of 9 cases of minimally invasive osteotomies with volar locking plate fixation. All osteotomies healed. The average pain was 5.3/10 preoperatively and 2.1/10 at last follow-up. The mean Quick DASH was 55.4/100 preoperatively and 24.24/100 at last follow-up. Compared to the opposite side, the average wrist flexion was 84.11%, the average wrist extension was 80.24%, the average pronation was 95.33% and the average supination was 93.9%. With similar results to those of the literature, our short series confirms the feasibility of minimally invasive osteotomy of the distal radius for extra-articular malunion. TYPE: Case-series.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Is Bone Grafting Necessary in the Treatment of Malunited Distal Radius Fractures?

Background Open wedge osteotomy with bone grafting and plate fixation is the standard procedure for the correction of malunited distal radius fractures. Bone grafts are used to increase structural stability and to enhance new bone formation. However, bone grafts are also associated with donor site morbidity, delayed union at bone-graft interfaces, size mismatch between graft and osteotomy defect, and additional operation time. Purpose The goal of this study was to assess bone healing and secondary fracture displacement in the treatment of malunited distal radius fractures without the use of bone grafting. Methods Between January 1993 and December 2013, 132 corrective osteotomies and plate fixations without bone grafting were performed for malunited distal radius fractures. The minimum follow-up time was 12 months. Primary study outcomes were time to complete bone healing and secondary fracture displacement. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs during follow-up were compared with each other, as well as with radiographs of the uninjured side. Results All 132 osteotomies healed. In two cases (1.5%), healing took more than 4 months, but reinterventions were not necessary. No cases of secondary fracture displacement or hardware failure were observed. Significant improvements in all radiographic parameters were shown after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation. Conclusion This study shows that bone grafts are not required for bone healing and prevention of secondary fracture displacement after corrective osteotomy and plate fixation of malunited distal radius fractures. Level of evidence Therapeutic, level IV, case series with no comparison group.

Non-union in 3 of 15 osteotomies of the distal radius without bone graft

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Open-wedge osteotomies of the distal radius create a void that is usually filled with either iliac crest bone graft or bone substitute. Previous studies have suggested that this is unnecessary. We investigated the safety of omitting the filling procedure.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included 15 patients with a dorsal malunion of a distal radius fracture. A palmar approach and angle-stable plates were used. The patients were followed until there was radiographic and clinical healing.

RESULTS

Non-union occurred in 3 of the 15 patients. The study, which had been planned to include 25 patients, was then discontinued. 6 osteotomies created a trapezoid void (no cortical contact); 3 of these did not unite after the index procedure (p = 0.04), but did subsequently, after autogenous bone grafting. A trapezoid void was significantly associated with non-union (p = 0.04).

INTERPRETATION

When a trapezoid defect is created, one should consider bone substitute or autogenous bone graft. This has been shown to be safe in other studies.

TREATMENT OF EXTRA-ARTICULAR DISTAL RADIAL MALUNION WITH PERCUTANEOUS OSTEOTOMY AND AN INTRAMEDULLARY IMPLANT

Purpose: Distal radius malunion is often seen after distal radius fracture. We performed a less invasive but secure corrective surgery using an intramedullary implant combined with percutaneous osteotomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of this surgical technique.

Patients and methods: Three patients with malunion of a distal radius fracture were included. We assessed the wrist joint disability scores pre-operatively and at the final follow-up an average of 21 months after surgery. We also performed radiological assessments of volar tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance.

Results: All three patients achieved excellent clinical results with an average joint disability score of 93.3 at the final follow-up. The radiological parameters improved without any post-operative correction loss.

Discussion: Intramedullary implant combined with percutaneous osteotomy provides sufficient stability after correction of distal radius malunion and avoids the complications associated with the use of a volar plate.

[Operative options for rectification after failed osteosynthesis of the distal radius]

BACKGROUND

Even in an era of clear improvements in implants and standardized treatment procedures, abortive osteosynthesis after distal radius fractures is not an uncommon complication.

DIAGNOSTICS

Although not every malunion of the radius leads to complaints, affected patients often suffer from limitations in movement, reduction in strength, pain and aesthetic deficits. Following thorough clinical and imaging diagnostics a selection from the possible treatment options must be made taking the results obtained from the diagnostics into consideration.

THERAPY

Operative possibilities are available for reconstructing the anatomical features as accurately as possible, functional improvement without correction of the malunion, pain reduction alone and combined procedures.

CONCLUSION

Despite abortive osteosynthesis of distal radial fractures there are possibilities for anatomical reconstruction, retention of mobility and pain reduction. Taking the pathological deformities into consideration, the highest priority should be given to reconstructing the anatomical joint conditions as accurately as possible, even when the conservative treatment options were unsuccessful.

Correction osteotomy of distal radius malunion stabilised with dorsal locking plates without grafting

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of our correction osteotomies of distal radial malunions without a bone graft. Eleven consecutive patients (mean age 52 years, range 18–71) were treated. A dorsal approach was utilised to perform an opening-wedge osteotomy which then was stabilised with two dorsal columnar plates without filling the osteotomy gap. All patients went on to radiographic union with a filling of the osteotomy gap within a mean period of 3 months (range 2–6 months). All patients had satisfactory results in terms of function and pain. Correction osteotomy and stabilisation with bicolumnar locked plate fixation without a bone graft provides sufficient stability to allow the highly vascularised metaphysis to heal. In patients without risk factors predisposing to non-union, this procedure is safe and feasible.

Corrective osteotomy of the distal radius following failed internal fixation

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to quantify the clinical and radiographic outcomes after corrective osteotomy for malunions of the distal radius following failed internal fixation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of 18 patients (8 women, 10 men; mean age 41 years) are presented an average of 7 years after osteotomy of a malunited distal radius fracture. We assessed active range of motion, grip strength, radiographic alignment, pain and disability. Subjective and objective data were summarized using the modified Mayo Wrist Score and the point-score system of Fernandez.

RESULTS

Wrist motion, pain and deformity improved with the operation in all cases. The modified Mayo Wrist Score averaged 79 points. The scale of Fernandez indicated ten good, two fair and six poor results.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the operative correction of a distal radius malunion following an unsuccessful internal fixation can be achieved with outcomes comparable to those reported after initial nonoperative treatment.

Opening wedge osteotomy for distal radius malunion: dorsal or palmar approach?

Background There are various technical variations to consider when performing a corrective osteotomy of a distal radius malunion. We chose two of the more commonly reported techniques and compared the results of volar (palmar) osteotomy and fixation with dorsal osteotomy and fixation. Method Within a continuous cohort of patients who had undergone corrective osteotomy for a malunited Colles fracture, two groups could be identified retrospectively. In 8 patients a dorsal approach was used. A structural trapezoidal graft, subtending the amount of correction, was inserted into the osteotomy gap and stabilization was performed with a thin round-hole mini-fragment plate. In 14 patients a palmar approach and a palmar fixed-angle plate was used for correction of the malunion and for angular stable rigid fixation of the two fragments. The osteotomy gap was loosely filled with nonstructural cancellous bone chips. A retrospective comparison of the two groups was performed to see whether the outcome was affected by the use of either operative technique.The demographics, the preoperative amount of deformity, range of motion, pain, and force were comparable for both groups. All osteotomies healed without loss of correction. After a minimal follow-up of one year, radiographic appearance, objective functional parameters were assessed and subjective data (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand [DASH] score and special pain and function questionnaire) obtained. Results These data did not show statistical difference for the two groups except for the amount of final wrist flexion. This parameter was significantly better in patients who had palmar approaches and fixed-angle plates. Conclusion Corrective osteotomies of distal radius malunions can be done in either way. It might result in some better flexion, if performed volarly.

Corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular distal radius malunion

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the functional outcome of corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular malunions of the distal radius using multiple outcome scores.

METHODS

We evaluated 18 skeletally mature patients at an average of 78 months after corrective osteotomy for a combined intra- and extra-articular malunion of the distal part of the radius. The indication for osteotomy in all patients was the combination of an extra-articular deformity (≥ 15° volar or ≥ 10° dorsal angulation or ≥ 3 mm radial shortening) and intra-articular incongruity of 2 mm or greater (maximum stepoff or gap), as measured on lateral and posteroanterior radiographs. The average interval from the injury to the osteotomy was 9 months. The average maximum stepoff or gap of the articular surface before surgery was 4 mm.

RESULTS

All 18 patients healed uneventfully and the final articular incongruity was reduced to 2 mm or less. Final range of motion and grip strength significantly improved, averaging 89% and 84% of the uninjured side and 185% and 241% of the preoperative measures, respectively. The rate of excellent or good results was 72% according to the validated rating system Mayo Modified Wrist Score, and 89% according to the unvalidated system of Gartland and Werley. The mean Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 11, which corresponds to mild perceived disability. Of the 18 cases, 11 normalized upper limb function. Five patients had complications; all were successfully treated. According to the rating system of Knirk and Jupiter, 4 had grade 1 and 1 had grade 2 osteoarthritis of the radiocarpal joint on radiographs. Two of those patients reported occasional mild pain. Radiographic osteoarthritis did not correlate with strength, motion, and wrist scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of corrective osteotomy for combined intra- and extra-articular malunions were comparable to those of osteotomy for isolated intra- and extra-articular malunions. A successful corrective osteotomy for the treatment of complex intra- and extra-articular distal radius malunions can improve wrist function.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Vascularized periosteal transfer from the medial femoral condyle: is it compulsory to include the cortical bone?

BACKGROUND

The corticoperiosteal flap from the medial femoral condyle has become the workhorse in the management of recalcitrant nonunions with vascularized periosteum. Inclusion of the outer condylar cortex has been advocated to avoid damaging the osteogenic capacity of the periosteum and is at present an ordinary technical step in the procedure.

PATIENTS

A clinical prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of periosteal-only microvascular transfers from the medial femoral condyle associated with bone grafts in the treatment of recalcitrant nonunions. A group of 8 patients with periosteal-only flaps (study group) is compared with a corticoperiosteal control group (13 patients). A statistical analysis is made of the results.

RESULTS

We had 100% union rate in both the study and control groups. Evaluation of early signs of bone healing by two independent evaluators did not found differences between the groups (4.5 months in the study and 4.9 months in the control group).

CONCLUSIONS

Although not statistically significant because of the small sample size, our study might support the idea that both periosteal and corticoperiosteal flaps from the medial femoral condyle are effective, when associated with a bone graft, in the treatment of recalcitrant nonunions with small gaps. A further analysis of the results suggests, albeit no statistical significant, that structural and nonstructural bone grafts are both effective when associated with a vascularized periosteal or corticoperiosteal transfer from the medial femoral condyle.

Corrective Radial and Ulnar Osteotomies for Distal Radial Fracture Malunion

Introduction

We describe a technique consisting of simultaneous radial closing-wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomy to treat malunion of distal radial fractures.

Step 1 Preoperative Planning

Plan the radial closing-wedge osteotomy to correct the volar tilt angle to 8.5° to 15.5° and the ulnar shortening osteotomy to restore ulnar variance to -2.5 to 0.5 mm.

Step 2 Radial Closing-Wedge Osteotomy

Remove the wedge of bone from the radius and reduce the distal fragment, keeping the dorsal cortex as a hinge.

Step 3 Distal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Resect the section of the ulna equivalent to the positive ulnar variance with transverse osteotomies.

Step 4 Plate Fixation of the Radial Osteotomy Site

Hold together the two fragments of the radius with a Kirschner wire and fix the osteotomy site with a volar locking plate.

Step 5 Proximal Ulnar Shortening Osteotomy

Evaluate residual ulnar positive variance with fluoroscopy and restore the ulnar variance to within a normal range by removing additional bone from the proximal fragment.

Step 6 Plate Fixation of the Ulnar Osteotomy Site

Use a compression device to close and fix the ulnar osteotomy site.

Step 7 Postoperative Management

Allow early motion immediately after the operation.

Results

We retrospectively evaluated forty-two patients at a minimum of one year after treatment of an extra-articular distal radial malunion with a radial corrective osteotomy.

What to Watch For

IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

Early correction of paediatric malunited distal metaphyseal radius fractures using percutaneous callus osteoclasis ("Calloclasis")

INTRODUCTION

Closed reduction of secondary displacements of distal metaphyseal radius fractures is an easy procedure only when performed within the first ten to fifteen days post-trauma, prior to the occurrence of malunion. When a hard bony callus prevents proper reduction, an open osteotomy is generally advocated.

HYPOTHESIS

We suggest the use of a less invasive technique which aims at correcting early malunion when closed reduction is made impossible: the percutaneous callus osteoclasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Callus osteoclasis consists in a series of multiple bone-drilling in a postage stamp pattern performed under image intensifier using a large diameter pin, at a distance from the growth plate. Once the bone has been weakened, reduction is obtained by using the pin as an intrafocal lever. The pin is then pushed through the opposite cortex to ensure postero-lateral stabilization.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were managed using this technique and reported good results with no complications.

DISCUSSION

This technique offers a low aggressive management of malunions and may be performed within two to six weeks after trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV. Multicenter retrospective study.

Malunion of the distal radius

Fractures of the distal radius are extremely common injuries, which are steadily becoming a public health issue. One of the most common complications following distal radius fractures is still malunion of the distal radius. This review of the literature surrounding distal radius malunion covers the biomechanics of distal radial malunion, treatment options, indications for surgery, surgical techniques, and results.

OSTEOTOMY OF THE DISTAL RADIUS USING A FIXED-ANGLE VOLAR PLATE

OBJECTIVE

Skewed consolidation of the distal radius, due to sequelae of fractures, may cause functional incapacity, thus leading such patients to present pain, loss of strength and diminished mobility. Based on the excellent results obtained from surgical treatment of unstable fractures of the distal radius through a volar approach and use of rigid fixation with a fixed-angle volar plate, we started to use the same method for osteotomy of the distal radius.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted, and 20 patients treated between February 2002 and October 2009 were found. The mean length of follow-up was 43.9 months (range: 12 to 96 months). The surgical indications were persistent pain, deformity and functional limitation subsequent to a dorsally displaced fracture.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative deformity was 27° of dorsal tilt of the distal radius, 87° of ulnar tilt, and 7.3 mm of shortening of the radius. All the osteotomies consolidated and the final mean volar tilt was 6.2°, with ulnar tilt of 69.3° and shortening of 1 mm. The mean mobility of the wrist increased by 19.9° (flexion) and by 24° (extension). Mean forearm supination increased by 23.5° and pronation by 21.7°. Grip strength increased from 13.4 to 34.5 pounds.

CONCLUSION

Use of a fixed-angle volar plate for a volar approach towards osteotomy of the distal radius enables satisfactory correction of the deformities and eliminates the need for removal of the synthesis material caused by tendon complications.

The role of bone allografts in the treatment of angular malunions of the distal radius

PURPOSE

Two cohorts of patients who had corrective osteotomies and volar platings for malunited fractures of the distal radius were compared retrospectively to determine whether the time to union and the outcome were affected by bone allograft.

METHODS

Patients in the first group (n = 14) did not receive any bone graft; patients in the second group (n = 14) had allograft bone chips following volar plating. Indications for surgery, surgical technique, and postoperative rehabilitation were the same in both groups. Volar cortical contact was maintained using a volar locking plate in all patients. Radiographic parameters of deformity correction, time to union, wrist and forearm range of motion, grip strength, patient-rated wrist evaluation and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire were used to evaluate the outcome before and after the surgery. Average follow-up time was 36 weeks. Patients who had diabetes, who smoked, who had a body mass index of more than 35, and who required lengthening for deformity correction were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Osteotomies in both groups healed without loss of surgical correction. Final outcome and time to union revealed no significant differences, clinically or statistically, between the 2 groups. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was improved in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

When volar cortical contact was maintained using a volar locked plate, bone allograft at the osteotomy site did not improve the final outcome.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Clinical outcomes of corrective osteotomy for distal radial malunion: a review of opening and closing-wedge techniques

BACKGROUND

Radial corrective osteotomy is an established but challenging treatment for distal radial malunion. There is ongoing discussion over whether an opening or closing-wedge osteotomy should be employed. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively compare the clinical and radiographic results of conventional opening-wedge osteotomy with those of our closing-wedge technique.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated forty-two patients with extra-articular distal radial malunion who were managed with corrective osteotomy and were followed for a minimum of one year. Twenty-two patients were managed with radial opening-wedge osteotomy and interpositional bone graft or bone-graft substitute, and twenty were managed with simultaneous radial closing-wedge and ulnar shortening osteotomy without bone graft. The selection of the surgical procedure was determined by the surgeon. Each patient was evaluated on the basis of objective radiographic measurements and functional outcomes as determined on the basis of clinical examination, including range of wrist motion, grip strength, pain-rating score, Mayo wrist score, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

The mean duration of follow-up was thirty-six months (range, twelve to 101 months) for the opening-wedge cohort and twenty-eight months (range, twelve to eighty-seven months) for the closing-wedge cohort. The two techniques were comparable in terms of complications. Postoperative volar tilt and ulnar variance improved significantly compared with the preoperative status in each cohort (p < 0.05). Restoration of ulnar variance to within defined criteria (-2.5 to 0.5 mm) was significantly more frequent in the closing-wedge cohort than in the opening-wedge cohort (p < 0.001). The postoperative mean extension-flexion arc of the wrist (p < 0.001) and Mayo wrist score (p = 0.008) were significantly better in the closing-wedge cohort. Differences between the two cohorts in terms of the pronation-supination arc, grip strength, pain-rating score, and DASH scores were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The closing-wedge osteotomy technique is an effective reconstructive procedure for the treatment of extra-articular distal radial malunion. It is significantly better than the opening-wedge osteotomy technique in terms of the restoration of ulnar variance, the extension-flexion arc of wrist motion, and the Mayo wrist score.

Palmar locking plates for corrective osteotomy of latent malunion of dorsally tilted distal radial fractures without structural bone grafting

The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes following corrective osteotomy for nascent malunion of distal radial fractures with dorsal tilt using palmar-locking plates without using autologous structural bone grafting for dorsal cortex support. The fractures were dorsally angulated distal radial fractures (AO types A2, A3, and C1) with neglected or delayed treatment for 5 to 8 weeks. Fractures were repaired using 2.4-mm palmar locking plates. Dorsal cortical defects at the osteotomy sites were filled with incipient healing callus. Radiographs were obtained before correction and at 2 and 6 weeks and 3, 4.5, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Palmar tilt, radial inclination, and ulnar variance were measured. There were no cases of loss reduction, implant failure, or delayed fracture union without structural bone graft and casting. Clinical assessments included active range of motion of the wrist and function based on the Mayo Wrist Score. Even with wrist immobilization for >1 month preoperatively, all patients had excellent Mayo Wrist Scores at 4.5 months due to early postoperative rehabilitation. No further changes were apparent between 4.5- and 12-month follow-up.The palmar locking plates provided sufficient stability for corrective osteotomy within 8 weeks of injury without the need for structural bone grafting. Furthermore, casting immobilization was also unnecessary, and a good wrist range of motion was restored early after rehabilitation.

Corrective osteotomy for isolated malunion of the palmar lunate facet in distal radius fractures

PURPOSE

Malunion of the palmar lunate facet fragment of distal radius fractures is associated with both early functional impairment and late degenerative changes. The goal of this study was to describe the clinical and radiographic outcomes after corrective osteotomy for isolated malunion of the palmar lunate facet.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2000, a retrospective review identified 13 patients with an average age of 44 years who had undergone corrective intra-articular osteotomy for isolated malunion of the palmar lunate facet. The average interval from the initial injury to the osteotomy was 5.4 months. Final evaluation was performed at 1 year. We performed statistical analysis using the Wilcoxon signed rank test.

RESULTS

Wrist extension improved from an average of 53° to 84° (p = .002), flexion from 46° to 61° (p < .002), supination from 38° to 87° (p = .002), and pronation from 79° to 87° (p < .001). Grip strength improved from 30% to 73% of the contralateral side (p < .002). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores improved from an average of 50.7 to 9.7 (p < .002). Palmar tilt improved from an average of 23° to 11° (p < .002). Radial inclination improved from an average of 29° to 22° (p < .002), ulnar variance decreased from +3.9 to -0.9 mm (p = .004), and intra-articular gap decreased from 3.6 to 0.9 mm (p < .002). All patients had excellent or good results according to both the Gartland and Werley and the Fernandez scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Early intra-articular osteotomy significantly improved wrist range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and radiographic parameters. Patients reported mostly positive outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Treatment of extra-articular distal radial malunions with an intramedullary implant

PURPOSE

Malunited distal radius fractures pose considerable problems, especially for young, active individuals. Surgical correction with osteotomy, bone grafting, and internal fixation with plates and screws has been the treatment of choice. Locked intramedullary fixation is an alternative technique to provide bony stability while minimizing soft tissue irritation in the management of acute distal radius fractures, with acceptable clinical results. The purpose of this study was to describe our experience with the use of an intramedullary device combined with grafting to repair distal radial malunions. This fixation device is inserted through the radial styloid and obtains distal fixation with 3 fixed-angle locking screws.

METHODS

Thirteen patients underwent distal radius malunion repair with an intramedullary implant and grafting. There were 6 male and 7 female participants with an average age of 51 years (range, 18-72 y). Patients were evaluated at an average follow-up of 24 months (range, 13-38 mo). Clinical outcome was measured by range of motion of the wrist and forearm, and grip strength, and by using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. We analyzed radiographs to determine time to union and adequacy of correction.

RESULTS

All of the malunions healed, with an average time to healing of 11 weeks. Patients' average range of motion at follow-up was 56 degrees of flexion, 66 degrees extension, 85 degrees pronation, and 84 degrees supination. Mean grip strength was 83% of the unaffected side, and the average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 21. Radiographs taken on the latest follow-up showed correction to the following average parameters: 20.6 degrees radial inclination, 11.0 mm radial height, +1.0 mm ulnar variance, and 2.1 degrees volar tilt.

CONCLUSIONS

The technique presented in this report demonstrates the effectiveness of an intramedullary nail combined with bone graft or graft substitute in repairing malunited fractures of the distal radius. The results show reliable correction of the deformity and good functional outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Long-term outcomes of corrective osteotomy for the treatment of distal radius malunion

Corrective osteotomy is an established but challenging treatment for distal radius malunion. Short- and intermediate-term results have been previously published while long-term results have not. The long-term results of 22 patients treated with corrective osteotomy for symptomatic distal radius malunion are presented (range 6-24 years, mean 13 years). All patients completed the DASH questionnaire and the modified Gartland and Werley, and Green and O'Brien scores postoperatively. Wrist alignment was assessed through standard wrist radiographs. Average wrist flexion-extension was 72.5% of the contralateral limb. Grip strength averaged 71%. The DASH score averaged 16 points corresponding to mild perceived disability. Results were categorized as fair on both the Gartland and Werley score (average 9 points) and the modified Green and O'Brien score (average 67 points). Wrist alignment was maintained over time but 13 patients presented mild to moderate symptomatic wrist arthritis. The outcome presented may be a reflection of the use of stricter evaluation instruments or reflect the development of post-traumatic arthritis.

Corrective osteotomy of the malunited distal radius fracture: use of periosteal bed may reduce the extent of postoperative graft resorption

The aim of this study was to compare osteotomy for malunited distal radius fracture with embedment of a corticospongious graft into a periosteal flap of the recipient bone (test) with the standard procedure (control) with respect to graft resorption. A retrospective assessor-blind analysis of consecutive patients (test: n = 19, control: n = 30) was performed. Ulnar tilt, palmar tilt and capitate-ulna distance were assessed from radiographs taken before, two to four days after and over three months after the surgery to determine loss of correction achieved by the surgery and estimate graft resorption during the postoperative period. In both unadjusted and adjusted comparisons, loss of correction of all parameters was lower in the test group (P < 0.05). The odds of "none to mild" resorption were greater in the test group with an adjusted odds ratio of 5.43 (95% confidence interval: 1.32-26.5, P = 0.025). Total graft collapse occurred in five of 30 controls and in none of 19 test patients. Graft embedment into the periosteum may improve its preservation.

Osteotomy of distal radius fracture malunion using a fast remodeling bone substitute consisting of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate

Malunion after a distal radius fracture can be treated with an osteotomy of the distal radius. Autologous iliac crest bone graft is often used to fill the gap, but the procedure is associated with donor site morbidity. In this study a novel fast resorbing biphasic bone substitute consisting of a mixture of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate is used (Cerament BoneSupport AB, Sweden). Fifteen consecutive patients, with a mean age of 52 (27-71) years were included. All had a malunion after a distal radius fracture and underwent an osteotomy. A fragment specific fixation system, TriMed (TriMed, Valencia, CA), consisting of a Buttress Pin and a Radial Pin Plate were used for fixation and a calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate mixture as bone substitute. The patients were followed for 1 year. Grip strength increased from 61 (28-93)% of the contralateral hand to 85 (58-109)%, p < 0.001. DASH scores decreased from 37 (22-61) to 24 (2-49) p = 0.003. Radiographically all osteotomies healed. An increase of ulnar variance was noted during healing from 1.8 mm immediately postoperatively to 2.6 mm at final follow up. Osteotomy can increase grip strength and decease disability after a malunited fracture. In the present series the bone substitute was replaced by bone, but a minor loss of the achieved radiographic correction was noted in some patients during osteotomy healing. A more rigid fixation may improve the radiographic outcome with this kind of bone substitute.

Management of post-traumatic malunion of fractures of the distal radius

Distal radius malunions are a common cause of patient morbidity. This review of the literature surrounding distal radius malunion covers the demographics, pathologic anatomy, and indications for surgery, surgical techniques, and salvage options. Particular emphasis is placed on subject areas that have not been reviewed as extensively in previous articles, including: intra-articular malunion, computer-assisted techniques, bone graft alternatives, and volar fixed-angle plate osteosynthesis.

Tricalcium phosphate bone substitute in corrective osteotomy of the distal radius

AIM

To evaluate the outcome of using tricalcium phosphate (TCP) as void filler and structural support in corrective opening-wedge osteotomy of the distal radius.

METHODS

A consecutive series of 17 patients with malunited dorsally angulated distal radius fracture underwent corrective osteotomy using plates, screws and TCP blocks. Results were evaluated postoperatively with DASH at 6 months with radiography at 8-12 weeks and 0.5-3.5 years.

RESULTS

Mean DASH score improved from 52 (S.D. 22) preoperatively to 30 (S.D. 22) postoperatively. There was one non-union. There was also a mean loss of radial length of 1.1mm (S.D. 1.0mm) between the first postoperative radiograph and final follow-up. Radiolucent zones were observed around the TCP grafts after 6-8 weeks in 10/14 cases, but could not be statistically correlated with the slight loss of reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

TCP seems to be an alternative to iliac crest bone grafting in corrective osteotomies of the distal radius. The shortening observed over time may be attributable to inflammation induced by the TCP.

Osteotomy of dorsally displaced malunited fractures of the distal radius: no loss of radiographic correction during healing with a minimally invasive fixation technique and an injectable bone substitute

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Malunion after a distal radius fracture can be treated with an osteotomy of the distal radius. Often autologous iliac crest bone graft is used to fill the gap, but this is associated with donor site morbidity. Instead of bone graft, we have used a slow-resorbing bone substitute in combination with a minimally invasive fixation technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

25 consecutive patients with a dorsal malunion after a distal radius fracture underwent an osteotomy. A TriMed buttress pin and a radial pin plate were used for fixation, and Norian SRS as bone substitute. The patients were followed for a minimum of 1 year and range of motion, grip strength, DASH scores, and the radiographic correction were measured.

RESULTS

Forearm rotation improved from 137 degrees to 155 degrees , flexion/extension from 102 degrees to 120 degrees , and radioul-nar deviation from 32 degrees to 43 degrees . Grip strength increased from 62% of the contralateral hand to 82%. DASH scores decreased from 36 to 23. Radiographically, all osteotomies but 1 healed and the radiographic correction achieved was consistent over the first year.

INTERPRETATION

Osteotomy of the distal radius is effective in increasing motion and grip strength after a malunited distal radial fracture. Patient satisfaction is high and subjective results measured with DASH are good. Using a bone substitute, the operation can be performed as an outpatient procedure and donor-site pain avoided. No loss of the radiographic correction achieved was noted during osteotomy healing.