Prolonged rewarming time during allograft implantation predisposes to recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation

An Alternative Surgical Technique of Native Hepatectomy in Liver Transplantation

Background

Orthotopic liver transplantation has become the procedure of choice for end-stage liver disease. There are 3 commonly used methods of vena cava anastomosis. Here, we report a new technique for native hepatectomy.

Material/Methods

The data of 12 patients who underwent orthotopic liver transplantation using a new surgical technique were retrospectively collected for analysis. The new separation and reconstruction surgical technique mainly involved the second portal isolation and hepatectomy that followed. We performed recipient liver resection without the occlusion of the inferior vena cava, which was then followed by classic, piggyback, modified piggyback, or side-to-side orthotopic liver transplantation. The graft function index and complications were collected after transplantation.

Results

The length of the anhepatic phase was 30.92±9.1 min. Alanine transaminase (ALT) levels were 138 to 2027 U/L, with a median of 361.5 U/L. The ALT levels of all patients gradually decreased to normal levels 7 to 10 days after surgery. Only 2 recipients had elevated levels of ALT higher than 1000 U/L. Four of 12 patients did not require red blood cell transfusion during surgery. Four patients appeared to have early allograft dysfunction, while others recovered smoothly.

Conclusions

This new surgical technique may shorten the anhepatic phase and decrease blood loss volume, aiding the success of liver transplant surgery. It can be used for most patients and does not increase the risk of complications or impair prognosis.

Peri-transplant lactate levels and delayed lactate clearance as predictive factors for poor outcomes after liver transplantation: A propensity score-matched study

This study aimed to investigate risk factors for early allograft dysfunction (EAD) and outcomes after liver transplantation (LT), focusing on peri-transplant lactate clearance. We reviewed patients who underwent deceased donor LTs between 2011 and 2014. Lactate levels were checked at reperfusion and at the time of intensive care unit admission. Early lactate clearance was defined as reduction rate of lactate between the times of reperfusion and immediately after LT. Patients were categorized into the normal and delayed clearance groups. We used propensity score matching (PSM) between these two groups to estimate an impact of lactate clearance on incidence of EAD and graft survival. A total of 256 recipients were eligible for this study. Cut-off value of lactate clearance to predict occurrence of EAD was determined at 0.2 mmol/L/h. After PSM, 120 patients in the normal clearance and 36 patients in the delayed clearance group were matched. Delayed lactate clearance was considered as an independent risk factor for EAD (Odds ratio 3.49, P = 0.002). The adjusted hazard of one-year graft loss was significantly increased in the delayed clearance group (hazard ratio 6.69, P = 0.001). In conclusion, peri-transplant delayed lactate clearance may be a strong predictor for EAD and poor liver graft outcomes.

Lipopolysaccharide and Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibit Interferon Signaling in Hepatocytes by Increasing Ubiquitin-Like Protease 18 (USP18) Expression

Inflammation may be maladaptive to the control of viral infection when it impairs interferon (IFN) responses, enhancing viral replication and spread. Dysregulated immunity as a result of inappropriate innate inflammatory responses is a hallmark of chronic viral infections such as, hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus (HCV). Previous studies from our laboratory have shown that expression of an IFN-stimulated gene (ISG), ubiquitin-like protease (USP)18 is upregulated in chronic HCV infection, leading to impaired hepatocyte responses to IFN-α. We examined the ability of inflammatory stimuli, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), lipopolysaccharide (LPS), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-10 to upregulate hepatocyte USP18 expression and blunt the IFN-α response. Human hepatoma cells and primary murine hepatocytes were treated with TNF-α/LPS/IL-6/IL-10 and USP18, phosphorylated (p)-STAT1 and myxovirus (influenza virus) resistance 1 (Mx1) expression was determined. Treatment of Huh7.5 cells and primary murine hepatocytes with LPS and TNF-α, but not IL-6 or IL-10, led to upregulated USP18 expression and induced an IFN-α refractory state, which was reversed by USP18 knockdown. Liver inflammation was induced in vivo using a murine model of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury. Hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury led to an induction of USP18 expression in liver tissue and promotion of lymphocytic choriomeningitis replication. These data demonstrate that certain inflammatory stimuli (TNF-α and LPS) but not others (IL-6 and IL-10) target USP18 expression and thus inhibit IFN signaling. These findings represent a new paradigm for how inflammation alters hepatic innate immune responses, with USP18 representing a potential target for intervention in various inflammatory states.

IMPORTANCE Inflammation may prevent the control of viral infection when it impairs the innate immune response, enhancing viral replication and spread. Blunted immunity as a result of inappropriate innate inflammatory responses is a common characteristic of chronic viral infections. Previous studies have shown that expression of certain interferon-stimulated genes is upregulated in chronic HCV infection, leading to impaired hepatocyte responses. In this study, we show that multiple inflammatory stimuli can modulate interferon stimulated gene expression and thus inhibit hepatocyte interferon signaling via USP18 induction. These findings represent a new paradigm for how inflammation alters hepatic innate immune responses, with the induction of USP18 representing a potential target for intervention in various inflammatory states.

Analysis of Post-Liver Transplant Hepatitis C Virus Recurrence Using Serial Cluster of Differentiation Antibody Microarrays

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection of the liver allograft after transplantation is universal, with some individuals suffering severe disease recurrence. Predictive markers of recurrent disease severity are urgently needed. In this study, we used a cluster of differentiation (CD) microarray to predict the severity of HCV recurrence after transplantation.

METHODS

The CD antibody microarray assays of live leukocytes were performed on peripheral blood taken in the first year after transplantation. The results were grouped into phases defined as; Pre-transplant (day 0), Early (day 3 to week 2), Mid (week 4 to week 10), and Late (week 12 to week 26). Hepatitis C virus severity was based on fibrosis stages in the first 2 years (F0-1 mild and F2-4 severe).

RESULTS

Serial blood samples from 16 patients were taken before and after liver transplantation. A total of 98 assays were performed. Follow-up was 3 years or longer. Comparing recurrence severity, significantly greater numbers of CD antigens were differentially expressed on the pretransplant samples compared to any posttransplant timepoints. Five differentially expressed CD antigens before transplantation (CD27 PH, CD182, CD260, CD41, and CD34) were significantly expressed comparing severe to mild recurrence, whereas expression of only CD152 was significant in the late phase after transplantation. No relationship was observed between the donor or recipient interleukin-28B genotypes and HCV recurrence severity.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that circulating leukocyte CD antigen expression has utility in assessing recurrent HCV disease severity after liver transplantation and serves as a proof of principle. Importantly, pretransplant CD antigen expression is most predictive of disease outcome.

Management of Hepatitis C Post-liver Transplantation: a Comprehensive Review

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a common cause of chronic liver disease, and HCV-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma are the leading causes for liver transplantation in the Western world. Recurrent infection of the transplanted liver allograft is universal in patients with detectable HCV viremia at the time of transplant and can cause a spectrum of disease, ranging from asymptomatic chronic infection to an aggressive fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Recurrent HCV is more aggressive in the post-transplant population and is a leading cause of allograft loss, morbidity, and mortality. Historically, treatment of recurrent HCV has been limited by low rates of treatment success and high side effect profiles. Over the past few years, promising new therapies have emerged for the treatment of HCV that have high rates of sustained virological response without the need for interferon based regimens. In addition to being highly effective, these treatments have higher rates of adherence and a lower side effect profile. The purpose of this review is to summarize current therapies in recurrent HCV infection, to review the recent advances in therapy, and to highlight areas of ongoing research.

Recurrent HCV after liver transplantation-mechanisms, assessment and therapy

Chronic HCV infection is the leading indication for liver transplantation. However, as a result of HCV recurrence, patient and graft survival after liver transplantation are inferior compared with other indications for transplantation. HCV recurrence after liver transplantation is associated with considerable mortality and morbidity. The development of HCV-related fibrosis is accelerated after liver transplantation, which is influenced by a combination of factors related to the virus, donor, recipient, surgery and immunosuppression. Successful antiviral therapy is the only treatment that can attenuate fibrosis. The advent of direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) has changed the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of patients with HCV. DAAs have improved tolerability, and can potentially be used without PEG-IFN for a shorter time than previous therapies, which should result in better outcomes. In this Review, we describe the important risk factors that influence HCV recurrence after liver transplantation, highlighting the mechanisms of fibrosis and the integral role of hepatic stellate cells. Indirect and direct assessment of fibrosis, in addition to new antiviral therapies, are also discussed.

Post-liver transplant hepatitis C virus recurrence: an unresolved thorny problem

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis represents the leading cause of liver transplantation in developed, Western and Eastern countries. Unfortunately, liver transplantation does not cure recipient HCV infection: reinfection universally occurs and disease progression is faster after liver transplant. In this review we focus on what happens throughout the peri-transplant phase and in the first 6-12 mo after transplantation: during this crucial period a completely new balance between HCV, liver graft, the recipient's immune response and anti-rejection therapy is achieved that will deeply affect subsequent outcomes. Nearly all patients show an early graft reinfection, with HCV viremia reaching and exceeding pre-transplant levels; in this setting, histological assessment is essential to differentiate recurrent hepatitis C from acute or chronic rejection; however, differentiating the two patterns remains difficult. The host immune response (mainly cellular mediated) appears to be crucial both in the control of HCV infection and in the genesis of rejection, and it is also strongly influenced by immunosuppressive treatment. At present no clear immunosuppressive strategy could be strongly recommended in HCV-positive recipients to prevent HCV recurrence, even immunotherapy appears to be ineffective. Nonetheless it seems reasonable that episodes of rejection and over-immunosuppression are more likely to enhance the risk of HCV recurrence through immunological mechanisms. Both complete prevention of rejection and optimization of immunosuppression should represent the main goals towards reducing the rate of graft HCV reinfection. In conclusion, post-transplant HCV recurrence remains an unresolved, thorny problem because many factors remain obscure and need to be better determined.

Peritransplant absolute lymphocyte count as a predictive factor for advanced recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Lymphocytes play an active role in natural immunity against hepatitis C virus (HCV). We hypothesized that a lower absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) may alter HCV outcome after liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of peritransplant ALC on HCV recurrence following LT. A total of 289 LT patients between 2005 and 2011 were evaluated. Peritransplant ALC (pre-LT, 2-week, and 1-month post-LT) and immunosuppression were analyzed along with recipient and donor factors in order to determine risk factors for HCV recurrence based on METAVIR fibrosis score. When stratifying patients according to pre- and post-LT ALC (<500/μL versus 500-1,000/μL versus >1,000/μL), lymphopenia was significantly associated with higher rates of HCV recurrence with fibrosis (F2-4). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed posttransplant ALC at 1 month remained an independent predictive factor for recurrence (P = 0.02, hazard ratio [HR] = 2.47 for <500/μL). When peritransplant ALC was persistently low (<500/μL pre-LT, 2-week, and 1-month post-LT), patients were at significant risk of developing early advanced fibrosis secondary to HCV recurrence (F3-4 within 2 years) (P = 0.02, HR = 3.16). Furthermore, severe pretransplant lymphopenia (<500/μL) was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0.01, HR = 3.01). The use of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction (RATG) had a remarkable protective effect on HCV recurrence (P = 0.02, HR = 0.6) despite its potential to induce lymphopenia. Subgroup analysis indicated that negative effects of posttransplant lymphopenia at 1 month (<1,000/μL) were significant regardless of RATG use and the protective effects of RATG were independent of posttransplant lymphopenia.

CONCLUSION

Peritransplant ALC is a novel and useful surrogate marker for prediction of HCV recurrence and patient survival. Immunosuppression protocols and peritransplant management should be scrutinized depending on peritransplant ALC.

Hepatitis C recurrence: the Achilles heel of liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation worldwide; however, recurrence post transplant is almost universal and follows an accelerated course. Around 30% of patients develop aggressive HCV recurrence, leading to rapid fibrosis progression (RFP) and culminating in liver failure and either death or retransplantation. Despite many advances in our knowledge of clinical risks for HCV RFP, we are still unable to accurately predict those most at risk of adverse outcomes, and no clear consensus exists on the best approach to management. This review presents a critical overview of clinical factors shown to influence the course of HCV recurrence post transplant, with particular focus on recent data identifying the important role of metabolic factors, such as insulin resistance, in HCV recurrence. Emerging data for genetic markers of HCV recurrence and their usefulness for predicting adverse outcomes will also be explored.

Female donor to male recipient gender discordance results in inferior graft survival: a prospective study of 1,042 liver transplants

BACKGROUND

The influence of donor-recipient gender mismatch on outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of donor and recipient gender discordance on graft survival.

METHODS

All patients who underwent primary LT from 1994-2012 at a single-center were identified prospectively. Clinico-demographic data were collected at the time of LT and last follow-up. Gender match included both male donor to male recipient (MM) and female donor to female recipient (FF), while gender mismatch included female donor to male recipient (FM) and male donor to female recipient (MF). Survival curves for graft survival were generated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Unadjusted and multivariate adjusted COX regression analyzing graft survival at up to 10 years post-transplant was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,042 subjects fulfilled the criteria. Graft survival in patients receiving a donor-recipient gender match was better than those receiving a gender mismatch (P = 0.047). Female-to-male transplants had the worst graft survival of all combinations (P < 0.001); this difference was maintained in multivariate regression after adjustment for recipient and donor variables (hazards ratio 2.09, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

Female-to-male liver transplants are associated with a statistically significant poorer graft survival as compared with other donor-recipient gender groups.

Hepatic preservation injury: severity of hepatitis C recurrence and survival after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Preservation injury in the HCV liver transplant population has been reported to correlate with poorer survival outcomes compared to preservation injury in the non-HCV liver transplant population. However, determinants of progression to cirrhosis in HCV infection remain poorly defined in this population.

AIM

This study aimed to determine if the presence and severity of preservation injury impact the acceleration of HCV recurrence and survival after liver transplant.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed liver transplant HCV patients over a 10-year period. Biopsies from postoperative day 7 were assessed for preservation injury and 4- and 12-month biopsies were assessed for fibrosis. Patients with Ishak fibrosis >0.8 Units/year were considered rapid fibrosers.

RESULTS

Our study group consisted of 255 patients. The mean age was 49.3 years old, 180 (70.6 %) were male, and 221 (86.7 %) were Caucasian. The incidence of preservation injury on the 7-day biopsy was 69.0 %. A strong correlation between postoperative peak AST within the first week and preservation injury was found. The overall prevalence of rapid fibrosers at 4 months, 1 and 2 years was 47.4, 75.2, and 58.9 %, respectively. The prevalence of rapid fibrosers at 4 months, 1 and 2 years between patients with or without preservation injury was not statistically significant (p = 0.39, p = 0.46, and p = 0.53, respectively). No differences were seen between patients with and without PI in terms of patient and graft survival.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the presence and severity of preservation injury were not associated with development of rapid HCV recurrence or worsening in survival.

Liver transplantation with piggyback anastomosis using a linear stapler: a case report

The so-called piggyback technique of liver transplantation (PB-LT) preserves the recipient's caval vein, shortening the warm ischemic time. It can be reduced even further by using a linear stapler for the cavocaval anastomosis. Herein, we have presented a case of a patient undergoing a side-to-side, whole-organ PB-LT for cryptogenic cirrhosis. Upper and lower orifices of the donor caval vein were closed at the back table using a running 5-0 polypropylene suture. Three stay sutures were then placed on caudal parts of both the recipient and donor caval with a 5-mm venotomies. The endoscopic linear stapler was placed upward through the orifices and fired. A second stapler was placed more cranially and fired resulting in a 8-9 cm long cavocavostomy. Some loose clips were flushed away from the caval lumen. The caval anastomosis was performed within 4 minutes; the time needed to close the caval vein stapler insertion orifices (4-0 polypropylene running suture) before reperfusion was 1 minute. All other anastomoses were performed as typically sutured. The presented technique enables one to reduce the warm ischemic time, which can be of particular importance with marginal grafts.

Living-donor liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompression. In areas with low deceased-donor organ availability like Japan, living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is similarly indicated for HCV cirrhosis as deceased-donor liver transplantation (DDLT) in Western countries and accepted as an established treatment for HCV-cirrhosis, and the results are equivalent to those of DDLT. To prevent graft failure due to recurrent hepatitis C, antiviral treatment with pegylated-interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. In contrast to DDLT, many Japanese LDLT centers have reported modified treatment regimens as best efforts to secure first graft, such as aggressive preemptive antiviral treatment, escalation of dosages, and elongation of treatment duration.

Spanish society of liver transplantation (SETH) consensus recommendations on hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation

In November 2010, the Spanish Society of Liver Transplantation (Sociedad Española de Trasplante Hepático, SETH) held a consensus conference. One of the topics of debate was liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis C. This document reviews (i) the natural history of post-transplant hepatitis C, (ii) factors associated with post-transplant prognosis in patients with hepatitis C, (iii) the role of immunosuppression in the evolution of recurrent hepatitis C and response to antiviral therapy, (iv) antiviral therapy, both before and after transplantation, (v) follow-up of patients with recurrent hepatitis C and (vi) the role of retransplantation.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis C from donation after cardiac death donors: an analysis of OPTN/UNOS data

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver transplantation is increasing largely because of a shortage of organs. However, there are almost no data that have specifically assessed the impact of using DCD livers for HCV patients. We retrospectively studied adult primary DCD liver transplantation (630 HCV, 1164 non-HCV) and 54 129 donation after brain death (DBD) liver transplantation between 2002 and 2009 using the UNOS/OPTN database. With donation after brain death (DBD) livers, HCV recipients had significantly inferior graft survival compared to non-HCV recipients (p < 0.0001). Contrary to DBD donors, DCD livers used in HCV patients showed no difference in graft survival compared to non-HCV patients (p = 0.5170). Cox models showed DCD livers and HCV disease had poorer graft survival (HR = 1.80 and 1.28, p < 0.0001, respectively). However, the hazard ratio of DCD and HCV interaction was 0.80 (p = 0.02) and these results suggest that DCD livers on HCV disease do not fare worse than DCD livers on non-HCV disease. The graft survival of recent years (2006-2009) was significantly better than that in former years (2002-2005) (p = 0.0482). In conclusion, DCD liver transplantation for HCV disease showed satisfactory outcomes. DCD liver transplantation can be valuable option for HCV related end-stage liver disease.

Donor graft steatosis influences immunity to hepatitis C virus and allograft outcome after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is universal, often with accelerated allograft fibrosis. Donor liver steatosis is frequently encountered and often associated with poor early postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that allograft steatosis alters immune responses to HCV and self-antigens promoting allograft fibrosis.

METHODS

Forty-eight HCV OLT recipients (OLTr) were enrolled and classified based on amount of allograft macrovesicular steatosis at time of OLT. Group 1: no steatosis (0%-5% steatosis, n=21), group 2: mild (5%-35%, n=16), and group 3: moderate (>35%, n=11). Cells secreting interleukin (IL)-17, IL-10, and interferon gamma (IFN-γ) in response to HCV antigens were enumerated by Enzyme Linked Immunospot Assay. Serum cytokines were measured by Luminex, antibodies to Collagen I, II, III, IV, and V by ELISA.

RESULTS

OLTr of moderate steatotic grafts had the highest incidence of advanced fibrosis in protocol 1 year post-OLT biopsy (10.8% vs. 15.8% vs. 36.6%, r=0.157, P<0.05). OLTr from groups 2 and 3 had increased HCV-specific IL-17 (P<0.05) and IL-10 (P<0.05) with reduced IFN-γ (P<0.05) secreting cells when compared with group 1. This was associated with increase in serum IL-17, IL-10, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-5, and decreased IFN-γ. In addition, there was development of antibodies to Collagen I, II, III and V in OLTr with increased steatosis (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that allograft steatosis influences post-OLT HCV-specific immune responses leading to an IL-17 T-helper response and activation of humoral immune responses to liver-associated self-antigens that may contribute to allograft fibrosis and poor outcome.

Liver transplantation using Donation after Cardiac Death donors

The success of solid organ transplantation has brought about burgeoning waiting lists with insufficient donation rates and substantial waiting list mortality. All countries have strived to expand donor numbers beyond the standard Donation after Brain Death (DBD). This has lead to the utilization of Donation after Cardiac Death (DCD) donors, also frequently referred to as Non-Heart Beating Donors (NHBD). Organs from these donors inevitably sustain warm ischaemic damage which varies in its extent and affects early graft function as well as graft survival. As a consequence, 'non-vital' organs such as renal transplants have increased rapidly from DCD donors but more 'vital' organ transplants such as the liver have lagged behind. However, an increasing proportion of liver transplants are now derived from DCD donors. This article covers this expansion, current results, pitfalls, and steps taken to minimize complications and to improve outcome, and future developments that are likely to occur.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis C

Hepatitis-C-virus- (HCV-) related end-stage cirrhosis is the primary indication for liver transplantation in many countries. Unfortunately, however, HCV is not eliminated by transplantation and graft reinfection is universal, resulting in fibrosis, cirrhosis, and finally graft decompensation. The use of poor quality organs, particularly from older donors, has a highly negative impact on the severity of recurrence and patient/graft survival. Although immunosuppressive regimens have a considerable impact on the outcome, the optimal regimen after liver transplantation for HCV-infected patients remains unclear. Disease progression monitoring with protocol biopsy and new noninvasive methods is essential for predicting patient/graft outcome and starting antiviral treatment with the appropriate timing. Antiviral treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is currently considered the most promising regimen with a sustained viral response rate of around 30% to 35%, although the survival benefit of this regimen remains to be investigated. Living-donor liver transplantation is now widely accepted as an established treatment for HCV cirrhosis and the results are equivalent to those of deceased donor liver transplantation.

Increased risk of severe recurrence of hepatitis C virus in liver transplant recipients of donation after cardiac death allografts

BACKGROUND

In hepatitis C virus (HCV) recipients of donation after cardiac death (DCD) grafts, there is suggestion of lower rates of graft survival, indicating that DCD grafts themselves may represent a significant risk factor for severe recurrence of HCV.

METHODS

We evaluated all DCD liver transplant recipients from August 2006 to February 2011 at our center. Recipients with HCV who received a DCD graft (group 1, HCV+ DCD, n=17) were compared with non-HCV recipients transplanted with a DCD graft (group 2, HCV- DCD, n=15), and with a matched group of HCV recipients transplanted with a donation after brain death (DBD) graft (group 3, HCV+ DBD, n=42).

RESULTS

A trend of poorer graft survival was seen in HCV+ patients who underwent a DCD transplant (group 1) compared with HCV- patients who underwent a DCD transplant (group 2) (P=0.14). Importantly, a statistically significant difference in graft survival was seen in HCV+ patients undergoing DCD transplant (group 1) (73%) as compared with DBD transplant (group 3) (93%)(P=0.01). There was a statistically significant increase in HCV recurrence at 3 months (76% vs. 16%) (P=0.005) and severe HCV recurrence within the first year (47% vs. 10%) in the DCD group (P=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

HCV recurrence is more severe and progresses more rapidly in HCV+ recipients who receive grafts from DCD compared with those who receive grafts from DBD. DCD liver transplantation in HCV+ recipients is associated with a higher rate of graft failure compared with those who receive grafts from DBD. Caution must be taken when using DCD grafts in HCV+ recipients.

Hepatitis C recurrence is not adversely affected by the use of donation after cardiac death liver allografts

Many factors can worsen a recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation (LT). We sought to determine whether the use of donation after cardiac death (DCD) livers affects HCV recurrence. From January 2000 to June 2008, 37 HCV patients underwent LT with DCD allografts. The outcomes and severity of HCV recurrence were analyzed along with those for 74 matched control patients with HCV who received donation after brain death (DBD) livers. The 2 groups had similar donor and recipient characteristics, immunosuppression regimens, rates of acute cellular rejection (ACR), and HCV profiles. DCD patients had a higher incidence of primary nonfunction (19% versus 3%, P = 0.006) and significantly higher peak aspartate aminotransferase levels in comparison with DBD subjects, suggesting a greater degree of ischemia/reperfusion injury. Although the survival rates were not significantly different, DCD recipients had lower 1- and 5-year patient survival rates (83% and 69% versus 84% and 78%, respectively, P = 0.75) and graft survival rates (70% and 61% versus 82% and 74%, respectively, P = 0.24). Three hundred fourteen protocol and clinically indicated liver biopsy procedures were performed within 6 years after transplantation, and mixed modeling analysis showed that fibrosis progression rates were similar for the 2 groups (0.6 fibrosis units/year according to the Ishak modified staging system). The rates of severe HCV recurrence (retransplantation or death due to recurrent hepatitis C and/or the development of stage 4/6 fibrosis or worse within 2 years) were similar [3 DCD patients (8%) versus 11 DBD patients (15%), P = 0.38], and cytomegalovirus infection (hazard ratio = 7.9, P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval = 2.1-28.9) and ACR (hazard ratio = 6.2, P = 0.002, 95% confidence interval = 2.0-19.7) were the only independent risk factors for severe recurrence. In summary, although there was a trend of poorer overall outcomes in DCD patients, the use of DCD livers did not appear to adversely affect HCV recurrence after LT.

Human liver transplantation as a model to study hepatitis C virus pathogenesis

Hepatitis C is a leading etiology of liver cancer and a leading reason for liver transplantation. Although new therapies have improved the rates of sustained response, a large proportion of patients (approximately 50%) fail to respond to antiviral treatment, thus remaining at risk for disease progression. Although chimpanzees have been used to study hepatitis C virus biology and treatments, their cost is quite high, and their use is strictly regulated; indeed, the National Institutes of Health no longer supports the breeding of chimpanzees for study. The development of hepatitis C virus therapies has been hindered by the relative paucity of small animal models for studying hepatitis C virus pathogenesis. This review presents the strengths of human liver transplantation and highlights the advances derived from this model, including insights into viral kinetics and quasispecies, viral receptor binding and entry, and innate and adaptive immunity. Moreover, consideration is given to current and emerging antiviral therapeutic approaches based on translational research results.

Recipient age affects long-term outcome and hepatitis C recurrence in old donor livers following transplantation

We studied the role of donor and recipient age in transplantation/ischemia-reperfusion injury (TIRI) and short- and long-term graft and patient survival. Eight hundred twenty-two patients underwent deceased donor liver transplantation, with 197 donors being > or = 60 years old. We evaluated markers of reperfusion injury, graft function, and clinical outcomes as well as short- and long-term graft and patient survival. Increased donor age was associated with more severe TIRI and decreased 3- and 5-year graft survival (73% versus 85% and 72% versus 81%, P < 0.001) and patient survival (77% versus 88% and 77% versus 82%, P < 0.003). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and recipient age were the only independent risk factors for graft and patient survival in patients receiving an older graft. In the HCV(+) cohort (297 patients), patients > or = 50 years old who were transplanted with an older graft versus a younger graft had significantly decreased 3- and 5-year graft survival (68% versus 83% and 64% versus 83%, P < 0.009). In contrast, HCV(+) patients < 50 years old had similar 3- and 5-year graft survival if transplanted with either a young graft or an old graft (81% versus 82% and 81% versus 82%, P = 0.9). In conclusion, recipient age and HCV status affect the graft and patient survival of older livers. Combining older grafts with older recipients should be avoided, particularly in HCV(+) patients, whereas the effects of donor age can be minimized in younger recipients.

Molecular and cellular aspects of hepatitis C virus reinfection after liver transplantation: how the early phase impacts on outcomes

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease postliver transplantation is associated with an accelerated course in comparison with that observed in the nonimmunosuppressed individual. Outcomes in transplantation for this indication have, therefore, been a major area of clinical interest in the field of liver transplantation. The factors underlying the rapid progression of HCV-related liver disease posttransplantation are complex and multifactorial. Nevertheless, recent data indicate a range of parameters assessable early posttransplantation that may be useful in the prediction of outcome of transplantation for this condition. This overview, therefore, concentrates on the early events occurring postliver transplantation in the HCV-infected patient, and the implications of these recent observations for the pathogenesis of the various forms of HCV-related allograft injury.

Technique and outcome of autologous portal Y-graft interposition for anomalous right portal veins in living donor liver transplantation

This study was intended to describe in detail the surgical technique and long-term outcome of autologous portal vein (PV) Y-graft interposition for adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We assessed the outcome of 841 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT from January 2002 to December 2007 with respect to the reconstruction of double-graft PVs. PV anatomy of the donor livers was classified as type I in 796 patients (94.6%), type II in 15 patients (1.8%), and type III in 30 patients (3.6%). Seven type II grafts and all type III PV grafts had double PV orifices. Autologous PV Y-graft interposition was used in 31 patients, and complications occurred in only 1 patient during a median follow-up of 27 months. Overall, the 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 87.5% and 80.6%, respectively. Use of a Y-graft was not a risk factor for biliary complications, but the liver anatomy of anomalous PV per se seems to be associated with a higher occurrence of biliary complications, especially during the early posttransplant period. The favorable outcome and technical feasibility of autologous portal Y-graft interposition imply that this technique could be the standard procedure for reconstruction of right lobe grafts with double PV orifices.

Ischemic preconditioning of the liver: a few perspectives from the bench to bedside translation

Utilization of ischemic preconditioning to ameliorate ischemia/reperfusion injury has been extensively studied in various organs and species for the past two decades. While hepatic ischemic preconditioning in animals has been largely beneficial, translational efforts in the two clinical contexts--liver resection and decreased donor liver transplantation--have yielded mixed results. This review is intended to critically examine the translational data and identify some potential reasons for the disparate clinical results, and highlight some issues for further studies.

Risk of extended criteria donors in hepatitis C virus-positive recipients

1. An extended criteria donor is a donor who has certain characteristics that have an impact on the short-term and long-term outcomes of the recipient. 2. Grafts with reduced quality from extended criteria donors may show an increased sensitivity toward additional damaging events such as ischemia/reperfusion injury, acute rejection episodes, or recurrent hepatitis C. 3. Extended criteria donor features potentially having an impact on outcome in hepatitis C virus recipients include donor age, allograft steatosis, prolonged warm and cold ischemia times, and donation after cardiac death. 4. In hepatitis C virus-positive recipients, there is strong evidence showing an association between the use of grafts from older donors (>40-50 years) and increased fibrosis progression and reduced graft and patient survival. 5. A potential strategy to minimize the severity of recurrence is to optimize donor selection. Donor age limitations and exclusion of moderately to severely steatotic livers, in addition to minimization of ischemic times, may reduce the likelihood of preservation injury as well as biliary complications, which, in turn, have been shown to have an impact on survival for hepatitis C virus-positive recipients. 6. Although a donor graft biopsy is not required if an extended criteria donor is used, it is highly recommended when hepatitis C virus-positive donors, donation after cardiac death, or multiple extended criteria donor factors are involved.

Effect of ischemia-reperfusion on the incidence of acute cellular rejection and timing of histologic hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Because of a critical shortage of deceased donor (DD) livers, more extended criteria allografts are being utilized; these allografts are at increased risk for ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). We assessed whether, in a large cohort of patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV) either via a DD or live donor (LD), there was a relationship between the degree of IRI and the frequency and timing of acute cellular rejection (ACR) and histologic HCV recurrence.

METHODS

During an 8-year study, patients were separated into four groups based on peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels and three groups based on severity of IRI on postreperfusion liver biopsy.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time of 433 DD and 44 LD recipients was 1212 days. We noted a strong correlation in DD between peak ALT and the histologic degree of IRI (P = .01). There was no difference in the incidence or grade of ACR among the four groups. There was no correlation between the severity of IRI and the incidence or time to histologic recurrence of HCV.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of peak ALT correlated with the severity of IRI on postreperfusion liver biopsy. Among this large HCV cohort, there was no correlation between the severity of IRI and the incidence or timing of histologic HCV recurrence or incidence of ACR.

Risk factors for hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related end-stage liver disease is the main indication for liver transplantation performed in Europe and the United States. Recurrence of hepatitis C in the graft is universal and may lead to chronic hepatitis in most patients and to cirrhosis in 20-30% of patients within 5-10 years of transplantation. The natural history of HCV recurrence is highly variable but leads to a lower survival rate than other recurrent liver diseases. The immunosuppressed status and several other factors have been linked with the pattern and severity of recurrence. What remains controversial are those factors associated with fibrosis progression and how these could be modified to improve outcome of recurrent hepatitis C. No single factor but a combination of several factors is associated with fibrosis progression on the graft. The major factors associated with accelerated disease recurrence include: high viral load pre- (>10(6) IU / mL) and / or early post-transplantation (>10(7) IU / mL at 4 months), donor older than 40-50 years, prolonged ischaemic time, cytomegalovirus coinfection, over immunosuppression and / or abrupt changes in immunosuppression, HIV coinfection, infection by genotype 1b. Cautious follow-up of the pathology of the graft is mandatory including routine biopsies and / or noninvasive monitoring of fibrosis.

Mild donor liver steatosis has no impact on hepatitis C virus fibrosis progression following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

This study examines the impact of donor liver macrovesicular steatosis on recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease after liver transplantation.

METHODS

Between 1998 and 2004, 113 patients underwent liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis. Time to histologic recurrence (fibrosis score >or=2) was the primary endpoint of the study. Recurrence was graded according to the system of Ludwig and Batts. A Cox's proportional hazard regression model was used to analyse the association between donor liver steatosis and HCV recurrence.

RESULTS

Recurrence-free survival for patients who received steatotic grafts was 82% and 47% at 1 and 4 years, respectively, and 81% and 52% for patients who received a non-steatotic liver. Donor macrovesicular steatosis (5-45%) was found to have no impact on HCV recurrence (P=0.47). Donor age (P=0.02) and cold ischaemia time (P=0.01) were found to increase the relative risk of HCV recurrence. The estimated risk of HCV recurrence increased by 23% for every 10-year increase in donor age. Similarly the risk of recurrence increased by 13% for every 1-h increase in cold ischaemia time.

CONCLUSION

Mild-moderate donor liver macrovesicular steatosis has no impact on HCV recurrence after liver transplantation for HCV-related cirrhosis. Cold ischaemia time and donor age increased the likelihood of HCV recurrence.

Hepatitis C virus re-infection: new perspectives

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) re-infection of the liver graft has been recognized to be one of the most important factors that determines prognosis and outcome after liver transplantation in HCV-positive patients. Graft loss due to recurrent HCV re-cirrhosis and subsequent hepatic decompensation, which is the predominant cause of death among transplant recipients, reflects the prognostic significance of HCV re-infection. Despite better overall outcome after liver transplantation, the prognosis of HCV-infected patients has not improved during the last two decades. Recent data suggest that increased liver donor age and intensified immunosuppression of transplant patients are the most important contributors to this situation. Other prognostic factors need further confirmation to stratify risk constellations. As HCV cirrhosis has also become the leading indication for orthotopic liver transplantation, the therapeutic management of HCV re-infection is a central issue of liver transplantation. The antiviral approaches based on interferon (IFN) alpha and ribavirin combinations are still hampered by high toxicity and low efficacy. Sustained viral response rates are still as low as approximately 10-30% and further prospective clinical trials are mandatory to identify the best time point and schedule of antiviral treatment in transplant patients.

Therapeutic management of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Recurrent hepatitis C ranges from minimal damage to cirrhosis developing in a few months or years in a substantial proportion of transplant recipients. Different virus, host and donor factors are involved in the pathogenesis of recurrence, but many are poorly understood. Therapeutic strategies can be utilized in the pre-, peri- or posttransplantation setting. Antiviral therapy using interferon and ribavirin and modifying immunosuppression are the main strategies to prevent progression disease. The efficacy of interferon and ribavirin is limited and side effects, reduction/withdrawal are frequent. Current sustained virological response rates are approximately 28%. An optimal immunosuppression regimen has not been established. The choice of calcineurin inhibitors has not clearly been shown to affect histological hepatitis C virus (HCV) but higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids to treat acute rejection is associated with more severe recurrence. The manner in which the doses of immunosuppression are modified has more influence on HCV recurrence than the use of a specific drug per se. Debate about the influence of immunosuppressive regimens on HCV recurrence is ongoing. Potential antifibrotic therapy and new agents targeting HCV infection and replication are emerging and are anticipated to be added to our armentarium in battling recurrent HCV post-LT.

Approach to recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Histologic evidence of recurrence is apparent in approximately 50% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients in the first postoperative year. Approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft due to hepatitis C-associated allograft failure. HCV-infected recipients who undergo retransplantation have 5-year patient and graft survival rates that are broadly similar to those for transplant recipients who are not HCV infected. Although the choice of calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or both has not been clearly shown to affect histologic recurrence of hepatitis C, higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality and more severe histologic recurrence. In contrast to treatment of non-HCV-infected recipients, treatment of HCV-infected transplant recipients for acute cellular rejection is associated with attenuated patient survival. Steroid-resistant rejection with or without the use of T-cell-depleting therapies is associated with a greater than fivefold increased risk of mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin should be considered for treatment of recipients with histologically apparent recurrence of hepatitis C before total bilirubin exceeds 3 mg/dL. The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin and new immunosuppressive agents in the management of hepatitis C after transplant continues to evolve.

Recurrent hepatitis C post-transplantation: where are we now and where do we go from here? A report from the Canadian transplant hepatology workshop

Approximately 400 liver transplants are performed in Canada every year and close to 6000 per year in the United States. Forty per cent to 45% of all liver transplants are performed for patients with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease. These patients have a different natural history, new complication risks and different treatment efficacy than nontransplant HCV patients. Every effort must be made to identify those patients at highest risk for progressive liver disease post-transplant. Recurrent HCV is an Achilles' heel to transplant hepatology. The true natural history of this disease is only starting to unravel and many questions remain unanswered on the optimal management of these patients after liver transplantation. The present report summarizes the literature and ongoing research needs that are specific to HCV-related liver transplantation.

Recurrent hepatitis C posttransplant: early preservation injury may predict poor outcome

Organ cold/warm ischemia is thought to be a risk factor for increased severity of recurrence of hepatitis C (HCV) post liver transplantation. We had noted some HCV patients with preservation injury (PI) to have particularly poor outcomes. Our goal was to determine if PI on biopsy in HCV patients is associated with earlier, more rapidly progressive recurrence or graft and patient survival. Sixty-nine patients from the University of Nebraska transplant database were included: 23 HCV patients with PI (group = 1), 23 non-HCV patients with PI (group = 2), and 23 HCV patients without PI (group = 3). Patient groups were matched for gender, age, immunosuppression, and time of transplantation for analysis. No difference in time to recurrence was noted between HCV groups (256 vs. 316 days posttransplant). More patients in group 1 had progression to stage 3 or 4 fibrosis, compared to group 3 (43 vs. 9%, P = 0.02). One-year survival for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 78, 82, and 100% respectively, whereas 3-yr survival was 59, 82, and 88% (group 1 vs. group 2 or 3 respectively, P = 0.0055). There was no difference in survival between groups 2 and 3. Patients in group 1 that received antiviral treatment had improved survival, compared to those who did not (P = 0.012). Risk factors for poor survival on univariate analysis included severity of PI (Relative Risk = 2.78, P < 0.001) and donor age of >55 (P = 0.014). Multivariate analysis shows HCV is the most important factor. In conclusion, HCV transplant patients with evidence of early PI on biopsy have poorer survival outcomes than non-HCV transplant patients with PI or HCV transplant patients without PI. Consideration for antiviral therapy early in the posttransplant course may be warranted in this subset of patients.

Recurrent hepatitis C after retransplantation: factors affecting graft and patient outcome

Retransplantation (re-LT) of patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) carries significant morbidity and mortality, negatively impacting on an already scarce donor allograft pool. In this study, we investigated the outcome of allografts and patients after re-LT due to recurrent HCV. Between 1989 and 2002, 47 patients were retransplanted at our institution due to HCV-related graft failure. Clinical HCV recurrence after re-LT was diagnosed when patients had acute liver enzyme elevation correlated with histological recurrence. The independent influence of these variables on survival was tested using Cox regression model. Chi-squared tests were used to examine the influence of individual demographic and pre/perioperative variables on recurrence. Thirty-one (66%) patients died after re-LT (median 2.2 months). Donor age >60, clinical HCV recurrence, and graft failure due to cirrhosis were significant risk factors for mortality (risk ratios of 3.6, 3.3, and 2.4, respectively). Pre-LT MELD score was lower among survivors (22+/- 5 vs. 27+/- 8). Following re-LT, 38 patients had at least one biopsy due to acute liver dysfunction; 19 of them (50%) had recurrence within the first 3 months. High-dose solumedrol was correlated with early recurrence. No association was found between time of recurrence after the first LT and time of recurrence after re-LT. In conclusion, patients with cirrhosis due to recurrent HCV undergoing re-LT have an extremely high mortality rate; older allografts should be avoided in retransplanting these patients. The timing of clinical recurrence after initial liver transplantation is not predictive of the timing of recurrence after re-LT. Patients experiencing early graft failure due to accelerated forms of HCV should not be denied re-LT with the expectation that a similar disease course will occur after re-LT.

Ischaemic preconditioning in transplantation and major resection of the liver

BACKGROUND

Ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) contributes significantly to the morbidity and mortality of transplantation and major resection of the liver. Its severity is reduced by ischaemic preconditioning (IP), the precise mechanisms of which are not completely understood. This review discusses the pathophysiology and role of IP in this clinical setting.

METHODS

A Medline search was performed using the keywords 'ischaemic preconditioning', 'ischaemia-reperfusion injury', 'transplantation' and 'hepatic resection'. Additional articles were obtained from references within the papers identified by the Medline search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The mechanisms underlying hepatic IRI are complex, but IP reduces the severity of such injury in several animal models and in recent human trials. Increased understanding of the cellular processes involved in IP is of importance in the development of treatment strategies aimed at improving outcome after liver transplantation and major hepatic resection.

Enteral donor pre-treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid protects the liver against ischaemia-reperfusion injury in rats

Liver donor pre-treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) may protect against injury during transplantation. In the present study we evaluated whether enteral administration of UDCA has an effect on bile flow and protects the liver from injury related to transplantation. Wistar rats were used in liver perfusion (LP) and transplantation (LTx) models. Rats were enterally administered UDCA (800 mg/kg) 3 h before cold perfusion. In LP, bile flow and bile acid composition were analysed. In LTx, serum ALT and liver histology were analysed. LP showed biliary UDCA enrichment up to 36+/-13% in pre-treated rats, causing higher bile flow (P = 0.026) compared with control rats. LTx showed lower ALT and TUNEL positive hepatocytes in the UDCA group (P < 0.02 and P < 0.05). In conclusion, augmented bile salt-dependent bile flow is preserved in the liver after cold storage. Enteral donor pre-treatment with UDCA protects the liver against ischaemia-reperfusion injury.

Donor age affects fibrosis progression and graft survival after liver transplantation for hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The use of liver allografts from an older donor (OD) (age>50 years) is a widespread strategy to manage the disparity between supply and demand of organs for liver transplantation. This study determines the effect of OD allografts on fibrosis progression and graft survival after liver transplantation in patients with and without infection caused by hepatitis C virus (HCV).

METHODS

All patients undergoing liver transplantation at our center from March 1998 to December 2001 were analyzed. Protocol liver biopsies were performed at 1, 16, and 52 weeks after transplantation and yearly thereafter. One liver pathologist scored all biopsy specimens for modified hepatic activity index (0-18) and fibrosis (0-6).

RESULTS

A total of 402 patients (167 with HCV and 235 without HCV) underwent liver transplantation during the study period. Among patients with HCV, baseline characteristics of OD recipients were similar to younger donor (YD) (age<50 years) recipients. In patients with HCV, graft survival was shorter in OD graft recipients than in YD recipients (P<0.001). In patients without HCV, graft survival was independent of donor age. In patients with HCV, a fibrosis score of 3 or greater was present in 17% of OD recipients at 4 months and in 26% at 12 months after transplantation, compared with 8% of YD recipients at 4 months and 13% at 12 months (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Liver transplantation with OD grafts is associated with rapid progression of fibrosis and decreased graft survival in patients with HCV, but not in patients without HCV. OD grafts should be considered preferentially for patients without HCV.

Retransplantation for recurrent hepatitis C: positive aspects

1. The prevalence of retransplantation for hepatitis C (HCV) patients is stable (around 40%). 2. Survival models to predict outcome of retransplantation do not show that HCV is an independent variable with poor outcomes. 3. Using Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database from 1996-2002, retransplantation for HCV had similar outcomes to other causes of retransplantation. 4. Poorer outcomes were noted for retransplantation with MELD scores greater than 25. 5. Minimal survival thresholds need to be developed for retransplantation for all causes of retransplantation.

Outcome and management of hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related cirrhosis is the leading indication for liver transplantation. Reinfection of the allograft with HCV is universal in all patients with pretransplantation viremia, and leads to histologically proven hepatitis in 50%-80% of these patients. Recent data have demonstrated significantly higher mortality among HCV-positive liver transplant recipients. For this subgroup of patients, retransplantation remains highly controversial. As current antiviral therapy is limited in efficacy and tolerability, an improved understanding of those patients at greatest risk of developing serious HCV-induced graft injury is necessary to optimize treatment.

Natural history of hepatitis C and outcomes following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation and the infection recurs nearly universally following transplantation. Histologic evidence of recurrence is apparent in approximately 50% of HCV-infected recipients in the first postoperative year. Approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft secondary to hepatitis C-associated allograft failure in the medium term. HCV-infected recipients who undergo retransplantation experience 5-year patient and graft survival rates that are similar to recipients undergoing retransplantation who are not HCV-infected. While the choice of calcineurin inhibitor or the use of azathioprine have not been clearly shown to affect histologic recurrence of hepatitis C or the frequency of rejection in HCV-infected recipients, cumulative exposure to corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality, higher levels of HCV viremia, and more severe histologic recurrence. In contrast to non-HCV-infected recipients, treatment for acute cellular rejection is associated with attenuated patient survival among recipients with hepatitis C. The development of steroid-resistant rejection is associated with a greater than 5-fold increased risk of mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. In lieu of large studies in a posttransplant population, therapy with pegylated IFN (+/- ribavirin) should be considered in recipients with histologically apparent recurrence of hepatitis C before total bilirubin exceeds 3 mg/dl. The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin and new immunosuppression agents in the management of posttransplant hepatitis C infection is still evolving.

Factors that influence the severity of recurrent hepatitis C virus following liver transplantation

Poor outcomes following OLT for HCV disease have been associated with several host, viral, and non-host/non-viral factors. As is evident from the literature, there is confounding data in favor of and against these factors in the pathogenesis of severe recurrent HCV. Nevertheless, from a viral perspective, the patient most likely to achieve a good outcome following OLT is someone with low-level (< or = 10(9) copies/mL) HCV RNA viremia both pre- and post-OLT and a genotype other than lb. In terms of host factors, the patients with best outcomes are: whites, men, less than 49 years of age, receiving a donor liver less than 40 years of age, not coinfected with CMV, and have low HAI or histologic activity indices during the early stage of follow-up. Host recipient immune homology may or may not be a major factor in outcomes. A non-host, non-viral factor favoring less severe recurrence of HCV is a shorter warm ischemia time. Finally, features that may influence outcomes over which there is no control include: recipient age, recipient gender, and donor age (in the case of cadaveric donors). Unfortunately, the best-case scenario is uncommon.

Outcome of liver transplantation for patients infected by hepatitis C, including those infected by genotype 4

Predictors of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease posttransplantation are still unclear. The impact of HCV genotype on outcome of transplantation has been studied, but conclusions are not in agreement. The role of HCV genotype 4 on the result of liver transplantation requires further study. The aim of this study is to examine the outcome of liver transplantation for patients with HCV genotype-4 infection. The study group included 128 patients who underwent transplantation for HCV infection: 28 patients, genotype 1; 11 patients, genotype 2; 19 patients, genotype 3; and 32 patients, genotype 4. For 64 of 128 patients, genotype was known and an assessable histological specimen was available. Median interval from transplantation to biopsy was 1.92 years (range, 0.24 to 11.48 years). Twenty-six percent of HCV genotype-4 patients developed either severe fibrosis or cirrhosis versus 6.7% in the genotype non-4 group (P =.04). A statistically significant greater fibrosis progression rate was observed in genotype-4 than genotype non-4 patients. In univariate and multivariate analysis, rapid liver fibrosis was associated with the presence of HCV genotype-4 infection. In addition, donor and recipient age and graft warm ischemic time also were associated with rate of fibrosis progression. Five-year cumulative rates for the development of cirrhosis or severe liver fibrosis were 84% in genotype-4 and 24% in genotype non-4 patients (P =.02). Five-year survival rates for patients with genotypes 1, 2/3, and 4 were 72%, 80%, and 79%, respectively (P =.8). In conclusion, 5-year survival for patients who underwent transplantation for HCV genotype-4 infection was similar to that of genotype non-4 patients; however, more severe fibrosis and rapid fibrosis progression was observed after transplantation in patients with genotype-4 infection.

Recent advances in liver transplantation

Advances in liver transplantation continue to evolve but are hampered by continued increasing shortages in donor organs. This has resulted in a high incidence of patients dying while on the United Network for Organ Sharing waiting list. Indeed, we continue to assess ways of expanding the donor pool by using marginal donors, living donor liver transplantation, split liver transplantation, domino transplantation, and hepatic support systems to prolong survival long enough for the patient to undergo liver transplantation. Changes in the liver allocation policy to reduce the number of people dying while waiting for an organ are discussed. Implementation of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation system should help alleviate the problem of increasing deaths of patients while on the waiting list. Recurrent disease, particularly recurrent hepatitis C, continues to be a major problem, and effective therapy is needed to prevent both progression of hepatitis C and recurrence in the graft and avoid retransplantation. The use of pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin holds promise for improving the success in overcoming recurrent hepatitis C. Finally, advances in immunosuppression have reduced the incidence of acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection. However, these therapies have been fraught with metabolic complications that are now affecting quality of life and long-term survival. Tailoring immunosuppressive regimens to the individual patient is discussed.