Fiberoptic nasopharyngolaryngoscopy for airway monitoring after obstructive sleep apnea surgery

Are we able to predict airway dimensional changes in isolated mandibular setback?

The goal of this study was to determine whether a relationship exists between the amount of mandibular setback and the amount of airway dimensional changes. Records and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) of patients who had undergone isolated bilateral sagittal split osteotomy setback between January 1, 2013 and March 16, 2020 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome variable was upper airway volume dimension change, and the predictor variable was the magnitude of mandibular setback as measured by six different methods. Thirty-one patients were included in the study, with a mean mandibular setback ranging from 1.41 mm to 6.11 mm. None of the predictor variables showed an association with oropharyngeal (P = 0.54) or hypopharyngeal (P = 0.33) volume. Stepwise regression analysis failed to show any significant relationships. Similarly, there was no statistically significant association between any of the predictor variables and oropharyngeal (P = 0.44) or hypopharyngeal (P = 0.74) minimum axial area. The results showed that no correlation exists between the magnitude of mandibular setback and the amount of static airway dimensional changes; therefore, it may not be possible to predict whether obstructive sleep apnea will develop following mild to moderate mandibular setback based upon CBCT measurements.

Tomographic Analysis of the Impact of Mandibular Advancement Surgery on Increased Airway Volume

PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantify, using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) in patients who underwent a mandibular advancement surgery associated with genioplasty, three-dimensional changes in airway space and to evaluate whether these changes differ between men and women.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preoperative and 8-month postoperative CBCT scans of 38 patients aged 18-45 years of either sex and any ethnicity who underwent mandibular advancement surgery associated with genioplasty were analyzed using the Xoran software (Xoran Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). The linear distances gonion-gnathion (Go-Gn) and condylion-menton (Co-Me) were obtained. Airway volume was measured using the Dolphin Imaging software, version 11.0. Then, data were tabulated and analyzed using Student's t-test.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 30.3 years; 39.47% were men and 60.63% were women. The mean Go-Gn distance was 72.05 mm before surgery and 78.56 mm after surgery, with a mean gain of 6.51 mm. The mean Co-Me distance was 113.47 mm before surgery and 119.89 mm after surgery, with a mean increase of 6.42 mm. Both differences were statistically significant. The mean volume of airway space was 17,272.92 mm3 before surgery and 24,173.74 mm3 after surgery, with a statistically significant mean increase of 6900.82 mm3. There was no statistically significant difference in mean volumetric gain between men (7566.69 mm3) and women (7456.69 mm3).

CONCLUSION

Mandibular advancement surgery results in significant increase of airway space, and there is no difference in airway volume between men and women.

Impact of Perioperative Fluid Administration on Postoperative Morbidity and Length of Hospital Stay Following Maxillomandibular Advancement for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the volume of perioperative fluids administered to patients undergoing maxillomandibular advancement (MMA) for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative complications and prolonged length of hospital stay.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study design was implemented and patients undergoing MMA for OSA at the Mayo Clinic were identified from 2001 through 2014. The primary predictor variable was the total volume of intravenous fluids administered during MMA. The primary outcome variable was length of hospital stay in hours. Secondary outcome variables included the presence of complications incurred during postoperative hospitalization. Additional covariates abstracted included basic demographic data, preoperative body mass index, preoperative apnea-hypopnea index, preoperative Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists score, type of intravenous fluid administered, surgical complexity score, duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, and the use of planned intensive care unit admission. Univariate and multivariable models were developed to assess associations between the primary predictor variable and covariates relative to the primary and secondary outcome variables.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients undergoing MMA for OSA were identified. Total fluid volume was significantly associated with increased length of stay (odds ratio [OR] = 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.71; P = .020) in univariate analysis. Total fluid volume did not remain significantly associated with increased length of hospital stay in stepwise multivariable modeling. Total fluid volume was significantly associated with the presence of postoperative complications (OR = 1.69; 95% CI, 1.08-2.63; P = .021) in univariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

Fluid administration was not found to be significantly associated with increased length of hospital stay after MMA for OSA. Increased fluid administration might be associated with the presence of postoperative complications after MMA; however, future large multicenter studies will be required to more comprehensively assess this association.

Perioperative management of patients who have pulmonary disease

The identification of risk factors and optimization of respiratory status are crucial to the successful management of patients who have pulmonary disease and are undergoing a surgical procedure. This article explores the approach to pulmonary patients, from the preoperative assessment to the intraoperative and postoperative periods. The management of specific pulmonary disorders in the perioperative period is discussed.

[Surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea]

INTRODUCTION

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common disorder in adults, however it also occurs in neonates with severe mandibular hypoplasia. The clinical significance of OSA results from hypoxemia and sleep fragmentation due to a collapse of the upper airway. Recently OSA has received much attention due to its potentially serious consequences on cardiac function. Besides daytime sleepiness and fatigue life expectancy is significantly shortened by a higher risk for apoplectic insults and heart failures. This paper reviews common surgical procedures with an emphasis on jaw advancement procedures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In six adults (mean age 46,9 ys; 2 female, 4 male; BMI averaged 28kg/m(2)) suffering from OSA with a history of a long-lasting unsuccessful continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy a bimaxillary advancement was performed. The respiratory disturbance was preoperatively evaluated by polysomnography; daytime sleepiness was recorded according to the 'Epworth Sleepiness Scale'. Controls were performed six months after therapy. All patients had a regular intermaxillary relation. Bimaxillary advancement was planned and performed according to the principles of cranio-maxillofacial corrective surgery. To widen the posterior airway space much attention was focused on the advancement of the mandible by 10mm.

RESULTS

The apnea/hypopnea index decreased from preoperatively 37/h to 4/h after treatment. The minimal peripheral oxygen saturation increased from 78% to 89%, whereas the average oxygen saturation raised from 92 to 95%. The arousal index decreased from 24/h to 9/h. Periods of snoring were reduced from 29,5% to 6,9%. According to the 'Epworth Sleepiness Scale' the patients' estimation improved from a level of 11 to 4. Sleep had a recuperating effect. All surgical procedures were uneventful.

CONCLUSION

Standard treatment of OSA is the CPAP-therapy. In some patients, however, CPAP-therapy cannot be applied, fails or is not well accepted. A great variety of surgical procedures for the treatment of OSA have been described. Bimaxillary advancement in adults and osteodistraction in neonates are safe and successful surgical techniques for an immediate improvement in OSA. Osteodistraction treatment can help to avoid tracheotomy in neonates.