Repair of traumatic inferior orbital wall defects with nasoseptal cartilage

A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis on the use of autologous cartilage in the repair of orbital fractures

Introduction

Fractures of the orbit are common injuries within the maxillofacial skeleton, and can often result in restrictions to ocular movement, diplopia, and enophthalmous if herniation of globe content occurs. Various studies have demonstrated the use of autologous cartilage grafts in the reconstruction of orbital fractures.

Methods

A systematic review protocol was registered with PROSPERO, and reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Comprehensive electronic search strategies of four databases were developed. Studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent reviewers.

Results

Seven thousand one hundred seventy-one articles were identified following a comprehensive literature search. These articles were filtered for relevance and duplication, which reduced the number of articles to 16. A total of 259 patients underwent orbital reconstruction with the use of autologous cartilage. Conchal cartilage was harvested in 148 patients, auricular cartilage in 22 patients, nasoseptal cartilage in 72 patients, and costal cartilage in 17 patients. Thirty, seven, twelve, and four complications were observed in patients where cartilage was harvested from the concha, auricle, nasoseptum and rib, respectively. Most common complications included diplopia (n=23), infra-orbital para/anaesthesia (n=27), and enophthalmos (n=7). No failure of graft or donor site morbidity were observed in the studies.

Conclusion

Autogenous materials such as cartilage can be used as an alternative for orbital reconstruction. Cartilage was considered by the authors to provide adequate structural support to the orbital contents, and that it was easy to harvest, shape, and position.

Controversies and Contemporary Management of Orbital Floor Fractures

Substantial controversy exists regarding the timing of intervention and management of patients with orbital floor fractures. Recent advances in computer-aided technology, including the use of 3-dimensional printing, intraoperative navigational imaging, and the use of novel implants, have allowed for improvement in prospective management modalities. As such, this article aims to review the indications and timing of repair, surgical approaches, materials used for repair, and contemporary adjuncts to repair. Indications for orbital floor fracture repair remain controversial as many of these fractures heal without intervention or adverse sequelae. Intraoperative navigation and imaging, as well as endoscopic guidance, can improve visualization of defects mitigating implant positioning errors, thereby reducing the need for secondary corrective procedures. Patient-specific implants may be constructed to fit the individual patient's anatomy using the preoperative CT dataset and mirroring the contralateral unaffected side and have been shown to improve pre-operative efficiency and minimize postoperative complications. With increased data, we can hope to form evidence-based indications for using particular biomaterials and the criteria for orbital defect characteristics, which may be best addressed by a specific surgical approach.

The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review

The aim of this study is to present a narrative review of the properties of materials currently used for orbital floor reconstruction. Orbital floor fractures, due to their complex anatomy, physiology, and aesthetic concerns, pose complexities regarding management. Since the 1950s, a myriad of materials has been used to reconstruct orbital floor fractures. This narrative review synthesises the findings of literature retrieved from search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. This narrative review was conducted of 66 studies on reconstructive materials. Ideal material properties are that they are resorbable, osteoconductive, resistant to infection, minimally reactive, do not induce capsule formation, allow for bony ingrowth, are cheap, and readily available. Autologous implants provide reliable, lifelong, and biocompatible material choices. Allogenic materials pose a threat of catastrophic disease transmission. Newer alloplastic materials have gained popularity. Consideration must be made when deliberating the use of permanent alloplastic materials that are a foreign body with potential body interactions, or the use of resorbable alloplastic materials failing to provide adequate support for orbital contents. It is vital that surgeons have an appropriate knowledge of materials so that they are used appropriately and reduce the risks of complications.

Comparison of Nasoseptal Cartilage Graft Versus Titanium Mesh in Reconstruction of Pure Orbital Blowout Fractures

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of nasoseptal cartilage grafts versus titanium mesh implants in pure orbital blowout fractures.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 48 patients who had surgical repair of an orbital fracture. Patients who underwent pure orbital blowout fracture repair with either nasoseptal cartilage grafts or titanium mesh implants and at least 1 year postoperative follow-up were included in the study. The clinical features and treatment outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients fulfilled our study criteria and were included in the analyses. Nasoseptal graft was used in 12 patients (48%) while titanium mesh was preferred in 13 patients (52%). Preoperative clinical features including age, size of the floor defect, and preoperative clinical findings (enophthalmos, diplopia, and restriction of ocular motility) were similar between 2 groups. Mean postoperative follow-up was 14.7 ± 2.3 months in the nasoseptal group while it was 16.1 ± 2.5 months in the titanium group (P = 0.84). Diplopia and ocular motility limitation were resolved in all patients at the last postoperative follow-up visit, while 1 patient in each group had enophthalmos (8.3% versus 7.6%, P = 1.0). No patient in the nasoseptal group experienced postoperative complications while 2 patients in the titanium group (15.3%) developed material-related complications (P = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term clinical results of nasoseptal cartilage grafts and titanium mesh implants in pure orbital blowout fractures with preoperative floor defects smaller than 4 cm2 were comparable. Nasoseptal cartilage grafts may be preferred in patients with septal deviation and no spurs or turbinate hypertrophy.

A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction

Orbital fractures are common fractures of the midface. As such, numerous techniques and materials exist for the repair of this region, each with inherent advantages and disadvantages. But does the ideal implant material exist? Should we stop and simply use readily available materials, or should the cycle of need and discovery continue? A comprehensive review of materials used in orbital reconstruction and possible new directions in orbital floor reconstruction are presented.

Use of anteriolateral wall of maxilla for reconstruction of orbital floor fracture: A clinical study

Purpose:

The aim of the present study was to assess the utility of anterolateral wall of maxilla as a bone graft to reconstruct the continuity of orbital floor.

Materials and Methods

This study was carried out at Datarkar Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Pratap Nagar, Nagpur. Out of five patients selected, three were male and two were female. All the patients had intact anterolateral wall of maxilla on contralateral side. In all the patients the reduction of the zygomatic complex fracture was done by Keen's approach. The fractures were stabilized by miniplates. From the contralateral sides,bone graft of 1.5 × 2 cm size was harvested from which were intact in all the patients. All the patients were reviewed at regular interval, initially once every week for 1 month, followed by once in every month for next 6 months postoperatively.

Results:

Five patients with orbital floor defects of medium size average 1.16 cm size (range 0.8-1.5 cm) were grafted by using autogenous bone graft harvested from anterolateral wall of maxilla. All the patients were successfully reconstructed with restoration of the orbital wall continuity. We have not come across any complications like infection, exposure, and extrusion of the graft. Only one patient did not show much improvement in enopthalmous where the size of the defect was large.

Conclusions:

The use of harvested bone graft from the anterolateral wall of the maxilla is better option for the reconstruction of orbital floor defects.

Structural pedicled mucochondral-osteal nasoseptal flap: a novel method for orbital floor reconstruction after sinonasal and skull base tumor resection

Unrepaired orbital floor defects after sinonasal and skull-base tumor resection can lead to herniation of orbital contents into the maxillary or ethmoidal sinuses, possibly resulting in infection and significant cosmetic and functional deficits. Orbital floor defects are usually repaired using prosthetic implants or autogenous material. Nasal septal cartilage has been used previously as a free graft for reconstruction. However, its reliance on local vascular supply can result in ischemia and necrosis in the postoperative period. The vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap, consisting of mucoperichondrium and mucoperiosteum, is routinely used as an effective reconstruction method for endoscopic repair of cerebrospinal fluid leaks arising from skull base dural defects. However, this flap does not provide rigid structural reconstruction when used alone. We report a case of an orbital floor defect repaired using a pedicled mucochondral-osteal nasoseptal flap. This technique incorporates the structural component of the nasal septal cartilage and bone with the vascularized pedicled nasoseptal flap. This repair technique may be useful in patients requiring postoperative radiotherapy.

Biomaterials for repair of orbital floor blowout fractures: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reported use and outcomes of implant materials used for the restoration of post-traumatic orbital floor defects in adults.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic search of the English literature was performed in the databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The study selection process was adapted from the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, and 55 articles complied with the study inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measures were diplopia, enophthalmos, graft extrusion/displacement, and infection related to the graft material. The secondary outcome measures were infraorbital paresthesia, orbital dystopia, orbital soft tissue entrapment, and donor-site complications.

RESULTS

Of 55 articles, 41 (74.5%) evaluated were retrospective case series, 9 (16.4%) were retrospective case-control studies, 3 (5.5%) were controlled trials, and 2 (3.6%) were prospective case series. Autogenous graft materials were predominantly used in 19 studies, alloplastic materials were used in 33 studies, and the remaining 3 articles reported on allogeneic materials. Overall, 19 different types of implant materials were used in 2,483 patients. Of 827 patients with diplopia before surgery, 151 (18.3%) had diplopia postoperatively. Of 449 patients with enophthalmos before surgery, 134 (29.8%) had enophthalmos postoperatively. Only 2 patients (0.1%) and 14 patients (0.6%) had graft extrusion/displacement and infection related to the graft material, respectively; alloplastic biomaterials were used in all of these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

All graft materials used were successful to variable degrees because all studies reported improvement in terms of the recorded outcome measures. A guideline for choice of implant material based on defect size was developed.

Management of zygomatic complex residual deformity due to war in Iraq

INTRODUCTION

Since March 20, 2003, maxillofacial surgeons in Iraq encounter several trauma cases, part of which are zygomatic residual deformities that result from conventional war, civil unrest, crimes, and car explosions. This study aimed to determine the relationship between etiological factors and severity of posttraumatic zygomatic residual deformity and to investigate methods of surgical repairs, treatment modalities, and any complications that may have occurred during this critical time in Iraq.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were a total of 40 patients with posttraumatic deformity of the zygoma included in this study. Records of these patients (29 men and 11 women) who have been treated in the maxillofacial unit of a specialized surgery hospital (Medical City Hospital, Baghdad) between 2006 and 2011 were collected.

RESULTS

Of all patients, 28 (70%) had injuries from missile whereas 12 patients (30%) had injuries from other causes (aggressive social behavior). According to the causes of delayed treatment, 30 patients (60%) were untreated previously (15 patients [50%] of them had delay because severe comminution, severe damage, or loss of the overlying soft tissue; 3 patients [10%] were undiagnosed; and 12 patients [40%] had treatment delayed as a result of major damage to other body parts or medical condition), 3 patients (30%) had improper reduction, and 7 patients (70%) had improper fixation. Our definitive treatment was as follows: 13 patients (32.5%) were treated by osteotomy, 10 patients (25%) were treated by onlay bone graft, 14 patients (35 %) were treated by both methods, and 3 patients (7.5%) were untreated.

CONCLUSIONS

[corrected] We recommend that every surgeon who deals with residual deformity should clinically evaluate the residual deformity.

Biomaterials and implants for orbital floor repair

Treatment of orbital floor fractures and defects is often a complex issue. Repair of these injuries essentially aims to restore the continuity of the orbital floor and to provide an adequate support to the orbital content. Several materials and implants have been proposed over the years for orbital floor reconstruction, in the hope of achieving the best clinical outcome for the patient. Autografts have been traditionally considered as the "gold standard" choice due to the absence of an adverse immunological response, but they are available in limited amounts and carry the need for extra surgery. In order to overcome the drawbacks related to autografts, researchers' and surgeons' attention has been progressively attracted by alloplastic materials, which can be commercially produced and easily tailored to fit a wide range of specific clinical needs. In this review the advantages and limitations of the various biomaterials proposed and tested for orbital floor repair are critically examined and discussed. Criteria and guidelines for optimal material/implant choice, as well as future research directions, are also presented, in an attempt to understand whether an ideal biomaterial already exists or a truly functional implant will eventually materialise in the next few years.

Comparison of conchal cartilage graft with nasal septal cartilage graft for reconstruction of orbital floor blowout fractures

Our aim was to compare autogenous nasal septal cartilage and conchal cartilage as grafts for reconstruction of orbital blowout fractures. Twenty-two patients with blowout fractures were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with a graft of nasal septal cartilage or conchal cartilage. Patients were evaluated for the presence of enophthalmos, diplopia, dysfunction of the infraorbital nerve, and restriction of the ocular muscles. Patients with enophthalmos of more than 2 mm were included in the study, and were followed up postoperatively at 10 days, 1 month, and 3-6 months. The patients treated with a nasal septal cartilage graft had significantly better correction of enophthalmos than those treated with conchal cartilage (p=0.02) after 10 days (p=0.02), 1 month (p=0.004), and 3-6 months (p=0.001). There was significantly less residual enophthalmos in the nasal septal graft group after 1 month (0.91 compared with 1.72 mm, p=0.02), and after 3-6 months (1.0 compared with 2.54 mm, p=0.008). Correction of enophthalmos was considerably better in patients who were operated on within 4 weeks of injury. We think that nasal septal cartilage is a better graft than conchal cartilage for reconstruction of blowout fractures. The time to intervention (the earlier the better) is a critical point in the correction of enophthalmos.

Effectiveness of a nasoseptal cartilaginous graft for repairing traumatic fractures of the inferior orbital wall

The goals of reconstruction after an orbital fracture are to restore the continuity of the floor, provide support for the orbital contents, and prevent fibrosis of the soft tissues. Nasoseptal cartilage is an easily accessible, abundant, and autogenous source that supports the orbital floor and gives minimal donor site morbidity. We evaluated the effectiveness of nasoseptal cartilage for repairing traumatic defects of the orbital floor. Autogenous nasoseptal cartilage was used in 20 patients. Presence or absence of diplopia, enophthalmos, paraesthesia of the infraorbital nerve, dystopia, range of covering of the defect by nasoseptal cartilage, complications at the recipient and donor sites, resorption of the graft, and ocular mobility disorders were recorded. Entrapment of orbital tissues, a large orbital defect (more than 50% of orbital floor or more than 8mm), or defects of the orbital floor with involvement of other fractures of the zygomaticofrontal complex are indications for exploration of the orbit. In one case after 24 months, the surgical field was explored for direct evaluation of the efficacy of the graft. All patients were treated successfully by restoration of the continuity of the orbital floor. Six months to 2 years follow up showed only one patient with postoperative enophthalmos. There was no donor site morbidity, and no grafts became infected or extruded. The nasoseptal graft was completely covered with underlying tissue. Nasoseptal cartilage is readily accessible autogenous tissue that should be considered when an autogenous graft is needed for reconstruction of a defect of the orbital floor.

Diagnosis and management of enophthalmos

Enophthalmos is a relatively frequent and misdiagnosed clinical sign in orbital diseases. The knowledge of the different etiologies of enophthalmos and its adequate management are important, because in some cases, it could be the first sign revealing a life-threatening disease. This article provides a comprehensive review of the pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of enophthalmos. The main etiologies, such as trauma, chronic maxillary atelectasis (silent sinus syndrome), breast cancer metastasis, and orbital varix, will be discussed. Its objective is to enable the reader to recognize, assess, and treat the spectrum of disorders causing enophthalmos.

Repair of Traumatic Orbital Wall Defects Using Conchal Cartilage

BACKGROUND

The authors' aim was to investigate the efficiency of conchal cartilage grafts in defective orbital wall fractures, which are encountered isolated or in combination with other orbitozygomatic fractures. The authors assessed, for this purpose, the follow-up results of patients treated by using conchal cartilage grafts.

METHODS

Ten patients who had defective orbital wall fractures and were treated by using conchal cartilage graft among those treated for facial fractures in the authors' clinic were included in the study. The wall defects in the patients were detected either with preoperative radiologic images or with orbital exploration performed to look for a possible defect accompanying the fracture with orbital extension during the operation. In all patients (four isolated and six combined orbital fractures), who had defects varying from 100 to 400 mm, conchal cartilage grafts were adapted to the defect. In the postoperative follow-up, Hertel exophthalmometry was also performed together with clinical examination so that enophthalmos that might develop as a complication could be assessed.

RESULTS

In the postoperative period, cartilage graft was palpated slightly in two patients at the edge of the infraorbital rim. Limitation in eye movement, diplopia, and enophthalmos did not occur in our patients, except for one who reported to us 1 year after the primary trauma. No complication in the donor area was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Conchal cartilage could be considered one of the autogenous materials among those materials suitable for the repair of defective orbital wall fractures that are not oversized. It has the advantages of being adequate for reconstruction of the fracture, easy to obtain, easily adaptable to the orbital walls, and having minimum morbidity at the donor site.

In Vitro Cartilage Regeneration From Proliferated Adult Elastic Chondrocytes

The purpose of this study was to investigate cellular feasibility in the proliferation and differentiation status of adult chondrocytes for cartilage regeneration in comparison to fetal chondrocytes. Primary cells were isolated from adult (n = 6) and fetal (n = 6) sheep ear cartilages and expanded in 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) containing Ham's F12 medium, in which adult and fetal cell proliferation rates were compared using a WST-1 assay kit. Approximately 4 million cells were seeded onto each 1 x 1 x 0.2-cm (200 microL) nonwoven fabric scaffold made from polyglycolic acid. Cell/polymer constructs were cultured in serum-free DMEM/F12 medium supplemented with 5 ng/mL TGF-beta2 and 5 ng/mL des(1-3)IGF-I (adult chondrocytes, group A) or in 10% FBS containing Ham's F12 medium (adult chondrocytes, group B, and fetal chondrocytes, group C) as controls in a rotating bioreactor for 6 weeks. The proliferation assay showed that fetal cells had a significantly better growth potential than did adult cells. Histology and extracellular matrix analyses revealed that groups A and C qualitatively displayed better matrix deposition than did group B. In conclusion, although adult sheep elastic chondrocytes had less growth potential than did fetal cells, the serum-free medium supplemented with growth factors significantly enhanced the production of cartilage matrix secreted from proliferated adult sheep elastic chondrocytes.