1
|
Farahani PK. Application of Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials in Nose Surgery. JPRAS Open 2024; 40:262-272. [PMID: 38708386 PMCID: PMC11067003 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Surgery of the nose involves a series of operations that are directed at restoring the nasal anatomy and physiology. The extent or degree of reconstruction needed is dependent on the appearance-based requirement of the patients and the procedure exploited for the correction such that nasal airflow is preserved. Standard surgical approach includes the use of autologous tissue or implantation alloplastic bio or synthetic/fabricated construct materials to correct the defects. Over the years, tissue engineering has been proven to be a promising technique for reconstructing tissue and organ defects, including the nose. Recently, there has been keen interest in fabricating new tissues and organ scaffolds using 3D printing technology with good control over the micro-architecture and excellent interior architecture suitable for cell seeding. Unviability of the tissue and harvest-associated complications have increased the need for the investigation of tissue engineering based methods for nasal reconstruction using biomaterials, stem cells, and growth factors combined with 3D bioprinting. However, there are only a handful of studies vis-à-vis the application of cartilage tissue engineering, stem cells, and growth factors for the purpose. This review provides highlights about the available studies based on the application of stem cells, biomaterials, and growth factors for nasal reconstruction surgery, as there is limited recent information on the use of these entities in nasal surgeries.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yousefzade O, Katsarava R, Puiggalí J. Biomimetic Hybrid Systems for Tissue Engineering. Biomimetics (Basel) 2020; 5:biomimetics5040049. [PMID: 33050136 PMCID: PMC7709492 DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics5040049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Revised: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Tissue engineering approaches appear nowadays highly promising for the regeneration of injured/diseased tissues. Biomimetic scaffolds are continuously been developed to act as structural support for cell growth and proliferation as well as for the delivery of cells able to be differentiated, and also of bioactive molecules like growth factors and even signaling cues. The current research concerns materials employed to develop biological scaffolds with improved features as well as complex preparation techniques. In this work, hybrid systems based on natural polymers are discussed and the efforts focused to provide new polymers able to mimic proteins and DNA are extensively explained. Progress on the scaffold fabrication technique is mentioned, those processes based on solution and melt electrospinning or even on their combination being mainly discussed. Selection of the appropriate hybrid technology becomes vital to get optimal architecture to reasonably accomplish the final applications. Representative examples of the recent possibilities on tissue regeneration are finally given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Yousefzade
- Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est-EEBE, 08019 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Ramaz Katsarava
- Institute of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Agricultural University of Georgia, Kakha Bedukidze Univesity Campus, Tbilisi 0131, Georgia;
| | - Jordi Puiggalí
- Departament d’Enginyeria Química, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Escola d’Enginyeria de Barcelona Est-EEBE, 08019 Barcelona, Spain;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +34-93-401-5649
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dhasmana A, Singh A, Rawal S. Biomedical grafts for tracheal tissue repairing and regeneration "Tracheal tissue engineering: an overview". J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2020; 14:653-672. [PMID: 32064791 DOI: 10.1002/term.3019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Revised: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Airway system is a vital part of the living being body. Trachea is the upper respiratory portion that connects nostril and lungs and has multiple functions such as breathing and entrapment of dust/pathogen particles. Tracheal reconstruction by artificial prosthesis, stents, and grafts are performed clinically for the repairing of damaged tissue. Although these (above-mentioned) methods repair the damaged parts, they have limited applicability like small area wounds and lack of functional tissue regeneration. Tissue engineering helps to overcome the above-mentioned problems by modifying the traditional used stents and grafts, not only repair but also regenerate the damaged area to functional tissue. Bioengineered tracheal replacements are biocompatible, nontoxic, porous, and having 3D biomimetic ultrastructure with good mechanical strength, which results in faster and better tissue regeneration. Till date, the bioengineered tracheal replacements studies have been going on preclinical and clinical levels. Besides that, still many researchers are working at advance level to make extracellular matrix-based acellular, 3D printed, cell-seeded grafts including living cells to overcome the demand of tissue or organ and making the ready to use tracheal reconstructs for clinical application. Thus, in this review, we summarized the tracheal tissue engineering aspects and their outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Archna Dhasmana
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
| | - Atul Singh
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
| | - Sagar Rawal
- Department of Biotechnology, School of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asnaghi A, Macchiarini P, Mantero S. Tissue Engineering toward Organ Replacement: A Promising Approach in Airway Transplant. Int J Artif Organs 2018; 32:763-8. [DOI: 10.1177/039139880903201101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Autologous tissue transfer, allografts and prosthetic replacements have so far failed to offer functional solutions for the treatment of long circumferential tracheal defects. Because of the shortcomings related with these strategies, interest has turned increasingly to the field of tissue engineering which applies the principles of engineering and life sciences in an effort to develop in vitro biological substitutes able to restore, maintain, or improve tissue and organ function. The advances in this field during the past decade have thus provided a new attractive approach toward the concept of functional substitutes and may represent an alternative to the shortage of suitable grafts for reconstructive airway surgery. This article gives an overview of the tissue engineering approach and of the encouraging strategies attempted so far in trachea regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adelaide Asnaghi
- Department of Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan - Italy
| | - Paolo Macchiarini
- Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona - Spain
| | - Sara Mantero
- Department of Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan - Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jacobs IN, Redden RA, Goldberg R, Hast M, Salowe R, Mauck RL, Doolin EJ. Pediatric laryngotracheal reconstruction with tissue-engineered cartilage in a rabbit model. Laryngoscope 2015; 126 Suppl 1:S5-21. [PMID: 26468093 DOI: 10.1002/lary.25676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2015] [Revised: 08/05/2015] [Accepted: 08/21/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS To develop an effective rabbit model of in vitro- and in vivo-derived tissue-engineered cartilage for laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR). STUDY DESIGN 1) Determination of the optimal scaffold 1% hyaluronic acid (HA), 2% HA, and polyglycolic acid (PGA) and in vitro culture time course using a pilot study of 4 by 4-mm in vitro-derived constructs analyzed on a static culture versus zero-gravity bioreactor for 4, 8, and 12 weeks, with determination of compressive modulus and histology as outcome measures. 2) Three-stage survival rabbit experiment utilizing autologous auricular chondrocytes seeded in scaffolds, either 1% HA or PGA. The constructs were cultured for the determined in vitro time period and then cultured in vivo for 12 weeks. Fifteen LTRs were performed using HA cartilage constructs, and one was performed with a PGA construct. All remaining specimens and the final reconstructed larynx underwent mechanical testing, histology, and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content determination, and then were compared to cricoid control specimens (n = 13) and control LTR using autologous thyroid cartilage (n = 18). METHODS 1) One rabbit underwent an auricular punch biopsy, and its chondrocytes were isolated and expanded and then encapsulated in eight 4 by 4-mm discs of 1% HA, 2% HA, PGA either in rotary bioreactor or static culture for 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively, with determination of compressive modulus, GAG content, and histology. 2) Sixteen rabbits underwent ear punch biopsy; chondrocytes were isolated and expanded. The cells were seeded in 13 by 5 by 2.25-mm UV photopolymerized 1% HA (w/w) or calcium alginate encapsulated synthetic PGA (13 × 5 × 2 mm); the constructs were then incubated in vitro for 12 weeks (the optimal time period determined above in paragraph 1) on a shaker. One HA and one PGA construct from each animal was tested mechanically and histologically, and the remaining eight (4 HA and 4 PGA) were implanted in the neck. After 12 weeks in vivo, the most optimal-appearing HA construct was used as a graft for LTR in 15 rabbits and PGA in one rabbit. The seven remaining specimens underwent hematoxylin and eosin, Safranin O, GAG content determination, and flexural modulus testing. At 12 weeks postoperative, the animals were euthanized and underwent endoscopy. The larynges underwent mechanical and histological testing. All animals that died underwent postmortem examination, including gross and microhistological analysis of the reconstructed airway. RESULTS Thirteen of the 15 rabbits that underwent LTR with HA in vitro- and in vivo-derived tissue-engineered cartilage constructs survived. The 1% HA specimens had the highest modulus and GAG after 12 weeks in vitro. The HA constructs became well integrated in the airway, supported respiration for the 12 weeks, and were histologically and mechanically similar to autologous cartilage. CONCLUSIONS The engineering of in vitro- and in vivo-derived cartilage with HA is a novel approach for laryngotracheal reconstruction. The data suggests that the in vitro- and in vivo-derived tissue-engineered approaches may offer a promising alternative to current strategies used in pediatric airway reconstruction, as well as other head and neck applications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE NA. Laryngoscope, 126:S5-S21, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian N Jacobs
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Robert A Redden
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Rachel Goldberg
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Michael Hast
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Rebecca Salowe
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Robert L Mauck
- School of Engineering and Applied Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Edward J Doolin
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sharma A, Janus JR, Hamilton GS. Regenerative medicine and nasal surgery. Mayo Clin Proc 2015; 90:148-58. [PMID: 25572199 DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 10/08/2014] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Nasal surgery is a constellation of operations that are intended to restore form and function to the nose. The amount of augmentation required for a given case is a delicate interplay between patient aesthetic desires and corrective measures taken for optimal nasal airflow. Traditional surgical techniques make use of autologous donor tissue or implanted alloplastic materials to restore nasal deficits. Limited availability of donor tissue and associated harvest site morbidity have pushed surgeons and researchers to investigate methods to bioengineer nasal tissues. For this article, we conducted a review of the literature on regenerative medicine as it pertains to nasal surgery. PubMed was searched for articles dating from January 1, 1994, through August 1, 2014. Journal articles with a focus on regenerative medicine and nasal tissue engineering are included in this review. Our search found that the greatest advancements have been in the fields of mucosal and cartilage regeneration, with a growing body of literature to attest to its promise. With recent advances in bioscaffold fabrication, bioengineered cartilage quality, and mucosal regeneration, the transition from comparative animal models to more expansive human studies is imminent. Each of these advancements has exciting implications for treating patients with increased efficacy, safety, and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayushman Sharma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Jeffrey R Janus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Grant S Hamilton
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Facial Plastic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Overview of Tracheal Tissue Engineering: Clinical Need Drives the Laboratory Approach. Ann Biomed Eng 2011; 39:2091-113. [DOI: 10.1007/s10439-011-0318-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2010] [Accepted: 04/22/2011] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
8
|
|
9
|
Abstract
Regenerative medicine offers new tools with which to tackle disorders for which there is currently no good therapeutic option. The trachea is an ideal organ in which to explore the clinical potential of tissue engineering because severe large airway disease is poorly managed by conventional treatments, and the success of a graft is determined only by its ability to conduct air lifelong: that is, whether it can become a sustainable biological conduit. We define the component parts of tissue engineering and review the experimental methods used to produce airway implants to date, including a recent successful, first-in-man experience.
Collapse
|
10
|
Bücheler M, von Foerster U, Haisch A, Bootz F, Lang S, Rotter N. [Tissue engineering of respiratory epithelium. Regenerative medicine for reconstructive surgery of the upper airways]. HNO 2008; 56:275-80. [PMID: 18286253 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-008-1677-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Reconstruction of long tracheal defects remains an unsolved surgical problem. Tissue engineering of respiratory epithelium is therefore of utmost surgical and scientific interest. Successful cultivation and reproduction of respiratory epithelium in vitro is crucial to seed scaffolds of various biomaterials with functionally active respiratory mucosa. Most frequently, the suspension culture as well as the tissue or explant cultures are used. Collagenous matrices, synthetic and biodegradable polymers, serve as carriers in studies. It is essential for clinical practice that mechanically stable biomaterials be developed that are resorbable in the long term or that cartilaginous constructs produced in vitro be employed which are seeded with respiratory epithelium before implantation. Vascularization of a bioartificial matrix for tracheal substitution is also prerequisite for integration of the constructs produced in vitro into the recipient organism. Here, the state of the art of research, perspectives and limitations of tracheal tissue engineering are reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Bücheler
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde/HNO-Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53105 Bonn, Deutschland.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
|
12
|
Abstract
In this review, we summarize the history of tracheal reconstruction and replacement as well as progress in current tracheal substitutes. In Part 1, we covered the historical highlights of grafts, flaps, tube construction, and tissue transplants and addressed the progress made in tracheal stenting as a means of temporary tracheal support. In Part 2 we analyze solid and porous tracheal prostheses in experimental and clinical trials and provide a summary of efforts aimed at generating a bioengineered trachea. In both parts, we provide an algorithm on the spectrum of options available for tracheal replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy E Doss
- Department of Graduate Medical Education, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Goessler UR, Stern-Straeter J, Riedel K, Bran GM, Hörmann K, Riedel F. Tissue engineering in head and neck reconstructive surgery: what type of tissue do we need? Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007; 264:1343-56. [PMID: 17628823 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0369-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2007] [Accepted: 05/25/2007] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Craniofacial tissue loss due to congenital defects, disease or injury is a major clinical problem. The head and neck region is composed of several tissues. The most prevalent method of reconstruction is autologous grafting. Often, there is insufficient host tissue for adequate repair of the defect side, and extensive donor site morbidity may result from the secondary surgical procedure. The field of tissue engineering has the potential to create functional replacements for damaged or pathologic tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrich Reinhart Goessler
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, 68135, Mannheim, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pfenninger C, Leinhase I, Endres M, Rotter N, Loch A, Ringe J, Sittinger M. Tracheal remodeling: comparison of different composite cultures consisting of human respiratory epithelial cells and human chondrocytes. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 2007; 43:28-36. [PMID: 17570032 DOI: 10.1007/s11626-006-9000-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The reconstruction of extensive tracheal defects is still an unsolved challenge for thoracic surgery. Tissue engineering is a promising possibility to solve this problem through the generation of an autologous tracheal replacement from patients' own tissue. Therefore, this study investigated the potential of three different coculture systems, combining human respiratory epithelial cells and human chondrocytes. The coculture systems were analyzed by histological staining with alcian blue, immunohistochemical staining with the antibodies, 34betaE12 and CD44v6, and scanning electron microscopy. The first composite culture consisted of human respiratory epithelial cells seeded on human high-density chondrocyte pellets. For the second system, we used native articular cartilage chips as base for the respiratory epithelial cells. The third system consisted of a collagen membrane, seeded with respiratory epithelial cells and human chondrocytes onto different sides of the membrane, which achieved the most promising results. In combination with an air-liquid interface system and fibroblast-conditioned medium, an extended epithelial multilayer with differentiated epithelial cells could be generated. Our results suggest that at least three factors are necessary for the development towards a tracheal replacement: (1) a basal lamina equivalent, consisting of collagen fibers for cell-cell interaction and cell polarization, (2) extracellular factors of mesenchymal fibroblasts, and (3) the presence of an air-liquid interface system for proliferation and differentiation of the epithelial cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosima Pfenninger
- Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Department of Rheumatology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Mitte, Tucholskystrasse 2, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Price RD, Myers S, Leigh IM, Navsaria HA. The role of hyaluronic acid in wound healing: assessment of clinical evidence. Am J Clin Dermatol 2006; 6:393-402. [PMID: 16343027 DOI: 10.2165/00128071-200506060-00006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Hyaluronic acid (hyaluronan), a naturally occurring polymer within the skin, has been extensively studied since its discovery in 1934. It has been used in a wide range of medical fields as diverse as orthopedics and cosmetic surgery, but it is in tissue engineering that it has been primarily advanced for treatment. The breakdown products of this large macromolecule have a range of properties that lend it specifically to this setting and also to the field of wound healing. It is non-antigenic and may be manufactured in a number of forms, ranging from gels to sheets of solid material through to lightly woven meshes. Epidermal engraftment is superior to most of the available biotechnologies and, as such, the material shows great promise in both animal and clinical studies of tissue engineering. Ongoing work centers around the ability of the molecule to enhance angiogenesis and the conversion of chronic wounds into acute wounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Price
- South Manchester University Hospitals NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
A huge variety of graft materials and transplantation approaches have been applied for decades in order to generate a clinically applicable tracheal substitute; so far, without success. Today, tissue engineering, the creation of man-made functional biological organs or tissue replacements from biodegradable carrier structures and autologous cells, may represent an alternative to the shortage of suitable grafts for reconstructive airway surgery. Partial success has been obtained by numerous groups following different concepts and strategies. In this article, tissue engineering approaches towards the bioartificial airway prosthesis are discussed, focusing primarily on recent developments in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Walles
- Hannover Medical School, Tissue Engineering Network, Podbielskistrasse 380, 30659 Hannover, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
ten Hallers EJO, Rakhorst G, Marres HAM, Jansen JA, van Kooten TG, Schutte HK, van Loon JP, van der Houwen EB, Verkerke GJ. Animal models for tracheal research. Biomaterials 2004; 25:1533-43. [PMID: 14697856 DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00500-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Tracheal research covers two main areas of interest: tracheal reconstruction and tracheal fixation. Tracheal reconstructions are aimed at rearranging or replacing parts of the tracheal tissue using implantation and transplantation techniques. The indications for tracheal reconstruction are numerous: obstructing tracheal tumors, trauma, post-intubation tissue reactions, etc. Although in the past years much progress has been made, none of the new developed techniques have resulted in clinical application at large scale. Tissue engineering is believed to be the technique to provide a solution for reconstruction of tracheal defects. Although developing functional tracheal tissue from different cultured cell types is still a challenge. Tracheal fixation research is relatively new in the field and concentrates on solving fixation-related problems for laryngectomized patients. In prosthetic voice rehabilitation tracheo-esophageal silicon rubber speech valves and tracheostoma valves are used. This is often accompanied by many complications. The animal models used for tracheal research vary widely and in most publications proper scientific arguments for animal selection are never mentioned. It showed that the choice on animal models is a multi-factorial process in which non-scientific arguments tend to play a key role. The aim of this study is to provide biomaterials scientists with information about tracheal research and the animal models used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E J O ten Hallers
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of BioMedical Engineering, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 196, Groningen, 9700, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|