Complications and adverse reactions with the use of botulinum toxin

Surface anatomy in dermatology: Part II-Impact on perioperative management, procedural technique, and cosmesis

This CME series reviews updated Delphi consensus surface anatomy terminology through the lens of common medical and procedural dermatology scenarios, helping to underscore high-yield points that can be readily integrated into clinical practice to support patient care. Part I of the series reviewed the current state of standardized surface anatomy, provided an illustrative review of consensus terminology, highlighted prominent landmarks that can aid in critical diagnoses, and related the importance of precise terminology to principles of medical management. Part II will utilize consensus terminology to heighten recognition of key landmarks in procedural dermatology to support optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes.

Recent Developments in Engineering Non-Paralytic Botulinum Molecules for Therapeutic Applications

This review discusses the expanding application of botulinum neurotoxin in treating neurological conditions. The article specifically explores novel approaches to using non-paralytic botulinum molecules. These new molecules, such as BiTox or el-iBoNT, offer an alternative for patients who face limitations in using paralytic forms of botulinum neurotoxin due to concerns about muscle function loss. We highlight the research findings that confirm not only the effectiveness of these molecules but also their reduced paralytic effect. We also discuss a potential cause for the diminished paralytic action of these molecules, specifically changes in the spatial parameters of the new botulinum molecules. In summary, this article reviews the current research that enhances our understanding of the application of new botulinum neurotoxins in the context of common conditions and suggests new avenues for developing more efficient molecules.

Skin Toxicities Associated with Botulin Toxin Injection for Aesthetic Procedures: Data from the European Spontaneous Reporting System

Botulinum toxin is a protein deriving from the bacteria Clostridium botulinum and it is widely used for the treatment of a variety of muscle hyperactivity syndromes and for cosmetic indications. Having a long-lasting effect, Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) is one of the most botulin toxin products used. Even if BTA has shown benefits in reducing the vertical lines between the eyebrows, Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) have been experienced as well, of which the most common ones are headache and drooping eyelids. In addition, since other local and systemic risks have been identified, a non-interventional post-authorization safety study (PASS) has been started. The aim of the present study was to report cases of skin toxicity associated with this drug, considering Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) existing on the Eudravigilance website. Among 1464 ICSRs sent to the EV database, 718 ICSRs, including 5154 PTs, reported BTA as a suspected drug associated with cutaneous toxicity. The majority of patients experiencing BTA-induced skin toxicity were female (92.1%) belonging mostly to the age group of 18-64 years. The most serious criteria, when reported, were "Other Medically Important Condition" and "Caused/prolonged hospitalization", although the outcome was mainly reported as "Unknown". The most reported PTs, related to skin disorders, were: "Erythema", "Rash", "Pruritus", "Urticaria", "Swelling face", "Brow ptosis", "Eyelid ptosis", "Injection site pain", and "Angioedema". Considering that in most ICSRs, ADRs related to skin disorders were symptoms of hypersensitivity reactions which in some conditions could be life-threatening, further studies are required to better define the safety profile of BTA used for aesthetic procedures.

Avoiding Complications on the Upper Face Treatment With Botulinum Toxin: A Practical Guide

BACKGROUND

Currently, botulinum toxin (BoNT) injections are the most commonly performed non-invasive procedure for rejuvenation on the upper face. The therapeutic use of botulinum toxin has generally been safe and well tolerated. Adverse effects are considered mild, transient, and self-limited. However, as with all other injectable procedures, this one is also susceptible to adverse events and complications. When the safety zones are respected, the chance of any of these complications is practically null. Thus, this review aims to describe the main complications of treatment with BoNT on the upper face and to present a practical guide based on current evidence on how to avoid them.

METHODS

The literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) and reference lists of respective articles.

RESULTS

The main complications secondary to BoNT injections on the upper face are: ptosis of eyelid or eyebrow, eyebrow asymmetry, diplopia, Lakeophthalmos, Palpebral ectropion, and prominence of the palpebral bags. To avoid such complications, it is necessary to have knowledge of the anatomy of this region and adequate and individualized planning based on the existing patterns of the frontalis muscle, glabella, and crow's feet. This review presents the specificities of each of these regions and practical suggestions to obtain satisfactory results, avoiding complications.

CONCLUSION

Particularly on the upper face treatment with BoNT offers predictable results, has few adverse effects, and is associated with high patient satisfaction. However, it is suggested that the commented parameters and safety areas be incorporated into daily practice so that the possibilities of complications are minimized as much as possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Anatomical Injection Guidelines for Glabellar Frown Lines Based on Ultrasonographic Evaluation

When botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) is injected to treat glabellar frown lines, the corrugator supercilia muscle (CSM) and procerus muscles are the main targets. Although there have been many studies on the treatment of glabellar frown lines, no study has confirmed the dynamic movement under ultrasonography (US). This study examined and evaluated dynamic muscle movements under US, thereby providing more effective BoNT injection guidelines for glabellar frowning. Glabellar frowning was categorized as either Type A or B. Type A is the general frowning pattern in which vertical wrinkles are made by contracting the CSM and procerus muscles (81%, n = 13). On US images, the procerus muscle thickens and the bilateral CSMs contract. Type B is an upward frowning pattern demonstrating upward elevation of vertical wrinkles due to hyperactive contraction of the frontalis muscle during frowning (19%, n = 3). On US images, the hypoechoic frontalis muscle thickens, forming horizontal forehead lines. After BoNT injection into the CSM and frontalis muscle but not the procerus muscle, Type B patterns showed improvements in the vertical crease and horizontal forehead line. Both types showed improvement in glabellar frown lines after conventional injection, but the horizontal forehead line did not improve in Type B. Type B wrinkles improved after additional injections into the frontalis muscle. This study provided novel anatomical findings related to the injection of glabellar frown lines with BoNT. Preliminary analysis and optimized procedures using US will enable more effective and safer injections.

Ophthalmic adverse events following facial injections of botulinum toxin A: A systemic literature review

BACKGROUND

Over the years, botulinum toxin has found its place as a neuromuscular blocking agent in numerous medical fields. Since the approval of botulinum toxin by the FDA for cosmetic indications in 2002, it had become the most commonly performed esthetic procedure worldwide, with ever-growing demand. The characteristics of the toxin, along with the facial areas it is injected to, could possibly account for a wide array of complication.

METHODS

The authors conducted a literature search for reported cases of ophthalmic adverse events following Botulinum toxin facial injections in the electronic databases of PubMed and Cochrane Library databases.

RESULTS

The authors found 25 publications, reporting 49 cases of ophthalmic adverse events following botulinum toxin injections. Injections for cosmetic indications accounted for 51% of all injections, treatment of blepharospasms for 22% of cases, protective ptosis for 11% of cases, and treatment of hemifacial spams for 8% of cases. The average quantity of botulinum toxin injected to a single patient ranged between 1.25 and 75 units, with a median of 13.75 units.Majority of injections for cosmetic indications were performed to the lateral canthal area (56%), followed by the glabella (28%) and the forehead (20%).Adverse events following injections included diplopia (64%), ptosis (14%), and decrease in visual acuity or vision loss (8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin is gaining extreme popularity in the management of a wide area of diseases and for cosmetic indications. Proper knowledge of potential adverse events is crucial for the clinician in attempt to decrease complications.

A Review of Complications Due to the Use of Botulinum Toxin A for Cosmetic Indications

BACKGROUND

Botulinum toxin A (botulinum toxin A) was found to provide a wide variety of therapeutic and aesthetic benefits as one of the most potent toxins in the world. Injectable remedies, including soft tissue fillers and botulinum toxin, have become very common in wrinkling and face rejuvenation management. While these methods of treatment are relatively safe, serious side effects can occur. In this review, the complications of BoNTA are highlighted.

METHODS

A literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct) were searched using key terms, and for identification of additional relevant studies, reference lists have also been examined. Only articles published in English were included in this review with a time restriction from 2000 to 2020.

RESULTS

There are various injection-related adverse effects associated (AE) with botulinum toxins such as erythema, oedema, pain, ptosis of eyelid or brow and ecchymosis. The overall majority of adverse events identified are mild and temporary.

CONCLUSION

As the use of toxins becomes increasingly more common, adverse events can be expected to increase as well. The practitioners need to be aware of such AEs, and the patients should be informed of these before undertaking such procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Complications of Botulinum toxin A: An update review

Cosmetic surgery procedures have increased manifolds all over the world owing to the ever-increasing demand of people to look beautiful and young. Injectable treatments like botulinum toxin are becoming more popular owing to their rapid, well-defined, and lasting results for the reduction of facial fine lines, wrinkles, and facial rejuvenation. These emerging treatments are quite safe but can have certain adverse effects. In this article, we have highlighted the complications and side effects of botulinum toxin based on the anatomical location. The possible causes and precautions to prevent these complications are also discussed. The search of literature included peer-reviewed articles including clinical trials and scientific reviews. Literature was identified from electronic databases (MEDLINE/PubMed) through January 2021 and references of respective articles and only the articles published in English language were included.

Effective Locations for Injecting Botulinum Toxin into the Mentalis Muscle; Cadaveric and Ultrasonographic Study

The mentalis muscle is now considered key structures when performing procedures for rejuvenating the lower face. The aim of this study was to determine the anatomical morphology and location of the mentalis muscle and thereby provide anatomical information for facilitating clinical procedures designed to rejuvenate the lower face. Forty-four adult hemifaces from five Thai cadavers and 21 Korean cadavers were dissected to identify the locations of the mentalis muscle. Sixty-six hemifaces from 33 healthy young Korean subjects were included in an ultrasonographic study. The depth of the mentalis muscle below the skin surface, the thickness of the mentalis muscle, and the distance from the bone to the mentalis muscle were measured at the two points that were 5 mm lateral to the most-prominent point of the chin. The mentalis muscle was classified into two types based to its shape: in type A (86.4%, 38 of the 44 cases) it was dome shaped in three dimensions, while in type B (13.6%, 6 of the 44 cases) it was flat. The mentalis muscle was present mostly at the area 5–10 mm from the midsagittal line and 20–30 mm from a horizontal line connecting the mouth corners. The mentalis muscle was present between depths of 6.7 to 10.7 mm below the skin. This new information about the location of the mentalis muscle may help when identifying the most effective and safe botulinum toxin injection points and depths during esthetic procedures for weakened facial rhytides on the lower face.

Complications of botulinum toxin and fillers: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Cosmetic surgery and esthetic procedures have become a billion dollar industry owing to the ever-growing demand of the population to stay young. The injectable treatments including fillers and botulinum toxin have become highly popular because of their quick, predictable and lasting results in the management of facial wrinkles and rejuvenation. Although these treatment modalities are relatively safe, they are associated with certain side effects.

AIMS

In this review, we will focus on the complications of fillers and botulinum toxin.

PATIENTS/METHODS

The literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles available in English were considered for this review.

RESULTS

Brow ptosis and asymmetry are common adverse effects of botulinum toxin while the most common adverse effects associated with fillers are the local injection related effects manifesting as erythema, edema, pain, and ecchymosis.

CONCLUSION

It is important that the treating physician is well verse with the various fillers and botulinum toxin complications and their management as some of the complications can be severely debilitating.

Clinical uses of botulinum toxin A in smile aesthetic modification

In this article we review the pharmacodynamics of commercially available preparations of botulinum toxin type A, and discuss the potential uses of the drug in smile modification. A major emphasis is placed on applications relevant to modern dental practice, and to the complications arising from its use. Botulinum toxin A, when applied correctly, is a safe and effective means of achieving aesthetic smile modification, with limited data on any demonstrable long-term adverse effects.

Pyridostigmine for the Reversal of Severe Adverse Reactions to Botulinum Toxin in Children

Therapeutic botulinum toxin injections are commonly performed in pediatric otolaryngology. Aerodigestive complications from botulinum toxin injections, although rare, may be serious. Oral pyridostigmine is effective in the symptomatic treatment of these complications. We report 2 cases of aerodigestive complications arising from injection of botulinum toxin that were successfully treated with pyridostigmine.

Injectable and topical neurotoxins in dermatology: Indications, adverse events, and controversies

The use of neuromodulators for therapeutic and cosmetic indications has proven to be remarkably safe. While aesthetic and functional adverse events are uncommon, each anatomic region has its own set of risks of which the physician and patient must be aware before treatment. The therapeutic usages of botulinum toxins now include multiple specialties and multiple indications. New aesthetic indications have also developed, and there has been an increased utilization of combination therapies to combat the effects of global aging. In the second article in this continuing medical education series, we review the prevention and treatment of adverse events, therapeutic and novel aesthetic indications, controversies, and a brief overview of combination therapies.

Imaging three-dimensional innervation zone distribution in muscles from M-wave recordings

OBJECTIVE

To localize neuromuscular junctions in skeletal muscles in vivo which is of great importance in understanding, diagnosing and managing of neuromuscular disorders.

APPROACH

A three-dimensional global innervation zone imaging technique was developed to characterize the global distribution of innervation zones, as an indication of the location and features of neuromuscular junctions, using electrically evoked high-density surface electromyogram recordings.

MAIN RESULTS

The performance of the technique was evaluated in the biceps brachii of six intact human subjects. The geometric centers of the distributions of the reconstructed innervation zones were determined with a mean distance of 9.4  ±  1.4 cm from the reference plane, situated at the medial epicondyle of the humerus. A mean depth was calculated as 1.5  ±  0.3 cm from the geometric centers to the closed points over the skin. The results are consistent with those reported in previous histology studies. It was also found that the volumes and distributions of the reconstructed innervation zones changed as the stimulation intensities increased until the supramaximal muscle response was achieved.

SIGNIFICANCE

Results have demonstrated the high performance of the proposed imaging technique in noninvasively imaging global distributions of the innervation zones in the three-dimensional muscle space in vivo, and the feasibility of its clinical applications, such as guiding botulinum toxin injections in spasticity management, or in early diagnosis of neurodegenerative progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Overview of Botulinum Toxins for Aesthetic Uses

Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) can be used for facial aesthetics. The 3 currently available BTA types include onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox; Botox Cosmetic, Allergan, Irvine, CA), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport; Ipsen, Ltd, Berkshire, UK), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin; Merz Pharmaceuticals, Frankfurt, Germany). The mechanism of action and clinical uses for treatment of dynamic lines of the forehead, brow, glabella, lateral orbit, nose, and lips are presented, as well as treatment of masseter hypertrophy, platysmal bands, and improvements of the perioral region. Specific BTA injection sites and suggested doses are presented.

Three-Dimensional Innervation Zone Imaging from Multi-Channel Surface EMG Recordings

There is an unmet need to accurately identify the locations of innervation zones (IZs) of spastic muscles, so as to guide botulinum toxin (BTX) injections for the best clinical outcome. A novel 3D IZ imaging (3DIZI) approach was developed by combining the bioelectrical source imaging and surface electromyogram (EMG) decomposition methods to image the 3D distribution of IZs in the target muscles. Surface IZ locations of motor units (MUs), identified from the bipolar map of their MU action potentials (MUAPs) were employed as a prior knowledge in the 3DIZI approach to improve its imaging accuracy. The performance of the 3DIZI approach was first optimized and evaluated via a series of designed computer simulations, and then validated with the intramuscular EMG data, together with simultaneously recorded 128-channel surface EMG data from the biceps of two subjects. Both simulation and experimental validation results demonstrate the high performance of the 3DIZI approach in accurately reconstructing the distributions of IZs and the dynamic propagation of internal muscle activities in the biceps from high-density surface EMG recordings.

Aesthetic Uses of Neuromodulators: Current Uses and Future Directions

BACKGROUND

The introduction of neuromodulators for aesthetic facial improvements greatly expanded the limits of nonsurgical facial rejuvenation. Although many current uses are considered "off-label," the widespread acceptance and favorable safety profile of properly used botulinum toxins have made them one of the most common aesthetic treatments available.

METHODS

A literature review of current facial aesthetic uses of various botulinum toxin preparations was done, and general concepts were identified.

RESULTS

Currently, Food and Drug Administration-approved botulinum toxin preparations onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), and incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) have similar off-label indications and clinical uses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not considered interchangeable, administration and clinical outcomes are not much different between the 3 commonly used botulinum products. The impact of botulinum products currently in development has yet to be determined.

Comparative trial of a novel botulinum neurotoxin type A versus onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of glabellar lines: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study

A novel botulinum neurotoxin type A (DWP450; Daewoong Pharmaceutical, Seoul, Korea) has recently been introduced for the treatment of facial wrinkles. The efficacy of this agent has previously been demonstrated in an in vivo study using an electrophysiological protocol in a rat model. To compare the efficacy and safety of DWP450 with onabotulinumtoxinA (OBoNT) for use in the treatment of glabellar lines, we performed a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, active-controlled trial comparing DWP450 and OBoNT (Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA). A total of 268 subjects with moderate to severe glabellar lines were randomized at a 1:1 ratio. Each patient received treatment with 20 U of study medication. Maximum frown responder rates at week 4 were measured to analyze the primary efficacy endpoint. To evaluate secondary efficacy endpoints, response rates were measured at weeks 8, 12, and 16, at maximum frown and rest. Specifically, responder rates at both maximum frown and at rest were assessed based on clinical photography. Subject degree of satisfaction and self-assessed rate of response were also measured. Adverse events (AEs) were documented to evaluate safety. Responder rate by physician-rating severity at maximal contraction at week 4 was 93.89% in the DWP450 group and 88.64% in OBoNT group. As the lower limit of the 97.5% one-sided confidence interval (-1.53%) surpassed the -15% threshold, we determined that DWP450 was not inferior to OBoNT. For the secondary efficacy endpoint analyses, no significant differences were observed between the two groups for any variable at any point in time. The incidences of AEs were similar for the two groups. Most of AEs were considered mild. DWP450 and OBoNT were comparable in efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar lines.

Differential characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA and its use in the management of glabellar frown lines

Objectives

This review examines the pharmacologic and clinical characteristics of incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin^®/Xeomeen^®/Bocouture^®/XEOMIN Cosmetic™; botulinum toxin type A [150 kDa]), which is free from complexing proteins, and discusses its efficacy and safety in the treatment of glabellar frown lines. Differences between incobotulinumtoxinA and other commercially available botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT/A) products that have been approved by the European Medicines Agency, US Food and Drug Administration, and other regulatory agencies for this indication are also discussed.

Findings

IncobotulinumtoxinA differs from other commercially available BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, minimizing foreign protein load. IncobotulinumtoxinA is commonly used at a 1:1 dose ratio with onabotulinumtoxinA and displays comparable efficacy and safety; furthermore, it is associated with early onset and long duration of effect, and high levels of subject satisfaction. In terms of practical considerations, incobotulinumtoxinA does not require cold storage and demonstrates low spread, enabling precise treatment and good tolerability.

Conclusion

IncobotulinumtoxinA is an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment for glabellar frown lines. It differs from other BoNT/A preparations, in that it is free from complexing proteins and contains only active neurotoxin, which is relevant clinically, as this reduces the foreign protein load and minimizes the risk of neutralizing antibody production. In practical terms, incobotulinumtoxinA has a long shelf-life, remaining stable without the need for refrigeration, and due to its limited spread is a precise localized treatment.

Botulinum neurotoxin A: a review

Despite its ubiquity in cosmetic circles and broad general awareness, a literature search of botulinum neurotoxin in JPRAS and BJPS yielded a mere 4 articles germane to cosmesis. A pair each detailing its application in masseteric hypertrophy(1,2) and the use of cryoanalgesia.(3,4) Given that botulinum neurotoxin A is the most commonly used cosmetic treatment, with American figures being most accurate,(5) a review of the background, development and scientific evidence would be perhaps useful, if not overdue, as Plastic Surgeons increasingly incorporate non-surgical interventions into their practices as part of a comprehensive facial rejuvenation strategy.

A succinct review of botulinum toxin in dermatology; update of cosmetic and noncosmetic use

Botulinum toxin A has a wide variety of clinical applications in medical and dermatologic sciences. Nowadays, researchers introduce some other indications for botulinum toxin in cosmetic and especially noncosmetic aspects of dermatology such as medical rhinoplasty, hypertrophic scar, chemical brow lift, supraciliary wrinkles, pompholix, eccrine angiomatosis, Hailey-Hailey, dermatochalasis, lichen simplex, nosthalgia parestetica, and granulosis rubra nasi. In this general overview of the use of botulinum toxin in dermatology, an extensive literature search was carried out to updates of all dermatology-oriented experiments and clinical trials on the mentioned aspect of botulinum toxin.

Progressive Cervical Kyphosis Associated with Botulinum Toxin Injection

Weakness of the neck extensors can lead to "dropped head syndrome", a condition of progressive cervical kyphosis in which a patient is unable to hold their head up against the force of gravity. This condition can be associated with structural abnormalities of the spine as found in ankylosing spondylitis and vertebral fractures. Neuromuscular disorders, such as myasthenia gravis, muscular dystrophies, inflammatory myopathies, and motor neuron disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have also been reported as etiologies of dropped head syndrome. In this article, we describe an elderly woman with rapidly progressive cervical kyphosis following an injection of botulinum toxin A into her neck extensor musculature.

Extensive myofascial necrosis: a delayed complication of botulinum toxin therapy

Botulinum toxin is now an important therapeutic agent in various clinical specialties. Although a lot is known about its short-term effects, little is known about the long-term effects or delayed complications. Most of the therapeutic effects appear within a week and last for 10-12 weeks. In most cases, the side effects are mild and often self-limiting and tend to occur within the first week. Myofascial necrosis and delayed onset of side effects are rarely reported and present a new challenge for a drug that has been proclaimed as an anti-ageing drug by the lay press and is widely used outside the licensed indications.

Botulinum toxin-physiology and applications in head and neck disorders

This article is structured around a literature review that was carried out using Ovid and Medline with the key words "botulinum," "toxin," and "ENT." Botulinum toxin has been used safely in humans for more than 20 years. The effects are transient, such that treatments are required to be repeated at intervals. Its application to ENT provides a useful tool to treat dystonia, autonomic dysfunction, facial nerve paresis, and hyperfunctional lines. It may also be of benefit in laryngeal rebalancing and the treatment of headaches. Further research is being carried out and new indications for treatment with botulinum toxin may include sialorrhea and rhinorrhea.

Managing adverse events associated with botulinum toxin type A: a focus on cosmetic procedures

Botulinum toxin A (BTXA) has become a widely used drug in cosmetic dermatology, not only to treat focal hyperhidrosis but also hyperkinetic facial lines, platysma bands, décolleté bands, and other skin features. The spectrum of possible adverse effects of BTXA is broad but fortunately those that have been observed with cosmetic use of this product are generally mild and transient. The major tools for preventing adverse effects from BTXA are knowledge and skill. Use of correct injection techniques is mandatory since most unwanted effects are caused by incorrect technique. Knowledge of the target structures, e.g. the facial and extrafacial muscles, allows physicians to select the optimal dose, time and technique. The most common adverse effects are pain and hematoma. In the periocular region, lid and brow ptosis are important adverse effects. Adverse effects such as pain, hematoma, ecchymosis, and bruising may also occur in the upper and lower face and at extrafacial sites. Other possible adverse effects seen in other indications that the user of BTXA in cosmetic dermatology should be wary of include induction headaches and possible interaction with concomitant medications. Induction of neutralizing antibodies due to cosmetic BTXA treatment has not been observed. This article also outlines recommendations regarding use of BTXA. Of these, the most important for avoiding most unwanted adverse effects are the proper techniques of dilution, storage, and injection, as well as the careful exclusion of patients with any contraindications. Pain, hematoma, ecchymosis, and bruising can be prevented by cooling the skin before and after BTXA injection. Upper lid ptosis may be partly corrected using apraclonidine or phenylephrine eyedrops. If simple rules relating to the indications for and application of BTXA are followed, this is a safe and effective drug in cosmetic dermatology.

[Botulinum toxin and medical liability: is the patient sufficiently informed?]

INTRODUCTION

The use of botulinum toxin injection therapy is soaring significantly today, with an ever-wider field of applications despite well-known side effects of the treatment. This article aims at analysing the medicolegal practices of practitioners who use this therapy, especially the information given to patients and finding a common practice for providing that information.

METHODS

We sent a questionnaire to 340 practitioners who might use the therapy (physiatrists, neurologists, ophthalmologists, ENT specialists, plastic surgeons) working in hospitals and in physical therapy and rehabilitation centres in France. Besides mentioning the possible side effects of the therapy, the questionnaire focused on how such information was transmitted before the injection.

RESULTS

Data collection and analysis were performed by use of a spreadsheet software programme. A total of 124 questionnaires were analysed. We did not analyse the items dealing with side effects. Sixty-five percent of the responders said they did not seek statutory authorisation for injections. Only 31% provided written, detailed information and 12% required a signed consent form. Complaints were rare, approximately 12%, were written or verbal, and were always dismissed.

DISCUSSION

Side effects after botulinum toxin injection are clearly described in the medical literature. Therefore, it is of utmost importance for this product to be used therapeutically and only by experienced therapists who will carefully respect the product's standard rules of use and inform their patients to the best of their ability. Issuing a detailed letter of information describing all the side effects seems necessary. We suggest a model information letter such as that provided to the patients in our facility.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin is a very worthwhile product for numerous abnormalities but has side effects, often brief, at the site of the injection. Therefore it is our duty to inform patients effectively.

Consensus recommendations on the use of botulinum toxin type a in facial aesthetics

The use of botulinum toxin type A for facial enhancement is the most common cosmetic procedure currently undertaken in the United States. Overall clinical and study experience with botulinum toxin type A treatment for facial enhancement has confirmed that it is effective and safe in both the short and long term. Nevertheless, consistent guidelines representing the consensus of experts for aesthetic treatments of areas other than glabellar lines have not been published. Therefore, a panel of experts on the aesthetic uses of Botox Cosmetic (botulinum toxin type A; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, Calif.) was convened to develop consensus guidelines. This publication comprises the recommendations of this panel and provides guidelines on general issues, such as the importance of the aesthetic evaluation and individualization of treatment, reconstitution and handling of the botulinum toxin type A, procedural considerations, dosing and injection-site variables, and patient selection and counseling. In addition, specific considerations and recommendations are provided by treatment area, including glabellar lines, horizontal forehead lines, "crow's feet," "bunny lines" (downward radiating lines on the sides of nose), the perioral area, the dimpled chin, and platysmal bands. The review of each area encompasses the relevant anatomy, specifics on injection locations and techniques, starting doses (total and per injection point), the influence of other variables, such as gender, and assessment and retreatment issues. Factors unique to each area are presented, and the discussion of each treatment area concludes with a review of key elements that can increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. Summary tables are provided throughout.

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders

Clinical data and experience to date have demonstrated that BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for the prevention of migraine and other headache disorders. It has a long duration of action that may last over 4 months with no systemic or serious AEs. Several issues remain to be defined, however, including dosing, location, and number of injections; optimal dilution of BoNT-A; specific headache types that respond best to BoNT-A; and long-term efficacy and safety. Data from ongoing well-designed trials that include a larger patient population investigating these issues may confirm a role for BoNT-A as a first-line agent for migraine prevention. Neurotoxin therapy is part of a broader headache management approach. Because the injection techniques for headache are unique and vary depending on the primary headache disorder being treated and the location and pattern of pain referral, the use of BoNT-A for headache is not simply an extension of its use for cosmesis. The use of BoNT-A in the overall management of primary headache disorders should be reserved for medical practitioners who not only have experience with BoNT-A injections, but possess the expertise in the diagnosis and management of complex headache disorders. Educating patients and addressing headache triggers and optimizing acute treatment improve the outcome of any preventive program.

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders

Botulinum toxin A (BoNT/A), a neurotoxin, is effective for treating a variety of disorders of involuntary muscle contraction, including cervical dystonia, blepharospasm and hemifacial spasm. It inhibits neurouscular signaling by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The biological effects of the toxin are transient with normal neuronal signaling returning within approximately 3-6 months post injection. Recently, clinical findings suggest that BoNT/A may inhibit pain associated with migraine and other headache types. The mechanism by which this toxin inhibits pain is under investigation, recent findings suggest that it inhibits the release of neurotransmitters from nociceptive nerve terminals and in this way may exert an analgesic effect. A number of retrospective open-label chart reviews and three placebo-controlled double-blind trials have demonstrated that localized injections of BTX-A significantly reduce migraine frequency, severity, and migraine-associated disability. The majority of patients in these studies experienced no BoNT/A mediated side effects; however, a small percentage of patients did report transient minor side effects including blepharoptosis, dipolpia, and injection-site weakness. Currently there are several large-scale randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials in progress evaluating the efficacy, optimal dosing and side effect profile of this toxin as a novel treatment for migraine and other headache types. These studies may provide further evidence that BoNT/A is an effective option for the preventive treatment of migraine.

Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of migraine and other primary headache disorders: from bench to bedside

Botulinum toxin type A, a neurotoxin, is effective for treating a variety of disorders of involuntary muscle contraction including cervical dystonia, blepharospasm, and hemifacial spasm. It inhibits neuromuscular signaling by blocking the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The biological effects of the toxin are transient, with normal neuronal signaling returning within approximately 3 to 6 months postinjection. Recent clinical findings suggest that botulinum toxin type A may inhibit pain associated with migraine and other types of headache. However, the mechanism by which this toxin inhibits pain is not fully understood and is under investigation. Research findings suggest that botulinum toxin type A inhibits the release of neurotransmitters from nociceptive nerve terminals and, in this way, may possess an analgesic effect. A number of retrospective open-label chart reviews and 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have demonstrated that localized injections of botulinum toxin type A significantly reduce the frequency, severity, and disability associated with migraine headaches. Although the majority of patients in these studies experienced no botulinum toxin type A-mediated side effects, a small percentage of patients did report transient minor side effects including blepharoptosis, diplopia, and injection-site weakness. Currently, 4 randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate the efficacy, optimal dosing, and side-effect profile of botulinum toxin type A as a novel treatment for migraine and other types of headache. These studies may provide further evidence that botulinum toxin type A is an effective option for the preventive treatment of migraine.

[Skin, wrinkles and botulinum toxin]

OBJECTIVE

To present an up-to-date analysis about the use of botulinum toxin for treating facial lines and wrinkles.Method. - A systematic search of the literature was conducted to select the most recent or relevant publications on this topic, through Medline.

RESULTS

Out of the 583 articles retrieved, 90 were finally selected for the study.

DISCUSSION

Validity of using botulinum toxin for cosmetic use is demonstrated, together with contra-indications and different methods to objectivate the results. The different available types of toxin are presented and compared. Modalities of preparation, conservation, and waste disposal are detailed. Anatomical bases of muscular facial balance are reviewed, with techniques of injection presented for each site, and also with adjunctive procedures. Complications and side effects are described and analysed. Most complications can be prevented through: perfect knowledge of local anatomy;use of small volumes;orientation of the needle bevel towards the muscle body, injection within the muscle body if thick, more superficial if thin;application of ice on the skin pre- and post-injecting. Adding epinephrin or diluting with xylocaïne and epinephrin is not commonly used.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin has found its way as a major component of the therapeutic armamentarium. Its efficacy for facial rejuvenation has made it extremely popular, but its use does follow strict rules, and should be restricted to soundly trained practitioners.