Atorvastatin in low-density lipoprotein apheresis-treated patients with homozygous and heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia

Retrospective Comparison of 5 different Methods for Long-Term LDL-Apheresis in 20 Patients between 1986 and 2001

Purpose

To compare long-term efficacy and biocompatibility of the 5 most commonly applied LDL-apheresis techniques using a specifically modified calculation method of the area under the curve (AUC) for laboratory parameters.

Design

Retrospective long-term analysis of 20 patients with homozygous or severe heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Procedures

The following 5 extra-corporeal LDL-apheresis methods were compared: IMAL (Immuno Adsorption of Lipoproteins), DSA (Dextran Sulphate Adsorption), HELP (Heparin Induced Extra-corporeal LDL Precipitation), DALI (Direct Adsorption of Lipoproteins), MDF (Membrane Differential Filtration).

Main outcome measures

AUC derived plasma concentrations (CAUC) of lipoproteins between two apheresis procedures and their long-term course. Comparison of biocompatibility and efficacy concerning the LDL-C target of < 2.6 mmol/L of 5 apheresis techniques. Progression of atherosclerosis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia.

Main findings

The means of AUC derived average plasma concentrations (CAUC) of all treatment intervals were for LDL-C and the LDL/HDL ratio as follows: IMAL (5.59 mmol/L; ratio 4.1), DSA (3.03 mmol/L; ratio 2.0), HELP (4.06 mmol/L; ratio 2.2), DALI (3.83 mmol/L; ratio 3.3), MDF (3.26 mmol/L; ratio 3.2). Coronary heart disease and cardiac events (myocardial infarction, PTCA/ stent implantation, CABG) progressed in only 2 patients whereas atherosclerosis manifestations (sclerosis abdominal aorta, carotid artery stenosis, peripheral vascular disease) worsened in 13 patients. Mean ergometric capacity improved from 112 to 118 Watt.

Conclusions

All 5 apheresis methods (IMAL, DSA, HELP, DALI, MDF) proved to be safe and suitable for long-term treatment in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia. The introduction of the CAUC revealed that the target of LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L was not achieved with regard to the time averaged concentration (CAUC).

Two Patients with Familial Hypercholesterolemia Who Were Successfully Weaned from Low-density Lipoprotein Apheresis after Treatment with Evolocumab

Two elderly patients (a 76-year-old man and a 75-year-old woman), who had been previously diagnosed with familial hypercholesterolemia (at 58 and 48 years of age, respectively) underwent long-term treatment with oral therapy and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) apheresis. As their LDL cholesterol levels remained high (>150 mg/dL and >120 mg/dL, respectively) and their familial hypercholesterolemia was complicated with angina pectoris, we added evolocumab to their prescription. Thereafter, their LDL cholesterol levels decreased rapidly, and the patients were successfully weaned from LDL apheresis. Evolocumab therapy should thus be considered when LDL apheresis cannot achieve the target LDL cholesterol levels, though the prognosis of such treatment remains unclear.

Systematic Review of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Apheresis for the Treatment of Familial Hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND

Apheresis is an important treatment for reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). We systematically reviewed the current literature surrounding LDL-C apheresis for FH.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Electronic databases were searched for publications of LDL-C apheresis in patients with FH. Inclusion criteria include articles in English published in 2000-2013 that provide descriptions of practice patterns, efficacy/effectiveness, and costs related to LDL-C apheresis in patients with FH. Data were stratified by country and FH genotype where possible. Thirty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria: 8 open-label clinical trials, 11 observational studies, 17 reviews/guidelines, and 2 health technology assessments. The prevalence of FH was not well characterized by country, and underdiagnosis was a barrier to FH treatment. Treatment guidelines varied by country, with some guidelines recommending LDL-C apheresis as first-line treatment in patients with homozygous FH and after drug therapy failure in patients with heterozygous FH. Additionally, guidelines typically recommended weekly or biweekly LDL-C apheresis treatments conducted at apheresis centers that may last 2 to >3 hours per session. Studies reported a range for mean LDL-C reduction after apheresis: 57-75% for patients with homozygous FH and 58-63% for patients with heterozygous FH. Calculated annual costs (in US$2015) may reach US$66 374 to US$228 956 per patient for weekly treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

LDL-C apheresis treatment may be necessary for patients with FH when drug therapy is inadequate in reducing LDL-C to target levels. While apheresis reduces LDL-C, high per-session costs and the frequency of guideline-recommended treatment result in substantial annual costs, which are barriers to the optimal treatment of FH.

Lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

This represents the first update of this review, which was published in 2012. Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the effects of various doses of atorvastatin on serum total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides in individuals with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease. The primary focus of this review was determination of the mean per cent change from baseline of LDL-cholesterol. Secondary objectives • To quantify the variability of effects of various doses of atorvastatin.• To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 11, 2013), MEDLINE (1966 to December Week 2 2013), EMBASE (1980 to December Week 2 2013), Web of Science (1899 to December Week 2 2013) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to December Week 2 2013). We applied no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included and extracted data. We collected information on withdrawals due to adverse effects from placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we found an additional 42 trials and added them to the original 254 studies. The update consists of 296 trials that evaluated dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 38,817 participants. Included are 242 before-and-after trials and 54 placebo-controlled RCTs. Log dose-response data from both trial designs revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides. The Summary of findings table 1 documents the effect of atorvastatin on LDL-cholesterol over the dose range of 10 to 80 mg/d, which is the range for which this systematic review acquired the greatest quantity of data. Over this range, blood LDL-cholesterol is decreased by 37.1% to 51.7% (Summary of findings table 1). The slope of dose-related effects on cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol was similar for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, but rosuvastatin is about three-fold more potent. Subgroup analyses suggested that the atorvastatin effect was greater in females than in males and was greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. Risk of bias for the outcome of withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) was high, but the mostly unclear risk of bias was judged unlikely to affect lipid measurements. Withdrawals due to adverse effects were not statistically significantly different between atorvastatin and placebo groups in these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.40).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This update resulted in no change to the main conclusions of the review but significantly increases the strength of the evidence. Studies show that atorvastatin decreases blood total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol in a linear dose-related manner over the commonly prescribed dose range. New findings include that atorvastatin is more than three-fold less potent than rosuvastatin, and that the cholesterol-lowering effects of atorvastatin are greater in females than in males and greater in non-familial than in familial hypercholesterolaemia. This review update does not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because included trials were of short duration and adverse effects were not reported in 37% of placebo-controlled trials.

Lipid lowering efficacy of atorvastatin

BACKGROUND

Atorvastatin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs and the most widely prescribed statin in the world. It is therefore important to know the dose-related magnitude of effect of atorvastatin on blood lipids.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood lipids and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library Issue 4, 2011, MEDLINE (1966 to November 2011), EMBASE (1980 to November 2011), ISI Web of Science (1899 to November 2011) and BIOSIS Previews (1969 to November 2011). No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled and uncontrolled before-and-after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of atorvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of 3 to 12 weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. WDAE information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-four trials evaluated the dose-related efficacy of atorvastatin in 33,505 participants. Log dose-response data revealed linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol and triglycerides. Combining all the trials using the generic inverse variance fixed-effect model for doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in decreases of 36% to 53% for LDL-cholesterol. There was no significant dose-related effects of atorvastatin on blood high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol. WDAE were not statistically different between atorvastatin and placebo for these short-term trials (risk ratio 0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.68 to 1.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Blood total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of atorvastatin was dependent on dose. Log dose-response data was linear over the commonly prescribed dose range. Manufacturer-recommended atorvastatin doses of 10 to 80 mg/day resulted in 36% to 53% decreases of LDL-cholesterol. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with atorvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 37% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Clinical applications of long-term LDL-apheresis on and beyond refractory hypercholesterolemia

Premature coronary heart disease (CHD) can result from high LDL cholesterol levels even in the absence of any other risk factors. A striking example is found in children who have the homozygous form of familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) with extremely high levels of LDL-cholesterol, and severe atherosclerosis and CHD often develop during the first decades of life. LDL-apheresis was developed for the treatment of severe type of FH patients who are resistant to lipid-lowering drug therapy. Clinical efficacy and safety of the therapeutic tool which directly removes LDL from circulation have already been established in the treatment for refractory hypercholesterolemia in FH patients. The most recently developed method enables lipoproteins to be adsorbed directly from whole blood, using polyacrylate column. In addition to benefits derived from the stabilization or regression of arterial lesions, we highlight other possible clinical applications of LDL-apheresis. However, most of these clinical benefits came from case reports or retrospective studies. Mechanisms related these clinical improvement remain unclear, and prospective randomized controlled trials should be performed for the new clinical indications of LDL-apheresis.

Long-term effects of LDL apheresis in patients with severe hypercholesterolemia

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is an inherited disorder of lipoprotein metabolism involving mutations in the LDL receptor (LDL-R). Patients with mutation in one (heterozygous) or both (homozygous) genes have markedly elevated LDL cholesterol and are at increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD). Aggressive lipid lowering is required for homozygous and many heterozygous FH patients. This often involves LDL-apheresis, where LDL and other apo-B containing lipoproteins are selectively removed from the plasma. We have retrospectively studied 34 patients treated with biweekly LDL-apheresis at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania. In our patient population, adverse events were uncommon and rarely resulted in shortened treatment time. There was a dramatic decrease in the relative risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular interventions in patients treated with LDL-apheresis for an average of 2.5 years. Some but not all patients had long-term reduction in their LDL levels as a result of LDL-apheresis, suggesting that time-averaged reduction in LDL and/or LDL:HDL ratios were responsible for clinical improvement. These data support the use of LDL-apheresis in patients with FH, as well as medication-intolerant patients that have elevated LDL cholesterol despite maximal pharmacological treatment.