1
|
Chantarojanasiri T, Aswakul P, Prachayakul V. Uncommon complications of therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography: What, why, and how to prevent. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2015; 7:960-968. [PMID: 26265989 PMCID: PMC4530329 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i10.960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2015] [Revised: 05/04/2015] [Accepted: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
There is an increasing role for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided interventions in the treatment of many conditions. Although it has been shown that these types of interventions are effective and safe, they continue to be considered only as alternative treatments in some situations. This is in part due to the occurrence of complications with these techniques, which can occur even when performed by experienced endosonographers. Although common complications have been described for many procedures, it is also crucial to be aware of uncommon complications. This review describes rare complications that have been reported with several EUS-guided interventions. EUS-guided biliary drainage is accepted as an alternative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction. Most of the uncommon complications related to this procedure involve stent malfunction, such as the migration or malposition of stents. Rare complications of EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage can result from air embolism and infection. Finally, a range of uncommon complications has been reported for EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis, involving neural and vascular injuries that can be fatal. The goal of this review is to identify possible complications and promote an understanding of how they occur in order to increase general awareness of these adverse events with the hope that they can be avoided in the future.
Collapse
|
2
|
Sey MSL, Schmaltz L, Al-Haddad MA, DeWitt JM, Calley CSJ, Juan M, Lasisi F, Sherman S, McHenry L, Imperiale TF, LeBlanc JK. Effectiveness and safety of serial endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for chronic pancreatitis. Endosc Int Open 2015; 3:E56-9. [PMID: 26134773 PMCID: PMC4423296 DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2014] [Accepted: 07/15/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS Endoscopic ultrasound - guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB) is an established treatment for pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis (CP), but the effectiveness and safety of repeated procedures are unknown. Our objective is to report our experience of repeated EUS-CPB procedures within a single patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS A prospectively maintained EUS database was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients who had undergone more than one EUS-CPB procedure over a 17-year period. The main outcome measures included number of EUS-CPB procedures for each patient, self-reported pain relief, duration of pain relief, and procedure-related adverse events. RESULTS A total of 248 patients underwent more than one EUS-CPB procedure and were included in our study. Patients with known or suspected CP (N = 248) underwent a mean (SD) of 3.1 (1.6) EUS-CPB procedures. In 76 % of the patients with CP, the median (range) duration of the response to the first EUS-CPB procedure was 10 (1 - 54) weeks. Lack of pain relief after the initial EUS-CPB was associated with failure of the next EUS-CPB (OR 0.17, 95 %CI 0.06 - 0.54). Older age at first EUS-CPB and pain relief after the first EUS-CPB were significantly associated with pain relief after subsequent blocks (P = 0.026 and P = 0.002, respectively). Adverse events included peri-procedural hypoxia (n = 2) and hypotension (n = 1) and post-procedural orthostasis (n = 2) and diarrhea (n = 4). No major adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS Repeated EUS-CPB procedures in a single patient appear to be safe. Response to the first EUS-CPB is associated with response to subsequent blocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S. L. Sey
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada,Corresponding author Michael Sai Lai Sey, MD Western University London Health Sciences Centre–Victoria Hospital800 Commissioners Road EastLondon, Ontario, Canada N6A 5W91-519-667-6820
| | - Leslie Schmaltz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Mohammad A. Al-Haddad
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - John M. DeWitt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Cynthia S. J. Calley
- Department of Biostatistics, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Michelle Juan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Femi Lasisi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Stuart Sherman
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Lee McHenry
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Thomas F. Imperiale
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA,Center of Innovation, Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Julia K. LeBlanc
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Teixeira MJ, Neto ER, da Nóbrega JCM, Dos Ângelos JS, Martin MS, de Monaco BA, Fonoff ET. Celiac plexus neurolysis for the treatment of upper abdominal cancer pain. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2013; 9:1209-12. [PMID: 23983470 PMCID: PMC3751497 DOI: 10.2147/ndt.s43730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal treatment of oncologic pain is a challenge to all professionals who deal with cancer and its complications. The management of upper abdominal pain is usually difficult and it is often refractory to conservative therapies. In this context, celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) appears to be an important and indispensable tool because it alleviates pain, gives comfort to patients and is a safe procedure. In this study, the importance of CPN is reviewed by a retrospective study of 74 patients with pain due to upper abdominal cancer. Almost all cases evaluated (94.6%) had an excellent result after CPN and the majority of side effects were transitory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manoel Jacobsen Teixeira
- Department of Neurology, Division of Functional Neurosurgery of the Institute of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|