The salt output of a nebulizer--a comparison between two nebulizer types

Measurement of bronchial hyperreactivity: comparison of three Nordic dosimetric methods

Clinical testing of bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) provides valuable information in asthma diagnostics. Nevertheless, the test results depend to a great extent on the testing procedure: test substance, apparatus and protocol. In Nordic countries, three protocols predominate in the testing field: Per Malmberg, Nieminen and Sovijärvi methods. However, knowledge of their equivalence is limited. We aimed to find equivalent provocative doses (PD) to obtain similar bronchoconstrictive responses for the three protocols. We recruited 31 patients with suspected asthma and health care workers and performed BHR testing with methacholine according to Malmberg and Nieminen methods, and with histamine according to Sovijärvi. We obtained the individual response-dose slopes for each method and predicted equivalent PD values. Applying a mixed-model, we found significant differences in the mean (standard error of mean) response-dose (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁)%/mg): Sovijärvi 7.2 (1.5), Nieminen 13.8 (4.2) and Malmberg 26 (7.3). We found that the earlier reported cut-point values for moderate BHR and marked BHR between the Sovijärvi (PD₁₅) and Nieminen (PD₂₀) methods were similar, but with the Malmberg method a significant bronchoconstrictive reaction was measured with lower PD₂₀ values. We obtained a relationship between slope values and PD (mg) between different methods, useful in epidemiological research and clinical practice.

Nebulization associated with bi-level noninvasive ventilation: analysis of pulmonary radioaerosol deposition

Nebulization associated with noninvasive ventilation is used in emergency services and intensive care units.

PURPOSES

To compare pulmonary radioaerosol deposition during jet nebulization associated to noninvasive ventilation versus spontaneous breathing nebulization; to measure the rate of lung depuration and the correlation between lung deposition, inspiratory flow and tidal volume (V(t)) using scintigraphy.

SUBJECTS

Thirteen healthy volunteers (with normal spirometry), mean age (23.3+/-1.49) years, body mass index 21.2+/-2.3 kg/m(2).

METHODS

Nebulization was performed in spontaneous breathing and associated with bi-level noninvasive ventilation (inspiratory pressure=12 cm H(2)O, expiratory pressure=5 cm H(2)O). The radioaerosol used in the nebulization was technetium (Tc99m) with diethylene triamine penta acetic acid, generated over a period of 9 min in a jet nebulizer. Analysis was performed through scintigraphy. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (for repeated measures), Bonferroni method, Student's t-test and Person's correlation.

RESULTS

There was a decrease in radioaerosol lung deposition with nebulization associated to noninvasive ventilation (mean counts in spontaneous breathing 200,510+11,012 and mean counts in noninvasive ventilation 106,093+2811 (P<0.001). During spontaneous breathing nebulization there was a significant correlation between V(t) and radioaerosol deposition (r=0.565, P<0.05), also between inspiratory flow and radioaerosol deposition in the lungs (r=0.141, P<0.05). However, there was no correlation between V(t) and pulmonary deposition of radioaerosol in bi-level noninvasive ventilation nebulization (r=0.082).

CONCLUSION

During nebulization with noninvasive ventilation in healthy volunteers, there was an increase in V(t) associated to a higher inspiratory flow rate, without resulting in a significant increase in pulmonary radioaerosol deposition.

Effect of deep inhalations after a bronchial methacholine provocation in asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects

Deep inhalations cause a transient relaxation of the peripheral airways smooth muscles in non-asthmatic subjects. It has been claimed that the airway response to deep inhalations may be different in asthmatic subjects in whom deep inhalations should rather cause bronchoconstriction. The aim of the present study was to find out whether deep inhalations discriminate between asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects with pre-constricted airways, using a methacholine provocation test protocol with deep inhalations following the last dose of methacholine. In 164 adults, a methacholine provocation was performed. Directly after the FEV1 measurement at the highest metacholine concentration, the subjects took one deep breath and another three deep inhalations 20 s later. One minute after the inhalation of the highest concentration FEV1 was measured twice. Thirty-three asthmatics PD20FEV1 = 0.24 mg (0.13-0.39) (median, 25-75th 75th percentiles) and 131 non-asthmatics PD20FEV1 = 2.05 mg (0.72-10.1) participated. The mean maximal decrease in FEV1 after the provocation test was 36% in the asthmatics and 27% in the non-asthmatics. Corresponding values after the deep inhalations were 18% in the asthmatics and 12% in the non-asthmatics. In conclusion, deep inhalations attenuate the methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in both asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects. Thus, the effect of deep inhalations did not discriminate between asthmatic and non-asthmatic subjects.

Bronchial responsiveness to eucapnic hyperventilation and methacholine following exposure to organic dust

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Inhalation of dust in a swine confinement building causes an intense airway inflammatory reaction in the airways and increased bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. The aims of the present study were to investigate whether exposure to organic dust also influences bronchial responsiveness to an indirect stimulus, and to assess the duration of increased postexposure bronchial responsiveness.

DESIGN

Twenty-two healthy nonatopic, nonsmoking subjects were exposed to dust for 3 h in a swine confinement building. Lung function was assessed, and either a methacholine bronchial provocation (n = 11) or a challenge with eucapnic hyperventilation of dry air (n = 11) was performed before exposure and at 7 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks after exposure.

RESULTS

Vital capacity and FEV(1) decreased 3% and 6%, respectively (p < 0.001), and airway resistance increased 15% (p < 0.05) after exposure. The median provocative dose of methacholine causing a 20% decline in FEV(1) fell from 1.38 mg (25th to 75th percentiles, 0.75 to 7.20 mg) before exposure to 0.18 mg (0.11 to 0.30 mg) after exposure (p = 0.004). Corresponding values for the dose-response slope were 15.3%/mg (2.88 to 25.3%/mg) and 100.2%/mg (2.1 to 27.3%/mg), respectively (p = 0.01). Bronchial responsiveness to eucapnic hyperventilation was not affected by the exposure: FEV(1) fell 4.3% (- 7.2 to - 1.8%) before and 4.8% (- 6.7 to - 1.6%) after exposure (p = 0.72). One week after exposure, the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was normalized.

CONCLUSIONS

The bronchial responsiveness to methacholine but not to dry air increases after exposure to swine house dust. Thus, exposure to organic dust induces increased bronchial responsiveness with different characteristics from that frequently found in asthma.

Comparison of airway conductance and FEV(1) as measures of airway responsiveness to methacholine. Discrimination of small differences in bronchial responsiveness with Gaw and FEV(1)

When defining bronchial responsiveness in healthy, non-asthmatic, subjects exposed in different working situations, it is not clear whether different outcome measures yield similar results. Therefore, the concentration and dose of methacholine that caused a 20% decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) (PC20(FEV(1)) and PD20(FEV(1))), the corresponding change in Gaw and the relationship between the dose-response slope (DRS) for FEV(1) and Gaw was studied in different working populations and healthy control subjects (n=1038). The two outcome measures were compared in groups of subjects in whom differences in bronchial responsiveness could be anticipated [atopics (n=72) and non-atopics (n= 207) and subjects exposed (n=54) and not exposed (n=32) to saw dust]. A bronchial challenge was also made before and after exposure in a swine confinement building, an exposure known to increase bronchial responsiveness (n=37). PD20(FEV(1)) was 1.7 mg in atopics and 4.9 mg in non-atopics, 7.1 mg in saw dust exposed and >20 mg in non-exposed subjects and 5.3 mg before and 0.79 mg after exposure to organic dust. There was a correlation between DRS(FEV(1)) and DRS(Gaw), r=0.87 (P<0.001). In subjects who were highly sensitive to methacholine a 20% change in FEV(1) corresponded to <40% change in Gaw, while a 20% decrease in FEV1 corresponded to none or a minor decrease in Gaw in subjects with less methacholine-sensitive airways. The ability to detect differences in bronchial responsiveness between groups, or to detect changes in bronchial responsiveness following exposure was approximately the same for FEV(1) and Gaw. The reproducibility was similar for both variables and a second measurement was within one doubling of the methacholine concentration of the first provocation in approximately 95% of all measurements (n=41). In conclusion, with our methacholine provocation method, FEV(1) and Gaw had similar sensitivity in detecting small differences in bronchial responsiveness in healthy subjects.

Different response to doubling and fourfold dose increases in methacholine provocation tests in healthy subjects

RATIONALE

In a modified methacholine provocation test that was used to study changes in airway responsiveness to occupational irritants or sensitizers in healthy subjects, two protocols were used: a long protocol (doubling methacholine concentrations between dose steps) or a short protocol (fourfold increases in concentration). This modified methacholine provocation allows measurements of the provocative dose causing 20% decrease in FEV(1) (PD(20)) in a high proportion of a normal population.

METHODS

The distribution of PD(20) was investigated in healthy nonatopic men without history of allergy or asthma symptoms using the long protocol (n = 101) or the short protocol (n = 309). In addition, 30 healthy subjects underwent methacholine provocation tests using both protocols.

RESULTS

PD(20) was defined in 79% of subjects with the long protocol and in 48% of subjects with the short protocol. The provocative concentration of methacholine causing a 20% decline in FEV(1) (PC(20)) and PD(20) were significantly lower using the long protocol: long-protocol PC(20) (median [25th to 75th percentile]), 19.9 mg/mL (3.9 to > 32 mg/mL) compared with short-protocol PC(20), > 32 mg/mL (8.7 to >32 mg/mL; p < 0.0001); long-protocol PD(20), 4.2 mg (1.6 to 20 mg) compared with short-protocol PD(20), > 13.7 (2.6 to > 13.7 mg; p = 0. 006). The differences in PD(20) using short and long protocols were confirmed in a randomized trial of 30 healthy subjects tested with both protocols.

CONCLUSION

Using doubling concentrations, PC(20) and PD(20) could be defined in a higher proportion of healthy subjects than a protocol using fourfold dose increases. Furthermore, the doubling protocol results in a PD(20) estimate that is less than half the value obtained when using a protocol with fourfold concentrations between dose steps. The difference remains, whether the methacholine effect is regarded as cumulative or noncumulative. The explanation for the difference between the protocols is unclear.