Eosinophil influx into the airways in patients with exercise-induced asthma

Air quality and temperature effects on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is exaggerated constriction of the airways usually soon after cessation of exercise. This is most often a response to airway dehydration in the presence of airway inflammation in a person with a responsive bronchial smooth muscle. Severity is related to water content of inspired air and level of ventilation achieved and sustained. Repetitive hyperpnea of dry air during training is associated with airway inflammatory changes and remodeling. A response during exercise that is related to pollution or allergen is considered EIB. Ozone and particulate matter are the most widespread pollutants of concern for the exercising population; chronic exposure can lead to new-onset asthma and EIB. Freshly generated emissions particulate matter less than 100 nm is most harmful. Evidence for acute and long-term effects from exercise while inhaling high levels of ozone and/or particulate matter exists. Much evidence supports a relationship between development of airway disorders and exercise in the chlorinated pool. Swimmers typically do not respond in the pool; however, a large percentage responds to a dry air exercise challenge. Studies support oxidative stress mediated pathology for pollutants and a more severe acute response occurs in the asthmatic. Winter sport athletes and swimmers have a higher prevalence of EIB, asthma and airway remodeling than other athletes and the general population. Because of fossil fuel powered ice resurfacers in ice rinks, ice rink athletes have shown high rates of EIB and asthma. For the athlete training in the urban environment, training during low traffic hours and in low traffic areas is suggested.

Immunopathology of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in athletes--a new modified inflammatory hypothesis

Elite athletes have a higher prevalence of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction than the general population. The pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction is not fully elucidated. Increasing evidence suggests that airway inflammation plays a major role in the immunopathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. The aim of our review is to discuss existing evidence and to present a new, modified inflammatory hypothesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction. Exercise alters the number and function of circulating immune cells. Episodes of upper respiratory symptoms in elite athletes do not follow the usual seasonal patterns. Moreover, they have an unusual short-term duration, which suggests a non-infectious etiology. If the pro-inflammatory response to exercise has the potential to induce symptoms that mimic respiratory tract infection, it definitely up-regulates pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in the airways. We can conclude that exercise up-regulates airway cytokine expression in a way that favors inflammation and allergic reactions in bronchi and lowers the threshold for bronchoconstriction to different stimuli like cool, dry air, allergens, and pollutants.

Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma: mechanisms, clinical significance, and treatment

Airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) and airway inflammation are key pathophysiological features of asthma. Bronchial provocation tests (BPTs) are objective tests for AHR that are clinically useful to aid in the diagnosis of asthma in both adults and children. BPTs can be either “direct” or “indirect,” referring to the mechanism by which a stimulus mediates bronchoconstriction. Direct BPTs refer to the administration of pharmacological agonist (e.g., methacholine or histamine) that act on specific receptors on the airway smooth muscle. Airway inflammation and/or airway remodeling may be key determinants of the response to direct stimuli. Indirect BPTs are those in which the stimulus causes the release of mediators of bronchoconstriction from inflammatory cells (e.g., exercise, allergen, mannitol). Airway sensitivity to indirect stimuli is dependent upon the presence of inflammation (e.g., mast cells, eosinophils), which responds to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Thus, there is a stronger relationship between indices of steroid-sensitive inflammation (e.g., sputum eosinophils, fraction of exhaled nitric oxide) and airway sensitivity to indirect compared to direct stimuli. Regular treatment with ICS does not result in the complete inhibition of responsiveness to direct stimuli. AHR to indirect stimuli identifies individuals that are highly likely to have a clinical improvement with ICS therapy in association with an inhibition of airway sensitivity following weeks to months of treatment with ICS. To comprehend the clinical utility of direct or indirect stimuli in either diagnosis of asthma or monitoring of therapeutic intervention requires an understanding of the underlying pathophysiology of AHR and mechanisms of action of both stimuli.

Eotaxin in exhaled breath condensate of allergic asthma patients with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils are the key inflammatory cells in asthma, and more and more evidence suggests their crucial role in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). Eotaxin, as the most important chemotactic factor for eosinophils, plays an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the changes in eotaxin levels in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) following intensive exercise in allergic asthmatics.

METHODS

The study was performed in a group of 27 asthmatics (17 with EIB, 13 without EIB) and 9 healthy volunteers. Changes induced by intensive exercise in the concentrations of eotaxin in EBC during the 24 h after an exercise test were assessed. The possible correlations of these measurements with the results of other tests commonly associated with eosinophilic airway inflammation were also determined.

RESULTS

In asthmatic patients with EIB, a statistically significant increase in eotaxin concentrations in EBC collected during the first 24 h after an exercise test - with maximal increase after 6 h - was revealed. A statistically significant correlation between the maximum increase in eotaxin concentrations in EBC after exercise, and an increase in either serum eosinophil cationic protein or F(ENO) 24 h after exercise in the group of asthmatics with EIB, was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm connections between EIB and airway eosinophilic inflammation. The increase of eotaxin in asthmatic airways, by promoting the migration and activation of eosinophils, may play an important role in upregulation and sustaining of the airway inflammation observed in EIB in asthmatic patients.

The inflammatory basis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in individuals with asthma, and may be observed even in the absence of a clinical diagnosis of asthma. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction can be diagnosed via standardized exercise protocols, and anti-inflammatory therapy with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) is often warranted. Exercise-related symptoms are commonly reported in primary care; however, access to standardized exercise protocols to assess EIB are often restricted because of the need for specialized equipment, as well as time constraints. Symptoms and lung function remain the most accessible indicators of EIB, yet these are poor predictors of its presence and severity. Evidence suggests that exercise causes the airways to narrow as a result of the osmotic and thermal consequences of respiratory water loss. The increase in airway osmolarity leads to the release of bronchoconstricting mediators (eg, histamine, prostaglandins, leukotrienes) from inflammatory cells (eg, mast cells and eosinophils). The objective assessment of EIB suggests the presence of airway inflammation, which is sensitive to ICS in association with a responsive airway smooth muscle. Surrogate tests for EIB, such as eucapnic voluntary hyperpnea or the osmotic challenge tests, cause airway narrowing via a similar mechanism, and a response indicates likely benefit from ICS therapy. The complete inhibition of EIB with ICS therapy in individuals with asthma may be a useful marker of control of airway pathology. Furthermore, inhibition of EIB provides additional, useful information regarding the identification of clinical control based on symptoms and lung function. This article explores the inflammatory basis of EIB in asthma as well as the effect of ICS on the pathophysiology of EIB.

Human airway eosinophils respond to chemoattractants with greater eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release, adherence to fibronectin, and activation of the Ras-ERK pathway when compared with blood eosinophils

Human blood eosinophils exposed ex vivo to hematopoietic cytokines (e.g., IL-5 or GM-CSF) subsequently display enhanced responsiveness to numerous chemoattractants, such as chemokines, platelet-activating factor, or FMLP, through a process known as priming. Airway eosinophils, obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage after segmental Ag challenge, also exhibit enhanced responsiveness to selected chemoattractants, suggesting that they are primed during cell trafficking from the blood to the airway. Earlier work has shown that chemoattractants stimulate greater activation of ERK1 and ERK2 following IL-5 priming in vitro, thus revealing that ERK1/ERK2 activity can be a molecular readout of priming under these circumstances. Because few studies have examined the intracellular mechanisms regulating priming as it relates to human airway eosinophils, we evaluated the responsiveness of blood and airway eosinophils to chemoattractants (FMLP, platelet-activating factor, CCL11, CCL5, CXCL8) with respect to degranulation, adherence to fibronectin, or Ras-ERK signaling cascade activation. When compared with blood eosinophils, airway eosinophils exhibited greater FMLP-stimulated eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release as well as augmented FMLP- and CCL11-stimulated adherence to fibronectin. In airway eosinophils, FMLP, CCL11, and CCL5 stimulated greater activation of Ras or ERK1/ERK2 when compared with baseline. Ras activation by FMLP in blood eosinophils was also enhanced following IL-5 priming. These studies are consistent with a model of in vivo priming of eosinophils by IL-5 or related cytokines following allergen challenge, and further demonstrate the key role of priming in the chemoattractant-stimulated responses of eosinophils. These data also demonstrate the importance of the Ras-ERK signaling pathway in the regulation of eosinophil responses to chemoattractants in the airway. Human airway eosinophils respond to several chemoattractants with increased activation of the Ras-ERK cascade, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin release, and adherence to fibronectin relative to blood eosinophils.

Changes in serum eosinophil cationic protein levels after exercise challenge in asthmatic children

The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between serum eosinophil cationic protein levels and the severity of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children. The 48 asthmatic children were divided into exercise-induced bronchoconstriction group and non-exercise-induced bronchoconstriction group. In the exercise-induced bronchoconstriction group, the post-exercise serum eosinophil cationic protein levels were significantly increased as compared with the pre-exercise serum eosinophil cationic protein levels. These results suggested that eosinophil cationic protein may serve as a possible contributor to the pathophysiology of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthmatic children.

Airway inflammation in the elite athlete and type of sport

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of asthma and bronchial hyper-responsiveness is greater in elite athletes than in the general population, and its association with mild airway inflammation has recently been reported.

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between the type of sport practised at the highest levels of competition (on land or in water) and sputum induction cell counts in a group of healthy people and people with asthma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In total, 50 athletes were enrolled. Medical history, results of methacholine challenge tests and sputum induced by hypertonic saline were analysed

RESULTS

Full results were available for 43 athletes, who were classified by asthma diagnosis and type of sport (land or water sports). Nineteen were healthy (10 land and 9 water athletes) and 24 had asthma (13 land and 11 water athletes). Although the eosinophil counts of healthy people and people with asthma were significantly different (mean difference 3.1%, 95% CI 0.4 to 6.2, p = 0.008), analysis of variance showed no effect on eosinophil count for either diagnosis of asthma or type of sport. However, an effect was found for neutrophil counts (analysis of variance: F = 2.87, p = 0.04). There was also a significant correlation between neutrophil counts and both duration of training and bronchial hyper-responsiveness among athletes exposed to water (Spearman's rank correlations, 0.36 and 0.47, p = 0.04 and 0.04, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Elite athletes who practice water sports have mild neutrophilic inflammation, whether or not asthma is present, related to the degree of bronchial hyper-reactivity and the duration of training in pool water.

The role of chemokines in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma is incompletely understood, and the role of chemokines has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the involvement of the CC chemokines eotaxin, regulated upon activation normal T-cell expressed and secreted (RANTES), thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC), and the CXC chemokine interferon-gamma-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) in exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Four groups were enrolled: asthmatic children with positive (n = 15) and negative (n = 15) responses to exercise, children with cystic fibrosis (n = 14), and healthy children (n = 11). Levels of eotaxin, RANTES, TARC, and IP-10 were determined in plasma before, immediately after, and 6 and 24 hours after exercise challenge using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Transcriptional activity was measured using reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

Exercise did not induce any significant changes in systemic chemokine levels. A significant difference was observed only in the preexercise IP-10 levels among groups (P = .045). There was a significant difference in peripheral blood eosinophil counts among groups (P = .003). In asthmatic children with a positive response to exercise, there was an inverse correlation between eosinophil counts and eotaxin levels (r = -0.616; P = .01) and between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and TARC levels (r = -0.865; P = .001). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction studies did not show any difference in the transcription of the chemokines.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise does not cause any changes in the systemic expression of eosinophilic chemokines. Peripheral blood eosinophils may be a determinant of the exercise response, and eotaxin and TARC may be associated with eosinophil counts and forced expiratory volume in 1 second in children with a bronchoconstrictor response to exercise.

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction alters airway nitric oxide exchange in a pattern distinct from spirometry

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) is altered in asthmatic subjects with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). However, the physiological interpretation of exhaled NO is limited because of its dependence on exhalation flow and the inability to distinguish completely proximal (large airway) from peripheral (small airway and alveolar) contributions. We estimated flow-independent NO exchange parameters that partition exhaled NO into proximal and peripheral contributions at baseline, postexercise challenge, and postbronchodilator administration in steroid-naive mild-intermittent asthmatic subjects with EIB (24-43 yr old, n = 9) and healthy controls (20-31 yr old, n = 9). The mean +/- SD maximum airway wall flux and airway diffusing capacity were elevated and forced expiratory flow, midexpiratory phase (FEF(25-75)), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and FEV(1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) were reduced at baseline in subjects with EIB compared with healthy controls, whereas the steady-state alveolar concentration of NO and FVC were not different. Compared with the response of healthy controls, exercise challenge significantly reduced FEV(1) (-23 +/- 15%), FEF(25-75) (-37 +/- 18%), FVC (-12 +/- 12%), FEV(1)/FVC (-13 +/- 8%), and maximum airway wall flux (-35 +/- 11%) relative to baseline in subjects with EIB, whereas bronchodilator administration only increased FEV(1) (+20 +/- 21%), FEF(25-75) (+56 +/- 41%), and FEV(1)/FVC (+13 +/- 9%). We conclude that mild-intermittent steroid-naive asthmatic subjects with EIB have altered airway NO exchange dynamics at baseline and after exercise challenge but that these changes occur by distinct mechanisms and are not correlated with alterations in spirometry.

Protective effect of fish oil supplementation on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in asthma

BACKGROUND

Previous research has demonstrated that fish oil supplementation has a protective effect on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in elite athletes, which may be attributed to its antiinflammatory properties. Since EIB in asthma involves proinflammatory mediator release, it is feasible that fish oil supplementation may reduce the severity of EIB in asthmatic subjects.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of fish oil supplementation on severity of EIB in subjects with asthma.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind, crossover study.

SETTING

Lung function and exercise testing in a university research laboratory.

PATIENTS AND MEASUREMENTS

Sixteen asthmatic patients with documented EIB entered the study on their normal diet and then received either fish oil capsules containing 3.2 g of eicosapentaenoic acid and 2.0 g of docohexaenoic acid (fish oil diet, n = 8) or placebo capsules (placebo diet, n = 8) daily for 3 weeks. At the beginning of the study (normal diet) and at the end of each treatment phase, the following pre-exercise and postexercise measures were assessed: (1) pulmonary function; (2) induced sputum differential cell count percentage and proinflammatory eicosanoid metabolite (leukotriene C4 [LTC4]-leukotriene E4 [LTE4] and prostaglandin D2 [PGD2]) and cytokine (interleukin [IL]-1beta and tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-alpha) concentrations; and (3) eicosanoid metabolites leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and leukotriene B5 (LTB(5)) generation from activated polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs).

RESULTS

On the normal and placebo diet, subjects exhibited EIB. However, the fish oil diet improved pulmonary function to below the diagnostic EIB threshold, with a concurrent reduction in bronchodilator use. Induced sputum differential cell count percentage and concentrations of LTC4-LTE4, PGD2, IL-1beta, and TNF-alpha were significantly reduced before and following exercise on the fish oil diet compared to the normal and placebo diets. There was a significant reduction in LTB4 and a significant increase in LTB5 generation from activated PMNLs on the fish oil diet compared to the normal and placebo diets.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that fish oil supplementation may represent a potentially beneficial nonpharmacologic intervention for asthmatic subjects with EIB.

Dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids in asthma- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

Despite progress that has been made in the treatment of asthma, the prevalence and burden of this disease has continued to increase. While pharmacological treatment of asthma is usually highly effective, medications may have significant side effects or exhibit tachyphylaxis. Alternative therapies for treatment that reduce the dose requirements of pharmacological interventions would be beneficial, and could potentially reduce the public health burden of this disease. Ecological and temporal data suggest that dietary factors may have a role in recent increases in the prevalence of asthma. A possible contributing factor to the increased incidence of asthma in Western societies may be the consumption of a proinflammatory diet. In the typical Western diet, 20- to 25-fold more omega (n)-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) than n-3 PUFA are consumed, which promotes the release of proinflammatory arachidonic acid metabolites (leukotrienes and prostanoids). This review will analyze the evidence for the health effects of n-3 PUFA in asthma- and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB). While clinical data evaluating the effect of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation in asthma has been equivocal, it has recently been shown that fish oil supplementation, rich in n-3 PUFA, reduces airway narrowing, medication use, and proinflammatory mediator generation in nonatopic elite athletes with EIB. These findings are provocative and suggest that dietary fish oil supplementation may be a viable treatment modality and/or adjunct therapy in asthma and EIB.

Gas exchange during exercise in habitually active asthmatic subjects

We determined the relations among gas exchange, breathing mechanics, and airway inflammation during moderate- to maximum-intensity exercise in asthmatic subjects. Twenty-one habitually active (48.2 +/- 7.0 ml.kg(-1).min(-1) maximal O2 uptake) mildly to moderately asthmatic subjects (94 +/- 13% predicted forced expiratory volume in 1.0 s) performed treadmill exercise to exhaustion (11.2 +/- 0.15 min) at approximately 90% of maximal O2 uptake. Arterial O2 saturation decreased to < or =94% during the exercise in 8 of 21 subjects, in large part as a result of a decrease in arterial Po2 (PaO2): from 93.0 +/- 7.7 to 79.7 +/- 4.0 Torr. A widened alveolar-to-arterial Po2 difference and the magnitude of the ventilatory response contributed approximately equally to the decrease in PaO2 during exercise. Airflow limitation and airway inflammation at baseline did not correlate with exercise gas exchange, but an exercise-induced increase in sputum histamine levels correlated with exercise Pa(O2) (negatively) and alveolar-to-arterial Po2 difference (positively). Mean pulmonary resistance was high during exercise (3.4 +/- 1.2 cmH2O.l(-1).s) and did not increase throughout exercise. Expiratory flow limitation occurred in 19 of 21 subjects, averaging 43 +/- 35% of tidal volume near end exercise, and end-expiratory lung volume rose progressively to 0.25 +/- 0.47 liter greater than resting end-expiratory lung volume at exhaustion. These mechanical constraints to ventilation contributed to a heterogeneous and frequently insufficient ventilatory response; arterial Pco2 was 30-47 Torr at end exercise. Thus pulmonary gas exchange is impaired during high-intensity exercise in a significant number of habitually active asthmatic subjects because of high airway resistance and, possibly, a deleterious effect of exercise-induced airway inflammation on gas exchange efficiency.

Single-dose agents in the prevention of exercise-induced asthma: a descriptive review

Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) refers to the transient narrowing of the airways that occurs after vigorous exercise in 50-60% of patients with asthma. The need to condition the air inspired during exercise causes water to be lost from the airway surface, and this is thought to cause the release of inflammatory mediators (histamine, leukotrienes, and prostaglandins) from mast cells. EIA is associated with airway inflammation and its severity is markedly reduced following treatment with inhaled corticosteroids. Drugs that inhibit the release of mediators and drugs that inhibit their contractile effects are the most successful in inhibiting EIA. Single doses of short-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists, given as aerosols immediately before exercise, are very effective in the majority of patients with asthma, providing about 80% protection for up to 2 hours. Long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (LABAs) given in single doses can be effective for up to 12 hours when used intermittently, but tolerance to the protective effect occurs if they are taken daily. Drugs such as cromolyn sodium (sodium cromoglicate) and nedocromil given as aerosols are less effective than beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonists (beta(2)-agonists), providing 50-60% protection for only 1-2 hours, but they have some advantages. They do not induce tolerance, the aerosol dosage can be easily titrated for the individual, and the protective effect is immediate. Because they cause no significant adverse effects, multiple doses can be used in a day. Leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast and zafirlukast, are also used for the prevention of EIA and provide 50-60% protection for up to 24 hours when given as tablets. Tolerance to the protective effect does not develop with regular use. If breakthrough EIA occurs, a beta(2)-agonist can be used effectively for rescue medication. For those patients with more persistent symptoms, the use of a LABA in combination with an inhaled corticosteroid has raised a number of issues with respect to the choice of prophylactic treatment for EIA. The most important issue is the development of tolerance to the protective effect of a LABA such that extra treatment may be needed in the middle of a treatment period. Recommending extra doses of a beta(2)-agonist to control EIA is not advisable on the basis that multiple doses can enhance the severity of EIA, delay spontaneous recovery from bronchoconstriction, and enhance responses to other contractile stimuli. It is time to take into account the advantages and disadvantages of the different drugs available to prevent EIA and to recognize that there are some myths related to their use in EIA.

Exhaled breath condensate cysteinyl leukotrienes are increased in children with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction

BACKGROUND

It is recognized that airway inflammation has a central role in the pathogenesis of asthma, but how it relates to exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is not completely understood.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between EIB and baseline concentrations of cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs) and other inflammatory markers in exhaled breath condensate (EBC).

METHODS

EBC was collected, and the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FE NO ) was measured in a group of 19 asthmatic children, after which they performed a treadmill exercise test. Fourteen healthy children were enrolled as control subjects.

RESULTS

The asthmatic children were divided into the EIB group (decrease in FEV 1 , > or =12%) and the non-EIB group. The EBC was analyzed for the presence of Cys-LTs, leukotriene B 4 , and ammonia. Asthmatic patients with EIB (mean FEV 1 decrease, 23% +/- 3%) had higher Cys-LT concentrations than either asthmatic patients without EIB or control subjects (42.2 pg/mL [median] vs 11.7 pg/mL and 5.8 pg/mL; P < .05 and P < .001, respectively). Ammonia concentrations were lower in both the EIB and non-EIB groups than in control subjects (253.2 microM and 334.6 microM vs 798.4 microM; P < .01 and P < .05, respectively). No difference in EBC leukotriene B 4 levels was found among the 3 groups. Both asthmatic groups had higher FE NO levels than control subjects ( P < .001). EBC Cys-LT ( P < .01; r = 0.7) and FE NO ( P < .05; r = 0.5) values both correlated significantly with the postexercise FEV 1 decrease.

CONCLUSION

this study shows that EBC Cys-LT values are higher in asthmatic children with EIB and correlate with the decrease in FEV 1 after exercise. These findings suggest that the pathways of both Cys-LT and nitric oxide are involved in the pathogenesis of EIB.

Exercise-Induced Asthma: An Update

Exercise-induced asthma (E.I.A) affects 12–16% of the general population and most of the patients affected by extrinsic or intrinsic asthma. Surprisingly, also a high percentage of professional and Olympic athletes are affected, showing that E.I.A. does not impair physical activity, whereas endurance sports bear a higher risk than the others. The mast cell role, late asthmatic responses, diagnosis, therapy, theories and data about immunological parameters in sports are taken into consideration in this review.

Activity-induced asthma

Exercise is the most common trigger of persistent childhood asthma. The history for EIA can be complicated by the lack of perception of significant airway obstruction during exercise. One must carefully identify those children with EIA from the group of children who report low level of activity because of lack of interest or because they are out of shape. Baseline spirometry of children with persistent asthma is frequently normal. Spirometry is important to identify those children with EIA who underrecognize their disease, but normal results should not be used as evidence of absence of disease. Formal exercise testing should be considered when the diagnosis is unclear or if there seems to be a lack of bronchoprotection with inhaled albuterol. The goal of treatment of EIA should be the attainment of a normal activity level for children and adolescents. Identification of the limits imposed by EIA and establishment of goals of therapy with the child and family should be the initial action. Inactivity or reduced exertion, in the presence of this diagnosis. should not be accepted. Therapy for EIA starts with control of the underlying persistent asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the most effective initial treatment of both EIA and persistent asthma in children and adolescents. Exercise-induced asthma is a common aspect of a prevalent disease that warrants proper diagnosis and treatment. With appropriate therapy, children with EIA should be able to participate in sports and maintain normal activity. They should strive to compete in the same playing field as their peers and have the same goals as those children and athletes who do not have exercise-induced asthma.

Exercise-induced asthma in children: a marker of airway inflammation

What we know: Exercise-induced asthma (EIA) occurs in up to 23% of schoolchildren. In 40% of children with demonstrable EIA, no clinical diagnosis of asthma has been made. Children with asthma and EIA have eosinophils in their sputum, consistent with active asthma. EIA is well controlled in 50%-65% of children with moderate to severe asthma, so that only a minority will need prophylactic therapy immediately before exercise. Beta(2)-agonists are not the most suitable therapy for preventing EIA if they need to be used on a daily basis. The severity of EIA appears to be an indirect index of the severity of airway inflammation. What we need to know: Do non-symptomatic children with EIA require treatment for asthma? Does failure to identify and treat children unaware of their airways narrowing after exercise lead to airflow limitation in the long term, particularly in the small airways? Can exercise, or surrogate tests used to identify EIA, also be used to assess children with asthma? What is the minimum dose of steroid required to inhibit EIA, as high doses of steroids may be inappropriate in children? What is the best prophylactic treatment for EIA in children whose asthma is otherwise well controlled by inhaled steroids? What is the best prophylactic treatment for EIA in children with frequent episodic asthma or mild persistent asthma? Are leukotriene antagonists alone better than beta(2)-agonists alone in preventing EIA throughout the day? How many children taking long-acting beta(2)-agonists twice daily, either alone or in combination with an inhaled steroid, experience breakthrough EIA during school and require rescue medication?