Assessment of asthma severity and treatment by GPs in Belgium: an Asthma Drug Utilization Research Study (ADUR)

Knowledge, attitude and practices of PHC physicians in Aseer region regarding management of acute asthma

Objectives

This study aims to explore knowledge, attitude and practices of physicians working at primary health care (PHC) in Abha, KSA, regarding assessment and management of acute bronchial asthma.

Subjects and Methods

This is a cross-sectional study that was conducted among PHC physicians in Abha, Khamis Mushayt and Ahad Rufeida cities, Aseer region KSA in 2018. A questionnaire that was constructed by the investigators was used to assess the knowledge, attitude and practices of PHC physicians regarding the diagnosis and management of patients with acute asthma. The questionnaire was distributed under the supervision of the first investigator. Data management was carried out using SPSS version 23.

Results

A total of 200 PHC physicians participated in this study. About two-thirds of them (63.5%) had good grade of knowledge regarding acute asthma management, whereas 44% had positive attitude toward acute asthma management. The main knowledge gaps were doses of drugs used in the management of acute severe asthma attack (36%), and diagnosis of acute severe asthma attack (51.5%). Physicians' main source of knowledge on asthma included textbooks (26%) and guidelines (61.5%). Physicians' practice grades were significantly higher among those with less experience in PHC (p = 0.011). Almost all PHC centers (PHCC) (98%) had oxygen and nebulizers, 72.5% had steroids, 71.5% had salbutamol, 50.5% had ipratropium and 41% had peak flow meter, whereas 73.5% had the Saudi Initiative for Asthma (SINA) guidelines.

Conclusion

This study revealed that knowledge of PHC physicians regarding the management of bronchial asthma was suboptimal, their attitude is not completely positive, and their adherence to asthma management guidelines is quite low. Some PHCCs were lacking important drugs and equipment for management acute asthma that should be provided. Well-structured training of PHCC doctors on SINA is mandatory to upgrade their knowledge, promote their attitude and improve their skills.

Mapping the Asthma Care Process: Implications for Research and Practice

BACKGROUND

Whether people with asthma gain and maintain control over their condition depends not only on the availability of effective drugs, but also on multiple patient and health care professional (HCP) behaviors. Research in asthma rarely considers how these behaviors interact with each other and drug effectiveness to determine health outcomes, which may limit real-life applicability of findings.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop a logic process model (Asthma Care Model; ACM) that explains how patient and HCP behaviors impact on the asthma care process.

METHODS

Within a European research project on asthma (ASTRO-LAB), we reviewed asthma care guidelines and empirical literature, and conducted qualitative interviews with patients and HCPs. Findings were discussed with the project team and respiratory care experts and integrated in a causal model.

RESULTS

The model outlines a causal sequence of treatment events, from diagnosis and assessment to treatment prescription, drug exposure, and health outcomes. The relationships between these components are moderated by patient behaviors (medication adherence, symptom monitoring, managing triggers, and exacerbations) and HCP behaviors (medical care and self-management support). Modifiable and nonmodifiable behavioral determinants influence the behaviors of patients and HCPs. The model is dynamic as it includes feedback loops of behavioral and clinical outcomes, which influence future patient and HCP decision making. Key evidence for each relationship is summarized to derive research priorities and clinical recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

The ACM model is of interest to both researchers and practitioners, and intended as a first version (ACM-v1) of a common framework for generating and translating research evidence in asthma care.

Drug prescription pattern for asthma among nigerian doctors in general practice: A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

A wide range of medications are now available for the treatment of asthma and selection of the optimal treatment combination of agents is essential.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate a self-reported drug prescribing pattern for asthma among Nigerian doctors in general practice.

METHODS

It was a cross-sectional survey conducted among general practitioners in six states of Nigeria.

RESULTS

For acute severe asthma, 75.9% of the doctors prescribed intravenous methylxanthines, which was combined with oral or inhaled short-acting β(2) agonists (SABA) by 56.3% of them. Systemic steroids were prescribed mainly via the intravenous route by 58.8% of them. Aberrant drugs such as antibiotics, antihistamines, and mucolytics were prescribed by 25.6% of them. For long-term, follow-up treatment of asthma, oral steroids, and oral SABA were commonly prescribed, while inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and ICS/LABA (long acting beta agonists) were infrequently prescribed. Aberrant drugs such as analgesics, antimalaria, and antihistamines were prescribed by 22.8% of them. About 48% of the doctors had never attended any form of update training on asthma management, whereas, only 16.3% attended update training on asthma within the last year preceding this study. Awareness of international guidelines on asthma treatment was poor among them with only 16.4% being able to mention any correct guideline on asthma management.

CONCLUSION

The poor anti-asthma prescribing behavior among these doctors is associated with a low level of participation at update training on asthma management and poor awareness of asthma guidelines. The Nigerian Medical Association and the Nigerian Thoracic Society should urgently address these problems.

The impact of bronchiectasis in clinical presentation of asthma

BACKGROUND

Though asthma and bronchiectasis are two different diseases, their coexistence has been shown in many patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical features of asthmatics with bronchiectasis compared with pure asthmatics.

METHODS

We evaluated 1680 asthmatics followed-up in our clinic. Fifty-one asthmatics had the diagnosis of bronchiectasis. These patients were compared with fifty-one age and gender matched asthmatics without bronchiectasis.

RESULTS

The prevalence of bronchiectasis among the asthmatics was 3%. Asthma diagnosis was made at the age of 33.2 +/- 16.8 years for asthmatics with bronchiectasis and 39.5 +/- 16.2 years for pure asthmatics (P = 0.05). Asthmatics with bronchiectasis mostly had severe persistent asthma (49.0%), while pure asthmatics mostly had mild persistent and intermittent asthma (69.4%). History of hospitalization due to severe asthma exacerbation and presence of chronic respiratory failure was significantly higher in bronchiectatic group.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that bronchiectasis can contribute to severe and difficult to control asthma with pulmonary complications like chronic respiratory failure.

Chronic outpatient management of asthmatics attending the emergency department: a survey from a country with low income

PURPOSE

Little is known about compliance with international guidelines of asthma management in developing countries where some medications are prohibitively expensive.

METHODS

A survey was conducted in asthmatic patients attending the emergency department for acute asthma. Asthma severity was evaluated and conformity of chronic treatment with international guidelines was assessed. Additional features of asthmatic education were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 127 consecutive patients (mean age 34 +/- 14 years) answered the questionnaire. Mild asthma was present in 19.7% patients, 56.7% had moderate asthma and 23.6% had severe asthma. Of the 124 known asthmatic patients, 33% had no treatment for chronic asthma. In the remaining, treatment adhered to international guidelines in 44% patients. The major cause of treatment inadequacy was the lack of inhaled corticosteroids (64%) or suboptimal dosage of corticosteroids (13%). Conformity to guidelines according to favorable or unfavorable economic conditions was 59% and 33%, respectively (P = 0.036). Treating physicians provided an 'action plan' for managing acute symptoms to 19% patients. Forty percent of asthmatic patients performed correctly the five components of metered dose inhaler use.

CONCLUSION

Our study reveals an important proportion of non-treated asthmatic patients. In most asthmatic patients, treatment did not conform with guidelines because of an underutilization of corticosteroids, mainly because of economic obstacles.

Prevalence estimates of asthma or COPD from a health interview survey and from general practitioner registration: what's the difference?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare prevalence estimates of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) derived from self-report in a health interview survey and from general practitioners' (GPs') medical records, and to explain any differences.

METHODS

the presence of asthma or COPD was measured by self-report in a random sample of 104 general practices in the Netherlands (n = 19 685) participating in the second Dutch National Survey of General Practice (DNSGP-2). This was compared with the presence of GP-diagnosed asthma or COPD in the same population as recorded using the International Classification of Primary Care by their GPs during a 12-month period. Gender, age, health insurance, ethnic background, educational level, tobacco exposure, and other symptoms and conditions were evaluated as explanatory variables using logistic models.

RESULTS

The prevalence of self-reported asthma or COPD (9.7%) was almost twice as high as the prevalence based on GP information (5.2%). The medical records of patients who reported having asthma or COPD, without having a diagnosis in their medical records, usually included other respiratory conditions. Patients reporting no asthma or COPD but whose medical records carried a diagnosis of asthma or COPD, were relatively older (P < 0.01) and tended to be exposed to smoking in their home (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Two methods for estimating prevalence of asthma or COPD yielded different results: compared with GP medical records, self-reported prevalence shows an overestimation in people who suffer from other respiratory conditions and an underestimation in elderly persons living in a smoky environment.

Impact of 'mild' asthma on health outcomes: findings of a systematic search of the literature

The present bibliographic review shows that patients considered to have mild asthma often suffer impairment in quality of life (QoL) and use considerable scheduled and unscheduled health care resources. I found that asthma investigators used no consistent classification scheme for asthma severity, and the level of agreement amongst specialists when categorizing patients with asthma was low. Asthma severity has been classified using a wide range of parameters including medication use, asthma symptoms, lung function, hospitalizations and incidence of exacerbations. Most studies showed a general association between asthma severity and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) such that patients with severe disease suffered greater impairment. However, few patients with mild asthma enjoyed unimpaired HRQoL. Indeed depression and impaired HRQoL were reported as frequently in patients with mild asthma as in those with more severe disease. Although in general severe patients used the most health care resources, even patients with mild asthma used considerable health care resources including emergency room care and hospitalizations. In summary, the term 'mild' when applied to asthma is potentially misleading given the impaired HRQoL and avoidable health care utilization prevalent amongst such patients. The application of disease severity classification in clinical asthma management has not been validated. It may now be appropriate to examine these classifications more critically in order to determine if they have clinical or research usefulness. By contrast, the strategy of treating to achieve disease control has been validated and offers the advantage of simplicity in its application.