Cytological examination of the whole endobronchial brush in bronchoscopic diagnosis of lung cancer

Staging research of human lung cancer tissues by high-resolution magic angle spinning proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (HRMAS 1 H NMR) and multivariate data analysis

AIM

High-resolution magic-angle spinning proton nuclear magnetic resonance (HRMAS ¹ H NMR) spectroscopy technique was employed to analyze the metabonomic characterizations of lung cancer tissues in hope to identify potential diagnostic biomarkers for malignancy detection and staging research of lung tissues.

METHODS

HRMAS ¹ H NMR spectroscopy technique can rapidly provide important information for accurate diagnosis and staging of cancer tissues owing to its noninvasive nature and limited requirement for the samples, and thus has been acknowledged as an excellent tool to investigate tissue metabolism and provide a more realistic insight into the metabonomics of tissues when combined with multivariate data analysis (MVDA) such as component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis in particular.

RESULTS

HRMAS ¹ H NMR spectra displayed the metabonomic differences of 32 lung cancer tissues at the different stages from 32 patients. The significant changes (P < 0.05) of some important metabolites such as lipids, aspartate and choline-containing compounds in cancer tissues at the different stages had been identified. Furthermore, the combination of HRMAS ¹ H NMR spectroscopy and MVDA might potentially and precisely provided for a high sensitivity, specificity, prediction accuracy in the positive identification of the staging for the cancer tissues in contrast with the pathological data in clinic.

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the potential of metabonomics in clinical settings so that the techniques might be further exploited for the diagnosis and staging prediction of lung cancer in future.

Establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is usually suspected in individuals who have an abnormal chest radiograph or have symptoms caused by either local or systemic effects of the tumor. The method of diagnosis of lung cancer depends on the type of lung cancer (small cell lung cancer or non-small cell lung cancer [NSCLC]), the size and location of the primary tumor, the presence of metastasis, and the overall clinical status of the patient. The objective of this study was to determine the test performance characteristics of various modalities for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer.

METHODS

To update previous recommendations on techniques available for the initial diagnosis of lung cancer, a systematic search of the MEDLINE, Healthstar, and Cochrane Library databases covering material to July 2011 and print bibliographies was performed to identify studies comparing the results of sputum cytology, conventional bronchoscopy, flexible bronchoscopy (FB), electromagnetic navigation (EMN) bronchoscopy, radial endobronchial ultrasound (R-EBUS)-guided lung biopsy, transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA) or biopsy, pleural fluid cytology, and pleural biopsy with histologic reference standard diagnoses among at least 50 patients with suspected lung cancer. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method (see the article "Methodology for Development of Guidelines for Lung Cancer" in this guideline), and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guideline Panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, the Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

Sputum cytology is an acceptable method of establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer, with a pooled sensitivity rate of 66% and a specificity rate of 99%. However, the sensitivity of sputum cytology varies according to the location of the lung cancer. For central, endobronchial lesions, the overall sensitivity of FB for diagnosing lung cancer is 88%. The diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy decreases for peripheral lesions. Peripheral lesions &lt; 2 or &gt; 2 cm in diameter showed a sensitivity of 34% and 63%, respectively. R-EBUS and EMN are emerging technologies for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer, with diagnostic yields of 73% and 71%, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of TTNA for the diagnosis of lung cancer was 90%. A trend toward lower sensitivity was noted for lesions &lt; 2 cm in diameter. TTNA is associated with a higher rate of pneumothorax compared with bronchoscopic procedures. In a patient with a malignant pleural effusion, pleural fluid cytology is reported to have a mean sensitivity of about 72%. A definitive diagnosis of metastatic disease to the pleural space can be estalished with a pleural biopsy. The diagnostic yield for closed pleural biopsy ranges from 38% to 47% and from 75% to 88% for image-guided closed biopsy. Thoracoscopic biopsy of the pleura carries the highest diagnostic yield, 95% to 97%. The accuracy in differentiating between small cell and non-small cell cytology for the various diagnostic modalities was 98%, with individual studies ranging from 94% to 100%. The average false-positive and false-negative rates were 9% and 2%, respectively. Although the distinction between small cell and NSCLC by cytology appears to be accurate, NSCLCs are clinically, pathologically, and molecularly heterogeneous tumors. In the past decade, clinical trials have shown us that NSCLCs respond to different therapeutic agents based on histologic phenotypes and molecular characteristics. The physician performing diagnostic procedures on a patient suspected of having lung cancer must ensure that adequate tissue is acquired to perform accurate histologic and molecular characterization of NSCLCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of bronchoscopy is high for endobronchial disease and poor for peripheral lesions &lt; 2 cm in diameter. The sensitivity of TTNA is excellent for malignant disease, but TTNA has a higher rate of pneumothorax than do bronchoscopic modalities. R-EBUS and EMN bronchoscopy show potential for increasing the diagnostic yield of FB for peripheral lung cancers. Thoracoscopic biopsy of the pleura has the highest diagnostic yield for diagnosis of metastatic pleural effusion in a patient with lung cancer. Adequate tissue acquisition for histologic and molecular characterization of NSCLCs is paramount.

Study on metabonomic characteristics of human lung cancer using high resolution magic-angle spinning 1H NMR spectroscopy and multivariate data analysis

Lung cancer causes serious health problems. Clinical diagnosis of lung cancer relies on histopathological evalution of tissue specimen. However, extensive knowledge of the metabolic biochemistry of tumors can potentially provide important information for accurate diagnosis of lung cancer. High resolution magic-angle spinning NMR spectroscopy has emerged and be widely acknowledged as an excellent tool in investigating tissue metabolism. Moreover, the combination of high resolution magic-angle spinning NMR technique and multivariate data analysis has become an important metabonomics platform for studying the intact biological tissues. This study reported the metabonomic characteristics of 51 lung tissues from 17 patients with lung cancer using the high resolution magic-angle spinning 1H NMR spectroscopy and the multivariate data analysis methods including principal component analysis and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis. Clear differences among the metabonomic characteristics of lung cancer tissues at various sites were disclosed. Compared with the adjacent noninvolved tissues, the lung cancer tissues had significantly high levels of aspartate, phosphocholine, glycerophosphocholine and lactate but significantly low levels of glucose and valine. Furthermore, significantly positive (or negative) correlations were observed between the levels of some metabolites such as lactate, fatty acids, valine, phosphocholine, and glycerophosphocholine.

Initial Diagnosis of Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is usually suspected in individuals who have an abnormal chest radiograph finding or have symptoms caused by either local or systemic effects of the tumor. The method of diagnosis of suspected lung cancer depends on the type of lung cancer (ie, small cell lung cancer [SCLC] or non-SCLC [NSCLC]), the size and location of the primary tumor, the presence of metastasis, and the overall clinical status of the patient.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the test performance characteristics of various modalities for the diagnosis of suspected lung cancer.

METHODS

To update previous recommendations on the initial diagnosis of lung cancer, a systematic search of MEDLINE, Healthstar, and Cochrane Library databases to July 2004, and print bibliographies was performed to identify studies comparing the results of sputum cytology, bronchoscopy, transthoracic needle aspiration (TTNA), or biopsy with histologic reference standard diagnoses among at least 50 patients with suspected lung cancer. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the lung cancer panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology Network, Health and Science Policy Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physician.

RESULTS

Sputum cytology is an acceptable method of establishing the diagnosis of lung cancer with a pooled sensitivity rate of 0.66 and specificity rate of 0.99. However, the sensitivity of sputum cytology varies by location of the lung cancer. For central, endobronchial lesions, the overall sensitivity of flexible bronchoscopy (FB) for diagnosing lung cancer is 0.88. The diagnostic yield of bronchoscopy decreases for peripheral lesions. Peripheral lesions smaller or larger than 2 cm in diameter showed a sensitivity of 0.34 and 0.63, respectively. In recent years, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has shown potential in increasing the diagnostic yield of FB while dealing with peripheral lesions without adding to the risk of the procedure. In appropriate situations, its use can be considered before moving on to more invasive tests. The pooled sensitivity for TTNA for the diagnosis of lung cancer is 0.90. A trend toward lower sensitivity was noted for lesions < 2 cm in diameter. The accuracy in differentiating between SCLC and NSCLC cytology for the various diagnostic modalities was 0.98, with individual studies ranging from 0.94 to 1.0. The average false-positive rate and FN rate were 0.09 and 0.02, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The sensitivity of bronchoscopy is high for the detection of endobronchial disease and poor for peripheral lesions < 2 cm in diameter. Detection of the latter can be aided with the use of EBUS in the appropriate clinical setting. The sensitivity of TTNA is excellent for malignant disease. The distinction between SCLC and NSCLC by cytology appears to be accurate.