Infectious complications in renal transplant recipients

A primer for managing cardiac transplant patients in the emergency department setting

BACKGROUND

Cardiac transplant is an effective long-term management option for several severe cardiac diseases. These cardiac transplant patients may present to the emergency department with a range of issues involving the cardiac transplantation, including complications due to their transplant as well as altered presentations of disease resulting from their transplant.

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review provides a focused guide to the evaluation and management of patients with cardiac transplantation and its complications.

DISCUSSION

Cardiac transplant is an effective therapy for end-stage heart failure. A transplanted heart varies both anatomically and physiologically from a native heart. Several significant complications may occur. Graft failure, rejection, and infection are common causes of morbidity and mortality within the first year of transplant. As these patients are on significant immunosuppressive medication regimens, they are at risk of infection, but inadequate immunosuppression increases the risk of acute rejection. A variety of dysrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation and ventricular dysrhythmias may occur. These patients are also at risk of acute coronary syndrome, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and medication adverse events. Importantly, patients with acute coronary syndrome can have an altered presentation with the so-called "painless" myocardial infarction. Consultation with the transplant physician is recommended, if available, for these patients to assist in evaluation and management.

CONCLUSIONS

An understanding of the presentations and various complications that may affect patients with cardiac transplant will assist emergency clinicians in the care of these patients.

Polyomavirus Nephropathy in Kidney Transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Association of treatment with 15-deoxyspergualin and BK virus nephropathy in kidney allograft recipients

OBJECTIVE

BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) has been proposed as an important cause of allograft dysfunction and loss in kidney allograft recipient over the last decade. Intense immunosuppression and tubular injury have been shown to promote the replication of polyomavirus. 15-deoxyspergualin (DSG), an effective immunosuppressive agent, is used as a rescue drug for acute rejection in clinical renal transplantation in Japan. To determine whether DSG is a risk factor for BKVN and outline the relationship among BKVN, DSG, and other risk factors, we analyzed 88 patients who received living-related renal transplantation between January 1999 and April 2003.

METHODS

A total of 114 biopsy specimens from 88 living-related kidney transplantation recipients (performed between January 1999 to April 2003) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients received immunosuppression therapy based on calcineurin inhibitors and corticosteroid [tacrolimus (TAC) 33 and cyclosporin (CyA) 55]. Additionally, mycophenolate mofeteil (MMF) was used in 21 patients; DSG was used in seven patients; and anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody was used in 16 patients. We analyzed the degree of donor/recipient human leucocyte antigen (HLA) compatibility assessed by the number of HLA-A, -B, and -DR-mismatched antigens in 88 patients. The diagnosis of BKVN was made by the light microscopic examination and a positive immunohistochemical staining of anti-40 antibody in biopsy specimens. Patients were divided into two groups of group A (mild histological change) and group B (moderate or severe histological change) to determine the risk factors in different histological staging. The clinical course of two typical patients in different histological stage is described briefly to outline the risk factors of BKVN.

RESULTS

We identified seven cases of BKVN (8.0%) from 88 transplanted patients. Significantly higher incidence of combination regimen consisting of TAC and MMF in BKVN group was noticed compared with non-BKVN group (57.1% vs. 9.9%; p = 0.003). BKVN was associated with a significantly higher incidence of DSG administration compared with non-BKVN group (57.1% vs. 3.7%; p </= 0.001). No difference was found in HLA mismatch between BKVN and non-BKVN group. Additionally, a significantly higher incidence of acute rejection episode prior to BKVN diagnosis was found in group B compared with group A (100% vs. 0%; p = 0.002), and the same statistical difference was shown in the number of anti-rejection therapy between group B and group A (100% vs. 0%; p = 0.002). We recognized a significant difference between group B and group A in terms of the combine regimen therapy of TAC with MMF (p = 0.002) and no difference in graft loss rate (p = 0.092), even though it was 50% in group B and was 0% in group A.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, our data indicated excessive intense immunosuppression with TAC-MMF is related to the development of BKVN. In addition, we found that anti-rejection therapy, especially with DSG, may accelerate the development of BKVN.

Achieving continuous improvement in reductions in foodborne listeriosis--a risk-based approach

Listeria monocytogenes is a foodborne pathogen that can cause listeriosis, a severe disease that can lead to septicemia, meningitis, and spontaneous abortion. Ongoing efforts are needed to further reduce the incidence of listeriosis, due to its high mortality rate. The focus of this report is the use of a risk-based approach to identify strategies that will have the greatest impact on reducing foodborne listeriosis. A continuum of risk for listeriosis is observed in the human population, ranging from exquisitely sensitive groups, who are highly immunocompromised and at very high risk of listeriosis, through the normal healthy population younger than 65 years of age, who appear to have a minimal risk for listeriosis. In addition, unique subpopulations may exist; for example, pregnant Latina women appear to have a higher risk of listeriosis than pregnant women of other ethnic groups, most likely due to consumption of contaminated soft cheeses such as queso fresco and queso blanco. The International Life Sciences Institute Risk Science Institute Expert Panel concluded that certain foods pose a high risk for causing listeriosis. High-risk foods have all of the following properties: (1) have the potential for contamination with L. monocytogenes; (2) support the growth of L. monocytogenes to high numbers; (3) are ready to eat; (4) require refrigeration; and (5) are stored for an extended period of time. Control strategies are needed in the food chain from preharvest through consumption to minimize the likelihood that food will become contaminated by L. monocytogenes and to prevent the growth of the organism to high numbers. The Expert Panel identified three main strategies for ensuring continuous improvement in reducing foodborne listeriosis: (1) preventing contamination of foods with L. monocytogenes; (2) preventing growth of L. monocytogenes to high numbers in foods; and (3) science-based education messages targeted to susceptible populations and their caregivers. Of these strategies, the Expert Panel concluded that preventing growth of L. monocytogenes to high numbers would have the greatest impact in reducing cases of listeriosis. Dose-response models predict that the risk of listeriosis increases as the number of organisms in a food increases and can be used as a scientific basis for a target level below which the organism should be reduced to minimize the likelihood of listeriosis in high-risk populations. This requires implementation of effective food safety control measures and ensuring that these control strategies are consistently met. Most effective strategies to control L. monocytogenes in high-risk foods include (1) good manufacturing practices, sanitation standard operating procedures, and hazard analysis critical control point programs to minimize environmental L. monocytogenes contamination and to prevent cross-contamination in processing plants and at retail; (2) an intensive environmental sampling program in plants processing high-risk foods and an effective corrective action plan to reduce the likelihood of contamination of high-risk foods; (3) time and temperature controls throughout the entire distribution and storage period, including establishing acceptable storage times of foods that support growth of L. monocytogenes to high numbers; (4) reformulating foods to prevent or retard the growth of L. monocytogenes; and (5) using postpackaging treatments to destroy L. monocytogenes on products. Science-based education and risk communication strategies aimed at susceptible populations and focused on high-risk foods should be delivered through health care providers or other credible sources of information. Exquisitely sensitive consumers may become ill when exposed to low numbers of L. monocytogenes or other opportunistic pathogens, so reducing the risk to this population could be achieved by maintaining them on restricted low-microbe diets during those periods when they are most severely immunocompromised. High-risk individuals (i.e., the elderly, pregnant women, and most immunocompromised individuals) should be provided with guidance on healthy eating, including specific information on high-risk foods that they should avoid, and strategies to reduce their risk, such as thorough cooking, avoidance of cross-contamination, and short-term refrigerated storage of cooked perishable foods. Those at low risk for listeriosis should receive information on safe food handling practices, preferably starting at a preschool age.

Nosocomial Infection in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Analysis of a Single-Center Experience

Posttransplant bacterial infections are important because of their influence on patient and graft outcomes. Therefore, prevention of infection as well as prompt diagnosis and appropriate treatment are crucial. In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed all posttransplant bacterial infections occurring during the admission of kidney transplant patients from January 2000 to May 2004. Of our patients, 25% had at least one episode of infection. Patients with immunosuppression based on an mTOR inhibitor showed the highest rate of wound infections compared to those receiving a calcineurin inhibitor (odds ratio 5.6, P < .001). Patients with renal failure caused by a urologic disease revealed a increased risk of a urinary tract infections (odds ratio 5.9, P < .001). Although infection complications are an important cause of morbidity in renal transplantation, the extensive use of antibiotics should be avoided in favor of a strict policy for infection prevention and control.

Is tolerance induction the answer to adolescent non-adherence?

By definition, tolerance will eliminate the problem of adolescent medication non-adherence. Although adolescents' propensity toward non-adherence makes them at first glance to be particularly attractive candidates for tolerance trials, there are also immunologic, psychosocial and ethical barriers that temper enthusiasm for their inclusion at present. Limits in emotional and cognitive maturity are combined during the teenage years with adult-like immunologic maturity to lessen the potential for successful implementation of tolerance and near tolerance strategies. Alternatively, an interval step to tolerance in adolescents is to eliminate the medications most likely contributing to non-adherence through harsh side effects such as steroids and calcineurin inhibitors. This manuscript will review the general topic of transplantation tolerance with specific attention given to the application of pro-tolerant therapies in adolescent recipients.

Polyomavirus nephropathy in kidney transplantation

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Improved Clinical Outcomes in Chinese Renal Allograft Recipients Receiving Lower Dose Immunosuppressants

BACKGROUND

The application of potent immunosuppressants has decreased the incidence of acute rejection and increased short- and long-term graft survival; however, these drugs cause a variety of complications. In China, many transplant centers have adopted the immunosuppressive protocols based on the white population, neglecting the differences between the races. The purpose of this study was to explore a suitable immunosuppressive regimen for Chinese renal allograft recipients.

METHODS

Two hundred cadaveric renal allograft recipients who underwent transplantation between July 1999 and October 2001 were observed. Before October 2000, 104 recipients received the conventional dose of immunosuppressants; thereafter, 96 recipients received lower dose treatment. Doses of immunosuppressive agents, the incidence of acute rejection and pulmonary infection, and patient and graft survival rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Doses of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine A (CsA) administered in the conventional dose group were significantly higher than in the lower dose group at 3 months posttransplant, as was prednisone at 6 months posttransplant. The incidence of acute rejection and subclinical rejection that was biopsy-proven or diagnosed by clinical manifestations was 17.3% and 19.8%, respectively, in the conventional dose group and the lower dose group within the first 6 months, and no significant difference was noted (P=0.55). The incidence of pulmonary infection, especially severe infection, was much higher in the conventional treatment group (40.1% and 26.9%, respectively) than that in the lower dose group (11.5% and 5.2%, respectively), and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). The corresponding 1-year survival rate of patients was 87.4% and 97.9% (P<0.01), and that of renal grafts was 85.5% and 96.9% (P<0.01), for patients receiving conventional dose and lower dose immunosuppressive drugs, respectively. The rate of death with a functioning allograft caused by infection in the conventional dose group was significantly higher than that in the lower dose group (12.5% vs. 0%, P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The regimen of lower dose MMF, CsA, and prednisone in combination can significantly reduce the incidence of pulmonary infection, especially severe pulmonary infection, without increasing the incidence and severity of allograft rejection.

A case of fungal sepsis due to aspergillus spondylitis followed by cytomegalovirus infection in a renal transplant recipient

Although advances in immunosuppressive therapy have led to increased survival of renal transplant recipients, there are greater risks of developing infectious complications. Because of its rarity and the lack of medical awareness, aspergillus spondylitis is often misdiagnosed as tuberculous spondylitis, especially in its early stages. We report a case of aspergillus spondylitis in a renal transplant followed by cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis.

CASE

A 59-year-old woman was admitted due to general weakness and abdominal discomfort. She had undergone renal transplantation 3 years previously. One month before admission, she was diagnosed with CMV retinitis and treated with IV ganciclovir. On admission, she suffered from lower abdominal pain. Colonoscopy revealed multiple circular or patchy ulcers with surrounding severe mucosal edema in the sigmoid colon findings consistent with intestinal tuberculosis. On hospital day 30, she complained of lower extremity paresthesia and weakness. An MRI of the spine revealed a well-demarcated paraspinal mass around the L2-4 body; tuberculous spondylitis was initially considered. But despite antituberculosis medication, the patient progressed to spastic paraparesis and sensory changes in both lower legs, requiring urgent surgical decompression. At hospital day 60, she suffered persistent fever and developed thrombocytopenia. Wound discharge continued and paraparesis became denser. A CT of the spine showed progression of the paraspinal abscess from the L2 body to the iliac crest. CT-guided psoas muscle drainage was performed. Fungal culture showed Aspergillus species. Despite antifungal therapy, the patient died after a prolonged hospital stay due to fungal sepsis and septic shock from aspergillosis.

The road to tolerance: renal transplant tolerance induction in nonhuman primate studies and clinical trials

Organ transplantation has become a standard life-saving therapy for many causes of end stage organ failure. Although valuable, it remains hampered by the requirement for, and complications of, immunosuppression to prevent immune rejection of the transplanted organ. It is now clear that rejection can be avoided in some experimental systems without a requirement of immunosuppressive medication, and these experimental concepts are now making their way into the clinic in the form of early transplantation tolerance trials. This manuscript will discuss the most promising techniques for tolerance induction, namely, costimulation blockade, lymphocyte depletion, and mixed chimerism. Seminal preclinical studies will be cited and the results of initial clinical trials will be reviewed. The data to date indicate that while tolerance remains elusive, immunosuppression minimization is a feasible near-term alternative.

Home Health Care for the Kidney and Kidney-Pancreas Transplant Recipient

Kidney transplantation has been a part of the world medical scene for more than 45 years and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation for more than 20 years. Improvements in medical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy, and expansion of patient eligibility have led to a population more in need of home health services than ever before. The home health needs of the population range from typical chronic health care needs to issues specifically associated with immunosuppression.

Infectious disease prophylaxis in renal transplant patients: a survey of US transplant centers

Definitive approaches to most infectious diseases following renal transplantation have not been established, leading to different approaches at different transplant centers. To study the extent of these differences, we conducted a survey of the practices surrounding specific infectious diseases at US renal transplant centers. A survey containing 103 questions covering viral, bacterial, mycobacterial and protozoal infections was developed. Surveys were sent to program directors at all U.S. renal transplant centers. Responses were received from 147 of 245 (60%) transplant centers and were proportionately represented all centers with respect to program size and geographical location. Pre-transplant donor and recipient screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) is uniform, but great discrepancy exists in the testing for other agents. HCV seropositive donors are used in 49% of centers. HIV seropositivity remains a contraindication to transplantation, although 13% of centers indicated they have experience with such patients. Post-transplant, there is wide variety in approach to CMV and Pneumocystis carinii (PCP) prophylaxis. Similarly divergent practices affect post-transplant vaccinations, with 54% of centers routinely vaccinating all patients according to customary guidelines in non-transplant populations. In contrast, 22% of centers indicated they do not recommend vaccination in any patients. We believe an appreciation of the differences in approaches to post-transplant infectious complications may encourage individual centers to analyse the results of their own practices. Such analysis may assist in the design of studies to answer widespread and important questions regarding the care of patients following renal transplantation.

Hospitalizations for fungal infections after renal transplantation in the United States

Fungal infections in renal transplant recipients have not been studied in a national population. Therefore, 33,420 renal transplant recipients in the United States Renal Data System from 1 July 1994 to 30 June 1997 were analyzed in a retrospective registry study of hospitalized fungal infections (FI). FI were most commonly associated with secondary diagnoses of esophagitis (68, 23.9%), pneumonia (57, 19.8%), meningitis (23, 7.6%), and urinary tract infection (29, 10.3%). Opportunistic organisms accounted for 95.4% of infections, led by candidiasis, aspergillosis, cryptococcosis, and zygomycosis. Most fungal infections (66%) had occurred by six months post-transplant, but only 22% by two months. In logistic regression analysis, end-stage renal disease due to diabetes, duration of pre-transplant dialysis, maintenance tacrolimus and allograft rejection were associated with FI. In Cox regression analysis, recipients with FI had a relative risk of mortality of 2.88 (95% CI=2.22-3.74) compared to all other recipients. Among FI, zygomycosis and aspergillosis were independently associated with both increased patient mortality and length of hospital stay. Most fungal infections in renal transplant recipients were opportunistic, occurred later than previously reported, and were associated with greatly decreased patient survival. Recipients with diabetes, prolonged pre-transplant dialysis, rejection, and tacrolimus immunosuppression should be considered high risk for FI.