Open study evaluating lamotrigine efficacy and safety in add-on treatment and consecutive monotherapy in patients with carbamazepine- or valproate-resistant epilepsy

Risk factors of elevated blood ammonia level in epilepsy patients treated with lamotrigine

AbstractThe aim of this study was to explore the effect of lamotrigine (LTG) on blood ammonia level in patients with epilepsy and identify risk factors affecting blood ammonia level. This study included 91 epilepsy patients who were treated with LTG at Department of Neurology, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University from January 2011 to April 2016, and were followed up for 3 years. Blood samples were taken during the interictal state and analyzed for blood LTG and ammonia levels. Total of 46.1% of the samples exceeded the median blood ammonia level, and 2.1% of patients had hyperammonemia. Blood ammonia level was positively correlated with LTG blood concentration. LTG combined with valproic acid therapy, seizure within 1 year, and elevated neutrophils affected blood ammonia level. Blood ammonia level was significantly correlated with plasma concentration of LTG. LTG combined with valproic acid therapy, seizure within 1 year, and elevated neutrophils may be risk factors for elevated blood ammonia level in epilepsy patients treated with LTG.

Antiepileptic Drug Selection According to Seizure Type in Adult Patients with Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a common neurological disorder that is mainly treated using antiepileptic drugs. Several antiepileptic drugs such as phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, and ethosuximide were developed in the early 20th century. More than 10 types of antiepileptic drugs have been developed since the 1990s, and there are now more than 20 antiepileptic drugs in active clinical use. The choice of antiepileptic drugs is based on the clinical features of the seizure types, electroencephalogram findings, epileptic syndrome, and drug stability. Currently there are 19 antiepileptic drugs approved by the Korean Food and Drug Administration, 18 of which (with the exclusion of brivaracetam) are covered by the National Health Insurance Service in Korea. We reviewed the selection of antiepileptic drugs according to the classification of epileptic seizures.

Therapeutic Index Estimation of Antiepileptic Drugs: A Systematic Literature Review Approach

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to determine whether data obtained from the medical literature can be used to estimate the therapeutic index of 5 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs): carbamazepine, lamotrigine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, and valproate.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed and EMBASE to collect published safety, efficacy, and therapeutic monitoring data for 5 AEDs and extracted all relevant information into a drug- and study-specific drug database. For each AED, we summarized (1) type, severity, and incidence of toxicity-related adverse events and toxicity-associated range of drug doses or concentrations; (2) effective versus toxic concentration and dose (therapeutic range); and (3) therapeutic drug monitoring practices. We defined therapeutic index as the ratio of the minimum toxic concentration to the minimum effective concentration.

RESULTS

We reviewed a total of 810 full-text articles and extracted data from 163. The literature suggests that the therapeutic index of phenytoin is 2. The therapeutic indices of phenobarbital and valproate exceed 2. There were insufficient data to precisely quantify the therapeutic indices of carbamazepine and lamotrigine.

CONCLUSIONS

For some drugs, this approach offers a low-cost method of therapeutic index estimation. Our results can serve as preliminary data for future trials and as guidance for US Food and Drug Administration decision making regarding narrow therapeutic index classification.

Pharmacodynamic interactions between antiepileptic drugs: preclinical data based on isobolography

BACKGROUND

At least 20 - 30% of epileptic patients do not sufficiently respond to monotherapy. Some of them can benefit from drug combinations; hence, animal data may provide some useful novel clues for rational polytherapy.

OBJECTIVE

To review combinations of antiepileptic drugs, evaluated with the help of isobolographic analysis, in terms of their efficacy and adverse effects.

METHODS

A literature search, on the basis of experimental studies, with no time limit was carried out.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

Preclinical data indicate that a synergy occurred for the combinations of valproate + phenytoin, valproate + ethosuximide, lamotrigine + valproate, gabapentin + valproate, gabapentin + carbamazepine, topiramate + carbamazepine, topiramate + valproate, topiramate + oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam + topiramate, levetiracetam + oxcarbazepine, oxcarbazepine + gabapentin, tiagabine + gabapentin and lamotrigine + topiramate. On the other hand, lamotrigine combined with carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine resulted in a clear-cut antagonism. Interestingly, a combination of oxcarbazepine + clonazepam produced variable responses, including synergy, additivity or antagonism, depending on the dose ratio of these drugs. In no case did pharmacokinetic factors contribute to the final analysis of the effects of drug combinations. Pharmacokinetic factors can contribute to the final effect of drug combinations,such as when stiripentol is added to valproate, or clobazam is added to valproate. It may be concluded that the rational treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy needs to consider the results of preclinical studies.

The safety and tolerability of newer antiepileptic drugs in children and adolescents

The newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) provide more therapeutic options and overall improved safety and tolerability for patients. To provide the best care, physicians must be familiar with the latest tolerability and safety data. This is particularly true in children, given there are relatively fewer studies examining the effects of AEDs in children compared with adults. Since we now have significant paediatric literature on each of these agents, we provide a comprehensive and current literature review of the newer AEDs, focusing on safety and tolerability data in children and adolescents. Because the safety profiles in children differ from those in adults, familiarity with this literature is important for child neurologists and other paediatric caregivers. We have organized the data by organ system for each AED for easier reference.

A cost-effectiveness decision model for antiepileptic drug treatment in newly diagnosed epilepsy patients

OBJECTIVE

To establish cost-effectiveness of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment strategies of newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy.

METHODS

A decision analysis was carried out comparing effectiveness and treatment cost of six treatment strategies comprising carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), and valproate (VPA) as first-line and second-line drugs. Three outcome groups were defined: complete success, partial success, and failure. Data on seizure control and failure due to adverse effects were derived from the literature. Data on resource use and costs were collected for each outcome group by means of a patient survey.

RESULTS

Cost data were obtained from 71 patients. Cost increased from complete success to failure outcome groups. The probability of obtaining complete success varied from 64% (VPA-CBZ strategy) to 74% (LTG-VPA strategy). The strategy LTG-VPA was more effective than the least expensive strategy CBZ-VPA, but at higher costs per additional effectively treated patient. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed these findings to be robust. Subsequent analysis showed that changing inclusion criteria used in the selection of the studies from the literature had a major effect on cost-effectiveness ratios of the various strategies. The probability that LTG first-line therapy is the most cost-effective option remains small, even defining a high cost-effectiveness threshold. Nevertheless, LTG second-line strategies can be cost-effective depending on the willingness to pay for patient improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Only a few studies satisfied our inclusion criteria for employment in our decision model. Our model supports the use of conventional AEDs as first-line options for patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. LTG second-line therapy is likely to be the most cost-effective option in case society is willing to pay more than Euro 6000 for an additional successfully treated patient. This study also illustrates that, with the data presently available, the outcome of decision analysis for AED treatment choice depends on the inclusion criteria used to select trials. Prospective real-life studies are needed in which first- and second-line treatment strategies are compared with respect to both effectiveness and costs.

Isobolographic analysis of interactions between loreclezole and conventional antiepileptic drugs in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure model

This study examined the interaction characteristics between loreclezole (LCZ) and various conventional antiepileptic drugs (phenytoin--PHT, carbamazepine--CBZ, valproate--VPA and phenobarbital--PB) in the mouse maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizure model using isobolographic analysis. Drug-related adverse effects were ascertained by use of the chimney test (motor impairment) and the step-through passive avoidance task (learning and retrieval). It was observed that the combination of LCZ with VPA or PB, at the fixed ratio of 1:1, was supra-additive (synergistic) and the combination of LCZ with CBZ, at all fixed ratios tested (1:3, 1:1 and 3:1), was supra-additive against electroconvulsions. The remaining combinations evaluated, i.e., LCZ with PB or VPA at fixed ratios of 1:3 and 3:1, as well as all fixed-ratio combinations between LCZ and PHT, were additive in the MES test in mice. Pharmacokinetic characterization revealed that LCZ significantly increased both free plasma and brain concentrations of CBZ and PHT, but was without effect on PB. Moreover, a bi-directional pharmacokinetic interaction between LCZ and VPA was observed in that while LCZ increased free plasma, but not total brain VPA concentrations, VPA increased the total brain, but not free plasma LCZ concentrations. Adverse-effect testing revealed that for all antiepileptic drug combinations neither motor performance nor long-term memory was altered. Of the drug combinations investigated, only that of LCZ and PB at the fixed ratio of 1:1 was not associated with any pharmacokinetic interactions, and thus it may be concluded that the supra-additive (synergistic) isobolographic interaction was pharmacodynamic in nature. Furthermore, the fact that LCZ and PB have similar mechanisms of action would suggest that drugs with similar mechanisms of action may provide rational polytherapy regimens.

Three-dimensional isobolographic analysis of interactions between lamotrigine and clonazepam in maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

The anticonvulsant effects of lamotrigine (LTG) and clonazepam (CZP) and combinations thereof against maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures in mice were investigated using three-dimensional (3D) isobolographic analysis. With this method, the doses of fixed-ratio combinations of the drugs (1:3, 1:1 and 3:1) that elicited 16, 50 and 84% of the maximum anticonvulsant effect were determined. Additionally, to evaluate the characteristics of interactions observed with 3D isobolography, the brain concentrations of both drugs were verified pharmacokinetically. The 3D isobolographic analysis showed that LTG and CZP combined at the fixed ratios of 3:1 and 1:1 interacted synergistically in the MES test for all anticonvulsant effects between 16% and 84% of maximum. In contrast, the combination of LTG and CZP at the fixed ratio of 1:3 showed only pure additivity for all estimated effects in 3D isobolography. Moreover, none of the examined antiepileptic drugs altered the brain concentrations of the coadministered drug, so the observed interactions in the MES test are of a pharmacodynamic nature. The 3D isobolographic findings suggest that in epilepsy therapy, increased efficacy of seizure control (synergistic interaction) might be achieved by using LTG and CZP in combination. In this study, some important problems and assumptions related to statistical analysis of data in 3D isobolography are discussed.

Efficacy and tolerability of conversion to monotherapy with lamotrigine compared with valproate and carbamazepine in patients with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

This randomized, open-label study was designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of lamotrigine monotherapy with those of valproate and carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with epilepsy whose seizures were uncontrolled on their prestudy antiepileptic drug monotherapy.

METHODS

Patients meeting eligibility criteria were randomized 2:1 to lamotrigine:carbamazepine or lamotrigine:valproate. The treatment phase was divided into a 4-week dose-escalation phase (Weeks 1-4), during which lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or valproate was added to patient's prestudy monotherapy; an 8-week add-on phase (Weeks 5-12), during which patients were stabilized on both the study medication and their prestudy antiepileptic therapy; an 8-week withdrawal phase (Weeks 13-20), during which prestudy antiepileptic therapy could be withdrawn if clinically appropriate; and an 8-week monotherapy phase (Weeks 21-28), during which patients could be treated with study medication as monotherapy.

RESULTS

The numbers of patients randomized to the carbamazepine and valproate arms of the study were 144 (98 lamotrigine, 46 carbamazepine) and 158 (105 lamotrigine, 53 valproate), respectively. Successful monotherapy sustained for at least 7 weeks was achieved in comparable percentages of patients in the lamotrigine group (56%) and the carbamazepine group (54%) and in more patients in the lamotrigine group (49%) than the valproate group (40%). Among monotherapy completers, the percentage of patients with zero seizures during the monotherapy phase was comparable for lamotrigine (41%) and carbamazepine (30%) and significantly higher (P<0.05) with lamotrigine (32%) than with valproate (11%). No differences between treatments were observed with respect to time to treatment failure or time to first seizure. Lamotrigine was also better tolerated than carbamazepine or valproate.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine monotherapy was as effective as and better tolerated than carbamazepine or valproate monotherapy in patients whose seizures were uncontrolled on their prestudy antiepileptic drug monotherapy.

Interactions of lamotrigine with topiramate and first-generation antiepileptic drugs in the maximal electroshock test in mice: an isobolographic analysis

PURPOSE

The study investigated the types of interactions between lamotrigine (LTG) and first-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) or topiramate (TPM) with isobolographic analysis.

METHODS

Anticonvulsant and adverse-effect profiles of combinations of LTG with other AEDs, at fixed ratios of 1:3, 1:1, and 3:1, were evaluated in the maximal electroshock (MES)-induced seizures and the chimney test (motor performance) in mice, which allowed the determination of benefit indices (BIs) for individual combinations.

RESULTS

Combinations of LTG with TPM or valproate (VPA), at fixed ratios of 1:1, were significantly supraadditive (synergistic) in the MES test and, simultaneously, subadditive (antagonistic) in the chimney test, showing the best profile for AED combinations. In contrast, combinations between LTG and carbamazepine (CBZ), in terms of antiseizure protection against MES, were subadditive (antagonistic) and additive in the chimney test, resulting in unfavorable AED combinations. Moreover, the combination of LTG with phenobarbital (PB), at a fixed ratio of 1:1, despite synergy in the MES test, also was synergistic in the chimney test, resulting in a modest BI for AED combination. LTG combined with phenytoin was additive in both the MES and chimney tests in mice. The remaining combinations, at fixed ratios not mentioned earlier, also showed an average BI for AED combinations. Furthermore, LTG combined with all studied AEDs did not affect long-term memory in mice. None of the AEDs influenced the free plasma level of LTG, whereas LTG slightly reduced the free plasma concentration of PB.

CONCLUSIONS

Interactions between LTG and TPM or LTG and VPA at a fixed ratio of 1:1 might be profitable from a preclinical point of view, displaying the most optimal BI.

Concomitant use of divalproex sodium and lamotrigine in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and tolerability

Objective. Epilepsy in institutionalized severe developmentally disabled patients poses a therapeutic challenge. Frequently these patients have multiple seizure (sz) types that are often intractable. Both divalproex sodium (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) have demonstrated efficacy. We sought to examine the efficacy of this specific combination in a group of institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy.Methods. Medical and pharmacy records of all patients with developmental disabilities and intractable seizures were reviewed to identify those who had received VPA and LTG. This retrospective evaluation was structured with respect to time frame and outcome measure. Phase 1 consisted of baseline monotherapy with VPA. Phase 2 consisted of titration/dose escalation. Phase 3 was treatment observation period with the combination of both. Seizure frequency and adverse effect data were obtained from nursing or residential staff records. Primary outcome measures were change in seizure frequency between Phases 1 and 3. Additional measures were percentage of patients seizure-free and those with >75% reduction in seizures. A Wilcoxan signed rank test was used for statistical analysis.Results. Of 293 patients, 25 (12M/13F, 31.7+/-10.2 years) had VPA monotherapy following which LTG was added. Mean doses of VPA and LTG were 1474+/-728 and 165+/-111mg/day, respectively. Baseline seizure frequency ranged from 1 to 25 per month. Mean seizure frequency significantly decreased (6.5+/-vs2.0+/-4.0seizures/month, P<0.001). Sixty-four percent of these patients had >/=75% reduction in seizures 28% became seizure-free.Conclusions. The combination of VPA and LTG appears efficacious in this group of developmentally disabled patients with intractable seizures. Rash, which has been associated with this combination, was notably absent and this may reflect the slower titration schedule used.

Place of polytherapy in the early treatment of epilepsy

Polytherapy with antiepileptic drugs is not popular mainly because it is thought to be associated with more adverse effects and to contribute relatively little in terms of efficacy compared with monotherapy. However, there are two reasons to question this assumption: certain combinations are more effective than others and, therefore, generalisations about the poor effectiveness of polytherapy cannot be made; and the total drug load, i.e. the total amount of drug exposure for a certain indication, is usually higher in polytherapy, which may explain the higher toxicity seen during such treatment. In this article, the available literature on the effectiveness of first-line monotherapy, alternative monotherapy and second-line polytherapy is reviewed. There is no conclusive evidence in favour for choosing either alternative monotherapy or polytherapy when first-line monotherapy fails. Therefore, a pragmatic approach is recommended until an evidence-based choice can be made.