Interaction of topiramate with carbamazepine: two case reports and a review of clinical experience

Which treatment strategy in patients with epilepsy with focal seizures uncontrolled by the first anti-seizure medication?

There is no definite proven or accepted strategy in the management of patients with focal epilepsy uncontrolled by the first anti-seizure medication (ASM). Clinical studies failed to find a significant difference in efficacy or tolerability between alternative monotherapy and/or adjunctive therapy in these patients. A second ASM is often added, the efficacy of the combination is assessed, and the dose of the first drug can be gradually reduced and withdrawn. If seizures recur, the effective combination therapy can be reinstated. In this review, we discussed experimental and clinical data about the efficacy and tolerability of the most frequently used combinations of ASMs. Animal studies suggested that the most favorable combinations are those between ASMs with different or multiple mechanisms of action, whereas combining drugs with similar pharmacodynamic properties is often associated with additive or infra-additive efficacy and additive or synergistic toxicity. Clinical studies have shown that levetiracetam (LEV) can be favorably combined with the sodium channel blockers (SCBs) lacosamide (LCM) and lamotrigine (LTG). Lamotrigine is particularly effective when associated with valproate (VPA) and possibly with LEV and topiramate (TPM). Carbamazepine (CBZ) has negative pharmacokinetic interactions with several ASMs and should not be combined with other SCBs; it could be effectively and safely combined with gabapentin (GBP) and LEV. Valproic acid has enzyme inhibiting properties and can be cautiously used with SCBs; its combination with TPM or zonisamide (ZNS) may be associated with higher toxicity.

Carbamazepine toxicity induced by lopinavir/ritonavir and nelfinavir

OBJECTIVE

To present a case of carbamazepine toxicity induced by lopinavir/ritonavir and nelfinavir.

CASE SUMMARY

A 50-year-old HIV-positive male developed excessive drowsiness secondary to carbamazepine when an antiretroviral regimen containing lopinavir/ritonavir was introduced. The carbamazepine serum concentration increased 46%. Subsequently, the patient developed a possible adverse skin reaction to his antiretrovirals and was hospitalized. The protease inhibitor was changed to nelfinavir. Within 3 days, the patient again developed excessive drowsiness and became unsteady on his feet. This time, the carbamazepine serum concentration had increased by 53%. In both instances, the carbamazepine dosage was decreased by 33%, which resulted in resolution of symptoms.

DISCUSSION

Carbamazepine undergoes extensive hepatic metabolism. The major metabolic pathway involves oxidation of carbamazepine via CYP3A4 to an active metabolite, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide. Protease inhibitors are well-known CYP3A4 inhibitors. Other cases of carbamazepine toxicity secondary to protease inhibitors are reviewed. A MEDLINE search (1966-May 2006) revealed 4 cases of carbamazepine toxicity secondary to antiretrovirals. Carbamazepine serum concentrations increased two- to threefold from baseline. Vertigo, drowsiness, disorientation, ataxia, and vomiting occurred within 12 hours to 2 months, which resolved with reduction of the carbamazepine dosage.

CONCLUSIONS

An objective causality assessment suggests that our patient became drowsy and unsteady on his feet secondary to a carbamazepine-protease inhibitor interaction. Lopinavir/ritonavir and nelfinavir may decrease carbamazepine metabolism, causing an elevation in carbamazepine serum concentrations. Carbamazepine toxicity may be prevented by reducing the carbamazepine dosage by 25-50% when protease inhibitors are introduced. A carbamazepine serum concentration should be repeated 3-5 days after the protease inhibitors are started.

Topiramate concentration in saliva: an alternative to serum monitoring

This study examines the relationship between serum and saliva topiramate concentrations, and attempts to determine if saliva may be a useful alternative to serum for therapeutic monitoring. Saliva and blood specimens were collected from 31 epilepsy patients (mean age 10.5 +/- 6.0 years; range 2.5 years to 24.8 years), and topiramate concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. One patient's results were omitted because the saliva concentration was below the limit of quantitation of the assay. A strong correlation exists between serum and saliva topiramate concentrations (adjusted r(2) = 0.97, n = 30, P < 0.0001). The mean fraction of saliva to serum concentration is 89.8% +/- 12.1% (range 62.9% to 112.7%). The results of this study support the use of saliva as a viable alternative to serum for monitoring topiramate therapy. Topiramate concentration in saliva: an alternative to serum monitoring.