The epilepsy nurse specialist--expendable handmaiden or essential colleague?

The epilepsy specialist nurse: A mixed-methods case study on the role and activities

PURPOSE

To describe the role and activities of epilepsy specialist nurses (ESNs) operating as a team in the setting of a hospital specialising in the diagnosis and management of seizure disorders.

METHODS

We conducted a descriptive mixed-methods embedded single case study. We recruited 9 ESNs, 14 of their professional colleagues and 9 'key informants' to analyse their perceptions of the role and activities of ESNs. We collected data through interviews, questionnaires, observations, and documentation. The study was conducted at the Filadelfia Epilepsy Hospital, Denmark.

RESULTS

The team of ESNs offers holistic care to patients and their caregivers regarding the clinical, social, and emotional aspects of epilepsy. The ESNs are integrated in a multidisciplinary team and promote collaboration among the team members. ESNs also contribute to organisational aspects and perform research activities.

CONCLUSION

A structured group of ESNs can operate effectively and extensively in a specialised hospital setting. Our findings contribute to clarifying the description of the ESN's role, and provide an example of how ESNs can be incorporated into a hospital's organisational structure.

A Survey of Epilepsy-related Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices of Home Healthcare Nurses in the San-in Region of Japan

Background

Comprehensive care is necessary for people with epilepsy (PWE) to lead a fulfilling life at home and in the community. The purpose of this study was to determine the epilepsy-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of home healthcare nurses (HHNs) in the San-in region of Japan.

Methods

A questionnaire survey was conducted by mail of 546 HHNs working in Tottori and Shimane Prefectures. The questionnaire assessed the epilepsy-related knowledge, attitudes and practices of HHNs. For the analysis, simple and cross tabulation of questionnaire responses were conducted, and the chi-squared test was used for statistical testing.

Results

A total of 285 HHNs participated in the study. Of the respondents, 43.9% had experience taking care of PWE in a home healthcare nursing setting. Regarding the cause of epilepsy, in descending order the percentage of correct responses were 86.7% for stroke, 85.3% for head injury, and only 13.3% for dementia. Concerning how to respond to an epileptic seizure, almost all respondents answered correctly, but 29.8% gave the incorrect answer of "place something inside the mouth." Regarding the practices of HHNs in relation to caring for PWE, nurses scored 52.0% for collaborating with the attending physician, indicating the need for improvement. The score for "provide information about social resources" was low at 18.4%. Of the respondents, 95.8% answered that epilepsy-related knowledge and technical skills were necessary for home healthcare nursing practice, and 87.7% were interested in participating in a workshop on epilepsy.

Conclusion

The study revealed an inadequate level of knowledge of epilepsy with dementia and corresponding epileptic seizures, a low awareness of nursing care in collaboration with physicians, and the importance of providing information about social resources. There is a need to offer information and education on the latest knowledge about epilepsy to HHNs.

Implementing epilepsy guidelines within a learning disability service

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of the implementation of NICE guidelines when reviewing care within an outpatient learning disability service.

METHODS

We set up a multi disciplinary specialist epilepsy clinic and reviewed all patients with a diagnosis of epilepsy using a specific assessment document based on NICE guidance. We then audited clinical documentation prior to and after the implementation of the clinic.

RESULTS

We reviewed 23 patients and found that implementing NICE guidelines showed improvements to individuals' seizure assessments and epilepsy management. When comparing specific areas related to NICE implementation we found that 83% compared to 6% of patients had accurate name and detailed seizure descriptions. We made changes to seizure diagnosis in 76% of patients and improved the level of recording of seizure frequency and severity. Finally 91% compared to 50% of consultations led to changes in treatment plans.

CONCLUSION

We found that implementing the NICE guidelines allowed us to use a systematic approach to epilepsy management, which in turn led to identifiable improvement in documentation and patient care.

A structured, nurse-led intervention program improves quality of life in patients with epilepsy: a randomized, controlled trial

We tested the hypothesis that structured epilepsy nursing improves quality of life (QOL). One hundred fourteen adult patients with uncontrolled epilepsy were randomly assigned to either an intervention group or a control group. The intervention group was offered an interactive, 1-day group education program followed by extended nurse follow-up and counseling. The nurse was present at as many outpatient consultations as possible and performed repeated consultations by telephone. All patients completed the QOLIE-89 before randomization and after 2 years. QOL was significantly improved from inclusion to completion of study in the intervention group (P=0.019), mainly in the subitems for Health Discouragement (P=0.01), Medication Effects (P=0.035), and Physical Role Limitations (P=0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate a significant effect of a structured nurse-led intervention program in QOL of patients with epilepsy.

Anxiety in patients with epilepsy: systematic review and suggestions for clinical management

Up to 50 or 60% of patients with chronic epilepsy have various mood disorders including depression and anxiety. Whereas the relationship between epilepsy and depression has received much attention, less is known about anxiety disorders. It is now recognized that anxiety can have a profound influence on the quality of life of patients with epilepsy. The relationship between anxiety disorders and epilepsy is complex. It is necessary to distinguish between different manifestations of anxiety disorder: ictal, postictal, and interictal anxiety. Preexisting vulnerability factors, neurobiological factors, iatrogenic influences (antiepileptic drugs, epilepsy surgery), and psychosocial factors are all likely to play a role, but with considerable individual differences. Despite the high prevalence of anxiety disorders in patients with epilepsy, there are no systematic treatment studies or evidence-based guidelines for best treatment practice. Nevertheless, a practical approach based on the temporal relationship between anxiety and epileptic seizures allows clinicians to consider appropriate treatment strategies to reduce the psychiatric comorbidity in patients with epilepsy.

Outcomes from a nurse-led clinic for adolescents with epilepsy

PURPOSE

Epilepsy is the commonest serious neurological condition to affect adolescents. We established a nurse-led clinic for young people with suspected or diagnosed epilepsy. Outcomes in all patients referred during the first 4 years after its inception are reported.

METHODS

A total of 301 adolescents were seen at the clinic during 1996-1999. Epilepsy was excluded in 135 (45%), including 5 receiving antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy. A single seizure occurred in 22 (7%) others. Seventy-six patients (25%) had treated epilepsy and 68 (23%) were newly diagnosed.

RESULTS

More than 1 year's seizure freedom was achieved by 53% of patients, 76% with one AED, 16% with two and 3% with three. Four (5%) patients remained seizure free off medication. Sixteen (11%) were lost to follow-up. Outcome was better (P<0.05) for newly diagnosed (59% seizure free) than for treated (47% seizure free) epilepsy and for idiopathic generalised (60% seizure free) than for partial (46% seizure free) seizures (P<0.02). Magnetic resonance imaging of brain was obtained in 63 (85%) patients with localisation-related epilepsy. Findings were abnormal in 43%, including nine with cortical dysplasia, eight with mesial temporal sclerosis and two with gliomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Epilepsy can be difficult to diagnose in adolescents. Outcomes were surprisingly poor suggesting the need for improved services for this patient population.

Implementing good practice in epilepsy care

Examples of evidence-based guidelines for epilepsy care exist. However, guidelines are of little use if they are not recognised, implemented and supported. The object of this study was to establish the degree to which good practice guidelines for epilepsy have been implemented and to identify positive and negative factors that affect their implementation. Semi-structured questionnaires were sent to 750 randomly selected health professionals working in primary and secondary care in England. The sample comprised nurses (200), adult consultants (including learning disability consultants) (300), paediatric consultants (150) and general practitioners (100). Aspects of good practice are being implemented in some areas, but not generally, therefore service provision is likely to remain fragmented until this is addressed. Professionals have been prevented from successful implementation of guidelines to sustain good practice due to a number of factors, most notably lack of time, workload, competing priorities and staffing levels. Factors that have promoted and encouraged the successful adoption and application of good practice include inputs from epilepsy specialist nurses (ESNs), appropriate, timely and accessible professional development opportunities and the support and enthusiasm of colleagues.

Personal view: Randomized controlled trials in epilepsy specialist nursing: the seduction of content by form

Research into the effectiveness of epilepsy specialist nursing needs to take into account a number of factors, which have not been adequately addressed in previous studies. Nursing outcome measures are different to medical ones and it is inappropriate to confuse these. Specialist nurses affect the whole culture of a service, and their impact on service quality may go beyond that of their individual patient contacts. Thus randomized studies within a service that already has specialist nurses may not give valid results. Some service users will benefit more from direct contact with a specialist nurse than others, and people who give informed consent to take part in randomized controlled trials might not be representative of those who would benefit most from specialist nurse access. The stampede for level one evidence risks failing to address the issues properly by overvaluing research process (form) against its appropriateness (content), yet there remain great opportunities for good quality research in this area.

The cost of everything and the value of nothing

A series of three nursing case histories related to epilepsy care are presented to demonstrate the range of clinical nursing activity in an epilepsy clinic and to pose the question whether any of these activities, deemed essential by both clinician and nurse, would be thought appropriate if cost effectiveness of nursing care was merely measured by a significant reduction in seizure frequency. The conclusion drawn is that a specialist epilepsy nurse in an epilepsy clinic is an invaluable member of the team, who frees the medical member of the team to concentrate on those duties which need medical input: but, using currently applied outcome criteria, it would be difficult to justify the nurse's cost effectiveness. Measures that do this accurately and fairly must be developed.