The tendency to have psychogenic non-epileptic attacks out of camera view during long-term video-EEG monitoring

Structured testing during seizures: A practical guide for assessing and interpreting ictal and postictal signs during video EEG long term monitoring

BACKGROUND

Ictal and postictal testing carried out in long-term epilepsy monitoring units is often sub-optimal. Recently, a European consensus protocol for testing patients during and after seizures was developed by a joint taskforce of the International League Against Epilepsy - Commission on European Affairs and the European Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Association.

AIM

Using this recently developed standardised assessment battery as a framework, the goal of this narrative review is to outline the proposed testing procedure in detail and explain the rationale for each individual component, focusing on the underlying neurobiology. This is intended to serve as an educational resource for staff working in epilepsy monitoring units.

METHODS

A literature review of PubMed was performed; using the search terms "seizure", "ictal", "postictal", "testing", "examination", and "interview". Relevant literature was reviewed and relevant references were chosen. The work is presented as a narrative review.

RESULTS

The proposed standardised assessment battery provides a comprehensive and user-friendly format for ictal-postictal testing, and examines consciousness, language, motor, sensory, and visual function.

CONCLUSION

The standardised approach proposed has the potential to make full use of data recorded during video EEG increasing the diagnostic yield with regards to lateralisation and localisation, aiding both presurgical and diagnostic studies.

Video-electroencephalography investigation of ictal alterations of consciousness in epilepsy and nonepileptic attack disorder: practical considerations

The ictal assessment of consciousness is of central importance in the differential diagnosis of epilepsy and nonepileptic attack disorder (NEAD). Long-term video-electroencephalography (video-EEG) is currently considered the gold standard investigative technique for the evaluation of patients with recurrent attacks associated with transient alterations of arousal (responsiveness) and/or awareness (experiential states). This paper offers a concise review focusing on the practical aspects of clinical relevance in the video-EEG diagnostic workout of inpatients with suspected epilepsy or NEAD, as outlined in existing guidelines and recommendations. The reviewed literature implies that both implementation of specific procedures (e.g., activation maneuvers) and interpersonal approach (e.g., monitoring protocols) during video-EEG should be tailored to the individual patient's presentation.

When do psychogenic nonepileptic seizures occur on a video/EEG telemetry unit?

To maximize the efficiency of diagnostic video/EEG telemetry, we retrospectively studied the occurrence of clinical events during admission in 254 patients. One hundred fifty-nine patients had psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES) and 95 had epileptic seizures (ES). Twenty-five with PNES and none with ES had an event before or during electrode placement (P<0.0001). In the remaining 229, the initial event occurred within 48 hours of electrode placement in 98.5% patients with PNES and 100.0% of patients with ES. Time to occurrence of initial event did not differ between groups (P=0.69). 17.1% patients with PNES and 51.6% with ES had events between 12 AM and 6 AM (P=0.001). In conclusion, during diagnostic video/EEG telemetry, most patients who experience PNES or ES have diagnostic, typical events within 2 days. Although time to initial event after electrode placement does not differ between diagnoses, events prior to or during placement are most likely PNES and events at night are most likely ES.

Clinical characteristics and outcome of patients diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: a 5-year review

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with PNES in a 5-year period.

RESULTS

Fifty patients with PNES were identified, giving an estimated incidence of 0.91/100,000 per annum. Thirty-eight were included for review, 15 of whom were male (39%). Eighteen patients had been diagnosed with epilepsy as well as PNES (47%). We demonstrated a gender difference in our patients, with males having higher seizure frequencies, more antiepileptic drug use, and a longer interval before diagnosis of PNES. Females were diagnosed with other conversion disorders more often than males. Impaired social function was observed in PNES, as was resistance to psychological interventions with a subsequent poor response to treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

PNES remains a difficult condition to treat, and may affect males in proportions higher than those described in previous studies.

Controversies in the diagnosis and management of psychogenic pseudoseizures

Since the advent of video-EEG telemetry studies (V-EEG) neurologists have become increasingly aware of psychogenic pseudoseizures (PPS) given the relatively high prevalence of these events among patients seen in epilepsy centers. The use of V-EEG has been accepted as the gold standard study in establishing this diagnosis; some clinicians, however, have suggested that the clinical phenomena of PPS are so obvious in many patients that V-EEG may not be necessary. This is one of many controversial points that clinicians face when evaluating patients suspected of having PPS. In this article, we review some of these controversies, specifically the need for a video-EEG monitoring study in all patients suspected of having PPS and the role of induction protocols in the evaluation of PPS, the question of whether patients have any control over their events, and finally some of the therapeutic strategies for PPS including the need to limit these patients' driving privileges.