Conceptual aspects of combining rituximab and Campath-1H in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Monoclonal antibody combinations in CLL: evolving strategies

Monoclonal antibodies have led to a profound shift in the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab and rituximab remain the most active antibodies, and their single-agent activity has been established in previously untreated and relapsed patients with CLL. Higher response rates and a better quality of response through eradication of minimal residual disease have been reported with monoclonal antibody combinations. Chemoimmunotherapy regimens are being actively explored in frontline CLL therapy, and numerous combination regimens have been investigated in relapse. New and more effective therapies are shifting the focus from palliation to treatment algorithms with curative attempt. Challenges for monoclonal antibody combinations in the future include: (1) defining appropriate patient populations for combination therapies; (2) assessing the impact of pretreatment biologic prognostic factors; (3) enhancing eradication of minimal residual disease; and (4) reassessing response criteria in CLL.

Monoclonal Antibody Therapy for B-Cell Malignancies

For decades, chemotherapy was the only available approach for patients with advanced lymphoid malignancies. Treatment paradigms were dramatically altered by the availability of novel and active targeted agents, particularly the monoclonal antibodies, alemtuzumab and rituximab. These agents are now playing an increasingly important role in the treatment of lymphoid malignancies. Alemtuzumab is being used earlier in the course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in patients with a more intact immune system, when it is likely to have its greatest activity. The immunosuppressive properties of monoclonal antibodies are also being explored in the stem cell transplant setting, including in vivo purging and, with alemtuzumab, for the management of graft-versus-host disease. Rituximab has become ubiquitous in the treatment of most B-cell malignancies. Further research with this antibody is focused on optimizing its use and determining its role in each of the relevant disease states. In addition, newer antibodies are in development for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B-cell malignancies. New treatment regimens, including combinations of monoclonal antibodies, could enhance complete response rates and prolong progression-free survival, perhaps eventually improving our ability to cure patients with lymphoid malignancies.

The Emerging Role of Alemtuzumab in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia

Targeted therapy for malignant hematologic disorders has become a realistic goal with the identification of novel antibodies that are designed to act against highly expressed antigens on malignant clones. CD52 is abundantly expressed on malignant lymphocytes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Alemtuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that targets CD52 and induces cell death by several mechanisms that are still under investigation. The initial positive results of many clinical studies that explored the activity of alemtuzumab in relapsed and/or refractory CLL have provoked many oncologists to incorporate this agent into the treatment paradigm of this disease. Prophylactic antibiotics for the duration of therapy or until patients are no longer immunocompromised are recommended. This review summarizes the clinical experience with alemtuzumab that eventually led to its approval. Recent novel prognostic factors and trends in CLL therapy are also reviewed.

Purine nucleoside analogues and combination therapies in B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: dawn of a new era

Purine nucleoside analogues are unique drugs that are effective in a variety of hematologic malignancies. Fludarabine and 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) are active in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) both as salvage therapy and in newly diagnosed patients. These agents have revolutionized therapeutic strategies for patients with CLL that had remained unchanged for many years and included alkylating agents-based therapy with no potential for long-term remission or cure. Purine analogues have also been successfully combined with a variety of other chemotherapeutic drugs such as mitoxantrone, cyclophosphamide, corticosteroids, and monoclonal antibodies, specifically Rituximab and CAMPATH-1H. These agents are immunosuppressive and have been associated with opportunistic infections, the incidence of which can be significantly reduced by early recognition and administration of prophylactic antibiotics. In this review, the activity and toxicity of 2-CdA, fludarabine, and pentostatin in CLL as single agents and in combination with conventional chemotherapy are discussed. These drugs are increasingly used as initial therapy in CLL. Such strategies are associated with higher remission rates than have been previously achieved and in some cases, molecular remission, suggesting an important step towards cure.

Rituximab: a review of its use in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

Rituximab is an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that has demonstrated efficacy in patients with various lymphoid malignancies, including indolent and aggressive forms of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). While the optimal use of the drug in many clinical settings has yet to be clarified, two pivotal trials have established rituximab as a viable treatment option in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent NHL, and as a standard first-line treatment option when combined with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (the most common type of aggressive NHL). The former was a noncomparative trial in relapsed indolent NHL (follicular and small lymphocytic subtypes) with clinical responses achieved in about half of patients treated with rituximab 375 mg/m(2) intravenously once weekly for 4 weeks, which was similar to some of the most encouraging results reported with traditional chemotherapeutic agents. The latter was a randomised comparison of eight cycles of CHOP plus rituximab 375 mg/m(2) intravenously (one dose per cycle) versus CHOP alone in previously untreated elderly patients (60 to 80 years of age) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. In this pivotal trial, 2-year event-free and overall survival were significantly higher with rituximab plus CHOP, and there was no increase in clinically significant adverse effects compared with CHOP alone. Treatment with rituximab is generally well tolerated, particularly in terms of adverse haematological effects and serious or opportunistic infections relative to standard chemotherapy. Infusion-related reactions occur in the majority of patients treated with rituximab; these are usually mild to moderate flu-like symptoms that decrease in frequency with subsequent infusions. In approximately 10% of patients, however, severe infusion-related reactions develop (e.g. bronchospasm, hypotension). These reactions are usually reversible with appropriate interventions and supportive care but there have been rare reports of fatalities.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trials with rituximab indicate that the drug has broad application to B-cell malignancies, although further clarification is needed to determine its optimal use in many of these clinical settings. Importantly, rituximab in combination with CHOP chemotherapy has emerged as a new treatment standard for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, at least in elderly patients. Compared with conventional chemotherapy, rituximab is associated with markedly reduced haematological events such as severe neutropenia, as well as associated infections. Rituximab may be particularly suitable for elderly patients or those with poor performance status, and its tolerability profile facilitates its use in combination with cytotoxic drugs.

PHARMACODYNAMIC PROPERTIES

Rituximab is a mouse/human chimaeric IgG(1)-kappa monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 antigen found on the surface of malignant and normal B lymphocytes. Although treatment with rituximab induces lymphopenia in most patients, typically lasting about 6 months, a full recovery of B lymphocytes in the peripheral blood is usually seen 9-12 months after therapy, as CD20 is not expressed on haematopoietic stem cells. CD20 is, however, expressed on >90% of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) and to a lesser degree on B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) cells. Although not fully elucidated, the cytotoxic effects of rituximab on CD20-positive malignant B cells appears to involve complement-dependent cytotoxicity, complement-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and induction of apoptosis. In addition, in vitro data indicate that rituximab sensitises tumour cells to the effects of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs.

PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES

Serum rituximab concentrations increased in proportion to dose across a wide range of single- and multiple-dose intravenous regimens in patients with B-cell NHL. When administll NHL. When administered at a dose of 375 mg/m(2) once weekly for 4 weeks in a pivotal trial in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell NHL (follicular or small lymphocytic subtypes), peak serum concentrations essentially doubled from the first (239.1 mg/L) to the fourth (460.7 mg/L) infusion, while elimination half-life (t(1/2)) increased from 76.3 to 205.8 hours (3.2 to 8.6 days). The concomitant increase in serum rituximab concentrations and t(1/2) with each successive infusion may be due, at least in part, to the elimination of circulating CD20-positive B cells and reduction or saturation of CD20-binding sites after the initial infusions of rituximab. The pharmacokinetic properties of rituximab are also characterised by wide inter-individual variability, and serum drug concentrations that are correlated with clinical response. Although pharmacokinetic data are limited in patients with aggressive forms of NHL, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, rituximab appears to have a similar pharmacokinetic profile in these patients to that in patients with indolent B-cell NHL. The pharmacokinetics of rituximab are also reported to be similar whether the drug is administered with or without cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) chemotherapy.

THERAPEUTIC USE

A number of studies have demonstrated efficacy of intravenous rituximab in patients with various lymphoid malignancies of B-cell origin, including indolent (e.g. follicular lymphoma) and aggressive (e.g. diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) forms of NHL, and CLL, but the drug has not yet been approved for use in CLL, and approved indications in NHL vary between countries. In the US, for example, rituximab is available for the treatment of patients with low-grade or follicular, relapsed or refractory, CD20-positive B-cell NHL. In Europe, the drug has similar approval for relapsed or refractory follicular NHL as in the US, but has also been approved for use in combination with CHOP chemotherapy for the most common aggressive form of NHL (CD20-positive, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma). Rituximab was approved for these indications primarily on the basis of results from two pivotal trials. In Japan, rituximab has been approved for indolent B-cell NHL and mantle cell lymphoma (an aggressive form of B-cell NHL), primarily on the basis of results of a Japanese phase II trial. Indolent NHL: Results of several studies evaluating rituximab 375 mg/m(2) once weekly for 4 weeks in patients with indolent forms of B-cell NHL (primarily follicular and small lymphocytic lymphomas) showed objective response (OR) rates ranging from approximately 40-60% in those receiving the drug for relapsed or refractory indolent B-cell NHL, and slightly higher (50-70%) for those receiving rituximab as first-line therapy. In a pivotal trial in 166 patients with relapsed or refractory low-grade or follicular B-cell NHL, intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis showed an OR rate of 48%, and a projected median time to progression of 13 months. Encouraging data are also emerging on the use of rituximab in combination with chemotherapeutic agents (e.g. CHOP, fludarabine-containing regimens) or other drugs (e.g. interferon-alpha2a) in previously untreated patients with indolent forms of B-cell NHL (primarily follicular and small lymphocytic subtypes). Rates for OR were consistently around 95%, with the majority being complete responses (CRs). Follow-up data from a study in 40 patients with low-grade or follicular B-cell NHL treated with rituximab plus CHOP as first-line therapy showed that responses were durable with a progression-free survival and median duration of response >5 years.Bcl-2 gene rearrangement (t14;18) occurs in malignant cells in up to 85% of patients with follicular lymphoma, and minimal residual disease in peripheral blood and bone marrow can be monitored using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In several studies assessing blood and/or bone marrow, rituximab has achieved molecular response (conversion from PCR-positive to PCR-negative bcl-2 status) in at least half of the patients. Aggressive NHL: Studies with rituximab as monotherapy in aggressive B-cell NHL, a potentially curable disorder, have generally been restricted to patients with relapsed or recurrent disease, since CHOP has traditionally been the standard first-line treatment regimen. However, promising results from phase II monotherapy studies prompted further clinical investigation of rituximab in conjunction with chemotherapy. Thus, most studies with rituximab in patients with aggressive forms of B-cell NHL have involved combination therapy, including a pivotal randomised trial comparing eight cycles of standard CHOP therapy plus rituximab 375 mg/m(2) (one dose per cycle) versus CHOP alone in 399 previously untreated elderly patients (60-80 years of age) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Results of the pivotal trial showed a clear advantage for rituximab plus CHOP versus CHOP in terms of event-free survival (primary endpoint) at 2 years (57% vs 38%, p < 0.001). Overall survival at 2 years (70% vs 57%, p < 0.01) and CR rate (76% vs 63%, p < 0.01) were also higher with the rituximab-CHOP combination. Other, smaller trials with rituximab in combination with CHOP or other chemotherapeutic regimens, either as first-line therapy or for patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell NHL, have also shown promising results in terms of clinical response rates.CLL: In relatively small trials (n < 40) conducted primarily in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell CLL, rituximab monotherapy (various regimens) achieved OR rates of 23-45%, with median duration of response ranging from approximately 3-10 months. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Monoclonal antibody therapy for cancer

Monoclonal antibody therapy has emerged as an important therapeutic modality for cancer. Unconjugated antibodies show significant efficacy in the treatment of breast cancer, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Promising new targets for unconjugated antibody therapy include cellular growth factor receptors, receptors or mediators of tumor-driven angiogenesis, and B cell surface antigens other than CD20. Immunoconjugates composed of antibodies conjugated to radionuclides or toxins show efficacy in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. One immunoconjugate containing an antibody and a chemotherapy agent exhibits clinically meaningful antitumor activity in acute myeloid leukemia. Numerous efforts to exploit the ability of antibodies to focus the activities of toxic payloads at tumor sites are under way and show early promise. The ability to create essentially human antibody structures has reduced the likelihood of host-protective immune responses that otherwise limit the duration of therapy. Antibody structures now can be readily manipulated to facilitate selective interaction with host immune effectors. Other structural manipulations that improve the selective targeting properties and rapid systemic clearance of immunoconjugates should lead to the design of effective new treatments, particularly for solid tumors.

Biological and clinical heterogeneity of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorders have been recognized as a heterogeneous group of neoplastic diseases affecting the lymphoid system. They are frequently characterized by leukemic manifestations with peripheral blood and/or bone marrow involvement. B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL), a disease which is now accepted as derived from immunologicallycompetent antigen-activated B-cells, is the most common in the western countries. Although for several decades it was considered as a unique entity, a body of evidences is now emerging indicating the biological heterogeneity of B-CLL. Molecular and immunophenotypic data induce to consider two main subgroups of B-CLL exist at the cellular level: in fact, B-CLL cases can be divided into two categories according to IgV gene mutation status. One group develops from "memory" B-cells after antigenic stimulation in the germinal center of secondary follicles, displays mutated gene IgV and lacks CD38 expression; the second one derives from the so-called "naïve" antigen inexperienced B-cells, does not present IgV gene mutations and displays CD38 surface molecule. The two groups seem to be characterised by different clinical outcomes with the "mutated" group expected to have a more benign course than that arising from a "naïve" B-cell. Thus, the definition of the biological features of these different groups could be of help for clinicians in order to recognize patients needing more intensive therapeutic approaches.