The uncemented Bi-Contact total hip arthroplasty

Long term results of the Bicontact D stem in dysplastic osteoarthritis: a 10-15 year follow-up study

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) using the Bicontact D stem with a minimum 10 year follow-up that focused on patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

METHODS

One hundred five patients with osteoarthritis due to DDH who underwent primary THA were included in this study. The mean final follow-up period was 12.7 ± 1.2 years (range 10-15 years). All cases were evaluated both clinically and radiographically, and Kaplan-Meier survivorship was determined as stem revision for any reason as the end point.

RESULTS

Modified Harris hip score averaged 89.0 ± 1.1 (range 60-98) at the final follow-up. The survivorship was 99.0% (95% confidence interval 93.4-99.9%) at 15.0 years, and only one hip with a well-fixed stem required stem revision due to recurrent dislocations. Cortical hypertrophy (CH) was observed in 40 of 105 hips (38.1%), and stress shielding (SS) progressed to grade 3 or 4 in six hips (6 of 105 hips: 5.7%) during the study period. Among the six hips with progressed SS, Dorr type C proximal femoral geometry was seen in five hips.

CONCLUSION

This study of 105 THAs using the Bicontact D stem that focused on DDH patients with a minimum 10 year follow-up period achieved satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes. Dorr type C proximal femoral geometry could be considered a risk factor for progressed SS.

Radiological Evaluation of the Relationship Between Cortical Hypertrophy and Stress Shielding After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Stem

Background

Unloading of the proximal medial femoral cortex is usually associated with an increased bone strain at the distal part of the prosthesis, which may cause distal femoral cortical hypertrophy (CH). The objective of this study was to determine the factors that may be considered a predisposition to distal femoral CH and its effect on the stress shielding (SS) or durability of the fixation of the stem.

Methods

A total of 240 total hip arthroplasties were performed between January 2006 and December 2016, with all hips implanted with a Bicontact stem. The minimum follow-up period was more than 2 years, and the mean follow-up period was 7.2 years. The radiographic outcome was assessed on an anteroposterior hip radiograph. CH and SS were assessed on postoperative radiographs in the Gruen zone. We defined CH that appeared in zone 3 or 5 as ‘the focal type’ and defined CH that appeared in zones 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 as ‘the diffuse type.’ SS followed the procedures from the Engh classification.

Results

CH was found in 72 hips (30% of the 240 hips), the focal type was found in 23 hips (9.6% of the 240 hips), and the diffuse type was found in 49 hips (20.4% of the 240 hips). SS was found in 41 hips (17.1% of 240 hips), including 32 hips with SS, which was found after the development of CH. One hip was from the focal-type CH and 31 hips were from the diffuse-type CH. SS, which is typically found in Engh classification types 1 and 2 developed in 13 hips, and SS, which is widely seen in Engh classification types 3 and 4 developed in 19 hips. All 19 hips with progressed SS were found after the diffuse-type CH had developed. In addition, among the 19 hips with progressed SS, Dorr type A was found in 0 hips, Dorr type B in 8 hips, and Dorr type C in 11 hips.

Conclusions

According to the results of our radiological evaluation, development of the diffuse-type CH after total hip arthroplasty using Bicontact stems is one of the critical causes of the later development of SS and could be predicted to progress to SS. To prevent the development of the diffuse-type CH, the indication to choose a Bicontact stem for a Dorr type C with osteoporotic bone should be considered.

Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few studies have addressed the association between early migration of femoral stems and late aseptic revision in total hip arthroplasty. We performed a meta-regression analysis on 2 parallel systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the association between early migration and late aseptic revision of femoral stems.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of the 2 reviews, one covered early migration data obtained from radiostereometric analysis (RSA) studies and the other covered long-term aseptic revision rates obtained from survival studies with endpoint revision for aseptic loosening. Stems were stratified according to the design concept: cemented shape-closed, cemented force-closed, and uncemented. A weighted regression model was used to assess the association between early migration and late aseptic revision, and to correct for confounders. Thresholds for acceptable and unacceptable migration were determined in accordance with the national joint registries (≤ 5% revision at 10 years) and the NICE criteria (≤ 10% revision at 10 years).

RESULTS

24 studies (731 stems) were included in the RSA review and 56 studies (20,599 stems) were included in the survival analysis review. Combining both reviews for the 3 design concepts showed that for every 0.1-mm increase in 2-year subsidence, as measured with RSA, there was a 4% increase in revision rate for the shape-closed stem designs. This association remained after correction for age, sex, diagnosis, hospital type, continent, and study quality. The threshold for acceptable migration of shape-closed designs was defined at 0.15 mm; stems subsiding less than 0.15 mm in 2 years had revision rates of less than 5% at 10 years, while stems exceeding 0.15 mm subsidence had revision rates of more than 5%.

INTERPRETATION

There was a clinically relevant association between early subsidence of shape-closed femoral stems and late revision for aseptic loosening. This association can be used to assess the safety of shape-closed stem designs. The published research is not sufficient to allow us to make any conclusions regarding such an association for the force-closed and uncemented stems.

[Cement-free and cemented Excia hip shaft prosthesis: comparison of intermediate term results]

AIM OF THE STUDY

For fixation of total hip prostheses, cemented and cement-free techniques are available. Normally, anchoring techniques and the definitive endoprosthesis model are determined preoperatively based on the available information, such as the quality of bone. Some newer endoprosthesis models utilize the same instruments for both implantation techniques. In this way it is possible to decide on the final anchoring technique intraoperatively. Because such a combined endoprosthesis system has been used in our clinic for 10 years, we were interested in the clinical results at the intermediate stage.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, non-randomized study 105 pairs from a continuing series were formed from 105 cases treated with cement-free prostheses and the latest cemented shaft implants from the same year. In this way a total of 210 hip shaft endoprostheses from the years 2002 to 2006 were included in the study. After an average time period of 6.3 years (range 4.5-8.2 years) the patients were recalled for a follow-up examination. The clinical results, early and late complications were analyzed. The immediately postoperative X-ray images and those from the follow-up examination were evaluated by an independent external expert with respect to primary positioning, migration and any signs of loosening.

RESULTS

At the follow-up examination at an average of 6.3 years the quota was 73%. The indications for cement-free/cemented total hip endoprosthesis were: primary arthritis 87%/98%, secondary arthritis 10%/2% and others 3%/0%. At the time of the last follow-up examination 4 and 14 patients, respectively, had died. The visual analog scale (VAS) for pain was given as 0.72/0.78. The Harris hip score improved from 54/48 to 93/90 points. The implant-related survival rate was 99.5%. Due to a periprosthetic fracture one of the cemented shafts had to be removed. Luxation occurred in 3/2 cases, respectively, of which 4 could be conservatively treated. In one cement-free case a head elongation and a change to an inlay with an anti-luxation shoulder was necessary. A fracture of the trochanter major was conservatively treated and an intraoperative shaft fissure was stabilized with wire cerclage and titan banding. The radiological evaluation showed no implant loosening or statistically significant differences in the shaft positioning.

DISCUSSION

Short and intermediate clinical and radiological results showed no differences in patients of similar average age in the sixth decade of life. The significant improvements in the Harris hip score and the range of movement could be confirmed in the intermediate term and are comparable to other current implants. It can be concluded that an intraoperative decision on the fixation technique based on the macroscopically visible bone quality supports the reliably good results of both methods.

Evaluation of the results from proximal fixation of uncemented conical femoral components in Dorr type C femurs

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the results from proximal fixation of uncemented conical femoral components in patients with a type C proximal femur and compare them with the results obtained from type A and B femurs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study on 87 patients with 90 uncemented total hip arthroplasty procedures. Three patients (three hips) were excluded because their follow-up lasted for less than two years. The follow-up ranged from 2 to 4.3 years and the mean was 2.8 years. The Bicontact femoral implant model was used. The preoperative radiographs were evaluated, the femurs were classified as Dorr types A, B or C and the cortical indices were measured. The patients were evaluated clinically by means of the Harris Hip Score (HHS), before the surgery and at the last follow-up. The sequences of postoperative radiographs were compared regarding stability, complications and any signs of osseointegration of the femoral prosthesis.

RESULTS

Among the 87 hips with follow-up greater than two years, 32 femurs were type A (37%), 37 type B (42%) and 18 type C (21%). Before the operation, the mean HHS was 39.4 for types A and B and 38.8 for type C. At the last follow-up, the mean HHS was 89.8 for types A and B and 86 for type C. None of the 87 femoral components had been revised by the time of the last follow-up; all of them were considered stable. In 86 cases, the radiographs showed signs of osseointegration.

CONCLUSION

There were no significant differences in the clinical results or in the fixation (and osseointegration) of conical uncemented femoral prostheses with proximal porosity, among femurs with different types of femoral morphology according to the Dorr classification. This conclusion may vary if another implant model were to be used.

Comparison of cementless and hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty

Cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implants were designed to provide long-term fixation without the risk of cement-associated complications. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of titanium-coated cementless implants compared with hybrid TKA implants with a cemented tibial and a cementless femoral component. The authors performed a case-control, single-center study of 120 TKAs performed between 2003 and 2007, including 60 cementless and 60 hybrid cemented TKAs. The authors prospectively analyzed the radiographic and clinical data and the survivorship of the implants at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Ninety patients who underwent TKA completed the 5-year assessment. Knee Society Scores increased significantly in both groups (P<.001). In both groups, 2 patients underwent revision due to aseptic tibial component loosening, resulting in a 96% implant survival rate. Radiographs showed significantly less radiolucent lines around the tibial baseplate in the cementless group (n=12) than in the hybrid cemented group (n=26) (P=.009).At 6-year mean follow-up, no significant difference existed between the cementless and hybrid cemented tibial components in TKA in terms of clinical and functional results and postoperative complications. The significantly smaller number of radiolucent lines in the cementless group is an indicator of primary stability with the benefit of long-term fixation durability of TKA.

The Bicontact cementless primary total hip arthroplasty: long-term results

We report on a prospective series of 201 primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties with a Bicontact prosthesis at a mean follow-up of 12.9 years. The mean Harris hip score improved from 41 before surgery to 89 at final follow-up. Two femoral stems, one each for infection and fracture, and 12 cups were revised. The mean number of years to revision post-primary surgery was 8.7 years (six months to 16 years). The cumulative survival of the prosthesis was 95.42% for any cause at ten years and 93.57% at 12 years. Survivorship for aseptic loosening of the femoral stem was 100%. In our series, the Bicontact uncemented total hip arthroplasty stem without hydroxyapatite coating showed excellent survival and the cup survival was comparable to other leading series.

Cementless total hip arthroplasty specifically designed for asians: clinical and radiologic results at a mean of 10 years

It is known that the proximal femoral osteometry is different between Asians and whites. An uncemented femoral stem was therefore designed by us specifically for Asians, and we now report the medium-term clinical results. Results of a proximally porous-coated femoral component anatomically matched for Asians were analyzed in a consecutive cohort of 48 hips. The mean follow-up was 10.3 years. The mean Harris hip score was 39.4 preoperatively and 94.2 at last follow-up (P < .001). All stems had bone ingrowth. Stem survival was 100% up to 14 years using revision as the end point. Eight acetabular component revisions were performed for bearing surface failures and osteolysis. This femoral stem, specifically designed for better fit in an Asian population, had excellent clinical and radiologic outcome.

Long-term outcome of a cementless, hemispherical, press-fit acetabular component: survivorship analysis and dose-response relationship to linear polyethylene wear

Between 1988 and 1998 we implanted 318 total hip replacements (THRs) in 287 patients using the Plasmacup (B. Braun Ltd, Sheffield, United Kingdom) and a conventional metal-on-polyethylene articulation. The main indications for THR were primary or secondary osteoarthritis. At follow-up after a mean 11.6 years (7.6 to 18.4) 17 patients had died and 20 could not be traced leaving a final series of 280 THRs in 250 patients. There were 62 revisions (22.1%) in 59 patients. A total of 43 acetabular shells (15.4%) had been revised and 13 (4.6%) had undergone exchange of the liner. The most frequent indications for revision were osteolysis and aseptic loosening, followed by polyethylene wear. The mean Kaplan-Meier survival of the Plasmacup was 91% at ten years and 58% at 14 years. Osteolysis was found around 36 (17.1%) of the 211 surviving shells. The median annual rate of linear wear in the surviving shells was 0.12 mm/year and 0.25 mm/year in those which had been revised (p < 0.001). Polyethylene wear was a strong independent risk factor for osteolysis and aseptic loosening. The percentage of patients with osteolysis increased proportionately with each quintile of wear-rate. There is a high late rate of failure of the Plasmacup. Patients with the combination of this prosthesis and bearing should be closely monitored after ten years.

Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years

BACKGROUND

There are multiple revision implant systems currently available for socket revision in revision total hip arthroplasty. Up until now, not all of these systems have been followed up with regards to their long-term use as a revision implantation.For the first time, this study presents the hemispherical porous-coated socket Plasmacup SC, produced by Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany, and the clinical and radiological mid-term results of this revision cup implant.

METHODS

Over a period of ten years the Plasmacup SC press-fit-cup was used as a revision implant in 72 consecutive aseptic cases which were included in this retrospective study. The mean follow-up period was 8 years. Bone graft transplantation was performed in 32% of all cases. In 90%, the cup was fixed with additional screws. The follow-up radiographs were analysed with regards to cup migration, osteointegration and osteolysis in the DeLee zones using a computer aided program taking the teardrop figure as a main point of reference. For clinical evaluation the Harris-Hip-Score and the WOMAC-Score were utilized.

RESULTS

At the follow up examination, the mean Harris-Hip-Score was 83.5 points and the mean WOMAC-Score 34.7 points. 93% of all patients were satisfied with the result of the operation. No aseptic cup loosening could be observed and only one cup had to be removed due to infection. No significant longitudinal or transversal cup migration could be observed.

CONCLUSION

Aesculap's Plasmacup SC is suitable as a cementless cup revision implant. There is stable cup osteointegration, post press-fit implantation, even in the case of major acetabular bone defects.

Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Since the introduction of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in Sweden, both components have most commonly been cemented. A decade ago the frequency of uncemented fixation started to increase, and this change in practice has continued. We therefore analyzed implant survival of cemented and uncemented THA, and whether the modes of failure differ between the two methods of fixation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients registered in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register between 1992 and 2007 who received either totally cemented or totally uncemented THA were identified (n = 170,413). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with revision of any component, and for any reason, as the endpoints was performed. Cox regression models were used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) for revision for various reasons, adjusted for sex, age, and primary diagnosis.

RESULTS

Revision-free 10-year survival of uncemented THA was lower than that of cemented THA (85% vs. 94%, p < 0.001). No age or diagnosis groups benefited from the use of uncemented fixation. Cox regression analysis confirmed that uncemented THA had a higher risk of revision for any reason (RR = 1.5, 95% CI: 1.4-1.6) and for aseptic loosening (RR = 1.5, CI: 1.3-1.6). Uncemented cup components had a higher risk of cup revision due to aseptic loosening (RR = 1.8, CI: 1.6-2.0), whereas uncemented stem components had a lower risk of stem revision due to aseptic loosening (RR = 0.4, CI: 0.3-0.5) when compared to cemented components. Uncemented stems were more frequently revised due to periprosthetic fracture during the first 2 postoperative years than cemented stems (RR = 8, CI: 5-14). The 5 most common uncemented cups had no increased risk of revision for any reason when compared with the 5 most commonly used cemented cups (RR = 0.9, CI: 0.6-1.1). There was no significant difference in the risk of revision due to infection between cemented and uncemented THA.

INTERPRETATION

Survival of uncemented THA is inferior to that of cemented THA, and this appears to be mainly related to poorer performance of uncemented cups. Uncemented stems perform better than cemented stems; however, unrecognized intraoperative femoral fractures may be an important reason for early failure of uncemented stems. The risk of revision of the most common uncemented cup designs is similar to that of cemented cups, indicating that some of the problems with uncemented cup fixation may have been solved.