The histology of "reactive lines" in well-fixed components

Radiology of the resurfaced hip

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty is an increasingly common procedure for osteoarthritis. Conventional radiographs are used routinely for follow-up assessment, however they only provide limited information on the radiological outcome. Various complications have been reported in the scientific literature although not all are fully understood. In an effort to investigate problematic or failing hip resurfacings, various radiological methods have been utilized. These methods can be used to help make a diagnosis and guide management. This paper aims to review and illustrate the radiographic findings in the form of radiography, computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound of both normal and abnormal findings in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. However, imaging around a metal prosthesis with CT and MRI is particularly challenging and therefore the potential techniques used to overcome this are discussed.

The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips

We report an independent prospective review of the first 230 Birmingham hip resurfacings in 212 patients at a mean follow-up of five years (4 to 6). Two patients, one with a loose acetabular component and the other with suspected avascular necrosis of the femoral head, underwent revision. There were two deaths from unrelated causes and one patient was lost to follow-up. The survivorship with the worst-case scenario was 97.8% (95% confidence interval 95.8 to 99.5). The mean Harris hip score improved significantly (paired t-test, p < 0.05) from 62.54 (8 to 92) pre-operatively to 97.7 (61 to 100) at a mean of three years (2.1 to 4.3), then deteriorated slightly to a mean of 95.2 (47 to 100) at a mean of five years. The mean flexion improved from 91.5 degrees (25 degrees to 140 degrees) to 110.4 degrees (80 degrees to 145 degrees) at a mean of three years with no further improvement at five years (111.2 degrees; 70 degrees to 160 degrees). On radiological review at five years, one patient had a progressive lucent line around the acetabular component and six had progressive lucent lines around the femoral component. A total of 18 femoral components (8%) had migrated into varus and those with lucent lines present migrated a mean of 3.8 degrees (1.02 degrees to 6.54 degrees) more than the rest. Superolateral notching of the femoral neck and reactive sclerosis at the tip of the peg of the femoral component were associated with the presence of lucent lines (chi-squared test, p < 0.05), but not with migration of the femoral component, and are of unknown significance. Our results with the Birmingham hip resurfacing continue to be satisfactory at a mean follow-up of five years.

Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty

The main advantage of hip resurfacing is bone conservation for patients likely to outlive a primary conventional hip replacement. Previous attempts at hip resurfacing failed predominantly because of the consequences of a high amount of wear of thin polyethylene acetabular components and poor femoral component fixation. With correct patient selection, surgeon education, and operative technique, survivorship at five years is comparable with that of traditional hip replacements. Hip resurfacing has its own unique set of complications, including a fractured neck of the femur. It is necessary to understand the risk factors prior to performing the procedure.

Stepwise introduction of a bone-conserving osseointegrated hip arthroplasty using RSA and a randomized study: I. Preliminary investigations--52 patients followed for 3 years

BACKGROUND

We developed a total hip system using osseointegration guidelines, a metaphyseal-loading proximal femoral replacement in the retained neck and a dual-geometry titanium shell in the acetabulum.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A randomized controlled clinical trial was undertaken in 52 patients (53 hips), using the cemented Spectron stem and cementless Harris-Galante II cup as control implants (24 patients in experimental group, 29 control patients). Clinical measures of Harris Hip Score (HHS), pain score and radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at regular intervals for up to three years were used to monitor progress.

RESULTS

No statistically significant differences were found in HHS and pain score; the stability of the cementless experimental implant was also comparable to that of the cemented controls by RSA. 3 revisions were required for migration in the experimental group and 1 was required for component dislocation in the control group.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings indicate the practicality of osseointegration of titanium implants, but suggest that current performance is inadequate for clinical introduction. However, the stable fixation achieved in the retained neck in the majority of patients is indicative of osseointegration. This finding will encourage technical and design improvements for enhancement of clinical osseointegration and should also encourage further study. Periprosthetic osteolysis might be avoided by the establishment and maintenance of direct implant-bone connection: "osseointegration".