No SMAD4 hypermethylation in colorectal cancer

Alterations of PTEN and SMAD4 methylation in diagnosis of breast cancer: implications of methyl II PCR assay

Background

Diagnosis of breast cancer is more complicated due to lack of minimal invasive biomarker with sufficient precision. DNA methylation is a promising marker for cancer diagnosis. In this study, authors evaluated methylation patterns for PTEN and SMAD4 in blood samples using EpiTect Methyl II QPCR assay quantitative PCR technology.

Results

Methylation status for PTEN and SMAD4 were statistically significant as breast cancer patients reported hypermethylation compared to benign and control groups (77.1 ± 17.9 vs. 24.9 ± 4.5 and 15.1 ± 1.4 and 70.1 ± 14.4 vs. 28.2 ± 0.61 and 29.5 ± 3.6, respectively). ROC curve analysis revealed that both PTEN (AUC = 0.992) and SMAD4 (AUC = 0.853) had good discriminative power for differentiating BC from all non-cancer individuals (benign and healthy combined) compared to routine tumor markers CEA (AUC = 0.538) and CA15.3 (AUC = 0.686). High PTEN methylation degree was associated with late stages (84.2 ± 17.4), positive lymph node (84.2 ± 18.5), positive ER (81.3 ± 19.7), positive PgR (79.5 ± 19.1), and positive HER2 (80.7 ± 19.0) vs. 67.4 ± 13.8, 70.6 ± 14.8, 72.8 ± 14.9, 72.5 ± 14.7, and 70.2 ± 13.5 in early stages, negative lymph node, negative ER, negative PgR, and negative HER2, respectively. Similar results were obtained regarding SMAD4 methylation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for methylated PTEN were 100%, 95%, 99.1%, 100%, and 95%, respectively when differentiated BC from all-non cancer controls. Interestingly, PTEN could distinguish early BC stages with good sensitivity 84.4%, 51.4%, 69.1%, 72%, and 70%, respectively.

Conclusion

Methylation status of PTEN and SMAD4 is a promising blood marker for early detection of breast cancer. Future studies are needed for their role as prognostic markers.

Upregulation of SMAD4 by MZF1 inhibits migration of human gastric cancer cells

SMAD4 is a tumor suppressor that is frequently inactivated in many types of cancer. The role of abnormal expression of SMAD4 has been reported in developmental processes and the progression of various human cancers. The expression level of SMAD4 has been related to the survival rate in gastric cancer patients. However, the molecular mechanism underlying transcriptional regulation of SMAD4 remains largely unknown. In the present study, we characterized the promoter region of SMAD4 and identified myeloid zinc finger 1 (MZF1), as a putative transcription factor. MZF1 directly bound to a core region of the SMAD4 promoter and stimulated transcriptional activity. We also found that the expression of MZF1 influences the migration ability of gastric adenocarcinoma cells. Collectively, our results showed that MZF1 has a role in cellular migration of gastric cancer cells via promoting an increase in intracellular SMAD4 levels. This study might provide new evidence for the molecular basis of the tumor suppressive effect of the MZF1-SMAD4 axis, a new therapeutic target in advanced human gastric cancer.

SMAD4 gene promoter mutations in patients with thyroid tumors

As a key component of the transforming growth factor beta (TGFB) pathway, which regulates the expression of thyroid-specific genes, tumor suppressor SMAD4 is crucial for thyroid development and function. Aberrant expression of SMAD4 in thyroid tumor tissue was reported and mutations affecting the coding region have been detected, but a potential role of mutations in SMAD4 gene regulatory regions remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to analyze SMAD4 gene promoters in thyroid tumors. A total of 76 thyroidectomy specimens were studied, including 42 malignant and 34 benign tumors. The presence of mutations in four SMAD4 gene promoters was analyzed in thyroid tumor tissue and peripheral blood by PCR and DNA sequencing. The expression and intracellular localization of endogenous SMAD4 protein in selected tumor samples was studied by immunostaining and confocal microscopy. Of three novel variants detected, two were within promoter A (-204T/C and -5C/T) and one in promoter D (-180delA). Unlike somatic mutations previously detected in the nearby region, germline mutation -180delA in promoter D doesn't appear to affect SMAD4 expression in the thyroid tumor tissue. However, all newly detected SMAD4 promoter variants affect predicted binding sites of transcription factors involved in cell cycle regulation and should be further characterized functionally. Although not directly involved in carcinogenesis, detected variants may alter SMAD4 transcriptional regulation to some extent. Considering that dosage dependence is of great importance for the role of SMAD4 protein as a tumor suppressor, potential clinical significance of SMAD4 gene promoter mutations is worth further investigation.

Deletion and down-regulation of SMAD4 gene in colorectal cancers in a Chinese population

OBJECTIVE

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common types of human cancers. As a tumor suppressor, SMAD4 plays a key role in colorectal carcinogenesis and invasiveness. Copy number variations (CNVs) of the SMAD4 gene have been reported to be associated with cancer pathogenesis in array-based studies in different populations. Here we aimed to investigate the CNVs of the SMAD4 gene in a relatively large number of CRC patients from China.

METHODS

In the present study, we collected 147 Chinese CRC tumors as well as self-paired normal control tissues. Quantitative PCR was carried out to examine the copy number as well as the mRNA expression of the SMAD4 gene.

RESULTS

Our results showed that the copy number deletions of SMAD4 were frequent in a relatively high percentage of CRC samples (34.7%, 51 out of 147). There was a positive correlation between the copy number decrease of SMAD4 and tumor progression in CRCs. Furthermore, copy number loss of SMAD4 was correlated with decreased mRNA expression.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggested that the copy number deletions of SMAD4 were frequent in CRC patients from China and had the potential to serve as a diagnostic indicator, alone or in combination with other markers, for CRC.

Genotype-defined cancer risk in juvenile polyposis syndrome

Background

Germline mutations in SMAD4 and BMPR1A disrupt the transforming growth factor β signal transduction pathway, and are associated with juvenile polyposis syndrome. The effect of genotype on the pattern of disease in this syndrome is unknown. This study evaluated the differential impact of SMAD4 and BMPR1A gene mutations on cancer risk and oncological phenotype in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Methods

Patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome and germline SMAD4 or BMPR1A mutations were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional registry. Medical records were reviewed and the clinical patterns of disease were analysed.

Results

Thirty-five patients had germline mutations in either BMPR1A (8 patients) or SMAD4 (27). Median follow-up was 11 years. Colonic phenotype was similar between patients with SMAD4 and BMPR1A mutations, whereas SMAD4 mutations were associated with larger polyp numbers (number of patients with 50 or more gastric polyps: 14 versus 0 respectively). The numbers of patients with rectal polyps was comparable between BMPR1A and SMAD4 mutation carriers (5 versus 17). No patient was diagnosed with cancer in the BMPR1A group, whereas four men with a SMAD4 mutation developed gastrointestinal (3) or extraintestinal (1) cancer. The gastrointestinal cancer risk in patients with juvenile polyposis syndrome and a SMAD4 mutation was 11 per cent (3 of 27).

Conclusion

The SMAD4 genotype is associated with a more aggressive upper gastrointestinal malignancy risk in juvenile polyposis syndrome.

Concordant promoter methylation of transforming growth factor-beta receptor types I and II occurs early in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a pleiotropic growth factor with multiple functions through its type I (TGFBR1) and type II (TGFBR2) receptors. A reduction or loss of expression of TGFBRs enables cancer cells to escape the growth inhibitory effect of TGF-β and to gain a growth advantage.

OBJECTIVE

The promoter methylation status and expression of TGFBR1, TGFBR2 and Smad4 gene were investigated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

DESIGN

Methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction approach was used to detect the methylation status. Immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method were used to examine the protein and messenger RNA expression, respectively.

RESULTS

Both the ESCC and the high-grade dysplastic tissues showed hypermethylation of TGFBR1 and TGFBR2, and the hyper-methylation of TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 in ESCC tissues was significantly associated with decreased messenger RNA and protein expression (P < 0.05). When stratified for tumor lymph node metastasis stages, TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 gene methylation was more frequent in stage III and stage IV tumor tissues than that in stage I and stage II tumor tissues (P < 0.05). Simultaneous methylation of the 2 receptors was progressively increased along with the increasing of tumor lymph node metastasis stage and decreasing of histological differentiation. Smad4 hypermethylation was only detected in 7 ESCC tumor tissues and associated with the loss of Smad4 expression. The decreased protein expression of TGFBR1, TGFBR2 and Smad4 was correlated with increased expression of TGF-β1 in ESCC.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that promoter methylation of TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 may exist in the early stage of ESCC and play important roles in TGFBR1 and TGFBR2 gene silencing.

Discovery of SMAD4 promoters, transcription factor binding sites and deletions in juvenile polyposis patients

Inactivation of SMAD4 has been linked to several cancers and germline mutations cause juvenile polyposis (JP). We set out to identify the promoter(s) of SMAD4, evaluate their activity in cell lines and define possible transcription factor binding sites (TFBS). 5′-rapid amplification of cDNA ends (5′-RACE) and computational analyses were used to identify candidate promoters and corresponding TFBS and the activity of each was assessed by luciferase vectors in different cell lines. TFBS were disrupted by site-directed mutagenesis (SDM) to evaluate the effect on promoter activity. Four promoters were identified, two of which had significant activity in several cell lines, while two others had minimal activity. In silico analysis revealed multiple potentially important TFBS for each promoter. One promoter was deleted in the germline of two JP patients and SDM of several sites led to significant reduction in promoter activity. No mutations were found by sequencing this promoter in 65 JP probands. The predicted TFBS profiles for each of the four promoters shared few transcription factors in common, but were conserved across several species. The elucidation of these promoters and identification of TFBS has important implications for future studies in sporadic tumors from multiple sites, and in JP patients.

Aberrant DNA methylation of integrin alpha4: a potential novel role for metastasis of cholangiocarcinoma

PURPOSE

Although the altered expression of integrin alpha4 is known to be associated with transformation or metastasis in several human cancers, the information on cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is still poor. In this study, we investigated the promoter methylation status of integrin alpha4 gene in CC.

METHODS

A total of 29 CC, 19 adjacent non-tumor-containing tissue and 15 normal liver specimens were used for identification of gene methylation status by methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction.

RESULTS

The frequency of DNA methylation was 55.17% (16 of 29) in the CC specimens (P < 0.001). Also, transcripts of the integrin alpha4 gene were decreased in all CC tissues in which there was DNA methylation of the integrin alpha4 gene. In addition, the downregulated expression of integrin alpha4 in CC cells with hypermethylation of the integrin alpha4 gene was restored by treatment with 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, a DNA methyltransferase inhibitor. Moreover, we found that DNA methylation of integrin alpha4 was detected in all CC tissues obtained from patients with LN metastasis (7/7). Furthermore, phosphorylation of paxillin, cell migration-related molecule, was regulated by silencing of integrin alpha4.

CONCLUSIONS

Taken together, these results suggest that loss of the integrin alpha4 gene is caused by aberrant DNA methylation of the 5'-CpG island site of the gene, and methylation of the integrin alpha4 gene can be a useful marker of metastasis of CC.

ITF-2 is disrupted via allelic loss of chromosome 18q21, and ITF-2B expression is lost at the adenoma-carcinoma transition

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The ubiquitously expressed basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor ITF-2B has an important role in differentiation processes, and its transcription is regulated by beta-catenin. The ITF-2 gene is located in the chromosomal region 18q21; allelic loss of this locus occurs in 70% of colorectal cancers. We analyzed the expression, regulation, and function of ITF-2B in colorectal carcinogenesis.

METHODS

The loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) status of 18q21 and expression of ITF-2B were studied in colorectal carcinomas using polymerase chain reaction-based methods and immunohistochemistry. The biologic effects of ITF-2B were studied in colorectal cancer cells. Reporter gene assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation were utilized to analyze effects of ITF-2B on gene transcription.

RESULTS

ITF-2B is strongly expressed in colon adenomas but frequently down-regulated in carcinomas because of LOH at 18q21. ITF-2B induces cell cycle arrest and regulates the expression of p21(Cip1) via newly identified E-boxes in the CDKN1A gene, independently of p53. Loss of ITF-2B expression correlates with loss of p21(Cip1) expression in primary colon carcinomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Accumulation of mutations and allelic losses are driving forces of colorectal carcinogenesis. ITF-2B, which is up-regulated during early colorectal carcinogenesis because of loss of adenomatous polyposis coli, is a target for LOH on chromosome 18q, along with deleted in colorectal carcinoma and Smad4. This finding, along with the fact that ITF-2B is a regulator of the key cell cycle inhibitor p21(Cip1), indicates that ITF-2B is a tumor suppressor that has an important function at the adenoma to carcinoma transition.

Expression of Smad2 and Smad4 in cervical cancer: absent nuclear Smad4 expression correlates with poor survival

Alterations in transforming growth factor-beta signaling, due to a decrease in Smad2 and especially Smad4 expression, has primarily been reported in pancreatic and colorectal cancers, although loss of the chromosomal region 18q21.1, containing the loci of Smad2 and Smad4, is among the most frequent molecular alterations in cervical cancer. The aim of our study was to investigate whether decreased Smad2 and Smad4 protein expression in primary cervical cancers is associated with molecular alterations at 18q21.1, mutations in the functional domains of Smad2 and Smad4 or hypermethylation, and to assess the biological relevance of decreased Smad2 and Smad4 expression. Subsequently, Smad2, Smad4 and p21 protein expression was determined by immunohistochemistry in 117 primary cervical carcinomas, assembled in a tissue array. Smad signaling was shown to be associated with p21 mRNA expression. All the tumors expressed Smad2 or Smad4. Weak cytoplasmic Smad2 or weak cytoplasmic Smad4 expression could not be attributed to loss of heterozygosity at 18q21.1. Despite weak/moderate Smad2 expression and absent nuclear Smad4 expression, the coding regions of the functional MH1 and MH2 domains of Smad2 and Smad4 were unchanged, as assessed by sequence analysis. The Smad4 promoter region was unmethylated in tumor samples with weak/moderate cytoplasmic Smad4 expression. Remarkably, both weak cytoplasmic Smad4 expression and absent nuclear Smad4 expression significantly correlated with poor disease-free (P=0.003 and P=0.003, respectively) and overall 5-year survival (P=0.003 and P=0.010, respectively). Our findings support the hypothesis that Smad4 is a target molecule for functional inactivation in cervical cancer.

Promoter methylation correlates with reduced Smad4 expression in advanced prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) is a potent growth inhibitor in a wide range of cell types. A transducer of TGF-beta signaling known as Mothers against decapentaplegic homologue 4 (Smad4) is a known tumor suppressor found on chromosome 18q21.1 and is typically inactivated by deletion or mutation in pancreatic and colorectal cancers. The purpose of the article is to investigate Smad4 expression, gene copy number and methylation status in advanced cases of prostate cancer.

METHODS

We have employed Methylation Specific PCR (MSP) to identify methylation sites within the Smad4 promoter and combined this with quantitative real-time PCR to look for correlates between methylation status and Smad4 expression and to examine androgen receptor (AR) expression. Bacterial artificial chromosome-comparative genomic hybridization (BAC-CGH) has been used to look for genomic amplifications and deletions which may also contribute to expression changes.

RESULTS

We fail to find evidence of genomic deletions or amplifications affecting the Smad4 locus on chromosome 18 but show a correlation between promoter methylation and the loss of Smad4 expression in the same material. We confirm that the AR locus on the X chromosome is amplified in 30% of the advanced clinical samples and that this correlates with increased transcript levels as previously reported by other groups.

CONCLUSION

This indicates that epigenetic changes affect the expression of the Smad4 protein in prostate cancer and points to methylation of the promoter as a novel marker of and contributor to the disease warranting further study.

Epigenetic and genetic alterations in Netrin-1 receptors UNC5C and DCC in human colon cancer

BACKGROUND & AIMS

DCC and UNC5C, Netrin-1 dependence receptors, perform an important role in intestinal epithelial biology. Both receptors frequently are down-regulated in colorectal cancer (CRC). Although CRCs frequently lose DCC owing to deletions at 18q, the mechanism for the UNC5C loss is poorly understood. We hypothesized that UNC5C is silenced epigenetically in CRC, and that there are interactions between losses of UNC5C and DCC in colorectal tumorigenesis.

METHODS

Gene expression and epigenetic analysis of UNC5C was examined in 8 CRC cell lines, 147 sporadic CRCs with corresponding normal mucosa, and 52 adenomatous polyps (APs). Allelic imbalances at DCC were determined in CRCs. The molecular analyses were compared with genetic and clinicopathologic features.

RESULTS

All CRC cell lines showed UNC5C methylation and an associated loss of gene expression. Treatment with 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine resulted in restoration of gene transcription. UNC5C methylation was significantly higher in CRCs (76.2%) and APs (63.5%) than in corresponding normal mucosa (6%; P < .0001). Allelic imbalance at DCC was observed in 61% of CRCs. Overall, 89.3% of CRCs had alterations of one of the dependence receptors. UNC5C methylation occurred predominantly in the earlier lesions (APs and early CRCs), whereas DCC losses were more often in advanced CRCs.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of CRCs harbor defects in Netrin-1 receptors, emphasizing the importance of this growth regulatory pathway in cancer. Furthermore, the timing of the molecular alterations in the Netrin-1 receptors is not random because UNC5C inactivation occurs early, whereas DCC losses occurs in later stages of multistep colorectal carcinogenesis.

Inactivation of SMAD4 tumor suppressor gene during gastric carcinoma progression

PURPOSE

Mothers against decapentaplegic homologue 4 (SMAD4) is a tumor suppressor gene associated with gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. The aim of the present study is to more precisely characterize its role in the development and progression of human gastric carcinoma.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The expression of SMAD4 was investigated in 283 gastric adenocarcinomas and related lesions, as well as in 9 gastric carcinoma cell lines. We also analyzed the methylation status of SMAD4 gene by using methylation-specific PCR, examined loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of this gene locus by using a vicinal marker, and detected exon mutation of SMAD4 through exon-by-exon amplification. Moreover, we assessed whether MG132, a proteasome inhibitor, affected the SMAD4 protein level.

RESULTS

We found loss of SMAD4 protein expression in the cytoplasm (36 of 114, 32%) and in the nucleus (46 of 114, 40%) of gastric cancer cells. The loss of nuclear SMAD4 expression in primary tumors correlated significantly with poor survival, and was an independent prognostic marker in multivariate analysis. We also found a substantial decrease in SMAD4 expression at both the RNA and protein level in several human gastric carcinoma cell lines. In addition, we found that LOH (20 of 70, 29%) and promoter hypermethylation (4 of 73, 5%) were associated with the loss of SMAD4 expression. SMAD4 protein levels were also affected in certain gastric carcinoma cell lines following incubation with MG132.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our results indicate that the loss of SMAD4, especially loss of nuclear SMAD4 expression, is involved in gastric cancer progression. The loss of SMAD4 in gastric carcinomas was due to several mechanisms, including LOH, hypermethylation, and proteasome degradation.

SMAD4 as a prognostic marker in colorectal cancer

More than 50% of patients with Dukes C colorectal cancer have disease recurrence and die within 5 years after surgical removal of their primary tumor. It is currently not possible to distinguish patients with good and bad prognosis. SMAD4 is an important tumor suppressor gene that mediates transforming growth factor-beta superfamily signaling and is located in chromosome 18q21, a region with frequent genetic losses in these tumors. Allelic imbalance in 18q has been linked to poor prognosis in a subset of colorectal cancer patients. Therefore, we generated a tissue microarray containing triplicate tumor samples from 86 Dukes C patients and used immunohistochemistry to assess the relative expression level of SMAD4 and its value as a prognostic marker. In addition, SMAD4 was screened for mutations and two polymorphic microsatellite markers were used to assess the presence of allelic imbalance in these tumors. Patients with tumors expressing high SMAD4 levels had significantly better overall (P < 0.025) and disease-free (P < 0.013) survival than patients with low levels. This identifies SMAD4 as a prognostic marker for Dukes C colorectal cancer. Although all tumors with absent SMAD4 staining showed allelic imbalance in 18q21, tumors with 18q21 allelic imbalance as a group showed no difference in SMAD4 levels compared with tumors without allelic imbalance, suggesting that additional mechanisms of SMAD4 down-regulation exist. In addition, although SMAD4 mutations were found in five tumors, they were not associated with shorter survival. In conclusion, the level of expression of SMAD4 was found to be a more sensitive marker than 18q21 allelic imbalance and SMAD4 mutations, which were of no prognostic significance for these patients.

Analysis of SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations in multiploid colorectal carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Although recent animal studies have shown that SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations are essential for late-stage intestinal tumorigenesis, the role of SMAD4/DPC4 gene alterations in primary human colorectal carcinomas is not fully understood. Therefore, we attempted to clarify the role of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene during tumor progression of colorectal carcinoma.

METHODS

Differences in allelic imbalance (AI) and mutations of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene between diploid and aneuploid populations were analyzed for 30 sporadic DNA multiploid colorectal carcinomas (used as a tumor progression model and defined as the coexistence of diploid and aneuploid cells within the same tumor). The crypt isolation technique was coupled with DNA cytometric sorting and a polymerase chain reaction assay. In addition, hypermethylation of the promoter region was examined to clarify whether inactivation of gene expression occurred.

RESULTS

Although a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI was detected in only 5 of 27 informative diploid populations, 25 of 27 aneuploid populations had a SMAD4/DPC4 gene AI. Mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene was detected in only one aneuploid population of multiploid colorectal carcinomas, but not in the corresponding diploid population. In total, 20 available multiploid carcinomas were selected for methylation analysis, and no evidence of hypermethylation of the promoter region was found.

CONCLUSIONS

We suggest that, although mutation of the SMAD4/DPC4 gene and hypermethylation of the promoter region are infrequent events in colorectal tumorigenesis, AI at the SMAD4/DPC4 gene locus may play a key role in the progression of colorectal carcinomas.

Smad4 deficiency in cervical carcinoma cells

Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix is one of the most frequent cancers affecting women worldwide. Carcinomas arise from cervical intraepithelial lesions, in which infection with high-risk human papillomavirus types has led to deregulated growth control through the actions of the viral E6 and E7 oncoproteins. The molecular mechanisms underlying progression to invasive tumor growth are poorly understood. One important feature, however, is the escape from growth inhibition by transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta). Loss of chromosomal arm 18q is among the most frequent cytogenetic alterations in cervical cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis. Since the TGF-beta response is mediated by Smad proteins and the tumor suppressor gene Smad4 resides at 18q21, we have analysed the Smad4 gene for cervical cancer-associated alterations in cell lines and primary carcinomas. Here, we report Smad4 deficiency in four out of 13 cervical cancer cell lines which is due to an intronic rearrangement or deletions of 3' exons. All cell lines, however, showed either absent or moderate responsiveness to TGF-beta irrespective of their Smad4 status. In 41 primary squamous cervical carcinomas analysed, 10 samples showed loss of Smad4 protein expression and 26 samples a reduced expression. Altogether, our results strongly suggest that Smad4 gene alterations are involved in cervical carcinogenesis.

Loss of SMAD4 function in small intestinal adenocarcinomas: comparison of genetic and immunohistochemical findings

Despite morphological similarities between adenocarcinomas of the small and the large intestine, recent evidence suggests that both tumor types follow different genetic pathways. In particular, inactivation of the APC tumor suppressor gene, a characteristic alteration of colorectal carcinomas, does not seem to play a significant role in sporadic small intestinal tumorigenesis. We could recently show that inactivating mutations of the SMAD4 gene frequently occur in small intestinal adenocarcinomas. To further elucidate the role of SMAD4 dysfunction for tumor development in the small intestine, we immunohistochemically analyzed 20 sporadic, non-ampullary carcinomas for the expression of the SMAD4 protein. We further determined homozygous SMAD4 gene deletions by real time PCR and compared SMAD4 immunohistochemical data with SMAD4 genetic data. Immunohistochemistry was negative for the tumor cells in two (10%) cases and strongly reduced in four (20%). Negative immunohistochemical staining corresponded with homozygous gene deletions. A regular or only slightly reduced staining pattern was noted in 14 carcinomas, including four tumors with previously identified SMAD4 missense and frame shift mutations. In conclusion, our data suggest a significant role of impaired SMAD4 function in the pathogenesis of small intestinal adenocarcinomas. Furthermore, our results show that SMAD4 immunohistochemistry may serve as a surrogate for analysis of homozygous gene deletions. However, the method fails to identify SMAD4 inactivation due to missense mutations.

Status of the DPC4 tumor suppressor gene in sporadic colon adenocarcinoma of Croatian patients: identification of a novel somatic mutation

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of loci on chromosome 18q occurs in a majority of colorectal cancers. The DPC4 (Smad4) tumor suppressor gene, located at 18q21.1, may be a predisposing gene for Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome. To investigate alterations of the DPC4 gene in sporadic colon adenocarcinoma, a panel of 60 tumor specimens from Croatian patients was surveyed for evidence of LOH and also for mutations within the entire DPC4 coding region (exons 1-11). Using three pairs of specific primers for the three DPC4 microsatellite repetitive sequences, we investigated the frequency of LOH. The presence of single nucleotide change at restriction sites of specific codons in exons 2, 8, 10, and 11 (which belong to the conserved region of the gene) was examined by RFLP analysis. The investigation was extended to search for any other mutation within the entire coding region of the DPC4 gene by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. Our results show a high frequency of heterozygosity in 58 of 60 (97%) colon adenocarcinoma samples. LOH at any one of the three flanking markers was observed in 26 (45%) of the 58 informative cases. The loss of one allele of the DPC4 gene was negatively correlated with tumor size; more frequent in smaller tumors (<5 cm) than in larger ones. A mutation was found in exon 11 in only one tumor sample (T18), and the mutation was verified by sequencing. Sequencing demonstrated a novel mutation-a deletion in exon 11 (134-153 del TAGACGAAGTACTTCATACC) of the DPC4 gene in the MH2 domain. These data suggest that inactivation of the DPC4 gene contributes to the genesis of colorectal carcinoma through allelic loss whereas mutation in the coding region of the DPC4 gene is infrequently detected in Croatian patients with A, B or C stages of colorectal cancers.

Decrease of Smad4 gene expression in patients with essential thrombocythaemia may cause an escape from suppression of megakaryopoiesis by transforming growth factor-beta1

Essential thrombocythaemia (ET) is characterized by the abnormal and sustained proliferation of megakaryocytes. The mechanism for this lineage-specific expansion in ET, remains unclear. We have previously reported that transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is involved in negative feedback regulation of megakaryopoiesis in both healthy volunteers (HV) and patients with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). The present study found that megakaryocyte colony-forming units (CFU-MK) of ET patients were less sensitive to TGF-beta1 than those of HV. The expression of Smad4 (Sma- and Mad-related protein-4) in CFU-MK of ET patients was reduced in comparison with that of HV. Finally, to confirm that the impaired TGF-beta1 sensitivity was caused by reduced expression of Smad4, we examined Smad4-transfected CFU-MK from ET patients in the presence of TGF-beta1, and verified that the transfectants were indeed as susceptible as CFU-MK from HV to TGF-beta1. Thus it was surmised that one of the mechanisms for impaired sensitivity of CFU-MK to TGF-beta1 is the reduced expression of Smad4.

Loss of chromosome 18q and DPC4 (Smad4) mutations in appendiceal adenocarcinomas

Appendiceal adenocarcinomas are uncommon, and the genetic alterations present in these tumors are not well characterized. We studied genetic alterations including loss of chromosome 18q (location of DCC, DPC4, and JV-18 genes), and mutations of the DPC4 (SMAD4) and beta-catenin genes in 28 appendiceal adenocarcinomas, consisting of 17 mucinous and 11 nonmucinous carcinomas. Chromosome 18q loss was present in 57% (12/21) of appendiceal carcinomas including 54% (7/13) of mucinous and 63% (5/8) of nonmucinous carcinomas. Mutation of the DPC4 gene was present in 14% (three of 22) of the carcinomas occurring in one tumor with chromosome 18q loss and in two with unassessed chromosome 18q status. beta-catenin gene mutation was present in 0% (0 of 25) of the carcinomas. Chromosome 18q loss status was not associated with any clinicopathological features. The presence of chromosome 18q loss and DPC4 mutations in appendiceal adenocarcinomas suggests involvement of DPC4 and nearby genes on chromosome 18q (DCC and/or JV-18) in the pathogenesis of appendiceal adenocarcinomas.

Transcriptional control of the RECK metastasis/angiogenesis suppressor gene

The RECK gene is widely expressed in normal human tissues but is downregulated in tumor cell lines and oncogenically transformed fibroblasts. RECK encodes a membrane-anchored glycoprotein that suppresses tumor invasion and angiogenesis by regulating matrix-metalloproteinases (MMP-2, MMP-9 and MT1-MMP). Understanding of the transcriptional regulation of tumor/metastasis suppressor genes constitutes a potent approach to the molecular basis of malignant transformation. In order to uncover the mechanisms of control of RECK gene expression, the RECK promoter has been cloned and characterized. One of the elements responsible for the Ras-mediated downregulation of mouse RECK gene is the Sp1 site, to which Sp1 and Sp3 factors bind. Other regulatory events, such as DNA methylation of the RECK promoter and histone acetylation/deacetylation have been studied to understand the underlying mechanisms of RECK expression. Understanding of the mechanisms which control RECK gene transcription may lead to the development of new strategies for cancer prevention and treatment.

Infrequent mutation of the tumour-suppressor gene Smad4 in early-stage colorectal cancer

Smad4 is a candidate tumour-suppressor gene identified recently on chromosome 18q21.1. Both alleles are inactivated in nearly one-half of pancreatic carcinomas, but its role in the tumorigenesis of other tumours is still unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential involvement of the Smad4 locus in early-stage colorectal cancers (stages I-III) in tumour samples from a randomised multicentre trial. Of a large collection of DNA samples, 73 with a loss of one allele of the Smad4 gene were analysed for the presence of point mutations in the remaining gene. Patients, from whom biopsies were isolated, were part of a previous randomised multicentre study of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research on the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (SAKK study 40/81). Mutation analysis was restricted to the highly conserved C-terminal domain (exons 8, 9, 10 and 11) of Smad4, using PCR and single-strand conformational variant analysis. Two of the 73 patients (3%) with loss of one allele of Smad4 had a point mutation in the remaining allele. These results indicate that whereas Smad4 point mutations are prevalent in pancreatic carcinoma, they are infrequent in early stages (I-III) of colorectal cancer.

Frequent loss of SMAD4/DPC4 protein in colorectal cancers

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Loss of DNA sequences from chromosome 18q21 is a major genetic change in colorectal tumorigenesis. Multiple genes have been identified in this area. One of these, DPC4 (deleted in pancreatic cancer 4, also known as SMAD4), is mutated in a minor subset of colorectal carcinomas as well as in germlines of humans predisposed to colon tumours.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The involvement of SMAD4 in sporadic colorectal neoplasia was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 53 unselected cases and 27 cases displaying microsatellite instability.

RESULTS

SMAD4 expression was absent in 20 of 53 (38%) unselected colorectal carcinomas, and reduced in another 15 (28%) cases. However, 26 of 27 cancers displaying microsatellite instability and TGF-betaIIR mutations were positive for SMAD4 immunostaining.

CONCLUSIONS

Loss of SMAD4 expression may play a more prominent role in colon cancer than anticipated based on genetic evidence, but not in mutator phenotype tumours.

Methylation and colorectal cancer

Statistics rate colorectal adenocarcinoma as the most common cause of cancer death on exclusion of smoking-related neoplasia. However, the reported accumulation of genetic lesions over the adenoma to adenocarcinoma sequence cannot wholly account for the neoplastic phenotype. Recently, heritable, epigenetic changes in DNA methylation, in association with a repressive chromatin structure, have been identified as critical determinants of tumour progression. Indeed, the transcriptional silencing of both established and novel tumour suppressor genes has been attributed to the aberrant cytosine methylation of promoter-region CpG islands. This review aims to set these epigenetic changes within the context of the colorectal adenoma to adenocarcinoma sequence. The role of cytosine methylation in physiological and pathological gene silencing is discussed and the events behind aberrant cytosine methylation in ageing and cancer are appraised. Emphasis is placed on the interrelationships between epigenetic and genetic lesions and the manner in which they cooperate to define a CpG island methylator phenotype at an early stage in tumourigenesis. Finally, the applications of epigenetics to molecular pathology and patient diagnosis and treatment are reviewed.

SMAD4 mutations in colorectal cancer probably occur before chromosomal instability, but after divergence of the microsatellite instability pathway

Loss of chromosome 18q21 is well documented in colorectal cancer, and it has been suggested that this loss targets the DCC, DPC4/SMAD4, and SMAD2 genes. Recently, the importance of SMAD4, a downstream regulator in the TGF-beta signaling pathway, in colorectal cancer has been highlighted, although the frequency of SMAD4 mutations appears much lower than that of 18q21 loss. We set out to investigate allele loss, mutations, protein expression, and cytogenetics of chromosome 18 copy number in a collection of 44 colorectal cancer cell lines of known status with respect to microsatellite instability (MSI). Fourteen of thirty-two MSI(-) lines showed loss of SMAD4 protein expression; usually, one allele was lost and the other was mutated in one of a number of ways, including deletions of various sizes, splice site changes, and missense and nonsense point mutations (although no frameshifts). Of the 18 MSI(-) cancers with retained SMAD4 expression, four harbored missense mutations in the 3' part of the gene and showed allele loss. The remaining 14 MSI(-) lines had no detectable SMAD4 mutation, but all showed allele loss at SMAD4 and/or DCC. SMAD4 mutations can therefore account for about 50-60% of the 18q21 allele loss in colorectal cancer. No MSI(+) cancer showed loss of SMAD4 protein or SMAD4 mutation, and very few had allelic loss at SMAD4 or DCC, although many of these MSI(+) lines did carry TGFBIIR changes. Although SMAD4 mutations have been associated with late-stage or metastatic disease, our combined molecular and cytogenetic data best fit a model in which SMAD4 mutations occur before colorectal cancers become aneuploid/polyploid, but after the MSI(+) and MSI(-) pathways diverge. Thus, MSI(+) cancers may diverge first, followed by CIN(+) (chromosomal instability) cancers, leaving other cancers to follow a CIN(-)MSI(-) pathway.