Frequent somatic loss of BRCA1 in breast tumours from BRCA2 germ-line mutation carriers and vice versa

Germline Mutations in Predisposition Genes in Pediatric Cancer

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and spectrum of predisposing mutations among children and adolescents with cancer are largely unknown. Knowledge of such mutations may improve the understanding of tumorigenesis, direct patient care, and enable genetic counseling of patients and families.

METHODS

In 1120 patients younger than 20 years of age, we sequenced the whole genomes (in 595 patients), whole exomes (in 456), or both (in 69). We analyzed the DNA sequences of 565 genes, including 60 that have been associated with autosomal dominant cancer-predisposition syndromes, for the presence of germline mutations. The pathogenicity of the mutations was determined by a panel of medical experts with the use of cancer-specific and locus-specific genetic databases, the medical literature, computational predictions, and second hits identified in the tumor genome. The same approach was used to analyze data from 966 persons who did not have known cancer in the 1000 Genomes Project, and a similar approach was used to analyze data from an autism study (from 515 persons with autism and 208 persons without autism).

RESULTS

Mutations that were deemed to be pathogenic or probably pathogenic were identified in 95 patients with cancer (8.5%), as compared with 1.1% of the persons in the 1000 Genomes Project and 0.6% of the participants in the autism study. The most commonly mutated genes in the affected patients were TP53 (in 50 patients), APC (in 6), BRCA2 (in 6), NF1 (in 4), PMS2 (in 4), RB1 (in 3), and RUNX1 (in 3). A total of 18 additional patients had protein-truncating mutations in tumor-suppressor genes. Of the 58 patients with a predisposing mutation and available information on family history, 23 (40%) had a family history of cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Germline mutations in cancer-predisposing genes were identified in 8.5% of the children and adolescents with cancer. Family history did not predict the presence of an underlying predisposition syndrome in most patients. (Funded by the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities and the National Cancer Institute.).

Functional analysis-make or break for cancer predictability

Copy number variations (CNVs) encompass a variety of genetic alterations including deletions and amplifications and cluster in regions of the human genome with intrinsic instability. Small-sized CNVs can act as initial genetic changes giving rise to larger CNVs such as acquired somatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) promoting cancer formation. Previous studies provided evidence for CNVs as an underlying cause of elevated breast cancer risk when targeting breast cancer susceptibility genes and of accelerated breast cancer progression when targeting oncogenes. With the development of novel techniques for genome-wide detection of CNVs at increasingly higher resolution, it became possible to qualitatively and quantitatively analyse manifestation of DNA damage resulting from defects in any of the large variety of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair mechanisms. Breast carcinogenesis, particularly in familial cases, has been linked with a defect in the homologous recombination (HR) pathway, which in turn switches damage removal towards alternative, more error-prone DSB repair pathways such as microhomology-mediated non-homologous end joining (mmNHEJ). Indeed, increased error-prone DSB repair activities were detected in peripheral blood lymphocytes from individuals with familial breast cancer risk independently of specific gene mutations. Intriguingly, sequence analysis of breakpoint regions revealed that the majority of genome aberrations found in breast cancer specimens are formed by mmNHEJ. Detection of pathway-specific error-prone DSB repair activities by functional testing was proposed to serve as biomarker for hereditary breast cancer risk and responsiveness to therapies targeting HR dysfunction. Identification of specific error-prone DSB repair mechanisms underlying CNAs and ultimately mammary tumour formation highlights potential targets for future breast cancer prevention regimens.

Chromogenic and fluorescent in situ hybridization in breast cancer

Fluorescent (FISH) and chromogenic (CISH) in situ hybridization have recently become part of the diagnostic armamentarium of breast pathologists. HER2 gene testing by FISH and/or CISH has become an integral part of the diagnostic workup for patients with breast cancer. In this era of high throughput technologies, these techniques have proven instrumental for the validation of results from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization and for the identification of novel oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Furthermore, FISH and CISH applied to tissue microarrays have expedited the characterization of genomic changes associated with specific breast cancer molecular subtypes and the identification of novel prognostic and predictive markers. In this review, we provide in this review a critical assessment of CISH and FISH and the impact of the analysis of amplification of specific oncogenes (eg, HER2, EGFR, MYC, CCND1, and FGFR1) and deletion of tumor suppressor genes (eg, BRCA1 and BRCA2) on our understanding of breast cancer.

Links between DNA double strand break repair and breast cancer: Accumulating evidence from both familial and nonfamilial cases

DNA double strand break (DSB) repair dysfunction increases the risk of familial and sporadic breast cancer. Advances in the understanding of genetic predisposition to breast cancer have also been made by screening naturally occurring polymorphisms. These studies revealed that subtle defects in DNA repair capacity arising from low-penetrance genes, or combinations thereof, are modified by other genetically determined or environmental risk factors and correlate to breast cancer risk. Overexpression of DSB repair enzymes, absence of surveillance factors and mutation or loss of heterozygosity in any of these genes contributes to the pathogenesis of sporadic breast cancers. The results identifying DSB repair defects as a common denominator for breast cancerogenesis focus attention on functional assays in order to assess DSB repair capacity as a diagnostic tool to detect increased breast cancer risk and to enable therapeutic strategies specifically targeting the tumor.

Three-color FISH analysis of TMPRSS2/ERG fusions in prostate cancer indicates that genomic microdeletion of chromosome 21 is associated with rearrangement

The recent description of novel recurrent gene fusions in approximately 80% of prostate cancer (PCa) cases has generated increased interest in the search for new translocations in other epithelial cancers and emphasizes the importance of understanding the origins and biologic implications of these genomic rearrangements. Analysis of 15 PCa cases by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was used to detect six ERG-related gene fusion transcripts with TMPRSS2. No TMPRSS2/ETV1 chimeric fusion was detected in this series. Three-color fluorescence in situ hybridization confirms that TMPRSS2/ERG fusion may be accompanied by a small hemizygous sequence deletion on chromosome 21 between ERG and TMPRSS2 genes. Analysis of genomic architecture in the region of genomic rearrangement suggests that tracts of microhomology could facilitate TMPRSS2/ERG fusion events.

Histopathology of BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast cancer

Hereditary breast carcinomas that are attributable to BRCA1/2 mutations have their own morphological and immunohistochemical characteristics. BRCA1-associated carcinomas are poorly differentiated infiltrating ductal carcinomas that frequently show morphological features of typical or atypical medullary carcinoma. BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas tend to be of higher grade than sporadic age-matched controls. BRCA1tumors have been found to be more frequently estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-negative, and p53-positive than are age-matched controls, whereas these differences are not usually found in BRCA2-associated tumors. In addition, BRCA1- and BRCA2-associated breast carcinomas show a low frequency of HER2 expression. Most BRCA1 breast carcinomas are characterized by the expression of basal (myoepithelial) markers, such as cytokeratin 5/6 and or P-cadherin. These features could be used to distinguish patients who are likely to carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation, thus indicating which gene should be screened for first in families with a high incidence of breast and ovarian cancer.

The molecular pathology of hereditary breast cancer: genetic testing and therapeutic implications

Cancer arising in carriers of mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes differs from sporadic breast cancer of age-matched controls and from non-BRCA1/2 familial breast carcinomas in its morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics. Most BRCA1 carcinomas have the basal cell phenotype, a subtype of high-grade, highly proliferating, estrogen receptor- and HER2-negative breast carcinomas, characterized by the expression of basal or myoepithelial markers such as basal keratins, P-cadherin, epidermal growth factor receptor, etc. This phenotype is rarely found in BRCA2 carcinomas, which are of higher grade than sporadic age-matched controls, but tend to be estrogen receptor- and progesterone receptor-positive. The expression of the cell-cycle proteins cyclins A, B1 and E and SKP2 is associated with a BRCA1 phenotype, whereas cyclin D1 and p27 expression is associated with BRCA2 carcinomas. Recent studies have shown that hereditary carcinomas that are not attributable to BRCA1/2 mutations have phenotypic similarities to BRCA2 tumors, but tend to be of lower grade and proliferation index. Somatic mutations in the BRCA genes are rarely found in hereditary tumors; by contrast, BRCA1 and BRCA2 loss of heterozygosity (LOH) is found in almost all BRCA1 and BRCA2 carcinomas, respectively. Furthermore, all types of hereditary breast carcinomas have a low frequency of HER2 expression. Finally, comparative genomic hybridization studies have revealed differences in chromosomal gains and losses between genotypes. The pathological and molecular features of hereditary breast cancer can drive specific treatments and influence the process of mutation screening. In addition, detecting molecular changes such as BRCA1/2 LOH in nonatypical cells obtained by random fine-needle aspiration, ductal lavage or nipple aspirate fluid may help to earlier identify carrier women who are at an even higher risk of developing breast carcinoma.

Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 13q: suggestion of a candidate tumor suppressor gene in sporadic breast cancer

In order to corroborate the assumption that a candidate tumor suppressor gene is located on chromosome 13q21-22 between D13S1313 and D13S162, we examined loss of heterozygosity of six microsatellite markers in this region in 98 sporadic breast tumors. Our data demonstrate that loss of heterozygosity at 13q21-22 is not solely caused by genetic changes in BRCA2, but is also attributable to another gene in this region. There is strong indication of a new tumor suppressor gene located between D13S1313 and D13S162, most probably adjacent to D13S1308, which could play a role in sporadic breast cancer.