Clinical application of the reversed pedicled venous flap containing perivenous areolar tissue and/or nerve in the hand

A Review and Meta-analysis of Adverse Events Related to Local Flap Reconstruction for Digital Soft Tissue Defects

We reviewed the current literature to estimate incidence rates for adverse events with pedicled flaps in the hand. We identified 241 different studies reporting adverse events for 6693 flaps. The average incidence rate was 5.4% and total or partial loss of flap constituted 65% of all reported complications. Flaps with reverse or perforator-based flow may be more prone to vascular complications compared with flaps with antegrade flow or skin pedicle. The incidence rates were acceptable in all flaps (1%-10%) and thus the flap can be chosen primarily based on considerations other than risk of adverse events.

A New Technique in Tamai Zone 1 Reconstruction: Reverse Dorsal Terminal Vein Flap (Hat Flap)

Introduction The aim of this study was to determine usability of the reverse dorsal terminal vein flap (hat flap) in the reconstruction of Tamai zone 1 defects. Materials and Methods A total of 31 patients with fingertip amputation in Tamai zone 1 defect in the finger operated upon between 2014 and 2016 were included in this study. Flaps were designed from the proximal end of the nail bed to the middle phalanx according to the defect size. After passing through the skin, the proximal parts of the dorsal vein and branches were knotted. The flap was harvested by preserving the paratenon and dorsal digital terminal vein. Then, the flap was rotated and the defect was closed. Results A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The average size of the defects was 2 × 2.2 cm. Loss of epidermis in five patients and partial flap loss in two patients were observed (7/32, 21.8%), but total flap loss was not observed in any patient. Conclusion The reverse flow terminal dorsal vein-based pedicle flaps can be used as a viable surgical technique in the reconstruction of Tamai zone 1 amputations. Level of Evidence This is a Level IV study.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Unconventional Perfusion Flaps in Clinical Practice

BACKGROUND

Although unconventional perfusion flaps have been in clinical use since 1975, many surgeons are still deterred from using them, because of some reports of high necrosis rates.

METHODS

The authors performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all articles written in English, French, German, Spanish, and Portuguese on the clinical use of unconventional perfusion flaps and indexed to PubMed from 1975 until July 15, 2015.

RESULTS

A total of 134 studies and 1445 patients were analyzed. The estimated survival rate of unconventional perfusion flaps was 89.5 percent (95 percent CI, 87.3 to 91.3 percent; p < 0.001). Ninety-two percent of unconventional perfusion flaps (95 percent CI, 89.9 to 93.7 percent; p < 0.001) presented complete or nearly complete survival. Most defects mandating unconventional perfusion flap reconstruction were caused by trauma (63.6 percent), especially of the hand and fingers (75.1 percent). The main complication of all types of flaps was a variable degree of necrosis (7.5 percent of all unconventional perfusion flaps presented marginal necrosis; 9.2 percent and 5.5 percent had significant and complete necrosis, respectively). There was a positive correlation between the rate of postoperative infection and the need for a new flap (Pearson coefficient, 0.405; p = 0.001). Flaps used to reconstruct the upper limb showed better survival than those transferred to the head and neck or to the lower limb (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Unconventional perfusion flaps show high survival rates and should probably be used more liberally, particularly in the realm of upper limb reconstruction.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, V.

Syndactylizing arterialized venous flaps for multiple finger injuries

Multiple soft tissue finger defects in different shapes and locations are usually difficult to manage. Such defects commonly involve tendons and bones. Palmar soft tissue defects may also lead to vascular compromise. In this retrospective report, we report the results of seven patients with multiple soft tissue finger defects that were covered by syndactylizing arterialized venous flaps. Six of the patients suffered hot-pressing machine and crushing injuries, one patient had a rolling belt injury. All patients presented with soft tissue defects on palmar or dorsal sides involving at least two digits. The palmar forearm was donor site for all patients. At least one afferent artery and two efferent veins were selected for the anastomosis. Lengths of afferent and efferent veins were long enough to perform healthy anastomosis outside the injury zone. The afferent vessels were anastamosed to the digital arteries with the largest possible diameter or to the common digital arteries to maximize flow. The efferent veins were anastamosed to dorsal veins. Separations of the digits were performed after three weeks by longitudinal incisions. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. None of our patients suffered a flap loss. Syndactylizing arterialized venous flaps may be used for composite or single tissue reconstruction for multiple finger defects with satisfactory cosmetic and functional outcomes.

Versatility of venous flap for coverage of proximal and middle phalanges of fingers

Owing to paucity of soft tissue in the fingers, the trauma to fingers can cause exposure of tendons, joints, and bone. Several flaps have been used to cover soft tissue defects of the fingers. From 2007 to 2010, we have operated on 18 male patients with skin defects of dorsal phalanges of fingers. We used reverse distally based venous flap with perivenous tissue to cover the defects. Their mean age was 30.6±8.6 (15 to 40). The etiology in all cases was severe trauma. Ten had defect in dorsal aspect of proximal phalanges and in 8 the defect was in the middle phalanges. One of our patients experienced superficial necrosis at the distal margin of the flap that was successfully treated with local wound care and dressing changes. There was 1 case of venous congestion that resolved itself. There were no postoperative wound infections. There were no serious complications. The venous flap with preservation of perivenous areolar network is a good option for coverage of soft tissue defects of proximal and middle phalanges of fingers.

Distally based venous flap: a new technique for the correction of syndactyly without skin graft in adult patients

Skin grafts and local flaps are conventional methods for repairing simple syndactyly. Skin grafts usually leave unsightly appearance and contracture formation. In this study, unipedicled distally based venous flap were raised from third or fourth metacarpal area of the hand for syndactyly treatment. The distally based venous flap was to provide skin coverage to one side of the finger, in order to avoid complications arising from using skin graft. Nine patients' syndactylies (5 simple incomplete and 4 simple complete syndactyly) were treated using this method. The mean follow-up period of the flaps was 14 months, ranging from 12 to 16 months. Mild edema and venous congestion occurred in all flaps. Superficial necrosis involving two flaps did not affect flap survival. All flaps survived completely. In this article, we have described a new surgical technique for the correction of syndactyly in a single surgical procedure that utilizes a distally based venous flap to provide skin coverage without skin graft.