Primary sciatic nerve repair using titanium staples

Surgeon perspectives on alternative nerve repair techniques

BACKGROUND

Over the past five decades, microsuturing has been established as the "gold standard" for nerve repair. Alternative techniques such as fibrin glue, protein "welds", and nerve connectors have been met with variable enthusiasm. While advancements in this area continue, there is little data on surgeon attitude and acceptance of these new techniques.

METHODS

A short questionnaire was electronically distributed to the members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand and the American Association of Hand Surgery. Survey questions ascertained demographic information of participants (specialty, years in practice, practice setting, etc.), attitudes about current techniques (what techniques currently used, why, etc.), and attitudes about new techniques (openness to trying, factors that would persuade for/against, etc.). The surveys were distributed and administered online. Data gathered from responses was analyzed looking for general trends and stratified based on demographic data.

RESULTS

The majority of responders still consider microsuturing as the gold standard for primary nerve repair, and it is by far the most utilized technique. However, over 90 % also reported that they either currently use or would consider using alternate techniques. Common barriers to utilizing alternate techniques included lack of data regarding outcomes and unfamiliarity with new techniques. Only 40 % of responders considered metal as safe around nerves, but most consider absorbable polymers safe. None of the underlying demographic variables including years in practice, number of nerve repair surgeries performed per month, practice setting, or specialty affected these general trends.

CONCLUSIONS

Most surgeons performing nerve repairs prefer suturing as their primary repair technique, but a vast majority is open to utilizing alternate repair techniques, especially those that improve outcomes with a faster and easier procedure. While not able to direct clinical practice guidelines, this study can be used to direct focus and funding of further alternate nerve repair techniques.

REPAIR OF AN ALARMING INTRAOPERATIVE INTRACAVERNOUS CAROTID ARTERY TEAR WITH ANASTOCLIPS: TECHNICAL CASE REPORT

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment of an intracavernous carotid aneurysm (ICCA) is difficult because of the close relationship to bone, dura, and neurovascular structures. Intraoperative rupture of an ICCA is challenging, especially if the site of rupture is at the base of the aneurysm. We present a case of intraoperative rupture of an ICCA caused by clinoidectomy. We repaired it by using a single-clamp applicator (AnastoClip Vessel Closure System, 1.4 mm; LeMaitre Vascular, Burlington, MA).

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

In April 2007, a 40-year-old woman underwent neurosurgical treatment at another institution for a ruptured basilar bifurcation aneurysm, with good recovery. Digital subtraction angiography performed at this time showed the presence of left internal carotid artery aneurysms, 1 at the anterior wall of the paraclinoidal segment and 1 at the lateral wall of the intracavernous segment. In February 2008, the patient was referred from outside Finland to our department for microsurgical treatment of both aneurysms.

TECHNIQUE

A lateral supraorbital approach was used, and during extradural removal of the anterior clinoid with a rongeur, the ICCA ruptured. The base of the intracavernous aneurysm was involved in the rupture, and we used a single-clamp applicator to repair the internal carotid artery. Intraoperative digital subtraction angiography, indocyanine green video angiography, and Doppler ultrasonography showed a good flow in the artery. The paraclinoid aneurysm was uneventfully clipped during the same intervention.

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative rupture of ICCA was repaired quickly and effectively by using a single-clamp applicator. Our case and experimental data from other microsurgical vascular experiences suggest that the future of intracranial vessel repair/anastomoses will be using microclips and other simpler devices more, allowing the neurosurgeon to perform fast and effective vessel repair.

Vascular Closure Stapler Clip Anastomosis Decreases Aortic Cross-Clamping Time Compared to Interrupted Nonabsorbable and Running Absorbable Sutures in Growing Pigs

The latest generation in titanium clip application systems, the vascular closure staples (VCS) system avoids intimal lesions and therefore minimizes the subsequent hyperplastic reaction, while at the same time enhancing distensibility and vascular growth. Moreover, VCS clips allow the surgeon to perform vascular anastomosis easily and faster than conventional suture. This system may become the option of choice for vascular reconstruction in pediatric surgery where, as in the case of aortic and transplant surgery, decreasing vascular occlusion times may influence the outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine whether VCS metallic clips would allow shorter anastomosis times than conventional interrupted polypropylene or running Dexon suturing in end-to-end anastomosis performed in the abdominal aorta of young pigs. Twenty-four domestic swine, 45 days old, were used for this study. All animals were subjected to an end-to-end anastomosis in the abdominal aorta using VCS clips, interrupted polypropylene, or running Dexon suture. Aortic cross-clamping time was significantly shorter in the VCS clips group (4.02 +/- 0.72 min), compared to interrupted polypropylene (21.89 +/- 1.93 min) or running Dexon (9.82 +/- 3.97 min) suture. VCS clips are easy to use, and therefore may aid surgeons to significantly decrease the time needed for performing an end-to-end anastomosis in the abdominal aorta, thus decreasing cross-clamping time when compared to interrupted polypropylene or running Dexon sutures.

Five years' world experience with nonpenetrating clips for vascular anastomoses

BACKGROUND

A new sutureless technique has been introduced clinically to facilitate the process of vascular reconstruction and improve patency. The Vessel Closure System (VCS) is nonpenetrating, creates an elastomeric everted anastomosis, and is easily and reproducibly applied. The objective of this report is to review the published world experience that has accrued regarding these clips with attention to the assets, liabilities, and pitfalls associated with the new technology.

DATA SOURCES

Medline search and manual cross-referencing were performed, after which 61 original articles were identified on the use of VCS clips for vascular anastomoses.

RESULTS

Advantages of the clips compared with sutures include the technical ease of application, the reduced anastomotic time, the superior hemodynamics, and the improved healing pattern of the anastomosis. Disadvantages include the potential problems in atherosclerotic vessels, lack of prospective randomized long-term follow-up, and initial costs. The best clinical results have been achieved in microvascular repair, as well as with vascular access and transplantation surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The VCS clip technology has become an accepted vascular anastomosing technique, which in future could lead to the use of clips as a standard approach and the use of sutures only in case of severe atherosclerosis and other circumstances in which vessel edges are difficult to evert.