Value of routine 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy in the detection of occult skeletal metastases in women with primary breast cancer

False Negative Bone Scintigraphy in a Patient with Primary Breast Cancer: A Possible Transient Phenomenon of Bisphosphonate (Alendronate) Treatment

Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer deaths among women in developed countries. Bone is a frequent site of metastatic disease with a stage-dependent incidence. Most women with breast cancer are at risk of osteoporosis due to their age or their breast cancer treatment. Scintigraphy enables imaging of the entire skeleton with high sensitivity but limited specificity. The false positive rate varies from 1.6% to as high as 22%, while the false negative rate varies from 0.96% to 13%.

We observed a 70-year-old woman with a diagnosis of breast cancer and a false negative bone scan despite extensive bone metastases. She was under alendronate treatment for osteoporosis at the time. The false negative finding might be due to a transient phenomenon of alendronate, a bisphosphonate cleared from the plasma by uptake into bone and by renal excretion. 99mTc-MDP is eliminated via the same pathways, and therefore competition may occur between the two substances. Another possible explanation for the false negative bone scan could be that bone metastases, indicating hematogenous tumor spread, are detected earlier by CT scan or MRI than by bone scan. Breast cancer patients under bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis must be carefully evaluated for bone metastasis during radionuclide studies with 99mTc-MDP.

Is the assessment of the central skeleton sufficient for osseous staging in breast cancer patients? A retrospective approach using bone scans

OBJECTIVE

By analyzing bone scans we aimed to determine whether the assessment of the central skeleton is sufficient for osseous staging in breast cancer patients. This might be of interest for future staging modalities, especially positron emission tomography/computed tomography, usually sparing the peripheral extremities, as well as the skull.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, a total of 837 bone scans for initial staging or restaging of breast cancer were included. A total of 291 bone scans in 172 patients were positive for bone metastases. The localization and distribution of the metastases were re-evaluated by two readers in consensus. The extent of the central skeleton involvement was correlated to the incidence of peripheral metastases.

RESULTS

In all 172 patients bone metastases were seen in the central skeleton (including the proximal third of humerus and femur). In 34 patients (19.8 %) peripheral metastases of the extremities (distally of the proximal third of humerus and femur) could be detected. Sixty-four patients (37.2 %) showed metastases of the skull. Summarizing the metastases of the distal extremities and skull, 79 patients (45.9 %) had peripheral metastases. None of the patients showed peripheral metastases without any affliction of the central skeleton. The incidence of peripheral metastases significantly correlated with the extent of central skeleton involvement (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Regarding bone scans, an isolated metastatic spread to the peripheral skeleton without any manifestation in the central skeleton seems to be the exception. Thus, the assessment of the central skeleton should be sufficient in osseous breast cancer staging and restaging. However, in case of central metastases, additional imaging of the periphery should be considered for staging and restaging.

A Comparative Study of Bone Scan Findings and Serum Levels of Tumor Marker CA15-3 in Patients with Breast Carcinoma

Breast cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies in the world. Available staging procedures to detect breast cancer are bone scan, chest X-ray, liver ultrasonography, computerized tomography, estimation of tumor markers like carbohydrate antigen (CA15-3) and carcino embryonic antigen. These procedures are expensive and may not be required in all cases. Out of 70 patients studied, 55 had normal CA15-3 and 15 had elevated levels of Ca15-3. Eight (14.5%) of the 55 patients with normal CA15-3 had abnormal bone scan. Fifteen patients had CA15-3 levels above the normal range and among these 9 (60%) had abnormal bone scan. While prime facie it would appear that a high level of CA15-3 correlate with abnormal bone scan, it is also true that the numbers are small at present and conclusions about the validity of CA15-3 as marker of bone metastasis may be premature.

Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis to compare (18)FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy (BS) for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

METHODS

Databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1995 to January 2010. Software was used to obtain pooled estimates of sensitivity, specificity and summary receiver operating characteristic curves (SROC).

RESULTS

67 articles consisting of 145 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. On per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 89.7%, 72.9%, 90.6% and 86.0% respectively. PET=MRI>BS>CT. ("="indicated no significant difference, P > 0.05; ">" indicated significantly higher, P < 0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 96.8%, 94.8%, 95.4% and 81.4% respectively. PET = CT = MRI>BS. On per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 86.9%, 77.1%, 90.4% and 75.1% respectively. PET = MRI>BS>CT. The pooled specificity estimates for PET, CT, MRI and BS were 97.0%, 83.2%, 96.0% and 93.6% respectively. PET>MRI>BS>CT.

CONCLUSION

PET and MRI were found to be comparable and both significantly more accurate than CT and BS for the diagnosis of bone metastases.

A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis comparing the diagnostic value of (18)FDG-PET, MRI, and bone scintigraphy (BS) in detecting bone metastases in patients with breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Web of Knowledge, EBSCO, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review databases were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1995 to January 2010. Inclusion criteria was as follows: (18)FDG-PET, MRI or (99m)Tc-MDP BS was performed to detect bone metastases (the number of published CT studies was inadequate for meta-analysis and therefore could not be included in this study); sufficient data were presented to construct a 2 × 2 contingency table; histopathological analysis and/or close clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 6 months were used as the reference standard. Two reviewers independently assessed potentially eligible studies and extracted relevant data. A software program called "META-DiSc" was used to obtain the pooled estimates for sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves, and the *Q index for each modality.

RESULTS

Thirteen articles consisting of 23 studies fulfilled all inclusion criteria. On a per-patient basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for MRI (97.1%) were significantly higher than those for PET (83.3%) and BS (87.0%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and BS (P <0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET (94.5%) and MRI (97.0%) were both significantly higher than those for BS (88.1%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and MRI (P >0.05). The pooled DOR estimates for MRI (298.5) were significantly higher than those for PET (82.1%) and BS (49.3%; P <0.05). There was no significant difference between PET and BS (P >0.05). The SROC curve for MRI showed better diagnostic accuracy than those for PET and BS. The SROC curve for PET was better than that for BS. The*Q index for MRI (0.935), PET (0.922), and BS (0.872) showed no significant difference (P ≥0.05). On a per-lesion basis, the pooled sensitivity estimates for BS (87.8%) were significantly higher than those for PET (52.7%; P <0.05). The pooled specificity estimates for PET (99.6%) were significantly higher than those for BS (96.1%; P <0.05).The pooled DOR estimates for PET (283.3) were significantly higher than those for BS (66.8%; P <0.05). The SROC curve for PET showed better diagnostic accuracy than that for BS. The*Q index for PET (0.941) was significantly higher than that for BS (0.893; P <0.05).

CONCLUSION

Magnetic resonance imaging was found to be better than (18)FDG-PET and BS for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer on a per-patient basis. On a per-lesion basis, (18)FDG-PET had lower sensitivity, higher specificity, a higher DOR, and a higher *Q index than BS.

Bone Scan and Liver Ultrasound Scan in the Preoperative Staging for Primary Breast Cancer

The aim of the present study was to investigate the value of preoperative staging in primary operable breast cancer. This retrospective study included patients presenting between May 1999 and February 2004 with operable primary breast cancer. Of the 221 patients 189 had normal and 32 suspicious or positive bone scans (BS). Of the 189 patients with normal BS 182 had normal liver ultrasound (US), whereas the remaining seven patients underwent computed tomography scan which was normal in five and two confirmed liver metastases (one with abnormal LFTs). Of the 32 patients with suspicious or positive BS 26 were false positive on further investigations and the remaining six patients were confirmed to have bony metastasis (one abnormal bone profile). BS and liver US truly altered treatment in 3% of patients. False-positive results caused delay, psychological upset, and costly investigations in 14% of cases. Preoperative staging with liver US and BS should be reserved for high-risk patients.

Predictors of a positive baseline bone scan in breast cancer

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the predictors of a positive bone scan in female patients with breast carcinoma. The participants were 126 females with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma and a baseline bone scan. Patients who had started treatment before their bone scan were excluded. Bone scans were assessed as "no metastases" or "definite skeletal metastases" without knowledge of the patient's predictor variables. Those with "possible metastases" were correlated with other available imaging and clinical information, and recategorized as "no metastases" or "definite skeletal metastases". Results were compared with predictor variables. Significant predictors were increasing age, a higher histopathological grading and positive progesterone receptor status following a forward-stepwise logistic regression analysis. Axillary nodal status, tumour size and oestrogen receptor status did not correlate with a positive bone scan. Not every patient needs a staging bone scan. This study is important because it predicts the need for baseline scintigraphy for specific patients in whom skeletal metastases are more likely to be present or to develop. The findings are particularly valuable in times of worldwide resource scarcity and evolving surgical practice.

Local recurrence after mastectomy and adjuvant CMF: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the patterns of failure in a series of patients with node-positive breast cancer that was treated by total mastectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of 217 patients with node-positive breast cancer who were referred to the oncology departments of Westmead and Nepean Hospitals following total mastectomy between January 1980 and December 1991. The majority of patients (82%) were pre- or peri-menopausal and all underwent chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil (CMF) by either an oral or intravenous regimen. No patient received adjuvant radiation therapy.

RESULTS

After a median follow up of 8.7 years, 19% of patients had developed a loco-regional recurrence (LRR). The majority of LRR (79%) occurred within the initial 3 years after mastectomy. The risk of LRR was positively associated with the size of the tumour (11% for T1 vs 53% for T3, P < 0.001) and axillary nodal status (16% for three or fewer positive nodes vs 31% for four or more positive nodes, P = 0.017). Patients with T1 or T2 tumours and 1-3 positive nodes had the lowest rate of LRR (11%) while those with T3 tumours or 4-10 positive nodes had the highest rates, ranging from 23 to 75%. Relapse at the chest wall and supraclavicular fossa (SCF) accounted for 46 and 35%, respectively, of all LRR; relapse at the internal mammary chain and axilla was uncommon.

CONCLUSION

The data suggest that patients with T3 tumours (> 5 cm) and any nodal involvement or patients with four or more involved axillary nodes, regardless of T stage, are at a high risk of LRR and will benefit from adjuvant radiation therapy to the chest wall and SCF.