HER-2 gene amplification by chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) compared with fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) in breast cancer—A study of two hundred cases

The purpose of the study was to compare two methods used to analyse HER-2 gene amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) and chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH)), and determine the accuracy of the antibodies CB11 and HercepTest for immunohistochemical detection of HER-2 overexpression from archival breast cancer tissue. Additionally, interobserver variability in the interpretation of CISH and immunohistochemical tests was measured. Two hundred cases of invasive breast carcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2003 were selected. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed with HercepTest and CB11, and gene amplification was determined by FISH (PathVision, Vysis) and CISH (Zymed) using tissue macroarrays. An excellent concordance (94.8%) was found between CISH and FISH. Considering FISH as gold standard, sensitivity of CISH was 97.5% and specificity 94%. Overall interobserver agreement of CISH was 97.5% and of IHC 84%. Both antibodies showed a sensitivity of 95.2% and a specificity of 70.7% (CB11) and 81.2% (HercepTest). Our results show that CISH is a highly accurate, reproducible and practical technique to determine HER-2 gene amplification. CB11 and HercepTest are good screening methods with a high sensitivity. The performance of tissue macroarrays to test HER-2 status by IHC, FISH and CISH has demonstrated to be an available and effective method to study large series of tumours.

Pharmacodiagnostic testing in breast cancer: focus on HER2 and trastuzumab therapy

Pharmacogenomics is defined as research into inherited genetic variations that determine an individual's response to therapeutic agents. In oncology, pharmacogenomics based on somatic molecular alterations inherited by subsequent cancer cell generations forms the basis of molecular targeting of novel therapeutic agents. What has emerged from clinical experience with such agents is the need for appropriate pharmacodiagnostic approaches to ensure the drugs are correctly targeted. Given the broad range of pharmacogenomic agents currently under evaluation for cancer therapy, it appears that a rapid extension of pharmacodiagnostic profiling will be required in the next 5-10 years, if not sooner. If this is to be successfully achieved, lessons learned in the past, particularly during the development of HER2 (ERBB2) testing for directing trastuzumab therapy in breast cancer, may provide a valuable framework for the development of future pharmacodiagnostic assays system. This article reviews the biological and clinical rationale for targeting breast cancer with trastuzumab and the steps taken to validate and improve pharmacodiagnostic procedures for testing tumor HER2 protein expression and HER2 gene amplification. Attention is given to quality assurance and reproducibility of testing approaches and the optimal selection of patients for response to trastuzumab. This approach serves as a paradigm for the future development of pharmacodiagnostic tests in oncology.

Interlaboratory Comparison of HER-2 Oncogene Amplification as Detected by Chromogenic and Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

PURPOSE

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is a new modification of the fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) technique for detection of oncogene amplification in archival tumor samples. In CISH, the oncogene probe is detected using a peroxidase reaction, allowing use of transmitted light microscopy. We compared detection of HER-2/neu amplification by CISH with a Food and Drug Administration-approved two-color FISH test in an interlaboratory setting.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples from 197 breast cancers were analyzed for HER-2 amplification by CISH. Two-color FISH (PathVysion) CISH of 17 centromere was done if the observer considered it necessary to ascertain amplification status in tumors with borderline HER-2 CISH copy numbers.

RESULTS

Paired CISH/FISH results were available from 192 (97%) of 197 cases, no clear difference in success rates of either method was observed. Centromere 17 CISH was considered necessary in seven tumors. CISH and two-color FISH results were concordant in 180 cases (93.8%). There were 92 and 88 tumors found HER-2 amplified and nonamplified, respectively, by both methods. Eight tumors were amplified by CISH but not by FISH, and four tumors exhibited the opposite condition (kappa coefficient 0.875). In 7 of 12 cases differences between the two methods could have related to a lack of CISH chromosome 17 information. The remaining cases were explained by difficult histology (ductal carcinoma in situ, poor representativity, dense lymphocytic infiltration, or intratumoral heterogeneity).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for clinical diagnosis of HER-2/neu oncogene amplification in archival formalin-fixed breast cancer samples.