1
|
Hughes BN, Jorgensen KA, Cummings S, Morah D, Krause K, Rauh-Hain JA, Herzog TJ. Systematic mapping review of guidelines for BRCA1/2 genetic testing globally: investigating geographic and regional disparities in health equity for women and families at risk for hereditary ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:250-256. [PMID: 36368709 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Identification of persons at risk for hereditary syndromes through genetic testing prior to cancer diagnosis may proactively reduce the cancer burden morbidity and mortality. Using a framework of health equity, this study characterizes the global landscape of publication and reference to BRCA1/2 genetic testing guidelines (GTG). METHODS This study used a systematic literature search supplemented by an International Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) informal survey and cross referenced with Myriad Genetics records, to identify published GTG, their country of origin, and countries referencing them. RESULTS Of 1011 identified publications, 166 met the inclusion criteria, from which 46 unique guidelines were identified, published by 18 countries and two regions (Europe and the UK). Authorship from the USA accounted for 63% of publications on GTG. Systematic mapping reviews revealed 34 countries with published and/or referenced guidelines, the IGCS survey revealed 22 additional countries, and coordination with Myriad Genetics revealed additional information for two countries and primary information for one country. Of the 57 countries evaluated, 33% published their own guidelines and reference guidelines from another country/region, 5% published their own guidelines without referencing another country/region, and 61% only referenced a guideline from another country/region. No data were available for 138 of 195 countries, disproportionately from Africa, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Southeast Asia. CONCLUSIONS Global geographic disparities in the publication and referencing of GTG exist, with a large emphasis on North American and European guidelines in the published literature. These disparities highlight a need for uniform BRCA GTG to improve global health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kirsten A Jorgensen
- Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Division of Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | | - Kate Krause
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Research Medical Library, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Thomas J Herzog
- University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wöckel A, Lux MP, Janni W, Hartkopf AD, Nabieva N, Taran FA, Overkamp F, Hadji P, Tesch H, Ettl J, Lüftner D, Müller V, Welslau M, Belleville E, Brucker SY, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Fehm TN, Schneeweiss A, Kolberg HC. Update Breast Cancer 2018 (Part 3) - Genomics, Individualized Medicine and Immune Therapies - in the Middle of a New Era: Prevention and Treatment Strategies for Early Breast Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:1110-1118. [PMID: 30498278 PMCID: PMC6255743 DOI: 10.1055/a-0715-2821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/23/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
In primary early breast cancer, the aim of treatment planning is to obtain an increasingly better understanding of the disease. The identification of patients with an excellent prognosis could help this group avoid unnecessary treatments. Furthermore, the planning of treatment is becoming increasingly patient-focussed. There is a growing understanding of those patients who benefit particularly from chemotherapy, as well as of those who could benefit from immunotherapy. Studies conducted on immunotherapies will be published shortly. Smaller individual studies offer an initial insight into the efficacy of checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1/PDL1 therapies). Not least, one of the largest breast cancer studies of all times has recently come to an end. The use of a multigene test has shown that it is sufficient to identify patients with such a good prognosis that chemotherapy is unnecessary. This review article is intended to summarise the current studies and give an outlook on current developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael P Lux
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas D Hartkopf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Naiba Nabieva
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Peyman Hadji
- Department of Bone Oncology, Nordwest Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumour Immunology, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Manfred Welslau
- Onkologie Aschaffenburg, Hämatolo-Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis am Klinikum Aschaffenburg, Aschaffenburg, Germany
| | | | - Sara Y Brucker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Tanja N Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases, Division Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|