1
|
Farr A, Swidsinski S, Surbek D, Tirri BF, Willinger B, Hoyme U, Walter G, Reckel-Botzem I, Mendling W. Bacterial Vaginosis: Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/028, June 2023). Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1331-1349. [PMID: 37928409 PMCID: PMC10624544 DOI: 10.1055/a-2169-8539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim This official guideline was coordinated and published by the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG with the involvement of additional professional societies. The aim of the guideline is to evaluate the relevant literature and use it to provide a consensus-based overview of the diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis. Methods This S2k-guideline was developed by representative members from different medical professional societies on behalf of the guidelines commission of the above-listed societies using a structured consensus process. Recommendations This guideline provides recommendations on the diagnosis, management, counselling, prophylaxis, and other aspects related to bacterial vaginosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Farr
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Abteilung für Geburtshilfe und feto-maternale Medizin, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | | | - Daniel Surbek
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Geburtshilfe und Feto-maternale Medizin, Inselspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Birgit Willinger
- Abteilung für Klinische Mikrobiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Udo Hoyme
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ilm-Kreis-Kliniken, Arnstadt, Germany
| | - Gisela Walter
- Ärztliche Gesellschaft zur Gesundheitsförderung e. V. (ÄGGF), Hamburg, Germany
- Deutsche STI-Gesellschaft (DSTIG), Bochum, Germany
| | - Inge Reckel-Botzem
- Berufsverband der Frauenärzte e. V. (BVF), Landesverband Hessen, Hainburg, Germany
| | - Werner Mendling
- Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionen in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Wuppertal, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Demertzidou E, Chatzakis C, Cavoretto P, Sarafidis K, Eleftheriades M, Gerede A, Dinas K, Sotiriadis A. Effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome in severe preterm birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 2023; 62:471-485. [PMID: 37128165 DOI: 10.1002/uog.26241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the evidence on the effect of mode of delivery on perinatal outcome of fetuses born before 32 weeks' gestation. METHODS MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), the ClinicalTrials.gov registry and gray literature sources were searched, starting from the year 2000 to reflect contemporary practice in perinatal care. Non-randomized or randomized studies that included singleton fetuses without chromosomal abnormality or major congenital defect delivered vaginally or via Cesarean section were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Primary outcomes were neonatal death, defined as death in the first 28 days of age, and survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes were other adverse perinatal events. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The overall quality of evidence for the outcomes was assessed according to GRADE. Summary odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated, and random-effects models were used for data synthesis. Subgroup analysis was performed for delivery before 28 weeks, delivery between 28 and 32 weeks and according to fetal presentation at delivery. RESULTS A total of 27 retrospective studies (22 887 neonates) were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, all of which reported on singleton pregnancies. Among cases born before 28 weeks, vaginal delivery significantly increased the risk of neonatal death of fetuses with any type of presentation (n = 1496) (OR 1.87 (95% CI, 1.05-3.35); I2 = 65%, very low quality of evidence) and of fetuses with breech presentation (n = 733) (OR 3.55 (95% CI, 2.42-5.21); I2 = 21%, moderate quality of evidence). The odds of survival to discharge were significantly decreased among fetuses with breech presentation delivered before 28 weeks (n = 646) (OR 0.36 (95% CI, 0.24-0.54); I2 = 21%, low quality of evidence). Among breech fetuses born between 28 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery increased the odds of perinatal death (intrapartum and neonatal) (n = 1581) (OR 3.06 (95% CI, 1.47-6.35); I2 = 0%, high quality of evidence). In non-cephalic fetuses born between 24 and 32 weeks, vaginal delivery decreased the odds of survival to discharge (n = 1030) (OR 0.28 (95% CI, 0.19-0.40); I2 = 0%, moderate quality of evidence). No significant effect on mortality of mode of delivery was observed in cephalic fetuses at any gestational age. CONCLUSIONS This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that vaginal delivery in severe preterm birth is associated with an increased risk of neonatal and perinatal death in breech fetuses, while no significant association was observed for cephalic fetuses. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Demertzidou
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C Chatzakis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - P Cavoretto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - K Sarafidis
- First Department of Neonatology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - M Eleftheriades
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Gerede
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
| | - K Dinas
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - A Sotiriadis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berger R, Abele H, Bahlmann F, Doubek K, Felderhoff-Müser U, Fluhr H, Garnier Y, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Hayward A, Helmer H, Herting E, Hoopmann M, Hösli I, Hoyme U, Kunze M, Kuon RH, Kyvernitakis I, Lütje W, Mader S, Maul H, Mendling W, Mitschdörfer B, Nothacker M, Olbertz D, Ramsell A, Rath W, Roll C, Schlembach D, Schleußner E, Schütz F, Seifert-Klauss V, Stubert J, Surbek D. Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, September 2022) - Part 2 with Recommendations on the Tertiary Prevention of Preterm Birth and on the Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:569-601. [PMID: 37169014 PMCID: PMC10166648 DOI: 10.1055/a-2044-0345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim The revision of this guideline was coordinated by the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (OEGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of the guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence from the current literature, the experience of members of the guidelines commission, and the viewpoint of self-help organizations. Methods The members of the contributing professional societies and organizations developed recommendations and statements based on international literature. The recommendations and statements were presented and adopted using a formal process (structured consensus conferences with neutral moderation, written Delphi vote). Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents statements and recommendations on the tertiary prevention of preterm birth and the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Berger
- Frauenklinik, Marienhaus Klinikum Neuwied, Neuwied, Germany
| | - Harald Abele
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franz Bahlmann
- Frauenklinik, Bürgerhospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Ursula Felderhoff-Müser
- Klinik für Kinderheilkunde I/Perinatalzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Herbert Fluhr
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Yves Garnier
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Susanne Grylka-Baeschlin
- Zürcher Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften, Institut für Hebammenwissenschaft und reproduktive Gesundheit, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Hanns Helmer
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Egbert Herting
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Markus Hoopmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Irene Hösli
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Udo Hoyme
- Frauenklinik, Ilm-Kreis-Kliniken, Arnstadt, Germany
| | - Mirjam Kunze
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ruben-H. Kuon
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Wolf Lütje
- Frauenklinik, Evangelisches Amalie Sieveking-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Mader
- European Foundation for the Care of Newborn Infants, München, Germany
| | - Holger Maul
- Frauenklinik, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Werner Mendling
- Frauenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Berlin
| | - Dirk Olbertz
- Klinik für Neonatologie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | | | - Werner Rath
- Emeritus, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Claudia Roll
- Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik Datteln, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schlembach
- Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Klinikum Neukölln/Berlin Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Frauenklinik, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Surbek
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Inselspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gitas G, Proppe L, Ertan AK, Baum S, Rody A, Kocaer M, Dinas K, Allahqoli L, Laganà AS, Sotiriadis A, Sommer S, Alkatout I. Influence of the second stage of labor on maternal and neonatal outcomes in vaginal births after caesarean section: a multicenter study in Germany. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2021; 21:356. [PMID: 33947354 PMCID: PMC8097953 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03817-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) introduced a new standard of care in 2014, extending the duration of the second stage of labor in order to reduce caesarean delivery (CD) rates and its severe complications. The aim of the present study is to evaluate success rates of trial of labor after caesarean section (TOLAC), as well as maternal and neonatal outcomes after the establishment of the recent guidelines. METHODS A retrospective study was performed at two large departments in Germany from January 2008 to January 2018. Patients undergoing TOLAC were divided into two groups. Group I (958 patients) was constituted before the establishment of the current guidelines, and Group II (588 patients) after the establishment of the guidelines. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare neonatal outcomes after successful TOLAC and operative vaginal delivery with those after failed TOLAC and secondary CD. RESULTS The success rate of vaginal births after cesarean section (VBAC) fell from 66.4% in Group I to 55.8% in Group II (p < 0.001). The median duration of the second stage of labor was statistically significantly longer in Group II than in Group I (79.3 ± 61.9 vs. 69.3 ± 58.2 min) for patients without previous vaginal birth. The incidence of operative vaginal delivery decreased from Group I to Group II (9.6% vs. 6.8%). The incidence of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations, blood loss and emergency CD were similar in the two groups. Concerning the neonatal outcome, our groups did not differ significantly in regard of rates of umbilical artery cord pH < 7.1 (p = 0.108), the 5-min Apgar scores below 7 (p = 0.224) and intubation (p = 0.547). However, the transfer rates to the neonatal care unit were significantly higher in Group II than in Group I (p < 0.001). Neonatal outcomes did not differ significantly in the subgroup analysis. CONCLUSION Extending the second stage of labor does not necessarily result in more vaginal births after TOLAC. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were similar in both groups. Further studies will be needed to evaluate the role of operative vaginal delivery and the duration of the second stage of labor in TOLAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Gitas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany.
| | - L Proppe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany
| | - A K Ertan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Leverkusen, 51375, Germany
| | - S Baum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany
| | - A Rody
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany
| | - M Kocaer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Leverkusen Municipal Hospital, Leverkusen, 51375, Germany
| | - K Dinas
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstaninoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
| | - L Allahqoli
- School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, 14535, Iran
| | - A S Laganà
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Filippo Del Ponte Hospital, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - A Sotiriadis
- Second Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical School, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Konstaninoupoleos 49, Thessaloniki, 546 42, Greece
| | - S Sommer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, Haus A, 23538, Luebeck, Germany
| | - I Alkatout
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bracic T, Pfniß I, Taumberger N, Kutllovci-Hasani K, Ulrich D, Schöll W, Reif P. A 10 year comparative study of caesarean deliveries using the Robson 10 group classification system in a university hospital in Austria. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0240475. [PMID: 33064735 PMCID: PMC7567372 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The Robson ten group classification system is used as a global standard for assessing, monitoring and comparing caesarean delivery (CD) rates within and between maternity services. Our objective was to compare the changes of CD rates at our institution between the years 2008-2010 and 2017-2019 using the Robson ten group classification system. STUDY DESIGN Data was collected retrospectively and all women were classified using the obstetric concepts and parameters described in the Robson ten group classification system. RESULTS During 2008-2010 7,832 deliveries were performed, increasing to 9,490 in 2017-2019. The CD rate also increased from 29.1% to 32.2% (p<.05) during this 10 year period. In both observed periods group 5 (single cephalic multiparous women at term with a previous CD) was the largest contributor to the overall CD rate accounting for 20.2% of all CD during 2008-2010 and increasing to 26.9% in 2017-2019 (p<.001). The overall size of group 5 also increased from 8.3% to 11.6% (p<.001). Furthermore, an increase in CD rate in group 7 (multiparous women with a single breech pregnancy, including women with a uterine scar) from 92.9% to 98.2% (p = .752) could be observed. In group 8 (women with multiple pregnancies, including women with a uterine scar) a slight shift towards vaginal delivery (VD) can be reported with CD rates decreasing from 82% to 79.2% (p = .784). There was no observed difference with CD rates in group 1 although the group size decreased from 29.4% in 2008-2010 to 24.2% in 2017-2019 (p<.001). The CD rate in group 10 experienced a slight elevation, in 2008-2010 46.2% were delivered per CD and in 2017-2019 48.8% (p = .553). The overall size of group 10 decreased, contributing 8.9% in 2008-2010 and 8% in 2017-2019 (p<.05) to the overall birthrate. CONCLUSION The biggest contributors to the CD rate in our hospital remain multiparous women at term with a previous CD. The CD rates, as well as the overall size of this group, keep rising, resulting in a need to establish more effective ways to motivate women with one previous CD towards vaginal birth after caesarean delivery (VBAC). Furthermore, the CD rate in preterm deliveries is increasing and approaching 50%. This illustrates the need to discuss whether CD is the appropriate mode of delivery in half of the preterm infants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taja Bracic
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Isabella Pfniß
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Nadja Taumberger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Daniela Ulrich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Schöll
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Philipp Reif
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Berger R, Abele H, Bahlmann F, Bedei I, Doubek K, Felderhoff-Müser U, Fluhr H, Garnier Y, Grylka-Baeschlin S, Helmer H, Herting E, Hoopmann M, Hösli I, Hoyme U, Jendreizeck A, Krentel H, Kuon R, Lütje W, Mader S, Maul H, Mendling W, Mitschdörfer B, Nicin T, Nothacker M, Olbertz D, Rath W, Roll C, Schlembach D, Schleußner E, Schütz F, Seifert-Klauss V, Steppat S, Surbek D. Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, February 2019) - Part 2 with Recommendations on the Tertiary Prevention of Preterm Birth and the Management of Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:813-833. [PMID: 31423017 PMCID: PMC6690742 DOI: 10.1055/a-0903-2735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims This is an official guideline of the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG), the Austrian Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (ÖGGG) and the Swiss Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (SGGG). The aim of this guideline is to improve the prediction, prevention and management of preterm birth based on evidence obtained from recently published scientific literature, the experience of the members of the guideline commission and the views of self-help groups. Methods The members of the participating medical societies and organizations developed Recommendations and Statements based on the international literature. The Recommendations and Statements were adopted following a formal consensus process (structured consensus conference with neutral moderation, voting done in writing using the Delphi method to achieve consensus). Recommendations Part 2 of this short version of the guideline presents Statements and Recommendations on the tertiary prevention of preterm birth and the management of preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Berger
- Frauenklinik, Marienhaus Klinikum Neuwied, Neuwied, Germany
| | - Harald Abele
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Franz Bahlmann
- Frauenklinik, Bürgerhospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ivonne Bedei
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Frankfurt Höchst, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | | | - Ursula Felderhoff-Müser
- Klinik für Kinderheilkunde I/Perinatalzentrum, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Herbert Fluhr
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yves Garnier
- Frauenklinik, Klinikum Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | | | - Hanns Helmer
- Universitätsklinik für Frauenheilkunde, Medizinische Universität Wien, Wien, Austria
| | - Egbert Herting
- Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Markus Hoopmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Irene Hösli
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsspital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Udo Hoyme
- Frauenklinik, Ilm-Kreis-Kliniken, Arnstadt, Germany
| | | | - Harald Krentel
- Frauenklinik, Annahospital Herne, Elisabethgruppe Katholische Kliniken Rhein Ruhr, Herne, Germany
| | - Ruben Kuon
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolf Lütje
- Frauenklinik, Evangelisches Amalie Sieveking-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Silke Mader
- European Foundation for the Care of the Newborn Infants
| | - Holger Maul
- Frauenklinik, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Werner Mendling
- Deutsches Zentrum für Infektionen in Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe an der Frauenklinik, Helios Universitätsklinikum Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | | | - Monika Nothacker
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Berlin, Germany
| | - Dirk Olbertz
- Abteilung Neonatologie und neonatologische Intensivmedizin, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Werner Rath
- Emeritus, Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Claudia Roll
- Vestische Kinder- und Jugendklinik Datteln, Universität Witten/Herdecke, Datteln, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schlembach
- Klinik für Geburtsmedizin, Klinikum Neukölln/Berlin Vivantes Netzwerk für Gesundheit, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Florian Schütz
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Daniel Surbek
- Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Inselspital, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|