Primary hypophysitis: Experience of a Single Tertiary Center

Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Therapeutic Responses for Lesions of the Sella and Orbit: Evidence-Based Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit are rare but require prompt diagnosis to initiate effective treatment. Because uniform recommendations for treatment are currently lacking, we performed an evidence-based review to identify recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify papers evaluating treatment of inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit. We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to define recommendations, specifically examining aggregated sample sizes, disease-specific patient follow-up, and clinical trials focused on inflammatory diseases of the sella and orbit.

RESULTS

A total of 169 studies were included and organized by disease pathology. Treatments for various pathologies were recorded. Treatment options included surgery, radiation, steroids, targeted treatments, immunomodulators, intravenous immune globulin, and plasmapheresis. Steroids were the most often employed treatment, second-line management options and timing varied. Pathological diagnosis was highly associated with treatment used. Most evidence were level 3 without available control groups, except for 13 trials in neuromyelitis optica with level 1 or 2 evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence-based review to provide recommendations on specific treatments for pathologies of the orbit and sella. The reported data may be useful to help guide randomized clinical trials and provide resource for clinical management decisions based on the available evidence.

Executive summary of the consensus document on hypophysitis of the Neuroendocrinology Area of Knowledge of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition

The term hypophysitis is used to designate a heterogeneous group of pituitary conditions characterized by the presence of inflammatory infiltration of the adenohypophysis, neurohypophysis, or both. Although hypophysitis are rare disorders, the most common in clinical practice is lymphocytic hypophysitis, a primary hypophysitis characterized by lymphocytic infiltration, which predominantly affects women. Other forms of primary hypophysitis are associated with different autoimmune diseases. Hypophysitis can also be secondary to other disorders such as sellar and parasellar diseases, systemic diseases, paraneoplastic syndromes, infections, and drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors. The diagnostic evaluation should always include pituitary function tests and other analytical tests based on the suspected diagnosis. Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging is the investigation of choice for the morphological assessment of hypophysitis. Glucocorticoids are the mainstay of treatment for most symptomatic hypophysitis.

Hypophysitis

OBJECTIVE

Hypophysitis is considered a rare inflammatory disease of the pituitary gland. For a long time, primary autoimmune hypophysitis has stood out as the most relevant type of hypophysitis. However, with the advent of immunotherapy for the treatment of malignancies and identification of hypophysitis as an immune-related adverse event, hypophysitis has garnered increasing interest and recognition. Therefore, awareness, early recognition, and appropriate management are becoming important as the indication for immunomodulatory therapies broaden.

METHODS

In this review, we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of hypophysitis with a focus on recent data and highlight subtypes of particular interest while recognizing the gaps in knowledge that remain.

RESULTS

Regardless of cause, symptoms and signs of hypophysitis may be related to mass effect (headache and visual disturbance) and hormonal disruption that warrant prompt evaluation. In the vast majority of cases, a diagnosis of hypophysitis can be made presumptively in the appropriate clinical context with radiologic findings consistent with hypophysitis and after the exclusion of other causes.

CONCLUSION

Although subtle differences currently exist in management and outcome expectations between primary and secondary causes of hypophysitis, universally, treatment is aimed at symptom management and hormonal replacement therapy.

Discrimination between non-functioning pituitary adenomas and hypophysitis using machine learning methods based on magnetic resonance imaging‑derived texture features

PURPOSE

Hypophysitis is a heterogeneous condition that includes inflammation of the pituitary gland and infundibulum, and it can cause symptoms related to mass effects and hormonal deficiencies. We aimed to evaluate the potential role of machine learning methods in differentiating hypophysitis from non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

METHODS

The radiomic parameters obtained from T1A-C images were used. Among the radiomic parameters, parameters capable of distinguishing between hypophysitis and non-functioning pituitary adenomas were selected. In order to avoid the effects of confounding factors and to improve the performance of the classifiers, parameters with high correlation with each other were eliminated. Machine learning algorithms were performed with the combination of gray-level run-length matrix-low gray level run emphasis, gray-level co-occurrence matrix-correlation, and gray-level co-occurrence entropy.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients were included, 17 of whom had hypophysitis and 17 had non-functioning pituitary adenomas. Among the 38 radiomics parameters obtained from post-contrast T1-weighted images, 10 tissue features that could differentiate the lesions were selected. Machine learning algorithms were performed using three selected parameters; gray level run length matrix-low gray level run emphasis, gray-level co-occurrence matrix-correlation, and gray level co-occurrence entropy. Error matrices were calculated by using the machine learning algorithm and it was seen that support vector machines showed the best performance in distinguishing the two lesion types.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis reported that support vector machines showed the best performance in distinguishing hypophysitis from non-functioning pituitary adenomas, emphasizing the importance of machine learning in differentiating the two lesions.

Outcomes of Initial Management Strategies in Patients With Autoimmune Lymphocytic Hypophysitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Lymphocytic hypophysitis (LyHy) is characterized by inflammation of the pituitary and or neuroinfundibulum and is uncommon. Treatment options include observation, high-dose glucocorticoids (HD-GCs) or surgery. Optimal first-line management strategy, however, remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess response to first-line treatment options (observation, HD-GCs, or surgery) of clinically relevant outcomes (symptomatic, hormonal, and radiographic improvement) among patients with LyHy.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted in 6 databases through 2020. Meta-analysis was conducted when feasible using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

We included 33 studies reporting on 591 patients (423 women, 72%) with LyHy. Improvement/resolution of anterior pituitary dysfunction was highest when HD-GCs was first-line treatment. Surgery was associated with the greatest proportion of patients who had regression on imaging. Subgroup analysis comparing HD-GCs to observation showed the odds of anterior pituitary hormone recovery (OR 3.41; 95% CI, 1.68-6.94) or radiographic regression (OR 3.13; 95% CI, 1.54-6.36) were higher with HD-GCs, but so was the need for additional forms of treatment (OR 4.37; 95% CI, 1.70-11.22). No statistically significant difference was seen in recovery of diabetes insipidus (OR 0.9; 95% CI, 0.26-3.10). Certainty in these estimates was very low.

CONCLUSION

Observation and use of HD-GCs both are successful first-line management strategies in LyHy. Although use of HD-GCs was associated with increased recovery of anterior pituitary hormone deficit, it also was associated with greater likelihood of additional treatment after withdrawal. Optimal dosing and duration of HD-GCs remains unknown.

[Clinical and radiological diagnosis of hypophysitis: a review of literature and own data]

This article presents a literature review of the various forms of hypophysitis, its varieties, as well as the problem of radiation diagnosis and treatment of this pathology. Hypophysitis is a poorly understood and multifactorial disease which the difficulty of diagnosing is not only to a variety of nonspecific clinical manifestations and hormonal research data, but also the ambiguous results of MRI studies, the lack of clear MR patterns. The article reflects the main histological types of hypophysitis, the peculiarities of diagnosis in connection with general clinical symptoms, outlines the features of each type of hypophysitis with their own clinical observations. This review is devoted to modern ideas about the clinical course of hypophysitis, presented a set of characteristic diagnostic signs of the disease according to MRI and the treatment algorithms recommended today are also highlighted. The article summarizes data from foreign literature and our own clinical observations in order to develop an optimal protocol for MRI studies in patients with suspected hypophysitis, to develop recommendations for radiologists and endocrinologists for the correct results interpretation. The uniqueness of this review is the lack of data on the clinic, diagnosis and treatment of hypophysitis in the Russian literature today.

Hypophysitis, the Growing Spectrum of a Rare Pituitary Disease

Hypophysitis is defined as inflammation of the pituitary gland that is primary or secondary to a local or systemic process. Differential diagnosis is broad (including primary tumors, metastases, and lympho-proliferative diseases) and multifaceted. Patients with hypophysitis typically present with headaches, some degree of anterior and/or posterior pituitary dysfunction, and enlargement of pituitary gland and/or stalk, as determined by imaging. Most hypophysitis causes are autoimmune, but other etiologies include inflammation secondary to sellar tumors or cysts, systemic diseases, and infection or drug-induced causes. Novel pathologies such as immunoglobulin G4-related hypophysitis, immunotherapy-induced hypophysitis, and paraneoplastic pituitary-directed autoimmunity are also included in a growing spectrum of this rare pituitary disease. Typical magnetic resonance imaging reveals stalk thickening and homogenous enlargement of the pituitary gland; however, imaging is not always specific. Diagnosis can be challenging, and ultimately, only a pituitary biopsy can confirm hypophysitis type and rule out other etiologies. A presumptive diagnosis can be made often without biopsy. Detailed history and clinical examination are essential, notably for signs of underlying etiology with systemic manifestations. Hormone replacement and, in selected cases, careful observation is advised with imaging follow-up. High-dose glucocorticoids are initiated mainly to help reduce mass effect. A response may be observed in all auto-immune etiologies, as well as in lymphoproliferative diseases, and, as such, should not be used for differential diagnosis. Surgery may be necessary in some cases to relieve mass effect and allow a definite diagnosis. Immunosuppressive therapy and radiation are sometimes also necessary in resistant cases.

Recent insights into the pathogenesis of autoimmune hypophysitis

INTRODUCTION

Hypophysitis is an inflammation of the pituitary gland and a rare case of hypopituitarism. Despite the expanding spectrum of histological variants and causative agents, its pathogenesis is far to be fully understood. The present review is focused on recent evidence concerning the pathogenesis of autoimmune hypophysitis by searching through online databases like MEDLINE and Scopus up to May 2021.

AREAS COVERED

Hypophysitis frequently develops in the context of a strong autoimmune background, including a wide spectrum of subtypes ranging from the commonest form of lymphocytic hypophysitis to the newly described and less common IgG4-, anti-PIT-1, and ICI-induced forms. A peculiar combination of genetic predisposition, pituitary damage and immunological setting represents the pathogenetic basis of autoimmune hypophysitis, which is characterized by diffuse infiltration of the gland by lymphocytes and variable degrees of fibrosis followed by pituitary cell destruction. Anti-pituitary antibodies (APA) have been described in sera from patients suffering from autoimmune hypophysitis, though their pathophysiological significance remains largely unknown and their diagnostic value limited.

EXPERT OPINION

In recent years hypophysitis has gained interest due to the increased number of new diagnoses and the recognition of novel subtypes. Further studies could lead to improvements in biochemical/immunological diagnosis and targeted treatments.

Primary and Ipilimumab-induced Hypophysitis: A Single-center Case Series

PURPOSE

To present a case series of primary and immunotherapy-related secondary hypophysitis.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective chart review was performed at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada. Eleven cases of primary hypophysitis and 2 cases of immunotherapy-related secondary hypophysitis were included. Of the 11 primary cases, 6 were diagnosed clinically without biopsy.

RESULTS

In primary hypophysitis, headache was the most common presenting symptom (6/11; 55%) and stalk enlargement the prevailing radiologic sign (8/11; 73%). Central adrenal insufficiency (4/11; 36%), central hypothyroidism (4/11; 36%), and central diabetes insipidus (CDI) (4/11; 36%) were the most common pituitary deficiencies at presentation. Initial management included surgery (4/11; 36%), supraphysiologic steroids (2/11; 18%), or observation (6/11; 55%). Outcomes assessed included radiologic improvement (8/9; 89%), improvement in mass symptoms (4/7; 57%), anterior pituitary recovery (1/7; 14%), and CDI recovery (0/4; 0%). In immunotherapy-related hypophysitis either under observation or supraphysiologic steroid therapy, the inflammatory mass resolved and pituitary dysfunction persisted.

CONCLUSIONS

In primary hypophysitis, the inflammatory pituitary mass typically resolves and hypopituitarism persists. In the absence of severe or progressive neurologic deficits, a presumptive clinical diagnosis and conservative medical management should be attempted. In the absence of severe features, immunotherapy-related hypophysitis may be managed effectively without the use of supraphysiologic steroids.