Mortalität und ökonomische Auswirkungen der hepatischen Enzephalopathie bei Leberzirrhose in deutschen Krankenhäusern auf der Basis von G-DRG-Kostendaten

[When should a liver disease patient be admitted to the intensive care unit?]

Liver diseases are a significant global cause of morbidity and mortality. Liver cirrhosis can result in severe complications such as bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and infections. Implementing a clear strategy for intensive care unit (ICU) admission management improves patient outcomes. Hemodynamically significant esophageal/gastric variceal bleeding (E/GVB) and grade 4 HE, when accompanied by the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT), are definitive indications for ICU admission. E/GVB, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), and infections with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) require close and stringent critical assessment. Patients with severe hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) or respiratory failure have increased baseline mortality and most likely benefit from early ICU treatment. Rapid identification of sepsis in patients with liver cirrhosis is a crucial criterion for ICU admission. Prioritizing cases based on mortality risk and clinical urgency enables efficient resource utilization and optimizes patient management. In addition, "Liver Units" provide an intermediate care (IMC) level for patients with liver diseases who require close monitoring but do not need immediate intensive care.

[Cost-efficiency of ascites treatment in the G-DRG system]

In Germany, around 1,000,000 people are affected by cirrhosis of the liver, with ascites being a common consequence. Hospitals are caught between the opposing aims of profitability and patient-centered treatment as a result of the increasing compression of services in hospitals and the increasing economization in the healthcare sector. Treatment costs are a crucial starting point for optimizing success and the optimal use of resources, given the restricted revenue flexibility due to established flat charges per case. The goal of this study is to examine the exact cost and income structures for ascites therapy at a university hospital that specializes in liver diseases. The treatment data of 778 patients admitted to the University Hospital Aachen's Department of Internal Medicine III between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively and anonymously evaluated for this study. The revenue shares of the matrix of cost centers and cost types of the German Diagnosis-Related Groups (G-DRG) system were compared to the revenue shares of the specified services in the context of activity-based costing. Inadequate refinancing was discovered in every area of the therapy process that was investigated. As a result, the treatment of ascites in cirrhosis is currently underrepresented in the DRG system. This is owing to the fact that patients treated at the university hospital have a greater case severity.

[Limits of the G-DRG system to reflect Complexity in German University Hospitals]

Since the introduction of the G-DRG-system in Germany for the reimbursement of in-hospital patients in 2003 the Institute for the Hospital Remuneration System (InEK) annually determines case reimbursements for currently 1300 individual diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). These are based on the cost documentation of 200 representative hospitals, coopted by InEK (§ 21-KHEntG-dataset). Since DRGs represent cost averages, one half of German hospitals would be expected to report an annual income surplus, the other half a deficit. In spite of sustained cost reductions two thirds of public University Hospitals, but only 29 % of non-University hospitals, report annual deficits. The German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS) has obtained the § 21-cost-dataset from 74 InEK-hospitals and 7 Mio anonymized cases since 2012 in order to appeal for individual DRG-corrections to InEK. In the current project this database was used to investigate whether the cost of care at University Hospitals is appropriately reflected in three representative DRGs and OPS codes (operation and procedure codes): Liver cirrhosis with hepatic encephalopathy, endoscopic procedure-tiers, and an endoscopic intervention after patient transfer from one hospital to another. The analysis reveals that the higher patient complexity, severity and cost at University Hospitals cannot be corrected by modification or further differentiation of individual DRGs within the existing G-DRG-system. Even in DRGs for which a differentiation would be possible and economically appropriate it is often not permitted. A further rise of the systematic deficit of German University Hospitals (currently 300 Mio. Euro annually) can only be prevented by introducing either a case-based DRG-System-Surcharge for University Hospitals or by separation of a University Hospital U-DRG-System from the general G-DRG-System.