Early Corrections after Failed Ankle Fracture Fixation

A Tension-Band Wiring Technique for Direct Fixation of a Chaput Tubercle Fracture: Technical Note

Few reports have described direct fixation of the Chaput tubercle; screw fixation is usually employed. Herein, we introduce a novel technique for Chaput tubercle fixation using tension-band wiring. This technique is applicable to fractured tubercles of various sizes and has the advantage that the fragment breakage that may occur during screw fixation is impossible. In addition, our technique increases fixation strength.

Analysis of the Effect of Posterior Lateral Malleolus Plate Fixation on the Curative Effect and Mechanical Stability of Complex Ankle Fractures

This paper investigates the effect of lateral and posterior 1/3 tubular plate bone plate fixation on the curative effect, wound healing, and mechanical stability of complex ankle fracture. 80 patients with complex ankle fractures treated in our hospital from January 2018 to July 2020 are selected for the study, and 80 patients are randomly divided into posterior fixation group and lateral fixation group according to the number table method, with 40 patients in each group. Patients in the posterior malleolus fixation group are treated with posterior lateral malleolus plate fixation, and patients in the lateral malleolus fixation group are treated with lateral malleolus plate fixation. The differences in efficacy, mechanical stability, wound healing, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and American Association of Foot and Ankle Surgery (AOFAS) ankle function are compared. The subjects are followed up for 6 months until January 2022. In patients with complex ankle fracture, 1/3 tubular plate osteoplate fixation in the posterior lateral malleolus can improve clinical efficacy and mechanical stability, which is helpful to promote incision healing and reduce the risk of complications. The 1/3 tubular plate osteoplate fixation in the posterior lateral malleolus is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Maisonneuve Fractures of the Ankle: A Critical Analysis Review

»

Maisonneuve fractures (MFs), originally described as subcapital (high) fibular fractures with additional injury to the anterior and interosseous tibiofibular ligaments, display a variable injury pattern, ranging from stable to highly unstable fractures.

»

The high incidence of associated fractures of the posterior malleolus, the medial malleolus, and the anterolateral distal tibia (the "anterior malleolus") as well as the variable position of the fibula in the fibular notch (FN) warrant preoperative examination via computed tomography (CT).

»

The main goal of treatment is anatomic reduction of the distal fibula into the FN, which requires prior reduction of displaced posterior malleolar fractures, if present, to restore the integrity of the FN.

»

Open reduction of the distal fibula into the FN and fixation with 2 transsyndesmotic screws or fixation with a screw(s) and suture-button implant, under direct vision, on the lateral aspect of the ankle joint and anterior tibiofibular alignment are preferred over closed reduction to avoid sagittal or rotational malpositioning, which is associated with an inferior outcome.

»

Intra- or postoperative 3D CT visualization is essential for assessment of the accuracy of the reduction of the distal fibula into the FN.

Pathoanatomy of the Anterolateral Tibial Fragment in Ankle Fractures

BACKGROUND

The anterior distal tibial tubercle provides attachment to the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis. It may be considered a fourth, or anterior, malleolus (AM). Fractures of the AM may extend into the tibial incisura and tibial plafond. The purpose of this study was to analyze the pathoanatomy of AM fractures and associated ankle injuries.

METHODS

One hundred and forty patients (median age, 61.0 years) with a total of 140 acute malleolar fractures (OTA/AO 44) involving the anterolateral distal tibial rim were analyzed with computed tomography (CT) imaging. All components of the malleolar fractures were analyzed and classified. Fracture patterns were compared with those of all patients with malleolar fractures treated during the same 9-year period. Patients with fractures of the tibial pilon (OTA/AO 43) and patients <18 years of age were excluded.

RESULTS

Of the 140 AM fractures, 52.9% were classified as type 1 (extra-articular avulsion); 35.7%, type 2 (incisura and plafond involvement); and 11.4%, type 3 (impaction of the anterolateral plafond). The fibula was fractured in 87.1%; the medial malleolus, in 66.4%; and the posterior malleolus, in 68.6%. An isolated AM fracture was seen in 4.3%. The size of the AM fractures correlated negatively with that of the posterior malleolar fractures. The proportion of pronation-abduction fractures increased and the proportion of supination-external rotation fractures decreased as the type of AM fracture increased. A fracture involving the AM occurred in 12.6% of all ankle fractures and occurred significantly more frequently in pronation-type injuries and elderly patients. No supination-adduction fractures with AM involvement were seen. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the proposed classification of the AM fractures was 0.961 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.933 to 0.980) for interobserver agreement and 0.941 (95% CI = 0.867 to 0.974) for intraobserver agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of the 3D pathoanatomy of AM fractures and associated malleolar fractures may help with surgical decision-making and planning. CT imaging should be employed generously in the diagnosis of complex ankle fractures, in particular with pronation-type injuries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Depending on the individual 3D fracture pattern, fixation of displaced anterolateral distal tibial fragments potentially contributes to the restoration of joint congruity, tibiofibular alignment, and syndesmotic stability in complex malleolar fractures.

Short-term results of gait analysis with the Heidelberg foot measurement method and functional outcome after operative treatment of ankle fractures

Background

Ankle fractures are common fractures in trauma surgery. Several studies have compared gait patterns between affected patients and control groups. However, no one used the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method in combination with statistical parametric mapping of the entire gait cycle in this patient cohort. We sought to identify possible mobility deficits in the tibio-talar joint and medial arch in patients after ankle fractures as a sign of stiffness and pain that could result in a pathological gait pattern. We focused on the tibio-talar flexion as it is the main movement in the tibio-talar joint. Moreover, we examined the healing progress over time.

Methods

Fourteen patients with isolated ankle fractures were included prospectively. A gait analysis using the Heidelberg Foot Measurement Method was performed 9 and 26 weeks after surgery to analyse the tibio-talar dorsal flexion, the foot tibia dorsal flexion, the subtalar inversion and the medial arch as well as the cadence, the walking speed and the ground reaction force. The American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle hindfoot score was used to obtain clinical data. Results were compared to those from 20 healthy participants. Furthermore, correlations between the American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society hindfoot score and the results of the gait analysis were evaluated.

Results

Statistical parametric mapping showed significant differences for the Foot Tibia Dorsal Flexion for patients after 9 weeks (53–75%: p = 0.001) and patients after 26 weeks (58–70%: p = 0.011) compared to healthy participants, respectively. Furthermore, significant differences regarding the tibio-talar dorsal flexion for patients 9 weeks after surgery (15–40%: p < 0.001; 56,5–70%: p = 0.007; 82–88%: p = 0.033; 97–98,5%: p = 0.048) as well as patients after 26 weeks (62,5–65%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. There were no significant differences looking at the medial arch and the subtalar inversion. Moreover, significant differences regarding the ground reaction force were found for patients after 9 weeks (0–17%: p < 0.001; 21–37%: p < 0.001; 41–54%: p < 0.001; 60–64%: p = 0.013) as well as patients after 26 weeks (0–1,5%: p = 0.046; 5–15%: p < 0.001; 27–33%: p = 0.001; 45–49%: p = 0.005; 57–59%: p = 0.049) compared to healthy participants, respectively. In total, the range of motion in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch was reduced in affected patients compared to healthy participants. Patients showed significant increase of the range of motion between 9 and 26 weeks.

Conclusions

This study shows, that patients affected by ankle fractures show limited mobility in the tibio-talar joint and the medial arch when compared to healthy participants. Even though the limitation of motion remains at least over a period of 26 weeks, a significant increase can be recognized over time. Furthermore, if we look at the absolute values, the patients’ values tend to get closer to those of the control group.

Trial registration

This study is registered at the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00023379).

Fixation of anterolateral distal tibial fractures: the anterior malleolus

OBJECTIVE

The anterior tibial rim with the anterolateral tibial tubercle provides attachment to the anterior tibiofibular syndesmosis. It may be considered an anterior or "fourth" malleolus. Fixation of a displaced anterior tibial fragment in the treatment of malleolar fractures aims at providing a bone-to-bone fixation of the anterior tibiofibular ligament and restoring the integrity of the tibial incisura.

INDICATIONS

Displaced intra-articular fragments of the anterior tibia; fractures involving the tibial incisura; fractures with intercalary fragments; impaction of the anterior tibial plafond; syndesmotic avulsions producing instability or preventing reduction of the distal fibula into the tibial incisura.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Critical local soft tissues preventing an anterolateral approach; missing consent to surgery by the patient; overall critical general condition preventing surgery to the extremities.

SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Anterolateral approach over the tibial tubercle. Identification and mobilization of the anterior tibial fragment without dissecting the anterior syndesmosis. Reduction of the anterior tibial fragment with a pointed reduction clamp. Fixation of extra-articular avulsion fractures (type 1) with suture anchor. Screw fixation of larger fragments involving the joint surface and incisura (type 2). Disimpaction, realignment of the joint surface, bone grafting as needed and plate fixation of impaction fractures of the anterolateral tibial plafond (type 3).

POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT

Mobilization with partial weight bearing (15-20 kg) in a special boot (ankle foot orthosis) or cast for 6-8 weeks depending on the overall malleolar fracture pattern, bone quality and patient compliance.

RESULTS

Few studies report the results of anterior tibial fractures in adults. Failure to fix displaced fragments frequently leads to nonunions. Overlooked Chaput fractures have been reported to result in malpositioning of the distal fibula in the tibial incisura leading to incongruity of the ankle mortise requiring revision surgery. Secondary avascular necrosis of the anterolateral tibial plafond may develop after joint impaction.

[Fractures of the anterolateral tibial rim : The fourth malleolus]

The anterolateral tibial rim with the anterior tibial tubercle (Tubercule de Tillaux-Chaput) serves as an insertion site of the anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL). It can also be termed the anterior malleolus or fourth malleolus. Fractures of the anterolateral tibial rim typically result from an external rotation or abduction mechanism of the talus within the ankle mortise. They are frequently overlooked in plain radiographs. Computed tomography (CT) is needed for an exact visualization of the fracture anatomy and treatment planning. A total of three main types can be differentiated: (1) extra-articular avulsion fracture of the AITFL, (2) fracture of the anterolateral distal tibia with involvement of the joint and tibial incisura and (3) impaction fracture of the anterolateral tibial plafond. Surgical fixation of displaced anterolateral distal tibial fractures aims at bone-to-bone stabilization of the anterior syndesmosis, restoration of the tibial incisura for the distal fibula and joint surface. Displaced extra-articular avulsion fractures (type 1) are fixed with a suture anchor or transosseal suture. Larger fragments involving the tibial incisura and plafond (type 2) are mostly fixed with screws. Impression fractures of the anterolateral tibial plafond (type 3) necessitate elevation with restoration of the joint surface, bone grafting of the impaction zone as needed and anterior buttress plating. Only a few studies have reported the treatment results of anterolateral tibial rim fractures in adults. Conservative treatment of dislocated fragments reportedly leads to non-union and malposition of the distal fibula with incongruence of the ankle mortise requiring revision. Impaction fractures (type 3) can lead to secondary avascular necrosis of the anterolateral tibial plafond.