From Routine to Research Laboratory: Strategies for the Diagnosis of Congenital Fibrinogen Disorders

Guideline for diagnosis and management of congenital dysfibrinogenemia

INTRODUCTION

Congenital dysfibrinogenemia (CD) is characterized by dysfunction induced by an abnormal fibrinogen molecule structure that results in blood coagulation dysfunction. The clinical manifestations of CD patients are asymptomatic, bleeding and thrombosis. The majority of patient are asymptomatic. However, the single fibrinogen detection method is easy to cause missed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of CD patients. The treatment strategies of CD patients with different clinical manifestations are also different.

METHODS

Combing the existing experimental diagnosis technology, literature and our research results, a simple and practical CD diagnostic criteria was proposed. And based on the relevant literature and existing treatment guidelines, more comprehensive treatment recommendations are summarized.

RESULTS

In this new criteria, combination Clauss method and PT derived method was proposed to detect fibrinogen and its ratio was used to diagnose for CD. Diagnosis also needs to be combined the clinical manifestations, family investigation and genetic testing. According to different clinical manifestation (bleeding, thrombosis or asymptomatic), treatment methods and strategies are different. The treatment of CD patients should consider the patient's personal and family history of bleeding or thrombosis. Treatment of thrombosis and pregnancy may be more challenging. The risk of bleeding and thrombosis should be evaluated and balanced at all times during clinical treatment. These detailed treatment recommendations can provide reference for patients with different clinical manifestations of CD.

CONCLUSIONS

The new CD diagnosis criteria and comprehensive treatment recommendations can effectively improve the diagnosis and treatment of CD.

Laboratory Testing for Fibrinogen Disorders: From Routine Investigations to Research Studies

Congenital and acquired fibrinogen disorders often have heterogeneous clinical phenotypes and are challenging from a laboratory perspective. Fibrinogen determination using the Clauss method remains the gold standard, while the reproducibility and significance of the thrombin time and the reptilase time are limited. Molecular testing for causative mutations in fibrinogen genes is now recommended to confirm the diagnosis of congenital fibrinogen disorders. Research assays are used to evaluate alterations to fibrin formation and properties of plasma and purified fibrinogen-derived clots, characterized by fiber thickness, the number of branches, and pore sizes. Fibrin clot permeability (permeation, porosity) using a hydrostatic pressure system represents the most commonly used method for evaluating fibrin network density. Reduced clot permeability, which denotes the reduced size of an average pore in the network, results in tighter fibrin networks, typically associated with impaired susceptibility to lysis, leading to a thrombotic tendency. Biophysical properties of fibrin clots are largely assessed using rheometry, with atomic force microscopy and nanorheology being increasingly used in disease states. Thromboelastography and thromboelastometry, a simple modification of rheometry, have been used, mainly in intensive care units, for more than 50 years. Given growing evidence for altered fibrin clot properties in diseases with elevated risk of venous and arterial thromboembolism and in some bleeding disorders, further work on standardization and validation of the assessment of fibrin clot characteristics is needed. This review summarizes the current methods used to evaluate fibrinogen abnormalities in both diagnostic and research laboratories.

Clinical phenotype and laboratory characteristics of 93 patients with congenital fibrinogen disorders from unrelated 36 families

Background

Congenital fibrinogen disorders (CFDs) are rare bleeding disorders (RBDs) caused by mutations in 1 of the 3 fibrinogen genes (FGA, FGB, and FGG).

Objectives

To investigate the clinical phenotype, laboratory features, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of CFDs.

Methods

Clinical data of 93 subjects with CFDs identified from June 2018 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Among the 93 patients, there were 46 males (49.5%) and 47 females (50.5%), with a median age of 23 years. Fifty-three of 93 (57%) subjects experienced bleeding, 3/93 (3.2%) experienced thrombosis, and 37/93 (39.8%) were asymptomatic. Females were more prone to experience bleeding (P < .0001). The 93 patients exhibited prolonged thrombin time, significantly decreased fibrinogen activity (Fg:C), and normal or decreased fibrinogen antigen. The 93 patients included 3 with hypofibrinogenemia, 16 with hypodysfibrinogenemia, and 74 with dysfibrinogenemia. Among the 53 patients with bleeding, bleeding episodes were identified in 3.8% (2/53), 20.8% (11/53), and 75.5% (40/53) patients with hypofibrinogenemia, hypodysfibrinogenemia, and dysfibrinogenemia, respectively. Genetic analysis was performed on 22 cases from 8 pedigrees, revealing 10 mutations, including 1 novel splice mutation. Twenty-eight (30.1%) subjects received replacement therapy to treat or prevent bleeding, consisting of 8 fresh frozen plasma transfusions, 3 packing and suture treatment, and 61 fibrinogen infusions.

Conclusion

Most patients with CFDs have mild or no bleeding symptoms. Fg:C combined with fibrinogen antigen and pedigree investigation can improve the feasibility and accuracy of diagnosis of CFDs. The severity of bleeding symptoms was negatively correlated with Fg:C.

Fibrinogen: Structure, abnormalities and laboratory assays

Fibrinogen is the primary precursor protein for the fibrin clot, which is the final target of blood clotting. It is also an acute phase reactant that can vary under physiologic and inflammatory conditions. Disorders in fibrinogen concentration and/or function have been variably linked to the risk of bleeding and/or thrombosis. Fibrinogen assays are commonly used in the management of bleeding as well as the treatment of thrombosis. This chapter examines the structure of fibrinogen, its role in hemostasis as well as in bleeding abnormalities and measurement thereof with respect to clinical management.

Diagnosis and classification of hereditary fibrinogen disorders

Hereditary fibrinogen disorders (HFDs) are rare bleeding disorders with a wide spectrum of biological and clinical features. While most patients with HFDs are at risk to suffer from mild to severe, sometimes life-threatening bleeding, thrombotic events are also common. Therefore, an appropriate diagnosis is needed to offer the optimal treatment. Diagnosis of HFDs can be challenging and plenty of pitfalls. The sensitivity and specificity of hemostasis routine test are depending on the reagents, the methods, and the fibrinogen variants. To distinguish subtypes of HFDs additional tests are often required. Historically based on the assessment of fibrinogen levels, a recent classification also considers the clinical phenotype and the genotype. In this short review, diagnosis strategies and HFDs classification are reviewed.

A case of congenital afibrinogenemia with multiple thrombotic and hemorrhagic disorders

This is a case of congenital afibrinogenemia with multiple thrombotic and hemorrhagic events. His fibrinogen concentration was negatively correlated with thrombin time and prothrombin time and abnormally negatively correlated with plasma D-dimer levels. The individualized standard for fibrinogen concentration may help to balance thrombotic and hemorrhagic events for this disease.

Development and validation of a novel qualitative test for plasma fibrinogen utilizing clot waveform analysis

Plasma fibrinogen is commonly examined by Clauss fibrinogen assay, which cannot distinguish between quantitative and qualitative fibrinogen anomalies. However, our previously reported Clauss fibrinogen assay utilizing clot waveform analysis (Clauss-CWA) provides additional information that contributes to the classification of fibrinogen anomalies. In this study, we adopted the Clauss-CWA method for an autoanalyzer to automatically measure the antigenic estimate (eAg) of fibrinogen in addition to the functional amount (Ac), and to thus provide the Ac/eAg ratio as a qualitative indicator. Performance was validated by receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and precision recall (PR) curve analyses using a patient cohort, consisting of a training cohort (n = 519) and a validation cohort (n = 523), both of which contained cases of congenital (hypo)dysfibrinogenemia as qualitative defects. We obtained an optimal cutoff of 0.65 for Ac/eAg by ROC curve analysis of the training cohort, offering superior sensitivity (> 0.9661) and specificity (1.000). This cutoff was validated in the validation cohort, providing positive predictive value > 0.933 and negative predictive value > 0.998. PR curve analysis also showed that Clauss-CWA provided excellent performance for detecting qualitative fibrinogen anomalies. The Clauss-CWA method may represent a useful approach for detecting qualitative fibrinogen abnormalities in routine laboratory testing.

Congenital Afibrinogenemia and Hypofibrinogenemia: Laboratory and Genetic Testing in Rare Bleeding Disorders with Life-Threatening Clinical Manifestations and Challenging Management

Congenital fibrinogen disorders are rare pathologies of the hemostasis, comprising quantitative (afibrinogenemia, hypofibrinogenemia) and qualitative (dysfibrinogenemia and hypodysfibrinogenemia) disorders. The clinical phenotype is highly heterogeneous, being associated with bleeding, thrombosis, or absence of symptoms. Afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia are the consequence of mutations in the homozygous, heterozygous, or compound heterozygous state in one of three genes encoding the fibrinogen chains, which can affect the synthesis, assembly, intracellular processing, stability, or secretion of fibrinogen. In addition to standard coagulation tests depending on the formation of fibrin, diagnostics also includes global coagulation assays, which are effective in monitoring the management of replacement therapy. Genetic testing is a key point for confirming the clinical diagnosis. The identification of the precise genetic mutations of congenital fibrinogen disorders is of value to permit early testing of other at risk persons and better understand the correlation between clinical phenotype and genotype. Management of patients with afibrinogenemia is particularly challenging since there are no data from evidence-based medicine studies. Fibrinogen concentrate is used to treat bleeding, whereas for the treatment of thrombotic complications, administered low-molecular-weight heparin is most often. This review deals with updated information about afibrinogenemia and hypofibrinogenemia, contributing to the early diagnosis and effective treatment of these disorders.

Clinical and molecular characterization of Iranian patients with congenital fibrinogen disorders

INTRODUCTION

Congenital fibrinogen disorders (CFDs) are caused by mutations in the FGA, FGB and FGG genes and are classified as quantitative and qualitative fibrinogen defects. This study sought to determine the genetic background of CFDs in Iran and to examine the genotype-phenotype correlation.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with a CFD diagnosis were included. Fibrinogen antigen and activity were measured by the immunoturbidimetric and Clauss methods respectively. Gene sequencing was performed following a polymerase chain reaction amplification of fibrinogen's genes. The ISTH Bleeding Assessment Tool was also evaluated for all cases.

RESULTS

Patients were diagnosed with dysfibrinogenemia (n = 10), hypodysfibrinogenemia (n = 2) and afibrinogenemia (n = 2). Seven different mutations located on FGA exon 2 (57 %), exon 4 (7%), exon 5 (7%) and FGG exon 8 (29 %) were identified. In patients with qualitative deficiencies, mutations were including p.Arg38Thr, p.Arg35His, p.Arg35Cys, p.Val145Asp, and p.Arg301Cys and were including p.Gly316GlufsX105 and p.Trp52stop in afibrinogenemic patients. In dysfibrinogenemia, two hotspot mutations, FGA Arg35 and FGG Arg301 were identified in 60 % of patients and the remaining (40 %) had p.Arg38Thr mutation. The p.Val145Asp and two hotspot mutations, p.Arg35His, p.Arg35Cys, were identified for the first time in Iran. The overall median (range) bleeding score (BS) was 4 (0-6) in all patients and it was 3.5 (0-5) in dysfibrinogenemia. Cutaneous bleeding and menorrhagia were the most common bleeding manifestations.

CONCLUSION

There was a weak genotype-phenotype correlation in CFDs and patients with dysfibrinogenemia were more symptomatic than in previous studies. Despite ethnic's differences, the prevalence of hotspot mutations in dysfibrinogenemia was similar to the other studies.

How I treat dysfibrinogenemia

Congenital dysfibrinogenemia (CD) is caused by structural changes in fibrinogen that modify its function. Diagnosis is based on discrepancy between decreased fibrinogen activity and normal fibrinogen antigen levels and is confirmed by genetic testing. CD results from monoallelic mutations in fibrinogen genes leading to clinically heterogenous disorders. Most patients with CD are asymptomatic at time of diagnosis but the clinical course may be complicated by a tendency to bleeding and/or thrombosis. Patients with a thrombotic-related fibrinogen variant are particularly at risk and in such patients long-term anticoagulation should be considered. Management of surgery and pregnancy raise important and difficult issues. The mainstay of CD treatment remains fibrinogen supplementation. Antifibrinolytic agents are part of the treatment in some specific clinical settings. In this article, we discuss five clinical scenarios to highlight common clinical challenges. We detail our approach to establish a diagnosis of CD and discuss strategies for the management of bleeding, thrombosis, surgery and pregnancy.

A Collection of Jewels

The authors of this issue of Hämostaseologie-Progress in Haemostasis on "PROGRESS AND PITFALLS IN LABORATORY HEMOSTASIS DIAGNOSIS: " were asked to write conceptual reviews, enucleating the quintessence of their subjects in order to share it with a wide audience. All performed a masterful job and you can now enjoy a collection of jewels, each with its peculiar character, which are presented in five "invisible" sections.