Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Algorithms (CEUS-LIRADS/ESCULAP) for the Noninvasive Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma - A Prospective Multicenter DEGUM Study

The Value of CEUS LI-RADS combined with AFP in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in low- and high-risk patients

BACKGROUND

We found that the occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has increased significantly in non-cirrhotic individuals, with HCC being frequently overlooked or misdiagnosed. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) is known to have a high diagnostic quality in high-risk HCC patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare the detection accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC between low- and high-risk individuals, to confirm its value in low-risk patients at increased risk of HCC, but not yet included in the high-risk groups of LI-RADS. In addition, since CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories contain a relatively high proportion of HCC, and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is the most commonly used biomarker for HCC, and the clinically valid, we attempted to further improve the early diagnostic capability of CEUS LI-RADS for HCC in the low-risk and high-risk patients by combining CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP.

METHODS

We defined high-risk groups (HR)-included in the high-risk patients of LI-RADS, low-risk groups (LR)-not included in the high-risk patients of LI-RADS and enrolled 189 HCC patients with LR and HR settings in a retrospective study. All lesions were confirmed histopathologically. The CEUS LI-RADS accuracy for detecting HCC in these two patients was compared. In addition, the diagnostic algorithm in our study was proposed (for CEUS LR-4 and LR-M patients with AFP>20 ng/ml). we analyzed the ability of CEUS LI-RADS as a valid method of establishing the early diagnosis of HCC in LR and HR patients by combining LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP.

RESULTS

Through comparative analysis, the specificity of the CEUS LR-5 category for HCC in the HR group was 78.4%, whereas in the LR group, it was 94.2%. Meanwhile, the sensitivity (63.2% vs. 63.0%) and positive predictive value (PPV) (75.0% vs. 88.7%) did not differ between the LR and HR groups ( P = 0.990, P = 0.299). It is noteworthy that there were the high proportion of HCC in CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories in our cases and when we combined CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories with AFP significantly improved the sensitivity by 21.0% (84.2%) in the LR group, and by 16.0% (79.0%) in the HR group, with statistically difference in sensitivity after combination in the HR group ( P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

The CEUS LR-5 category has real meaningful utility in the diagnosis of HCC in both LR and HR patients. The early detection power of the CEUS LI-RADS category for HCC patients was further increased when the CEUS LR-4 and LR-M categories were combined with elevated AFP.

Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer (i.e. cholangiocarcinoma or metastasis) is highly challenging and definitive diagnosis still relies on histological exam. The patterns of enhancement and wash-out of liver nodules can be used to stratify the risk of malignancy only in cirrhotic patients and HCC frequently shows atypical features. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) with standardized software could help to overcome these obstacles, providing functional and quantitative parameters and potentially improving accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion.

AIM

To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.

RESULTS

Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive differential diagnosis between hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and other liver cancer (i.e. cholangiocarcinoma or metastasis) is highly challenging and definitive diagnosis still relies on histological exam. The patterns of enhancement and wash-out of liver nodules can be used to stratify the risk of malignancy only in cirrhotic patients and HCC frequently shows atypical features. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCEUS) with standardized software could help to overcome these obstacles, providing functional and quantitative parameters and potentially improving accuracy in the evaluation of tumor perfusion.

AIM

To explore clinical evidence regarding the application of DCEUS in the differential diagnosis of liver nodules.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of clinical studies was performed to identify the parameters of DCEUS that could relate to histological diagnosis. In accordance with the study protocol, a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the evidence was planned.

RESULTS

Rise time was significantly higher in HCC patients with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of 0.83 (95%CI: 0.48-1.18). Similarly, other statistically significant parameters were mean transit time local with a SMD of 0.73 (95%CI: 0.20-1.27), peak enhancement with a SMD of 0.37 (95%CI: 0.03-0.70), area wash-in area under the curve with a SMD of 0.47 (95%CI: 0.13-0.81), wash-out area under the curve with a SMD of 0.55 (95%CI: 0.21-0.89) and wash-in and wash-out area under the curve with SMD of 0.51 (95%CI: 0.17-0.85). SMD resulted not significant in fall time and wash-in rate, but the latter presented a trend towards greater values in HCC compared to intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

CONCLUSION

DCEUS could improve non-invasive diagnosis of HCC, leading to less liver biopsy and early treatment. This quantitative analysis needs to be applied on larger cohorts to confirm these preliminary results.

Insights in Molecular Therapies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We conducted a comprehensive review of the current literature of published data and clinical trials (MEDLINE), as well as published congress contributions and active recruiting clinical trials on targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma. Combinations of different agents and medical therapy along with radiological interventions were analyzed for the setting of advanced HCC. Those settings were also analyzed in combination with adjuvant situations after resection or radiological treatments. We summarized the current knowledge for each therapeutic setting and combination that currently is or has been under clinical evaluation. We further discuss the results in the background of current treatment guidelines. In addition, we review the pathophysiological mechanisms and pathways for each of these investigated targets and drugs to further elucidate the molecular background and underlying mechanisms of action. Established and recommended targeted treatment options that already exist for patients are considered for systemic treatment: atezolizumab/bevacizumab, durvalumab/tremelimumab, sorafenib, lenvatinib, cabozantinib, regorafenib, and ramucirumab. Combination treatment for systemic treatment and local ablative treatment or transarterial chemoembolization and adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment strategies are under clinical investigation.

HCCs lacking arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) - a diagnostic challenge. Findings from the prospective multicenter DEGUM CEUS HCC trial

OBJECTIVES

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) upon contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) typically shows arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE), followed by late (> 60 seconds) and mild contrast washout (WO). Although APHE is considered as the hallmark of HCC, it can be absent in some HCCs. Thus, we explored which sonomorphological and histopathological features of HCC are associated with a lack of APHE upon CEUS.

METHODS

Focal liver lesions in high-risk patients for HCC were assessed with CEUS following a standardized protocol in a prospective multi-center real-life setting. CEUS patterns in HCC were assessed, and tumour and patient characteristics were compared for HCCs with and without APHE.

RESULTS

316 patients with HCC were recruited (cirrhosis, 76.9%). APHE occurred in 271/316 HCCs (85.8%). A lack of APHE was associated with portal vein thrombosis, tumour infiltration of the liver vessels (p<0.001), larger size, multilocularity, and higher depth location upon ultrasound (p<0.01). Histological grading did not differ between HCCs with and without APHE (p=0.39). Histopathological features of HCCs without APHE included cirrhotic stromal reaction, marked tumour cell steatosis and absence of the typical surrounding dilated sinusoidal vascular channels.

CONCLUSION

Correlation with histopathological findings support the fact that HCCs with a lack of APHE in CEUS are a heterogeneous group. The examiner has to be aware that particularly HCCs with portal vein thrombosis or macro-invasion of the liver vessels may lack APHE.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound pattern of hepatocellular carcinoma in noncirrhotic liver - results from the prospective multicentre DEGUM CEUS HCC study

OBJECTIVES

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has a high diagnostic accuracy for the noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. However, as HCC in noncirrhosis becomes an emerging clinical concern, our study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of CEUS and the CEUS algorithms CEUS LI-RADS and ESCULAP in noncirrhotic liver in a prospective multicentre real-life setting.

METHODS

High-risk patients for HCC with focal liver lesions upon B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively in a multicentre real-life approach to undergo standardized CEUS. Diagnostic accuracies of CEUS and the CEUS algorithms were assessed for the sub-collective of noncirrhotic patients. Histology, MRI and CT served as the reference standard.

RESULTS

In total 47/517 patients were noncirrhotic. The reference standard of the lesions showed 30 HCCs (63.8%), four intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinomas (iCCAs), two other malignancies and 11 benign lesions. HCCs in noncirrhosis showed a tendency towards larger tumor size and better differentiation. A typical CEUS pattern of arterial phase hyperenhancement and late-onset (>60 s), mild washout occurred in 22/30 HCCs (73.3%). Very late onset of washout > 4-6 min was not seen in noncirrhotic liver. The CEUS algorithm ESCULAP showed a perfect sensitivity (100 vs. 68% with CEUS LI-RADS), whereas CEUS LI-RADS had a superior specificity (83 vs. 53%). The positive predictive value was high with both algorithms.

CONCLUSION

The CEUS patterns of HCCs in noncirrhotic liver resembled those in cirrhosis. Our findings suggest that although designed for the application in cirrhosis only, the diagnostic accuracies of the CEUS algorithms in noncirrhotic liver seem comparable to the findings in cirrhosis.

Washout appearance of hepatocellular carcinomas using standardized contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) including an extended late phase observation - Real-world data from the prospective multicentre DEGUM study

BACKGROUND

Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is based on the combination of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) and subsequent late (>60 seconds) and mild contrast washout (WO). Whereas APHE is seen in the majority of HCC, wash-out pattern may vary in onset and intensity. In some HCC lesions, even no washout is seen at all.

OBJECTIVE

Our prospective multicentre DEGUM HCC CEUS study aimed at identifying typical and atypical washout appearance of HCC in a real-life setting.

METHODS

High-risked patients for HCC with focal liver lesions upon B-mode ultrasound were recruited prospectively. In a multicentre real-life setting, a standardised CEUS examination including an extended late phase up to 6 minutes was performed. CEUS patterns of HCC were recorded, and onset and intensity of washout appearance were assessed with respect to patient and tumour characteristics. Histological findings served as reference standard.

RESULTS

In 230/316 HCC (72.8%), a CEUS pattern of APHE followed by WO was observed. In 158 cases (68.7%), WO was typical (onset > 60 seconds, mild intensity). 72 cases (31.3%) showed marked and / or early WO, whereas in 41 HCCs (13%), APHE was followed by sustained isoenhancement.Atypical WO upon CEUS was associated with macroinvasion of the liver vessels, portal vein thrombosis and diffuse growth pattern, but not tumour size and histological grading.

CONCLUSIONS

In a prospective multicentre real-life setting, APHE is followed by atypical washout appearance or no washout at all in almost half of the HCCs with APHE. The examiner has to bear in mind that in spite of a characteristic APHE in HCCs, washout appearance can be atypical in CEUS, especially in HCCs with macrovascular invasion or diffuse growth pattern.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System: Lights and shadows in hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocellular carcinoma diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is considered a secondary examination compared to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), due to the risk of misdiagnosing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The introduction of CEUS Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS LI-RADS) might overcome this limitation. Even though data from the literature seems promising, its reliability in real-life context has not been well-established yet.

AIM

To test the accuracy of CEUS LI-RADS for correctly diagnosing HCC and ICC in cirrhosis.

METHODS

CEUS LI-RADS class was retrospectively assigned to 511 nodules identified in 269 patients suffering from liver cirrhosis. The diagnostic standard for all nodules was either biopsy (102 nodules) or CT/MRI (409 nodules). Common diagnostic accuracy indexes such as sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were assessed for the following associations: CEUS LR-5 and HCC; CEUS LR-4 and 5 merged class and HCC; CEUS LR-M and ICC; and CEUS LR-3 and malignancy. The frequency of malignant lesions in CEUS LR-3 subgroups with different CEUS patterns was also determined. Inter-rater agreement for CEUS LI-RADS class assignment and for major CEUS pattern identification was evaluated.

RESULTS

CEUS LR-5 predicted HCC with a 67.6% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity, and 99.3% PPV (P < 0.001). The merging of LR-4 and 5 offered an improved 93.9% sensitivity in HCC diagnosis with a 94.3% specificity and 98.8% PPV (P < 0.001). CEUS LR-M predicted ICC with a 91.3% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, and 99.6% NPV (P < 0.001). CEUS LR-3 predominantly included benign lesions (only 28.8% of malignancies). In this class, the hypo-hypo pattern showed a much higher rate of malignant lesions (73.3%) than the iso-iso pattern (2.6%). Inter-rater agreement between internal raters for CEUS-LR class assignment was almost perfect (n = 511, k = 0.94, P < 0.001), while the agreement among raters from separate centres was substantial (n = 50, k = 0.67, P < 0.001). Agreement was stronger for arterial phase hyperenhancement (internal k = 0.86, P < 2.7 × 10^-214; external k = 0.8, P < 0.001) than washout (internal k = 0.79, P < 1.6 × 10^-202; external k = 0.71, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CEUS LI-RADS is effective but can be improved by merging LR-4 and 5 to diagnose HCC and by splitting LR-3 into two subgroups to differentiate iso-iso nodules from other patterns.

Comparison of superb microvascular imaging (SMI) quantified with ImageJ to quantified contrast-enhanced ultrasound (qCEUS) in liver metastases-a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare methods for the assessment of vascularisation of liver metastases (LM) between superb microvascular imaging (SMI), contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and microvascular density (MVD).

METHODS

SMI results were quantified as the vascularisation quotient (VQ), based on a grey-scale analysis with ImageJ image software. Those results were compared to contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) values, calculated with VueBox^®. MVD was measured with an anti-CD34 antibody.

RESULTS

This study included 13 patients with LM. The VQ showed a strong correlation with the quantified parameters of contrast-enhanced ultrasound. The parameters of quantified contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with quantified SMI showed the following statistical correlations: peak enhancement (PE), in arbitrary unit (a.u.) (r=0.72104, P=0.0054), PE in Decibel (dB) (r=0.65918, P=0.00141), Wash-in- Area Under the Curve (WiAUC) in a.u. (r=0.63604, P=0.00194), Wash-in Perfusion-Index (WiPI) in a.u. (r=0.73337, P=0.0043), Wash-in Perfusion-Index (WiPI) in dB (r=0.65642, P=0.0194), Wash-in-Rate (WiR) in a.u. (r=0.7304, P=0.0036) and Wash-in-Rate (WiR) in dB (r=0.82897, P=0.0005).

CONCLUSIONS

Comparison of the two methods, SMI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), for quantitative assessment of vascularisation of LM showed good correlation. The contrast-independent Doppler technique SMI can qualitatively assess the vascularisation of LM.

[Alternatives of histological material collection - When and how is histological confirmation by ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or endosonography (EUS) useful?]

Histological classifications of tumorous lesions together with adequate staging are necessary for stage-appropriate and personalized therapies. The indications, technical possibilities, and limitations as well as potential complications of image-guided needle biopsy by ultrasound, computed tomography, and endosonography are described. Which procedure for which organ and which lesion?

Study on correlation between two-dimensional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound and microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To explore the correlation between two-dimensional ultrasound (2D-US), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 56 patients with surgically pathologically confirmed HCC lesions were included. Patients were classified according to the presence of MVI: MVI positive group (n = 17) and MVI negative group (n = 39). 2D-US and CEUS examinations were performed within two weeks before surgery. The 2D-US and CEUS features were analyzed for correlation with MVI. Statistically significant parameters of ultrasound characteristic were scored, and the results of the scores were analyzed by ROC curve.

RESULTS

There were statistically significant differences in tumor shape, boundary, capsule, CEUS portal phase and delayed phase enhancement pattern, time to wash out, and tumor margin after enhancement (P <  0.05), while there were no statistically significant differences in tumor location and size, CEUS arterial phase enhancement pattern, initial time, time to peak, and peritumor enhancement (P >  0.05). When diagnosing the presence of MVI in HCC patients with cut-off value of the score combined 2D-US and CEUS features≥3, the maximum Jorden index was 0.58, and its diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 94.10%and 64.1%, respectively, meaning that the total score≥3 was highly suspicious of the presence of MVI.

CONCLUSIONS

2D-US and CEUS are feasible methods for preoperative prediction of MVI in HCC, and can provide some theoretical basis for individualized clinical treatment.

Differentiation between hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To explore the diagnostic ability of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in distinguishing intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in differentiating ICC from HCC. The diagnostic ability of CEUS was assessed based on the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and area under the curve (AUC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The methodologic quality was assessed by the QUADAS-2 tool. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias were performed to identify the source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included, consisting of 1,116 patients with HCC and 529 with ICC. The general diagnostic performance of CEUS in distinguishing ICC and HCC were as follows: pooled sensitivity, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.84-0.96); pooled specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.92); pooled PLR, 7.1 (95% CI: 4.1-12.0); pooled NLR, 0.09 (95% CI: 0.05-0.19); pooled DOR, 76 (95% CI: 26-220) and AUC, 0.95(95% CI: 0.93-0.97). Different liver background may be a potential factor that influenced the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS according to the subgroup analysis, with the pooled DOR of 89.67 in the mixed liver background group and 46.87 in the cirrhosis group, respectively. Six informative CEUS features that may help differentiate HCC from ICC were extracted. The three CEUS features favoring HCC were arterial phase hyperenhancement(APHE), mild washout and late washout (>60s); the three CEUS favoring ICC were arterial rim enhancement, marked washout and early washout(<60s). No potential publication bias was observed.

CONCLUSION

CEUS showed great diagnostic ability in differentiating ICC from HCC, which may be promising for noninvasive evaluation of these diseases.

Ultrasound or Sectional Imaging Techniques as Screening Tools for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Fall Forward or Move Forward?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is probably the epitome of a screening target, with a well-defined high-risk population, accessible screening methods, and multiple curative-intent treatments available for early disease. Per major societies guideline consensus, biannual ultrasound (US) surveillance of the at-risk patients is the current standard of care worldwide. Yet, despite its documented success in the past decades, this standard is far from perfect. While the whole community is working to further tighten the knots, a worrying number of cases still slip through this safety net. Consequently, these patients lose their chance to a curative solution which leads to a high disease burden with disproportionate mortality. While US will probably remain the fundamental staple in the screening strategy, key questions are seeking better answers. How can its caveats be addressed, and the technique be improved? When are further steps needed? How to increase accuracy without giving up on accessibility? This narrative review discusses the place of US surveillance in the bigger HCC picture, trying to navigate through its strengths and limits based on the most recent available evidence.

Alteration of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS)

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can treat portal hypertensive complications and modifies hepatic hemodynamics. Modification of liver perfusion can alter contrast enhancement dynamics of liver nodules. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to diagnose hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis with TIPS. In this prospective monocentric observational study, CEUS was used to characterize focal liver lesions in patients at risk for HCC with and without TIPS. Times of arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) und washout were quantified. Perfusion-index (PI) and resistance-index (RI) of hepatic artery and portal venous flow parameters were measured via doppler ultrasonography. Diagnostic gold standard was MRI/CT or histology. This study included 49 liver lesions [23 TIPS (11 HCC), 26 no TIPS (15 HCC)]. 26 were diagnosed as HCC by gold standard. Sensitivity and specificity of CEUS to diagnose HCC with and without TIPS were 93.3% and 100% vs. 90.9% and 93.3%, respectively. APHE appeared significantly earlier in patients with TIPS compared to patients without TIPS. TIPS significantly accentuates APHE of HCC in CEUS. CEUS has good diagnostic performance for diagnosis of HCC in patients with TIPS.