1
|
Yilmaz S, Gorgun E. Endoscopic Mucosal Resection and Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:277-288. [PMID: 39132198 PMCID: PMC11309798 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/13/2024]
Abstract
Up to 15% of colorectal polyps are amenable for conventional polypectomy. Advanced endoscopic resection techniques are introduced for the treatment of those polyps. They provide higher en bloc resection rates compared with conventional techniques, while helping patients to avoid the complications of surgery. Note that 20 mm is considered as the largest size of a polyp that can be resected by polypectomy or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in an en bloc fashion. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is recommended for polyps larger than 20 mm. Intramucosal carcinomas and carcinomas with limited submucosal invasion can also be resected with ESD. EMR is snare resection of a polyp following submucosal injection and elevation. ESD involves several steps such as marking, submucosal injection, incision, and dissection. Bleeding and perforation are the most common complications following advanced endoscopic procedures, which can be treated with coagulation and endoscopic clipping. En bloc resection rates range from 44.5 to 63% for EMR and from 87.9 to 96% for ESD. Recurrence rates following EMR and ESD are 7.4 to 17% and 0.9 to 2%, respectively. ESD is considered enough for the treatment of invasive carcinomas in the presence of submucosal invasion less than 1000 μm, absence of lymphovascular invasion, well-moderate histological differentiation, low-grade tumor budding, and negative resection margins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumeyye Yilmaz
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Emre Gorgun
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yang D, Hasan MK, Jawaid S, Singh G, Xiao Y, Khalaf M, Tomizawa Y, Sharma NS, Draganov PV, Othman MO. Hybrid Versus Conventional Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (Short-Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection). Am J Gastroenterol 2024:00000434-990000000-01197. [PMID: 38912697 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), which utilizes ESD knife along with snare-based resection, has been developed to overcome the technical complexity of conventional ESD (C-ESD). The aim of this study was to compare the therapeutic outcomes of H-ESD vs C-ESD for nonpedunculated colorectal lesions ≥20 mm in size. METHODS We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to compare H-ESD and C-ESD (Short-ESD trial). Patients with colorectal lesions between 20 and 50 mm in size were randomly assigned (1:1) to H-ESD or C-ESD. Primary outcome was procedure time/speed. Secondary outcomes were en bloc and complete (R0) resection rates and adverse event rates. RESULTS A total of 89 patients (median age 63 years; 49.3% women) with the median polyp size of 30 mm underwent H-ESD (n = 40) and C-ESD (n = 49). The mean procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD (41.1 ± 16.3 vs 54.3 ± 28.2 minutes; P = 0.007). The en bloc and R0 resection rates trended lower in the H-ESD vs C-ESD groups (77.5% vs 87.8%; P = 0.26% and 72.5% vs 79.6%; P = 0.46) without reaching statistical significance. Adverse event rate was similar between H-ESD and C-ESD (10% vs 8.2%; P = 1.00). DISCUSSION Both H-ESD and C-ESD were safe and effective for resection of large colorectal lesions. H-ESD was associated with a shorter procedure time. H-ESD may represent a viable alternative to C-ESD, with the main advantage being easy applicability of a snare-based technique for colorectal lesions. Future studies are needed to further define the most suitable lesions for H-ESD, as to optimize efficiency and safety without compromising resection outcomes. ClinicaTrials.gov NCT NCT05347446.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Salmaan Jawaid
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Gurdeep Singh
- Internal Medicine, AdventHealth Medical Group, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Yasi Xiao
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Mai Khalaf
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Washington Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Neil S Sharma
- Division of Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yang L, Ma XZ, Su H, Zhang J, Sheng JQ, Jin P. Safe and effective hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with ALL IN ONE snare in porcine gastric model (with video). Sci Rep 2024; 14:10060. [PMID: 38698246 PMCID: PMC11065994 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61031-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 05/05/2024] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD) using a newly developed ALL IN ONE (AIO) snare. This was a matched control study in a porcine model. Five paired simulated stomach lesions 2-2.5 cm in size were removed by H-ESD using an AIO snare or conventional ESD (C-ESD) using an endoscopic knife. The outcomes of the two procedures were compared, including en-bloc resection rates, procedure times, intraprocedural bleeding volumes, muscular injuries, perforations, thicknesses of the submucosal layer in resected specimens, and stomach defects. All simulated lesions were resected en-bloc. Specimens resected by H-ESD and C-ESD were similar in size (7.68 ± 2.92 vs. 8.42 ± 2.42 cm2; P = 0.676). H-ESD required a significantly shorter procedure time (13.39 ± 3.78 vs. 25.99 ± 4.52 min; P = 0.031) and submucosal dissection time (3.99 ± 1.73 vs. 13.1 ± 4.58 min; P = 0.003) versus C-ESD; H-ESD also yielded a faster dissection speed (241.37 ± 156.84 vs. 68.56 ± 28.53 mm2/min; P = 0.042) and caused fewer intraprocedural bleeding events (0.40 ± 0.55 vs. 3.40 ± 1.95 times/per lesion; P = 0.016) than C-ESD. The thicknesses of the submucosal layer of the resected specimen (1190.98 ± 134.07 vs. 1055.90 ± 151.76 μm; P = 0.174) and the residual submucosal layer of the stomach defect (1607.94 ± 1026.74 vs. 985.98 ± 445.58 μm; P = 0.249) were similar with both procedures. The AIO snare is a safe and effective device for H-ESD and improves the treatment outcomes of gastric lesions by shortening the procedure time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lang Yang
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Xian-Zong Ma
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hui Su
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Jian-Qiu Sheng
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Peng Jin
- Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China.
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, No. 5 Nan Men Cang, Dong Cheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang YX, Liu X, Gu F, Ding SG. Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study. Dig Dis Sci 2024; 69:949-960. [PMID: 38218733 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08195-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD), a modified ESD with a snare, has become increasingly utilized to overcome the limitations of conventional ESD (C-ESD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Planned H-ESD and C-ESD for colorectal lesions. METHODS Propensity score matching was performed to control for confounding variables in this retrospective study. Outcomes included en bloc resection and complete resection (R0) rates, procedure time, adverse event rates, and local recurrence rate. RESULTS 1286 lesions were enrolled in the study. After matching, 263 lesions were assigned to each group. The Planned H-ESD group has lower en bloc rate but similar R0 resection rate compared to the C-ESD group (90.9% vs 98.1%, P = 0.001; 77.2% vs 77.9%, P = 0.917). The median procedure time was shorter in the Planned H-ESD group (27.0 min vs 35.0 min, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in adverse events rates or local recurrence rate. Subgroup analysis based on lesion size revealed that a significantly lower en bloc resection rate in the Planned H-ESD group compared to the C-ESD group for lesions ≥ 40 mm (71.0% vs 94.3%, P = 0.027), but there was no significant difference for lesions < 40 mm. CONCLUSION The Planned H-ESD has a lower en bloc resection rate but a similar R0 resection rate, adverse event rates, local recurrence rate, and shorter procedure duration. Compared to C-ESD, Planned H-ESD presents advantages for managing colorectal neoplasms below 40 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Xin Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Xun Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Fang Gu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing, 100191, China
| | - Shi-Gang Ding
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory for Helicobacter Pylori Infection and Upper Gastrointestinal Diseases, Beijing, 100191, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gao P, Zhou K, Su W, Yu J, Zhou P. Endoscopic management of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2023; 11:goad027. [PMID: 37251504 PMCID: PMC10224796 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal polyps are premalignant lesions in the lower gastrointestinal tract. Endoscopic polypectomy is an effective strategy to prevent colorectal cancer morbidity and more invasive procedures. Techniques for the endoscopic resection of polyps keep evolving, and endoscopists are required to perform the most appropriate technique for each polyp. In this review, we outline the evaluation and classification of polyps, update the recommendations for optimal treatment, describe the polypectomy procedures and their strengths/weaknesses, and discuss the promising innovative methods or concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Wei Su
- Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Jia Yu
- Surgery Department, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, P. R. China
| | - Pinghong Zhou
- Corresponding author. Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 180 Fenglin Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200032, P. R. China. Tel: +86-21-64041990;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Libânio D, Pimentel-Nunes P, Bastiaansen B, Bisschops R, Bourke MJ, Deprez PH, Esposito G, Lemmers A, Leclercq P, Maselli R, Messmann H, Pech O, Pioche M, Vieth M, Weusten BLAM, Fuccio L, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection techniques and technology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Technical Review. Endoscopy 2023; 55:361-389. [PMID: 36882090 DOI: 10.1055/a-2031-0874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 28.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
ESGE suggests conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; marking and mucosal incision followed by circumferential incision and stepwise submucosal dissection) for most esophageal and gastric lesions. ESGE suggests tunneling ESD for esophageal lesions involving more than two-thirds of the esophageal circumference. ESGE recommends the pocket-creation method for colorectal ESD, at least if traction devices are not used. The use of dedicated ESD knives with size adequate to the location/thickness of the gastrointestinal wall is recommended. It is suggested that isotonic saline or viscous solutions can be used for submucosal injection. ESGE recommends traction methods in esophageal and colorectal ESD and in selected gastric lesions. After gastric ESD, coagulation of visible vessels is recommended, and post-procedural high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) (or vonoprazan). ESGE recommends against routine closure of the ESD defect, except in duodenal ESD. ESGE recommends corticosteroids after resection of > 50 % of the esophageal circumference. The use of carbon dioxide when performing ESD is recommended. ESGE recommends against the performance of second-look endoscopy after ESD. ESGE recommends endoscopy/colonoscopy in the case of significant bleeding (hemodynamic instability, drop in hemoglobin > 2 g/dL, severe ongoing bleeding) to perform endoscopic hemostasis with thermal methods or clipping; hemostatic powders represent rescue therapies. ESGE recommends closure of immediate perforations with clips (through-the-scope or cap-mounted, depending on the size and shape of the perforation), as soon as possible but ideally after securing a good plane for further dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Libânio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
- Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, FMUP, Porto, Portugal.,Gastroenterology, Unilabs, Portugal
| | - Barbara Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Raf Bisschops
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Michael J Bourke
- Department of Gastroenterology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Western Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Pierre H Deprez
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Gianluca Esposito
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Arnaud Lemmers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, CUB Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Philippe Leclercq
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Roberta Maselli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy. Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Interventional Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brueder Regensburg, Germany
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Michael Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - Bas L A M Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, The Netherlands
| | - Lorenzo Fuccio
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Gastroenterology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pradeep Bhandari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Mario Dinis-Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Portuguese Oncology Institute - Porto, Portugal.,MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (Porto.CCC) & RISE@CI-IPOP (Health Research Network), Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takada K, Hotta K, Imai K, Ito S, Kishida Y, Minamide T, Yamamoto Y, Yabuuchi Y, Yoshida M, Maeda Y, Kawata N, Takizawa K, Ishiwatari H, Matsubayashi H, Kawabata T, Ono H. Tip-in EMR as an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20- to 30-mm nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:849-856.e3. [PMID: 35798055 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Tip-in EMR, which includes anchoring the snare tip, has recently shown a favorable en-bloc and R0 resection rate for colorectal neoplasms. Thus, Tip-in EMR may be an alternative to endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). We aimed to compare clinical outcomes between Tip-in EMR and ESD for large colorectal neoplasms. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated consecutive patients who underwent Tip-in EMR or ESD for 20- to 30-mm nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms at a Japanese tertiary cancer center between January 2014 and December 2019. Baseline characteristics, treatment results, and long-term outcomes were analyzed using 1:1 propensity score matching. RESULTS Seven hundred nine lesions were evaluated. The Tip-in EMR group included 1 lesion with a nonlifting sign but no lesions with fold convergence. After propensity score matching, each group included 140 lesions. The ESD group showed significantly higher en-bloc resection rates (99.3% vs 85.0%) and R0 resection rates (90.7% vs 62.9%). Procedure time was significantly shorter in the Tip-in EMR group (8 minutes vs 60 minutes). The Tip-in EMR and ESD groups did not differ significantly with respect to local recurrence rate (2.1% vs 0%). CONCLUSIONS Tip-in EMR is comparable with ESD with respect to the local recurrence rate but has a shorter procedure time, despite the lower en-bloc and R0 resection rates for 20- to 30-mm nonpedunculated colorectal neoplasms without fold convergence or nonlifting sign. Thus, Tip-in EMR could be a feasible alternative to ESD in these lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Takada
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Imai
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Sayo Ito
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Yoichi Yamamoto
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yohei Yabuuchi
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Masao Yoshida
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan; Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yuki Maeda
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Noboru Kawata
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Kohei Takizawa
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan; Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Sapporo Kinentou Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Hiroyuki Ono
- Division of Endoscopy, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang D, Aihara H, Hasan MK, Simsek C, Khan H, Brar TS, Gorrepati VS, Forde JJ, Kadkhodayan K, Arain MA, Draganov PV. Novel single-operator through-the-scope traction device for endoscopic submucosal dissection: Outcomes of a multicenter randomized pilot ex-vivo study in trainees with limited endoscopic submucosal dissection experience (with video). DEN OPEN 2022; 3:e174. [PMID: 36247316 PMCID: PMC9549878 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Objectives Endoscopic submucosal dissection is a technically demanding procedure. The pilot study aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel single‐operator through‐the‐scope dynamic traction device among trainees with limited endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) experience. Methods Randomized, controlled, pilot study comparing traction‐assisted ESD (T‐ESD) versus conventional ESD (C‐ESD) in an ex‐vivo porcine stomach model. Trainees were randomized to group 1 (T‐ESD followed by C‐ESD) and group 2 (C‐ESD followed by T‐ESD). Lesions were created on the gravity‐dependent area of the stomachs. The primary outcome was submucosal dissection speed. Secondary outcomes included differences in en‐bloc resection, adverse events, and workload, assessed by the National Aeronautical and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA‐TLX). Results Five trainees performed two T‐ESD and two C‐ESD each, for a total of 20 procedures. Submucosal dissection speed was significantly faster in the T‐ESD group compared to the C‐ESD group (43.32 ± 22.61 vs. 24.19 ± 15.86 mm2/min; p = 0.042). En‐bloc resection was achieved in 60% with T‐ESD and 70% with C‐ESD (p = 1.00). The muscle injury rate was higher in the C‐ESD group (50% vs. 10%; p = 0.21) with 1 perforation reported with C‐ESD and none with T‐ESD. NASA‐TLX physical demand was lower with T‐ESD compared to C‐ESD (4.5 ± 2.17 vs. 6.9 ± 2.50; p = 0.03). Conclusion T‐ESD resulted in faster submucosal dissection and less physical demand when compared to C‐ESD, as performed by trainees in an ex‐vivo gravity‐dependent model. Future studies are needed to assess its role in human ESD cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional EndoscopyAdventHealthOrlandoUSA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of GastroenterologyHepatology, and EndoscopyBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
| | | | - Cem Simsek
- Division of GastroenterologyHepatology, and EndoscopyBrigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA
| | - Hafiz Khan
- Center for Interventional EndoscopyAdventHealthOrlandoUSA
| | - Tony S. Brar
- Center for Interventional EndoscopyAdventHealthOrlandoUSA
| | | | - Justin J. Forde
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
| | | | | | - Peter V. Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Metter K, Aepli P, Dumoulin FL, Hayee B, Grund KE, Farin G, Frei R. Endoscopic submucosal resection: a technique using novel devices for incision and resection of neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 2022; 54:1001-1006. [PMID: 34918311 DOI: 10.1055/a-1723-3194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are established techniques for treatment of superficial gastrointestinal neoplasia. Limitations of EMR are low en bloc resection rates for larger lesions, resulting in frequent recurrences. Major disadvantages of ESD are technical difficulty and long procedure times. We evaluated technical feasibility and safety of newly designed devices for en bloc resection of lesions measuring 20-40 mm in a technique called endoscopic submucosal resection (ESR). METHODS This case series included 93 lesions from different locations (11 stomach, 25 colon, 57 rectum) with a median size of 29 mm (range 10-70). ESR was performed using two novel instruments for circumferential mucosal incision and deep submucosal resection, respectively. RESULTS Resection by ESR was feasible in all cases. En bloc and R0 rates were insufficient when ESR was attempted without prior circumferential mucosal incision, but were 70 % and 63 %, respectively, when mucosal incision was done before application of the submucosal resection device. We observed three complications (two delayed bleedings, one microperforation) but no cases of emergency surgery or 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS Results demonstrated feasibility and excellent safety of ESR using two novel devices for en bloc resection of early gastrointestinal neoplasia. The technique offered relative technical ease and high efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus Metter
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Diabetologie, Alb Fils Kliniken, Klinik am Eichert, Göppingen, Germany
| | - Patrick Aepli
- Gastroenterologie/Hepatologie, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Bu'Hussain Hayee
- Gastroenterology, King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Karl-Ernst Grund
- Experimentelle Chirurgische Endoskopie (CETEX), Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Klinik für AVT-Chirurgie, Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - Remus Frei
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie/Hepatologie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cecinato P, Lucarini M, Campanale C, Azzolini F, Bassi F, Sassatelli R. Underwater endoscopic submucosal dissection and hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection as rescue therapy in difficult colorectal cases. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E1225-E1232. [PMID: 36118634 PMCID: PMC9473857 DOI: 10.1055/a-1882-4306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is still not widely used due to its technical difficulty and the risk of complications. Rescue therapies such as hybrid ESD (H-ESD) have been proposed for very difficult cases, as has underwater ESD (U-ESD). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of H-ESD and U-ESD in difficult cases. Patients and methods The hospital charts of consecutive patients referred for colorectal ESD between January 2014 and February 2021 because they were considered difficult cases were retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome of the study was en bloc resection rate; secondary outcomes were the rate of complete resection, procedure speed, and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Results Fifty-nine colorectal neoplasms were considered, 22 of which were removed by U-ESD and 37 by H-ESD. The en bloc resection rate in the U-ESD group was 100 %, while it was 59.5 % in the H-ESD group. Dissection speed was 17.7mm 2 /min in the U-ESD group and 8.3 mm 2 /min in the H-ESD group. The AE rate was low in the U-ESD group and moderately high during H-ESD (5 % and 21.6 %, respectively; and perforation rate 0 % and 10.8 %, respectively). Larger lesions were treated with U-ESD, while more fibrotic ones were treated with H-ESD. Conclusions U-ESD and H-ESD are both effective and safe techniques in difficult colorectal situations. U-ESD is particularly effective and fast for large lesions when it is not possible to obtain comfortable knife position, while H-ESD is more suitable for very fibrotic lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Cecinato
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Matteo Lucarini
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Chiara Campanale
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Azzolini
- Unit of Digestive Endoscopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Bassi
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Romano Sassatelli
- Unit of Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Esaki M, Maehara R, Nagatomo S, Nishioka K, Minoda Y, Ogino H, Ihara E. Application of traction-method to hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal tumors. Endoscopy 2022; 54:E160-E161. [PMID: 33878790 DOI: 10.1055/a-1422-2902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Esaki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Maehara
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shuzaburo Nagatomo
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kei Nishioka
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yosuke Minoda
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Haruei Ogino
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Eikichi Ihara
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Okamoto T, Ikeya T, Fukuda K. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for anal canal fibroma. VideoGIE 2022; 7:154-157. [PMID: 35937195 PMCID: PMC9347181 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2022.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Okamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Medicine, Cancer Institute Hospital of Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Ikeya
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Katsuyuki Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mann R, Gajendran M, Umapathy C, Perisetti A, Goyal H, Saligram S, Echavarria J. Endoscopic Management of Complex Colorectal Polyps: Current Insights and Future Trends. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:728704. [PMID: 35127735 PMCID: PMC8811151 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.728704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most colorectal cancers arise from adenomatous polyps and sessile serrated lesions. Screening colonoscopy and therapeutic polypectomy can potentially reduce colorectal cancer burden by early detection and removal of these polyps, thus decreasing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Most endoscopists are skilled in detecting and removing the vast majority of polyps endoscopically during a routine colonoscopy. Polyps can be considered “complex” based on size, location, morphology, underlying scar tissue, which are not amenable to removal by conventional endoscopic polypectomy techniques. They are technically more challenging to resect and carry an increased risk of complications. Most of these polyps were used to be managed by surgical intervention in the past. Rapid advancement in endoscopic resection techniques has led to a decreasing role of surgery in managing these complex polyps. These endoscopic resection techniques do require an expert in the field and advanced equipment to perform the procedure. In this review, we discuss various advanced endoscopic techniques for the management of complex polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rupinder Mann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Agnes Medical Center, Fresno, CA, United States
- *Correspondence: Rupinder Mann
| | - Mahesh Gajendran
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, United States
| | - Chandraprakash Umapathy
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Abhilash Perisetti
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, United States
- Interventional Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE), Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, IN, United States
| | - Hemant Goyal
- The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| | - Juan Echavarria
- Division of Gastroenterology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Maselli R, Spadaccini M, Belletrutti PJ, Galtieri PA, Attardo S, Carrara S, Anderloni A, Fugazza A, Ferrara EC, Pellegatta G, Iannone A, Hassan C, Repici A. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: outcomes and predictors of recurrence. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E127-E134. [PMID: 35047343 PMCID: PMC8759944 DOI: 10.1055/a-1551-3058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims The role of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for colorectal lesions in Western communities is unclear and its adoption is still limited. The aim of this study is to assess the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients treated with colorectal ESD in a tertiary Western center. Patients and methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients treated by ESD for superficial colorectal lesions between February 2011 and November 2019. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were en-bloc and R0 resection rates, procedural time, adverse events (AEs), and need for surgery. The curative resection rate was assessed for submucosal invasive lesions. Results A total of 327 consecutive patients, median age 69 years (IQR 60-76); 201 men (61.5 %) were included in the analysis. Of the lesions, 90.8 % were resected in an en-bloc fashion. The rate of R0 resection was 83.1 % (217/261) and 44.0 % (29/66) for standard and hybrid ESD techniques, respectively. Submucosal invasion and piecemeal resection independently predicted R1 resections. A total of 18(5.5 %) intra-procedural AEs (perforation:11, bleeding:7) and 12(3.7 %) post-procedural AEs occurred (perforation:2, bleeding: 10). Eighteen adenoma recurrences per 1,000 person-years (15cases, 5.6 %) were detected after a median follow-up time of 36 months. All recurrences were detected within 12 months. No carcinoma recurrences were observed. R1 resection status and intra-procedural AEs independently predicted recurrences with seven vs 150 recurrences per 1,000 person-years in the R0 vs R1 group, respectively. Conclusions Colorectal ESD is a safe and effective option for managing superficial colorectal neoplasia in a Western setting, with short and long-terms outcomes comparable to Eastern studies. En-bloc R0 resection and absence of intra-procedural AEs are associated with reduced risk of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Maselli
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Marco Spadaccini
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Paul J. Belletrutti
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | | | - Simona Attardo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy
| | - Silvia Carrara
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Alessandro Fugazza
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Elisa Chiara Ferrara
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Gaia Pellegatta
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy
| | - Andrea Iannone
- Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Cesare Hassan
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Humanitas University, Department of Biomedical Science, Pieve Emanuele (Milan), Italy,Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Division of Gastroenterology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R McCarty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tomizawa Y, Hwang JH. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the West-Making Progress Toward a Promising Future. Gastroenterology 2021; 161:1101-1103. [PMID: 34280384 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Tomizawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Joo Ha Hwang
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Esaki M, Ihara E, Gotoda T. Endoscopic instruments and techniques in endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 15:1009-1020. [PMID: 33909540 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2021.1924056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a less invasive local treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC).Areas covered: Japanese guidelines have recently expanded the endoscopic treatment indications for EGC. ESD is sometimes performed for lesions with a relative indication that has not previously been considered for ESD. ESD procedures are technically difficult, especially for larger and more invasive lesions. Complete resection and accurate histological assessment of EGC lesions are essential to evaluate endoscopic curability. Various endoscopic instruments, including three types of endoscopic knives and specific hemostatic forceps, have been developed, and endoscopic techniques, including the traction method, have been modified to simplify the procedure.Expert opinion: An insulated-tip knife with large tissue contact allows us to perform faster incisions, while a needle-type knife with minimal tissue contact allows us to perform precise incisions. Furthermore, a scissor-type knife with grasping tissues allows us to perform more secure incision. The traction method enables the operator to proceed with submucosal dissection procedures. In cases with small lesions, snaring can be used, as well as knife dissection. Understanding the features of each endoscopic instrument and technique is essential because appropriate selection and usage contribute to successful and safe ESD procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Esaki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Eikichi Ihara
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takuji Gotoda
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Esaki M, Ihara E, Hashimoto N, Abe S, Aratono C, Shiga N, Sumida Y, Fujii H, Haraguchi K, Takahashi S, Iwasa T, Nakano K, Wada M, Somada S, Nishioka K, Minoda Y, Ogino H, Ogawa Y. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection with SOUTEN in gastric lesions: An ex vivo porcine model basic study. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:563-573. [PMID: 34194614 PMCID: PMC8223703 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i6.563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Revised: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) that comprises mucosal incision and partial submucosal dissection followed by snaring in a planned manner, has been developed for endoscopic resection of gastrointestinal neoplasms to overcome the technical barrier of ESD. Although the superiority of hybrid ESD with SOUTEN, a single multifunctional device, over conventional ESD has been indicated, the actual effect of snaring itself remains unclear since SOUTEN could be applied to hybrid ESD group, but not to the conventional ESD group, due to ethical issue in clinical practice.
AIM To determine whether and how hybrid ESD was superior to conventional ESD in the endoscopic treatment of gastric lesions in an ex vivo porcine model basic study.
METHODS Sixteen endoscopists participated in this basic study in August 2020 at Kyushu University, performing 32 procedures each for hybrid ESD and conventional ESD. Mock lesions (10-15 mm, diameter) were created in the porcine stomach. The primary outcome was total procedure time and secondary outcomes were en bloc or complete resection, perforation, procedure time/speed for both, mucosal incision, and submucosal dissection. Factors associated with difficulty in ESD including longer procedure time, incomplete resection, and perforation, were also investigated. Categorical and continuous data were analyzed using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test, respectively.
RESULTS The median total procedure time of hybrid ESD was significantly shorter than that of conventional ESD (median: 8.3 min vs 16.2 min, P < 0.001). Time, speed, and the amount of hyaluronic acid during submucosal dissection were more favorable in hybrid ESD than conventional ESD (time, 5.2 min vs 10.4 min, P < 0.001; speed, 43.7 mm2/min vs 23.8 mm2/min, P < 0.00; injection volume, 1.5 mL vs 3.0 mL, P < 0.001), although no significant differences in those factors were observed between both groups during mucosal incision. There was also no significant difference between both groups in the en bloc/complete resection rate and perforation rate (complete resection, 93.8% vs 87.5%, P = 0.67; perforation, 0% vs 3.1%, P = 1). Selection of conventional ESD as the treatment method was significantly associated with difficulties during ESD (odds ratio = 10.2; highest among factors).
CONCLUSION Hybrid ESD with SOUTEN improves the treatment outcomes of gastric lesions. It also has the potential to reduce medical costs since SOUTEN is a single multifunctional device that is inexpensive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Esaki
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Eikichi Ihara
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Norikazu Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka 811-1394, Japan
| | - Shuichi Abe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka 812-0033, Japan
| | - Chihoko Aratono
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Fukuokahigashi Medical Center, Koga 811-3195, Japan
| | - Noriko Shiga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuokaken Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, Futsukaichi 811-8516, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yorinobu Sumida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinical Research Institute, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka 810-8564, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Fukuokahigashi Medical Center, Koga 811-3195, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Haraguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Harasanshin Hospital, Fukuoka 812-0033, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka City Hospital, Fukuoka 811-1394, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Iwasa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuokaken Saiseikai Futsukaichi Hospital, Futsukaichi 811-8516, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kayoko Nakano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Fukuoka Central Hospital, Fukuoka 805-0050, Japan
| | - Masafumi Wada
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Shinichi Somada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center, Beppu 874-0011, Japan
| | - Kei Nishioka
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yosuke Minoda
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Haruei Ogino
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ogawa
- Department of Medicine and Bioregulatory Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Visrodia K, Sethi A. A knife plus a snare, but how will it fare? Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:679-681. [PMID: 33583523 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.11.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kavel Visrodia
- Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Disease, Columbia University Medical Center-NYPH, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|