1
|
Georgiou K, Boyanov N, Thanasas D, Sandblom G, Linardoutsos D, Enochsson L. Saliva stress biomarkers in ERCP trainees before and after familiarisation with ERCP on a virtual simulator. Front Surg 2024; 11:1364195. [PMID: 38952438 PMCID: PMC11215138 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1364195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Stress during the early ERCP learning curve may interfere with acquisition of skills during training. The purpose of this study was to compare stress biomarkers in the saliva of trainees before and after familiarisation with ERCP exercises on a virtual simulator. Methods Altogether 26 endoscopists under training, 14 women and 12 men, completed the three phases of this study: Phase 1. Three different ERCP procedures were performed on the simulator. Saliva for α-amylase (sAA), Chromogranin A (sCgA), and Cortisol (sC) were collected before (baseline), halfway through the exercise (ex.), and 10 min after completion of the exercise (comp.); Phase 2. A three-week familiarisation period where at least 30 different cases were performed on the virtual ERCP simulator; and Phase 3. Identical to Phase 1 where saliva samples were once again collected at baseline, during, and after the exercise. Percentage differences in biomarker levels between baseline and exercise (Diffex) and between baseline and completion (Diffcomp) during Phase 1 and Phase 3 were calculated for each stress marker. Results Mean % changes, Diffex and Diffcomp, were significantly positive (p < 0.05) for all markers in both Phase 1 and Phase 3. Diffex in Phase 1 was significantly greater than Diffex in Phase 3 (p < 0.05) for sAA and sCgA. Diffcomp for sAA in Phase 1 was significantly greater than Diffcomp in Phase 3 (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found in sC concentration between Phases 1 and 3. Conclusion This study shows that familiarisation with the ERCP simulator greatly reduced stress as measured by the three saliva stress biomarkers used with sAA being the best. It also suggests that familiarisation with an ERCP simulator might reduce stress in the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Georgiou
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocrateion Athens General Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Nikola Boyanov
- Medical Simulation Training Centre, Research Institute of Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Dimitrios Thanasas
- Medical Physics Laboratory Simulation Centre, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Gabriel Sandblom
- Department of Clinical Science and Education Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Dimitrios Linardoutsos
- 1st Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippocrateion Athens General Hospital, Athens Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Lars Enochsson
- Department of Diagnostics and Intervention, Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Interventions and Technology, Division of Orthopedics and Biotechnology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Voiosu TA, Benguș A, Bronswijk M, Lyutakov I, Klarin I, Voiosu B, Bălănescu P, Diaconu C, Busuioc B, Boskoski I, Voiosu AM, Mateescu RB, Wani S. A simple clinical score to stratify the risk of procedure-related adverse events in ERCP procedures with trainee involvement. Endoscopy 2023; 55:804-811. [PMID: 36828031 DOI: 10.1055/a-2042-6288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND : Optimal training strategies in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) remain controversial despite the shift toward competence-based training models, with limited data available on patient safety during training. We aimed to assess whether pre-procedural clinical predictors could identify patients at low risk of developing procedure-related adverse-events (AEs) in a training environment. METHODS : We performed a prospective, multicenter, cohort study in five training centers. A data collection system documenting indication, clinical data, trainee performance (assessed using a validated competence assessment tool), technical outcomes, and AEs over a 30-day follow-up was utilized. We developed a clinical risk score (Trainee Involvement in ERCP Risk Score [TIERS]) for patients undergoing ERCP and compared the rate of AEs in a training environment between low-risk and high-risk groups. The association between trainee performance and AE rate was also evaluated. RESULTS : 1283 ERCPs (409 [31.9 %, 95 %CI 29.3 %-34.4 %] with trainee involvement) performed by 11 trainers and 10 trainees were analyzed. AEs were more frequent in the high-risk compared with the low-risk group: 26.7 % (95 %CI 20.5 %-34.7 %) vs. 17.1 % (95 %CI 12.8 %-22.2 %). TIERS demonstrated a high negative predictive value for AEs (82.9 %, 95 %CI 79.4 %-85.8 %) and was the only predictor of AEs on multivariable analysis (odds ratio 1.38, 95 %CI 1.09-1.75). Suboptimal trainee performance was associated with an increase in AE rates. CONCLUSION : Simple, clinical-based predictive tools could improve ERCP training by selecting the most appropriate cases for hands-on training, with the aim of increasing patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodor A Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea Benguș
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Michiel Bronswijk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Imelda GI Research Center, Bonheiden, Belgium
| | - Ivan Lyutakov
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital "Tsaritsa Yoanna - ISUL", Sofia, Bulgaria
- Department of Gastroenterology, Medical University Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ivo Klarin
- Department of Health Studies, University of Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
- Gastroenterology Department, General Hospital Zadar, Zadar, Croatia
| | - Bianca Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Cantacuzino Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Paul Bălănescu
- Internal Medicine Department, Carol Davila School of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
- Clinical Immunology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudia Diaconu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan Busuioc
- Gastroenterology Department, Cantacuzino Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ivo Boskoski
- Gastroenterology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Centre for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrei M Voiosu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Radu B Mateescu
- Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
- Department of Internal Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Sachin Wani
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Osagiede O, Lukens FJ, Kumbhari V, Corral JE. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Performed by Trainees Is Not Associated with Increased Immediate Adverse Events or Technical Failure Rates. Dig Dis Sci 2022; 68:1747-1753. [PMID: 36355334 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07753-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Training endoscopists to perform endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is critical to address the increasing patient population with pancreatobiliary diseases. Concerns remain about ERCP safety and success involving trainees. We compared the technical success and immediate adverse events between ERCP with and without trainee involvement. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 28,271 ERCP procedures in a national sample of the United States over 12 years. Demographics, procedure and fluoroscopy time, visualization and cannulation of main structures, adverse events, and technical success rates were compared between ERCP with and without trainees. Categorical variables were compared using Pearson's chi-square test and continuous variables using a standard t-test. Univariate and multivariate regressions were performed adjusting for age, gender, ethnicity, US region, ASA class and clinical setting. RESULTS Approximately 49.5% of ERCPs had a trainee involved. The ampulla was visualized in 97.4% with trainee vs. 97.3% without trainee involvement (P = 0.858). The common bile duct was visualized and cannulated in 90.4% with trainees vs. 91.7% without trainees involved (P < 0.001). The ERCP was incomplete in 5.9% of cases with trainees vs. 6.4% without trainees involved (P = 0.207). Trainee participation added 8.7 min to average procedure time (aOR: 1.02, P < 0.001) and 2.0 min to fluoroscopy time (aOR: 1.00, P = 0.796). Adverse events (aOR: 0.89, P = 0.704) and technical success (aOR: 0.83, P = 0.571) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Trainee involvement leads to increased procedure duration but is not associated with increased immediate adverse events, or technical failure. Our study supports ERCP safety and success with trainee participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Osayande Osagiede
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| | - Frank J Lukens
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Vivek Kumbhari
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA
| | - Juan E Corral
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Presbyterian Healthcare Services, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de-Madaria E, Mira JJ, Carrillo I, Afif W, Ang D, Antelo M, Bollipo S, Castells A, Chahal P, Heinrich H, Law JK, van Leerdam ME, Lens S, Pannala R, Park SH, Rabiee A, Savarino EV, Singh VK, Vargo J, Charabaty A, Drenth JPH. The present and future of gastroenterology and hepatology: an international SWOT analysis (the GASTROSWOT project). Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 7:485-494. [PMID: 35247318 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(21)00442-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
GASTROSWOT is a strategic analysis of the current and projected states of the different subspecialties in gastroenterology that aims to provide guidance for research, clinical, and financial planning in gastroenterology. We executed a consensus-based international strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis. Four general coordinators, six field coordinators, and 12 experts participated in the study. SWOTs were provided for the following fields: neurogastroenterology, functional gastrointestinal disorders, and upper gastrointestinal diseases; inflammatory bowel disease; pancreatology and biliary diseases; endoscopy; gastrointestinal oncology; and hepatology. The GASTROSWOT analysis highlights the following in the current state of the field of gastroenterology: the incidence and complexity of several gastrointestinal diseases, including malignancies, are increasing; the COVID-19 pandemic has affected patient care on several levels; and with the advent of technical innovations in gastroenterology, a well trained workforce and strategic planning are required to optimise health-care utilisation. The analysis calls attention to the following in the future of gastroenterology: artificial intelligence and the use of big data will speed up discovery and smarter health-care provision in the field; the growth and diversification of gastroenterological specialties will improve specialised care for patients, but could promote fragmentation of care and health system inefficiencies; and furthermore, thoughtful planning is needed to reach an effective balance between the need for subspecialists and the value of general gastroenterology services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique de-Madaria
- Gastroenterology Department, Alicante University General Hospital, Alicante Institute for Health and Biomedical Research, Alicante, Spain
| | - José J Mira
- Atenena Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, FISABAO, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain; Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Irene Carrillo
- Atenena Research Group, Foundation for the Promotion of Health and Biomedical Research of Valencia Region, FISABAO, Sant Joan d'Alacant, Spain; Department of Health Psychology, Miguel Hernández University of Elche, Elche, Spain
| | - Waqqas Afif
- Division of Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Daphne Ang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Marina Antelo
- Oncology Section, Dr C Bonorino Udaondo Gastroenterology Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Steven Bollipo
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Antoni Castells
- Gastroenterology Department, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Henriette Heinrich
- Stadtspital Waid und Triemli Abteilung für Gastroenterologie, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Sabela Lens
- Liver Unit, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rahul Pannala
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - San Hyoung Park
- Department of Gastroenterology, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Atoosa Rabiee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Edoardo V Savarino
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Vikesh K Singh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - John Vargo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Digestive Diseases and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Aline Charabaty
- Division of Gastroenterology, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Joost P H Drenth
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Siau K, Keane MG, Steed H, Caddy G, Church N, Martin H, McCrudden R, Neville P, Oppong K, Paranandi B, Rasheed A, Sturgess R, Hawkes ND, Webster G, Johnson G. UK Joint Advisory Group consensus statements for training and certification in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E37-E49. [PMID: 35047333 PMCID: PMC8759929 DOI: 10.1055/a-1629-7540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Despite the high-risk nature of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), a robust and standardized credentialing process to ensure competency before independent practice is lacking worldwide. On behalf of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), we aimed to develop evidence-based recommendations to form the framework of ERCP training and certification in the UK. Methods Under the oversight of the JAG, a modified Delphi process was conducted with stakeholder representation from the British Society of Gastroenterology, Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons, trainees and trainers. Recommendations on ERCP training and certification were formulated after formal literature review and appraised using the GRADE tool. These were subjected to electronic voting to achieve consensus. Accepted statements were peer-reviewed by JAG and relevant Specialist Advisory Committees before incorporation into the ERCP certification pathway. Results In total, 27 recommendation statements were generated for the following domains: definition of competence (9 statements), acquisition of competence (8 statements), assessment of competence (6 statements) and post-certification support (4 statements). The consensus process led to the following criteria for ERCP certification: 1) performing ≥ 300 hands-on procedures; 2) attending a JAG-accredited ERCP skills course; 3) in modified Schutz 1-2 procedures: achieving native papilla cannulation rate ≥80%, complete bile duct clearance ≥ 70 %, successful stenting of distal biliary strictures ≥ 75 %, physically unassisted in ≥ 80 % of cases; 4) 30-day post-ERCP pancreatitis rates ≤5 %; and 5) satisfactory performance in formative and summative direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessments. Conclusions JAG certification in ERCP has been developed following evidence-based consensus to quality assure training and to ultimately improve future standards of ERCP practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Siau
- Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, UK
- Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Margaret G Keane
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Helen Steed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Grant Caddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, South Eastern Health and Social Care Trust, Northern Ireland, UK
| | - Nick Church
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Scotland
| | - Harry Martin
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Raymond McCrudden
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Bournemouth, UK
| | - Peter Neville
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board, Merthyr Tydfil, UK
| | - Kofi Oppong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, UK
| | - Bharat Paranandi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Ashraf Rasheed
- Department of Surgery, Aneurin Bevan University Health Board, Newport, UK
| | - Richard Sturgess
- Department of Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | - Neil D Hawkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Cwm Taf Morgannwg Health Board, Merthyr Tydfil, UK
| | - George Webster
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Gavin Johnson
- Department of Gastroenterology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|