Die Stimulation des Nervus hypoglossus in der Behandlung der obstruktiven Schlafapnoe – Aktualisiertes Positionspapier der Arbeitsgemeinschaft Schlafmedizin der DGHNO-KHC

Real-world data on polysomnography- and patient-reported outcomes in hypoglossal nerve stimulation and auto-titrating positive airway pressure therapy for obstructive sleep apnea

BACKGROUND

Few data are available comparing first-line positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), especially auto-adjusting PAP (aPAP), with second-line hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) therapy. The aim of this study was to directly compare these therapeutic options by standard polysomnography (PSG)-related parameters and patient-reported outcomes in comparable groups.

METHODS

20 patients (aged 57.30 ± 8.56 years; 6 female) were included in the HGNS and 35 patients (aged 56.83 ± 9.20 years; 9 female) were included in the aPAP group. In both groups participants had to fit the current guideline criteria for HGNS treatment. Groups were compared by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) using inverse propensity score weighting.

RESULTS

Propensity scores did not differ between groups. Pre-therapeutic AHI (HGNS: 40.22 ± 12.78/h; aPAP: 39.23 ± 12.33/h) and ODI (HGNS: 37.9 ± 14.7/h, aPAP: 34.58 ± 14.74/h) were comparable between the groups. After 413.6 ± 116.66 days (HGNS) and 162.09 ± 140.58 days (aPAP) of treatment AHI (HGNS: 30.22 ± 17.65/h, aPAP group: 4.71 ± 3.42/h; p < 0.001) was significantly higher in the HGNS group compared to the aPAP group. However, epworth sleepiness scale (ESS) was post-interventionally significantly lower in the HGNS group compared to the aPAP group (pretherapeutic: HGNS: 13.32 ± 5.81 points, aPAP: 9.09 ± 4.71 points; posttherapeutic: HGNS: 7.17 ± 5.06 points; aPAP: 8.38 ± 5.41 points; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

These are novel real-world data. More research on the key parameters regarding titration of the HGNS neurostimulation parameter tuning and on the impact of factors influencing HGNS adherence is needed.

[Ten years of hypoglossal nerve stimulation in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic literature review]

OBJECTIVE

To show the importance of hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) as a treatment method for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in the German healthcare context and to better assess the way patients who do not receive adequate care could benefit from HGNS.

METHODS

A systematic literature review in the Medline and Cochrane Library literature database was conducted, including publications using different stimulation technologies for HGNS. The efficacy of HGNS was assessed based on patient-relevant outcomes (daytime sleepiness, quality of life), treatment adherence and the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI). The safety of the treatment method was assessed based on adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

Inclusion and analysis of 33 publications: 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, level Ib), 1 level IIb trial (n = 1) and 30 level IV trials with a study duration of up to 60 months. The RCTs showed better values for daytime sleepiness and quality of life when using HGNS than in the control group. AHI and ODI showed a deterioration under placebo stimulation or therapy withdrawal in the RCTs. Consistently high adherence was also reported in the long-term course. Severe AEs under HGNS were rare and could usually be resolved by repositioning electrodes or replacing device components. Other AEs were mostly transient or could be resolved by non-invasive measures. All investigated parameters showed similar results in the evaluated studies. The results of different stimulation systems are comparable in type and extent.

CONCLUSION

The comprehensive review of the literature shows consistent data that highlight the importance of HGNS as an effective and safe treatment for OSA after unsuccessful CPAP treatment. The evaluation also shows that the different stimulation systems make it possible to better tailor the therapy to the patient's individual requirements. A future systematic evaluation of real-world data on the use of HGNS would help gain additional insights into the relevance of the method in routine clinical practice.

Difficulty Falling Asleep is Associated with Poorer Therapeutic Outcomes in Unilateral Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation

Purpose

The coexistence of insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is very prevalent. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an established second-line therapy for patients suffering OSA. Studies investigating the effect of the different aspects of insomnia on the therapeutic outcome are largely missing. Therefore, this study aimed to understand the impact of the different aspects of insomnia on the therapeutic outcome under HGNS therapy in clinical routine.

Patients and Methods

This is a retrospective study including 30 consecutive patients aged 55.40 ± 8.83 years (8 female; 22 male) undergoing an HGNS implantation in our tertiary medical center between 2020 and 2023. All patients underwent preoperative polysomnography (PSG) according to AASM. First follow-up PSG was performed 95.40 ± 39.44 days after activation (30 patients) and second follow-up PSG was performed 409.89 ± 122.52 days after activation (18 patients). Among others, the following PSG-related parameters were evaluated: apnea-hypopnea index (n/h) (AHI) and oxygen desaturation index (n/h) (ODI). Insomnia was assessed by the insomnia severity index (ISI) questionnaire. Preoperatively, all patients included filled out each ISI item. Spearman's-rho correlation coefficient was calculated for correlations.

Results

Preoperative score of ISI item 1 (difficulty falling asleep) was 1.93 ± 1.34 and preoperative cumulative ISI score (item1-7) was 18.67 ± 5.32. Preoperative AHI was 40.61 ± 12.02 (n/h) and preoperative ODI was 38.72 ± 14.28 (n/h). In the second follow-up, the mean difference in AHI was ∆ 10.47 ± 15.38 (n/h) and the mean difference in ODI was ∆ 8.17 ± 15.67 (n/h). Strong significant correlations were observed between ISI item 1 (difficulty falling asleep) and both ∆ AHI (r: -0.65, p=0.004) and ∆ ODI (r: -0.7; p=0.001) in the second follow-up.

Conclusion

Difficulty falling asleep may hence negatively influence HGNS therapeutic outcome. Insomnia-related symptoms should be considered in the preoperative patient evaluation for HGNS.

Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy Findings and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy Outcomes

Hypoglossal-nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an established second-line therapy for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Existing studies investigating the effect of preoperative drug-induced sleep endoscopic (DISE) findings on HGNS outcomes have mainly focused on the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) among polysomnography (PSG) parameters, and have less frequently tested other PSG parameters such as the apnea index (AI), hypopnea index (HI), oxygen desaturation index (ODI), snoring index, and arousal index, or patient-reported excessive daytime sleepiness. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between DISE findings and the above-mentioned metrics after HGNS therapy. We only included patients with DISE findings providing detailed information about the degree of the anteroposterior velar (APV), oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW), or tongue-base (BT) obstruction based on the velum, oropharynx, base of tongue, and epiglottis (VOTE) classification. The data of 25 patients (9 female (36%)) were retrospectively evaluated. The mean age at the date of implantation was 54.52 ± 9.61 years, and the mean BMI was 29.99 ± 3.97 kg/m2. Spearman’s rho correlation coefficients were calculated. Significant correlations were found between the degree of APV obstruction and postoperative HI (r = −0.5, p < 0.05), and between the degree of OPLW obstruction and postoperative snoring index (r = 0.42, p < 0.05). BT obstruction was strongly correlated with postoperative metrics such as AHI (r = −0.57, p < 0.01), AI (r = −0.5, p < 0.05), ODI (r = −0.57, p < 0.01), ∆ AHI (r = 0.58, p < 0.01), ∆ AI (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and ∆ ODI (r = 0.54, p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between DISE findings and postoperative Epworth Sleepiness Scale values. These findings suggest that preoperative DISE findings, especially the degree of BT obstruction, are important for predicting an HGNS therapy outcome.

Insomnia in Patients Undergoing Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a treatment for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients with intolerance of positive airway pressure therapy. Comorbid insomnia is quite prevalent in OSA patients. We investigated the impact of insomnia and excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) on polysomnography metrics after HGNS treatment. Data of 27 consecutive patients (9 female; mean age 55.52 ± 8.6 years) were retrospectively evaluated. Insomnia was assessed using the ISI (insomnia severity index) and EDS using the Epworth sleepiness scale (ESS). The median ISI was reduced significantly 3 months after HGNS activation (preoperative: 19; postoperative: 14; p < 0.01). Significant correlations emerged between preoperative ISI and postoperative AHI (apnea/hypopnea index; Spearman’s rho = 0.4, p < 0.05), ∆ AHI (r = −0.51, p < 0.01) and ∆ ODI (oxygen desaturation index; r = −0.48, p < 0.05). ISI correlated strongly with EES both preoperatively (r = 0.46; p < 0.02) and postoperatively (r = 0.79; p < 0.001). Therefore, HGNS therapy is associated with a significant reduction of insomnia-related symptoms, in addition to the improvement in respiratory metrics in OSA. Nonetheless, the preoperative severity of patient-reported insomnia symptoms was inversely correlated with the respiratory PSG-outcomes after HGNS. Insomnia should be considered in studies of EDS in OSA patients, especially those treated with HGNS.

Short-Term Outcome of Unilateral Inspiration-Coupled Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is a therapeutic option for patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and intolerance of positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy. Most reported data are based on multicentre pivotal trials with selected baseline core clinical features. Our aim was to investigate polysomnography (PSG)-based outcomes of HGNS-therapy in a patient cohort with higher average AHI and BMI than previously reported. Data of 29 consecutive patients (nine female; mean age: 55.52 ± 8.6 years, mean BMI 30.13 ± 3.93 kg/m²) were retrospectively evaluated. Numerical values of PSG- based metrics were compared before and after intervention using Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. AHI (38.57/h ± 12.71, 24.43/h ± 13.3, p < 0.001), hypopnea index (24.05/h ± 9.4, 15.27/h ± 8.23, p < 0.001), apnea index (14.5/h ± 12.05, 9.17/h ± 10.86, p < 0.01), snoring index (262.68/h ± 170.35, 143.48/h ± 162.79, p < 0.001), cortical arousal index (20.8/h ± 10.34 vs. 14.9/h ± 8.36, p < 0.01) and cumulative duration of apnea and hypopnea during sleep (79.79 min ± 40.32 vs. 48.62 min ± 30.56, p < 0.001) were significantly lower after HGNS. HGNS provides an effective therapy option for selected patients not tolerating PAP-therapy with higher average AHI and BMI than usually reported. HGNS-therapy appears to suppress central nervous system arousal circuits while not eliciting peripheral autonomous sympathetic activation. Such metrics as the snoring index and the cumulative duration of respiratory events during sleep may be considered in future HGNS studies.

Patient Related Outcome and Therapy Effects in Stimulation Treatment of Sleep-Related Breathing Disorders

Several neurostimulation devices exist for the treatment of various sleep-related breathing diseases. The most data for hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) in the therapy of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) derive the HNS with respiratory sensing. Herewith, daytime sleepiness measured with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) was improved in several publications by 5 points with a stability shown for up to several years. Sleep related quality of life, documented with the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, increased by 2 points. In many cohorts showed a mean usage of 5 to 6 hours per night. Under the consideration of shorter follow-ups and smaller group sizes, the ESS improved by 4 under unilateral continuous HNS and by 3 under bilateral HNS. Transvenous stimulation of the phrenic nerve is approved for the treatment in central sleep apnea. In a pivotal trial with 5 year follow-up data, an ESS reduction is documented by 3 points. There is one publication describing a usage of more than 5 hours. The daytime enoral neuromuscular electrical therapy improved ESS (2 points) and sleep-related quality of life of the snoring patients and the bed partner. The daytime training for the effects during the night adherence is given with 83%. For all described devices, there are running or announced studies and/or registry trials that consider patient related outcome.

Hypoglossal nerve stimulation for obstructive sleep apnea: updated position paper of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

Since the first statement of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) is meanwhile an established treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). There are three HNS systems available in Germany which differ in their technical details of the underlying comparable basic principle. For the unilateral HNS with respiratory sensing, several comparative studies, high-volume register analysis and long-term reports exist. The continuous HNS without respiratory sensing does not require a sleep endoscopy for indication. For the bilateral continuous HNS as the single partially implantable device, a feasibility study exists. For indication, the assessment of positive airway pressure failure by sleep medicine is crucial, and the decision for HNS should be made in discussion of other treatment options for at least moderate OSA. The implantation center holds primarily responsibility among the interdisciplinary sleep team and is primary contact for the patient in problems. This depicts why structural processes are required to secure outcome quality and minimize the complications. The aftercare of HNS patients can be provided interdisciplinary and by different medical institutions, whereat, minimal reporting standards to document outcome and usage are recommended.

[Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea]

Reduced genioglossus muscle tone is considered one of the major causes for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HNS) keeps the upper airway patent by increasing the muscle tone of the genioglossus muscle being the major airway opener. According to the German S3-Guideline on Sleep Disordered Breathing this treatment is indicated in patients with OSA failing or rejecting positive airway pressure, showing an AHI between 15 and 65, in particular when anatomy is normal and the BMI below 35. In 2021 it has been made available for regular patient care in Germany. However, breathing synchronized, continuous, and bilateral HNS differ in parts relevantly regarding their patient selection criteria, technical features, surgical technique, therapy setting and programming, and daily use for the patient. There are many publications showing the safety, efficacy, and patient satisfaction of breathing synchronized HNS. Less but promising data are available for continuous and the most recent bilateral HNS.