1
|
Mokhtari L, Hosseinzadeh F, Nourazarian A. Biochemical implications of robotic surgery: a new frontier in the operating room. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:91. [PMID: 38401027 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01861-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 02/26/2024]
Abstract
Robotic surgery represents a milestone in surgical procedures, offering advantages such as less invasive methods, elimination of tremors, scaled motion, and 3D visualization. This in-depth analysis explores the complex biochemical effects of robotic methods. The use of pneumoperitoneum and steep Trendelenburg positioning can decrease pulmonary compliance and splanchnic perfusion while increasing hypercarbia. However, robotic surgery reduces surgical stress and inflammation by minimizing tissue trauma. This contributes to faster recovery but may limit immune function. Robotic procedures also limit ischemia-reperfusion injury and oxidative damage compared to open surgery. They also help preserve native antioxidant defenses and coagulation. In a clinical setting, robotic procedures reduce blood loss, pain, complications, and length of stay compared to traditional procedures. However, risks remain, including device failure, the need for conversion to open surgery and increased costs. On the oncology side, there is still debate about margins, recurrence, and long-term survival. The advent of advanced technologies, such as intraoperative biosensors, localized drug delivery systems, and the incorporation of artificial intelligence, may further improve the efficiency of robotic surgery. However, ethical dilemmas regarding patient consent, privacy, access, and regulation of this disruptive innovation need to be addressed. Overall, this review sheds light on the complex biochemical implications of robotic surgery and highlights areas that require additional mechanistic investigation. It presents a comprehensive approach to responsibly maximize the potential of robotic surgery to improve patient outcomes, integrating technical skill with careful consideration of physiological and ethical issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Mokhtari
- Department of Nursing, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran
| | | | - Alireza Nourazarian
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Khoy University of Medical Sciences, Khoy, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elshaer M, Askari A, Pathanki A, Rajani J, Ahmad J. Comparative study of operative expenses: robotic vs. laparoscopic vs. open liver resections at a university hospital in the UK. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:12. [PMID: 38214790 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01778-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
Robotic liver resections (RLR) are increasingly being performed and has previously been considered more costly. The aim is to explore the cost of RLR compared with laparoscopic and open liver resection in a single National Health Service (NHS) hospital. A retrospective review of patients who underwent RLR, LLR, and OLR from April 2014 to December 2022 was conducted. The primary outcomes were the cost of consumables and median income, and the secondary outcomes were the overall length of stay and mortality at 90 days. Overall, 332 patients underwent liver resections. There were 204 males (61.4%) and 128 females (38.6%), with a median age of 62 years (IQR: 51-77 years). Of these, 60 patients (18.1%) underwent RLR, 21 patients (6.3%) underwent LLR, and 251 patients (75.6%) underwent OLR. Median consumables cost per case was £3863 (IQR: £3458-£5061) for RLR, £4326 (IQR: £4273-£4473) for LLR, and £4,084 (IQR: £3799-£5549) for the OLR cohort (p = 0.140). Median income per case was £7999 (IQR: £4509-£10,777) for RLR, £7497 (IQR: £2407-£14,576) for LLR, and £7493 (IQR: £2542-£14,121) for OLR. The median length of stay (LOS) for RLR was 3 days (IQR: 2-4.7 days) compared to 5 days for LLR (IQR: 4.5-7 days) and 6 days for OLR (IQR: 5-8 days, p < 0.001). Within the NHS, RLR has consumable costs comparable to OLR and LLR. It is also linked with a shorter LOS and generates similar income for patients undergoing OLR and LLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Elshaer
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry, and Warwickshire (UHCW), Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK.
| | - Alan Askari
- Department of Upper GI Surgery, Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Luton, UK
| | - Adithya Pathanki
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry, and Warwickshire (UHCW), Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| | - Jaimini Rajani
- University Hospitals Coventry, and Warwickshire (UHCW), Coventry, UK
| | - Jawad Ahmad
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University Hospitals Coventry, and Warwickshire (UHCW), Clifford Bridge Road, Coventry, CV2 2DX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Libia A, Podda M, Di Martino M, Pata F, Pellino G, Di Saverio S, Anselmo A, Muttillo EM, De Pastena M, Campanile FC, Ielpo B, Spampinato MG. Current status of liver surgery for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases: the NON.LI.MET. Italian Society for Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE) and Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE) collaborative international survey. Updates Surg 2024; 76:43-55. [PMID: 37875725 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01649-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023]
Abstract
Despite the increasing trend in liver resections for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM), the role of surgery for these liver malignancies is still debated. Registries are an essential, reliable tool for assessing epidemiology, diagnosis, and therapeutic approach in a single hub, especially when data are dispersive and inconclusive, as in our case. The dissemination of this preliminary survey would allow us to understand if the creation of an International Registry is a viable option, while still offering a snapshot on this issue, investigating clinical practices worldwide. The steering committee designed an online questionnaire with Google Forms, which consisted of 37 questions, and was open from October 5th, 2022, to November 30th, 2022. It was disseminated using social media and mailing lists of the Italian Society of Endoscopic Surgery and New Technologies (SICE), the Association of Italian Surgeons in Europe (ACIE), and the Spanish Chapter of the American College of Surgeons (ACS). Overall, 141 surgeons (approximately 18% of the total invitations sent) from 27 countries on four continents participated in the survey. Most respondents worked in general surgery units (62%), performing less than 50 liver resections/year (57%). A multidisciplinary discussion was currently performed to validate surgical indications for NCNNLM in 96% of respondents. The most commonly adopted selection criteria were liver resectability, RECIST criteria, and absence of extrahepatic disease. Primary tumors were generally of gastrointestinal (42%), breast (31%), and pancreaticobiliary origin (13%). The most common interventions were parenchymal-sparing resections (51% of respondents) of metachronous metastases with an open approach. Major post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo > 2) occurred in up to 20% of the procedures, according to 44% of respondents. A subset analysis of data from high-volume centers (> 100 cases/year) showed lower post-operative complications and better survival. The present survey shows that NCNNLM patients are frequently treated by surgeons in low-volume hospitals for liver surgery. Selection criteria are usually based on common sense. Liver resections are performed mainly with an open approach, possibly carrying a high burden of major post-operative complications. International guidelines and a specific consensus on this field are desirable, as well as strategies for collaboration between high-volume and low-volume centers. The present study can guide the elaboration of a multi-institutional document on the optimal pathway in the management of patients with NCNNLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annarita Libia
- General Surgery Unit, Hospital Vito Fazzi, Lecce, Italy.
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Cagliari State University, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marcello Di Martino
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery, A.O.R.N. Cardarelli, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Pata
- Department of Surgery, Nicola Giannettasio Hospital, Corigliano-Rossano, Italy
| | - Gianluca Pellino
- Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- Unit of General Surgery, San Benedetto del Tronto Hospital, av5 Asur Marche, San Benedetto del Tronto, Italy
| | - Alessandro Anselmo
- Department of Surgical Science, University of Rome "Tor Vergata", 00133, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Matteo De Pastena
- General and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Institute, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabio Cesare Campanile
- Division of General Surgery, ASL Viterbo, San Giovanni Decollato-Andosilla Hospital, 01033, Civita Castellana, Italy
| | - Benedetto Ielpo
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mao B, Zhu S, Li D, Xiao J, Wang B, Yan Y. Comparison of safety and effectiveness between robotic and laparoscopic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:4333-4346. [PMID: 37720925 PMCID: PMC10720848 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic platform has been increasingly applied in major hepatectomy. However, the role or advantage of robotic approach comparing with laparoscopic approach in major hepatectomy remains controversial. This meta-analysis compares perioperative outcomes of robotic major hepatectomy (RMH) to laparoscopic major hepatectomy (LMH) for hepatic neoplasms. METHODS PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify comparative studies compared RMH versus LMH for hepatic neoplasms. The search timeframe was set before May 2023. Main outcomes were mortality, overall morbidities, serious complications, and conversion to open surgery. Secondary outcomes were operative time, intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative length of hospital stay, R0 resection, reoperation, and readmission. Studies were evaluated for quality by Cochrane risk of bias tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data were pooled as odds ratio (OR) or mean difference (MD). This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42023410951). RESULTS Twelve retrospective cohort studies concerning total 1657 patients (796 RMH, 861 LMH) were included. Meta-analyses showed no significant differences in mortality (OR=1.23, 95% CI=0.50-2.98, P =0.65), overall postoperative complications (OR=0.83, 95% CI=0.65-1.06, P =0.14), operative time (MD=6.47, 95% CI=-14.72 to 27.65, P =0.55), blood transfusion (OR=0.77, 95% CI=0.55-1.08, P =0.13), R0 resection (OR=1.45, 95% CI=0.91-2.31, P =0.12), reoperation (OR=0.76, 95% CI=0.31-1.88, P =0.56), and readmission (OR=0.63, 95% CI=0.28-1.44, P =0.27) between RMH and LMH. Incidence of serious complications (OR=0.60, 95% CI=0.40-0.90, P =0.01), conversion to open surgery (OR=0.41, 95% CI=0.27-0.63, P <0.0001), blood loss (MD=-91.42, 95% CI=-142.18 to -40.66, P =0.0004), and postoperative hospital stay (MD=-0.64, 95% CI=-0.78 to -0.49, P <0.00001) were reduced for RMH versus LMH. CONCLUSIONS RMH is associated with comparable short-term surgical outcomes and oncologic adequacy compared to LMH when performed by experienced surgeons at large centres. RMH may result in reduced major morbidities, conversion rate, blood loss, and hospital stay, but these results were volatile. Further randomized studies should address the potential advantages of RMH over LMH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benliang Mao
- Departments of General Surgery
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | | | - Dan Li
- Thoracic Surgery, Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou
| | - Junhao Xiao
- Departments of General Surgery
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | - Bailin Wang
- Departments of General Surgery
- College of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Huang J, Wu M, Xu D. Global trends in robotic liver surgery: From bibliometrics and visualization research. Asian J Surg 2023; 46:5186-5187. [PMID: 37479659 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/23/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Huang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650102, Yunnan, China.
| | - Min Wu
- Department of Hepatological Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian Province, China
| | - Dingwei Xu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, 650102, Yunnan, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sucandy I, Kang RD, Adorno J, Goodwin S, Crespo K, Syblis C, Ross S, Rosemurgy A. Analysis of Clinical Outcomes After Robotic Hepatectomy Applying the Western-Model Southampton Laparoscopic Difficulty Scoring System. An Experience From a Tertiary US Hepatobiliary Center. Am Surg 2023; 89:3788-3793. [PMID: 37265440 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231173948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of resections with high risk of intraoperative complications is critical in guiding case selection for minimally invasive liver surgery. Several Japanese and European difficulty scoring systems have been proposed for laparoscopic liver surgery. However, the applicability of these systems for robotic liver resections has not been fully investigated. This study considers the Southampton system and examines its validity when applied to robotic hepatectomies. METHODS We undertook a retrospective review of 372 patients who underwent robotic hepatectomies for various indications between 2013 and 2022. Of these patients, 63 operations were classified as low risk, 91 as moderate risk, 198 as high risk and 20 as extremely high risk based on Southampton criteria. Patient outcomes were compared by utilizing an ANOVA of repeated measures. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). RESULTS The Southampton difficulty scoring system was a strong predictor of intraoperative variables including tumor size, operative duration, estimated blood loss (EBL), and incidence of major vs minor resection (all P < .0001). In contrast, the Southampton system was a weaker predictor of postoperative outcomes including 30-day mortality (P = .15), length of stay (P = .13), and readmissions within 30 days (P = .38). CONCLUSION The Southampton difficulty scoring system is a valid system for classifying robotic liver resections and is a strong predictor of intraoperative outcomes. However, the system was found to be a weaker predictor of postoperative outcomes. This finding may suggest the need for proposal of a new difficulty scoring system for robotic hepatectomies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Richard D Kang
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jeilianis Adorno
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
- University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sarah Goodwin
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Crespo
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Cameron Syblis
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Sharona Ross
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pollmann L, Juratli M, Roushansarai N, Pascher A, Hölzen JP. Quantification of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging in General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12103550. [PMID: 37240657 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12103550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Near-infrared (NIR) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG) has proven to be useful in general, visceral, and transplant surgery. However, most studies have performed only qualitative assessments. Therefore, a systematic overview of all studies performing quantitative indocyanine green evaluation in general, visceral, and transplant surgeries should be conducted. Free term and medical subject heading (MeSH) term searches were performed in the Medline and Cochrane databases until October 2022. The main categories of ICG quantification were esophageal surgery (24.6%), reconstructive surgery (24.6%), and colorectal surgery (21.3%). Concordantly, anastomotic leak (41%) was the main endpoint, followed by the assessment of flap perfusion (23%) and the identification of structures and organs (14.8%). Most studies examined open surgery (67.6%) or laparoscopic surgery (23.1%). The analysis was mainly carried out using manufacturer software (44.3%) and open-source software (15.6%). The most frequently analyzed parameter was intensity over time for blood flow assessment, followed by intensity alone or intensity-to-background ratios for structure and organ identification. Intraoperative ICG quantification could become more important with the increasing impact of robotic surgery and machine learning algorithms for image and video analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Pollmann
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Munster, Germany
| | - Mazen Juratli
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Munster, Germany
| | - Nicola Roushansarai
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Munster, Germany
| | - Andreas Pascher
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Munster, Germany
| | - Jens Peter Hölzen
- Department for General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Münster, 48149 Munster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Liu L, Wang Y, Wu T, Lin J, Deng L, Jiang J, An T. Robotic versus laparoscopic major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term outcomes from a single institution. BMC Surg 2022; 22:432. [PMID: 36528768 PMCID: PMC9759871 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01882-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, an increasing number of robotic major hepatectomies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are being performed. Despite the advantages of robotic surgery over laparoscopic procedures, studies comparing robotic with laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of short-term results remain scarce. This study was performed to compare robotic major hepatectomy and laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of their intraoperative and postoperative results. METHODS Data regarding demographics and intraoperative and postoperative results of 131 patients undergoing robotic or laparoscopic major hepatectomy between January 2017 and March 2022 were retrieved from their medical records and compared between the two types of surgery. RESULTS Between January 2017 and March 2022, 44 robotic major hepatectomies and 87 laparoscopic major hepatectomies were performed at the Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People's Hospital. Patients undergoing robotic major hepatectomy were not significantly different from those undergoing laparoscopic major hepatectomy in terms of age (P = 0.397), sex (P = 0.624), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.118), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) (P = 0.09), tumor size (P = 0.176), cirrhosis (P = 0.384), fatty liver (P = 0.162), preoperative antiviral treatment (P = 0.934), hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA (P = 0.646) and operation type (P = 0.054). Robotic major hepatectomy was associated with a longer operation time (median: 255.5 versus 206.8 min; P < 0.001) and less estimated blood loss (median: 118.9 versus 197.0 ml; P = 0.002) than laparoscopic major hepatectomy. However, robotic major hepatectomy was not significantly different from laparoscopic major hepatectomy regarding length of postoperative hospital stay (P = 0.849), open conversion (P = 0.077), ICU stay (P = 0.866), postoperative massive abdominal bleeding (P = 1.00), portal vein thrombosis (P = 1.00), abdominal infection (P = 1.00), pulmonary infection (P = 1.00), pulmonary embolism (P = 1.00), cardiac complications (P = 1.00), liver failure (P = 1.00), kidney failure (P = 1.00), biliary leak (P = 1.00), positive resection margin (P = 1.00), 30-day mortality (P = 1.00) and 90-day mortality (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS Robotic major hepatectomy was as effective as laparoscopic surgery in terms of intraoperative and postoperative results but took longer and could more efficiently control intraoperative blood loss.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linsen Liu
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yan Wang
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Tianchong Wu
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Radiology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianwei Lin
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Lingna Deng
- Department of Pathology, Qing Yuan People’s Hospital, Yinquan Road B24, Qingcheng District, Qingyuan, 511518 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiling Jiang
- The First Department of Surgery, Shenzhen Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Fuhua Road 1, Futian District, Shenzhen, 518033 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| | - Tailai An
- grid.440218.b0000 0004 1759 7210Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Shenzhen People’s Hospital, Dongmen North Road 1017, Luohu District, Shenzhen, 518020 Guangdong People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mehdorn AS, Richter F, Hess K, Beckmann JH, Egberts JH, Linecker M, Becker T, Braun F. The Role of ICG in Robot-Assisted Liver Resections. J Clin Med 2022; 11:3527. [PMID: 35743595 PMCID: PMC9225074 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11123527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Robotic-assisted liver surgery (RALS) with its known limitations is gaining more importance. The fluorescent dye, indocyanine green (ICG), is a way to overcome some of these limitations. It accumulates in or around hepatic masses. The integrated near-infrared cameras help to visualize this accumulation. We aimed to compare the influence of ICG staining on the surgical and oncological outcomes in patients undergoing RALS. Material and Methods: Patients who underwent RALS between 2014 and 2021 at the Department of General Surgery at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, were included. In 2019, ICG-supported RALS was introduced. Results: Fifty-four patients were included, with twenty-eight patients (50.9%) receiving preoperative ICG. Hepatocellular carcinoma (32.1%) was the main entity resected, followed by the metastasis of colorectal cancers (17%) and focal nodular hyperplasia (15.1%). ICG staining worked for different tumor entities, but diffuse staining was noted in patients with liver cirrhosis. However, ICG-supported RALS lasted shorter (142.7 ± 61.8 min vs. 246.4 ± 98.6 min, p < 0.001), tumors resected in the ICG cohort were significantly smaller (27.1 ± 25.0 mm vs. 47.6 ± 35.2 mm, p = 0.021) and more R0 resections were achieved by ICG-supported RALS (96.3% vs. 80.8%, p = 0.075). Conclusions: ICG-supported RALS achieve surgically and oncologically safe results, while overcoming the limitations of RALS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Sophie Mehdorn
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Florian Richter
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Katharina Hess
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany;
| | - Jan Henrik Beckmann
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Jan-Hendrik Egberts
- Department of Surgery, Israelit Hospital, Orchideenstieg 14, 22297 Hamburg, Germany;
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Thomas Becker
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| | - Felix Braun
- Department of General, Abdominal, Thoracic, Transplantation and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105 Kiel, Germany; (A.-S.M.); (F.R.); (J.H.B.); (M.L.); (T.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Delvecchio A, Inchingolo R, Laforgia R, Ratti F, Gelli M, Anelli MF, Laurent A, Vitali G, Magistri P, Assirati G, Felli E, Wakabayashi T, Pessaux P, Piardi T, di Benedetto F, de'Angelis N, Briceño J, Rampoldi A, Adam R, Cherqui D, Aldrighetti LA, Memeo R. Liver resection vs radiofrequency ablation in single hepatocellular carcinoma of posterosuperior segments in elderly patients. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:1696-1707. [PMID: 35070074 PMCID: PMC8727180 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i12.1696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver resection and radiofrequency ablation are considered curative options for hepatocellular carcinoma. The choice between these techniques is still controversial especially in cases of hepatocellular carcinoma affecting posterosuperior segments in elderly patients.
AIM To compare post-operative outcomes between liver resection and radiofrequency ablation in elderly with single hepatocellular carcinoma located in posterosuperior segments.
METHODS A retrospective multicentric study was performed enrolling 77 patients age ≥ 70-years-old with single hepatocellular carcinoma (≤ 30 mm), located in posterosuperior segments (4a, 7, 8). Patients were divided into liver resection and radiofrequency ablation groups and preoperative, peri-operative and long-term outcomes were retrospectively analyzed and compared using a 1:1 propensity score matching.
RESULTS After propensity score matching, twenty-six patients were included in each group. Operative time and overall postoperative complications were higher in the resection group compared to the ablation group (165 min vs 20 min, P < 0.01; 54% vs 19% P = 0.02 respectively). A median hospital stay was significantly longer in the resection group than in the ablation group (7.5 d vs 3 d, P < 0.01). Ninety-day mortality was comparable between the two groups. There were no significant differences between resection and ablation group in terms of overall survival and disease free survival at 1, 3, and 5 years.
CONCLUSION Radiofrequency ablation in posterosuperior segments in elderly is safe and feasible and ensures a short hospital stay, better quality of life and does not modify the overall and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Delvecchio
- Unit of General Surgery, "A. Perrino" Hospital, Ceglie Messapica 70124, Bari, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Interventional Radiology Unit, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 75100, Italy
| | - Rita Laforgia
- Unit of Laparoscopic Surgery, University of Bari, Bary 70124, Italy
| | - Francesca Ratti
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, University Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Maximiliano Gelli
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus Grand Paris, Villejuif 94800, France
| | | | - Alexis Laurent
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Mondor University Hospital, Creteil 94000, France
| | - Giulio Vitali
- Division of Transplantation, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva 44041, Switzerland
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 42121, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 42121, Italy
| | - Emanuele Felli
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg 67000, France
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg 67000, France
| | - Patrick Pessaux
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg 67000, France
| | - Tullio Piardi
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Robert Debrè University Hospital, Reims 51100, France
| | - Fabrizio di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena 42121, Italy
| | - Nicola de'Angelis
- Unit of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Digestive Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| | - Javier Briceño
- Department of General Surgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Antonio Rampoldi
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan 20162, Italy
| | - Renè Adam
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif 94800, France
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Paul Brousse University Hospital, Villejuif 94800, France
| | | | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti 70124, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang Y, Cao D, Chen SL, Li YM, Zheng YW, Ohkohchi N. Current trends in three-dimensional visualization and real-time navigation as well as robot-assisted technologies in hepatobiliary surgery. World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:904-922. [PMID: 34621469 PMCID: PMC8462083 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2021] [Revised: 04/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
With the continuous development of digital medicine, minimally invasive precision and safety have become the primary development trends in hepatobiliary surgery. Due to the specificity and complexity of hepatobiliary surgery, traditional preoperative imaging techniques such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging cannot meet the need for identification of fine anatomical regions. Imaging-based three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, virtual simulation of surgery and 3D printing optimize the surgical plan through preoperative assessment, improving the controllability and safety of intraoperative operations, and in difficult-to-reach areas of the posterior and superior liver, assistive robots reproduce the surgeon’s natural movements with stable cameras, reducing natural vibrations. Electromagnetic navigation in abdominal surgery solves the problem of conventional surgery still relying on direct visual observation or preoperative image assessment. We summarize and compare these recent trends in digital medical solutions for the future development and refinement of digital medicine in hepatobiliary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Wang
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Di Cao
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Si-Lin Chen
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yu-Mei Li
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Yun-Wen Zheng
- Institute of Regenerative Medicine, and Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212001, Jiangsu Province, China
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Large Animal Models for Biomedicine, and School of Biotechnology and Heath Sciences, Wuyi University, Jiangmen 529020, Guangdong Province, China
- School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama 234-0006, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8575, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|