Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in infants and children

Pediatric ERCP: Evolving into an Outpatient Procedure

BACKGROUND

While most adult ERCPs are performed on an outpatient basis, pediatric ERCPs are typically performed on an inpatient basis, or with ERCP followed by at least one night inpatient admission. We have begun performing a substantial proportion of our pediatric ERCPs on an outpatient basis, using our clinical judgment to guide the decision process. In the present study, we compare patient characteristics, indications, and adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

METHODS

Using our endoscopy database, we identified patients 18 years of age and under who underwent ERCP from 2019 to 2021. Demographics, hospitalization status, indications, findings, interventions, as well as available adverse event and clinical outcomes data were analyzed.

RESULTS

147 ERCP procedures were performed during the study period by one of two interventional endoscopists. A subset of 51 (34.7%) patients underwent outpatient ERCP. Comparison of the two groups (outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP) was notable for no statistically significant difference in patient age, range of indications, or proportion of index vs. subsequent ERCP. Overall rates of ERCP-associated adverse events were low and there was no statistically significant difference between adverse events in patients who underwent outpatient vs. inpatient ERCP.

CONCLUSION

We analyzed outpatient and inpatient pediatric ERCP patient demographics and ERCP characteristics to identify factors that guide decision to determine whether pediatric ERCPs are performed on an outpatient vs. inpatient basis. There was no significant difference in adverse events associated with outpatient vs. inpatient pediatric ERCPs, attesting to the safety of outpatient ERCP for this subset of patients in the studied context. This is an area worthy of future prospective and multi-center study.

The impact of pre-operative cholecystostomy on laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in paediatric patients

PURPOSE

This aim of this study was to identify the pre-operative risk factors for conversion during laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in paediatric patients.

METHODS

A retrospective single-centre study was carried out. All paediatric patients (< 18 years) who had undergone laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst between 2004 and 2021 were reviewed. The outcome was conversion to open surgery and pre-operative factors that affected the conversion rate were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients were included. Conversion was required in 24 cases (39.3%). There was no difference in the conversion rate between the first (before 2012, n = 30) and second (after 2012, n = 31) half of the series (36.7% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.674). Majority was type 1 cyst (86.8%) and the median cyst size was 4.6 cm (IQR: 2.2-6.4 cm). Antenatal diagnosis was available in 18 patients (29.5%). The median age at operation was 23.0 months (IQR: 8.0-72.0 months). Pre-operatively, 19 patients (31.1%) suffered from cholangitis and 5 (8.2%) of them required cholecystostomy. Comparing patients with successful laparoscopic surgery (L) and converted cases (C), there were no differences in the age at operation (p = 0.74), cyst size (p = 0.35), availability of antenatal diagnosis (p = 0.23) and cholangitic episodes (p = 0.40). However, a higher percentage of patients required cholecystostomy in the converted group (L vs. C = 2.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.05). Using logistic regression analysis, it was also a risk factor for conversion (OR = 3.5 [1.37-5.21], p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative cholecystostomy is a potential risk factor for conversion during laparoscopic excision of choledochal cyst in children.

Pediatric ERCP: Factors for Success and Complication-A 17-Year, Multisite Experience

OBJECTIVES

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an increasingly utilized procedure in pediatric populations. A lack of dedicated pediatric research has led endoscopists to extrapolate adult risk factors and preventative strategies to children. The aim of this multisite, retrospective study was to identify risks for adverse events, procedure failure, and prolonged courses in pediatric patients undergoing ERCP.

METHODS

Pediatric patients who had an ERCP at one of our academic centers were identified by query of their electronic medical records. Pre-procedure and post-procedure data were collected with ERCP-related adverse events defined according to the consensus criteria developed by Cotton et al 2010.

RESULTS

Between January 2004 and January 2021, 287 children had a total of 716 ERCPs. The procedure success rate was 95.5% with no mortality and an adverse event rate of 12.7%. Younger age was associated with increased case complexity, increased adverse events, and an increased rate of repeat ERCP. Case complexity score correlated with increased procedure time ( P < 0.001) and increased adverse events (tau 0.24, P < 0.01); stent removal and pancreatic stenting were more likely to precede an adverse event. Pancreatitis, pancreatic divisum, and pancreatic stricture/stenosis were associated with increased adverse events and rates of repeat ERCP.

CONCLUSIONS

Pediatric ERCP adverse event rates are higher than adults. The complexity grading system proposed by the Cotton et al appears to have applicability to pediatric patients. Young age and interventions affecting the pancreatic duct are associated with adverse ERCP outcomes in pediatrics.

External use of mirabilite to prevent post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in children: A multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Acute pancreatitis is the most common complication of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Currently, there is no suitable treatment for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) prophylaxis. Few studies have prospectively evaluated interventions to prevent PEP in children.

AIM

To assess the efficacy and safety of the external use of mirabilite to prevent PEP in children.

METHODS

This multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial enrolled patients with chronic pancreatitis scheduled for ERCP according to eligibility criteria. Patients were randomly divided into the external use of mirabilite group (external use of mirabilite in a bag on the projected abdominal area within 30 min before ERCP) and blank group. The primary outcome was the incidence of PEP. The secondary outcomes included the severity of PEP, abdominal pain scores, levels of serum inflammatory markers [tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and serum interleukin-10 (IL-10)], and intestinal barrier function markers [diamine oxidase (DAO), D-lactic acid, and endotoxin]. Additionally, the side effects of topical mirabilite were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were enrolled, including 117 in the external use of mirabilite group and the other 117 in the blank group. The pre-procedure and procedure-related factors were not significantly different between the two groups. The incidence of PEP in the external use of mirabilite group was significantly lower than that in the blank group (7.7% vs 26.5%, P < 0.001). The severity of PEP decreased in the mirabilite group (P = 0.023). At 24 h after the procedure, the visual analog scale score in the external use of mirabilite group was lower than that in the blank group (P = 0.001). Compared with those in the blank group, the TNF-α expressions were significantly lower and the IL-10 expressions were significantly higher at 24 h after the procedure in the external use of mirabilite group (P = 0.032 and P = 0.011, respectively). There were no significant differences in serum DAO, D-lactic acid, and endotoxin levels before and after ERCP between the two groups. No adverse effects of mirabilite were observed.

CONCLUSION

External use of mirabilite reduced the PEP occurrence. It significantly alleviated post-procedural pain and reduced inflammatory response. Our results favor the external use of mirabilite to prevent PEP in children.

Expanding the Use of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pediatrics: A National Database Analysis of Demographics and Complication Rates

Background

This study aimed to aid in risk assessment of pediatric endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) candidates by utilizing a national pediatric database with a large sample to assess how patient characteristics may affect ERCP complication rates.

Methods

The Kids' Inpatient Database (KID) is a sample of pediatric discharges in states participating in the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). This database provides demographic information, hospitalization duration, and outcome information for hospitalizations during which an ERCP occurred. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes were used to determine the hospitalization indication. ERCP complication rate was ascertained via ICD codes. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS 9.4.

Results

Complications were seen in 5.4% of hospitalizations with mortality observed in less than 0.2%. This analysis captured a large Hispanic population, specifically in the South and West regions. Gallbladder calculus and cholecystitis were more likely to occur in females. A higher percentage of patients in the age 10 - 17 group were female (72.2% vs. 52.7%, P < 0.01) and Hispanic (33.4% vs. 22.7%, P < 0.01) compared to the age 0 - 9 group. Age 0 - 5 and male gender were associated with lower routine home discharge rates and longer lengths of stay. Complications occurred at a higher rate in ages 0 - 5, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

ERCP is a safe procedure for pediatric patients with low complication rates and rare mortality. We found statistically significant differences in the procedure indications between pediatric age groups, races, and genders. Age ≤ 5 years and male gender were associated with more complicated healthcare courses.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in Pediatric Patients

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an advanced endoscopic technique used in the diagnosis and treatment of pancreaticobiliary system. ERCP is used less frequently in children than in adults due to the rarity of pancreaticobiliary diseases and technical difficulties. However, ERCP is a safe, effective diagnosis and treatment tool for children. Methods: All patients within the age range of 1-19 years, who underwent ERCP between 2010 and 2021 at our endoscopy unit, were retrospectively examined. Patient demographics, use of imaging methods, indications, type of sedation, interventions, success of ERCP, findings, and complications were evaluated. Results: Overall, 105 ERCPs were performed in 66 children (29 male and 37 female). The indications were choledocholithiasis, cyst hydatic, choledochal cyst, biliary atresia or anomaly, liver transplantation-related disorders, and pancreatic disorders, respectively. ERCP was finished as diagnostic ERCP in 20% and as therapeutic in 80%. Therapeutic procedures were sphincterotomy, stent placement or removal, stone or debris extraction, and balloon sweep or dilatation, respectively. The success rate in the procedures was 75.23%. The overall complication rate was 15.23%. Postprocedure pancreatitis occurred in 11.42%, hemorrhage occurred in 2.85%, and aggravation of cholangitis in 0.95%. All complications were managed conservatively. Conclusion: ERCP in pediatric patients is a safe procedure that can be performed by adult endoscopists with high success rates. Since our region is an endemic region for hydatid cyst disease, the most common ERCP indication after choledocholithiasis is procedures related to liver hydatid cyst disease. The most common complication was pancreatitis, and complications were treated medically.