Prevalence of and risk factors for stent migration-induced duodenal perforation

Evaluation of ERCP-related perforation: a single-center retrospective study

Background

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related perforation is a rare and serious adverse event. The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk factors and management of ERCP-related perforation, and to further determine the predictive factors associated with perforation outcome.

Methods

A total of 27,018 ERCP procedures performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (Nanchang, China) between January 2007 and March 2022 were included in the investigation of ERCP-related perforation. Medical records and endoscopic data were extracted to analyse the risk factors, management, and clinical outcome of ERCP-related perforation.

Results

Seventy-six patients (0.28%) were identified as having experienced perforation following ERCP. Advanced age, Billroth II anatomy, precut sphincterotomy, and papillary balloon dilatation were significantly associated with ERCP-related perforation. Most patients with perforation (n = 65) were recognized immediately during ERCP whereas 11 were recognized later on. The delay in recognition primarily resulted from stent migration (n = 9). In addition, 12 patients experienced poor clinical outcome including death or hospice discharge (n = 3), ICU admission for >3 days (n = 6), and prolonged hospital stay for >1 month due to perforation (n = 3). Cancer and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) are associated with a higher risk of poor outcome.

Conclusions

Advanced age, Billroth II anatomy, precut sphincterotomy, and balloon dilation increase the risk of ERCP-related perforation whereas cancer and SIRS independently predicted poor clinical outcome.

Side-by-side placement of fully covered metal stents versus conventional 7F plastic stents in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of metal stents compared with plastic stents when bilateral side-by-side stents were deployed for malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO).

METHODS

Fifty patients with unresectable advanced MHBO were randomly assigned to the metal stent (MS, n = 25) or plastic stent group (PS, n = 25). Fully covered self-expandable metal stents with 6 mm diameter and plastic stents with either 7F straight or double pigtail were used for MS and PS groups, respectively. Time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was evaluated as the primary outcome.

RESULTS

Both groups had 100% technical success rates; 88% and 76% of clinical success rates were obtained in MS and PS, respectively. Although stent migrations were more frequent in MS than PS (48% vs. 16%, P = 0.02), the mean TRBO was significantly longer in MS (190 days; 95% confidence interval [CI] 121-260 days vs. 96 days; 95% CI 50-141 days, P = 0.02). The placement of plastic stents (hazard ratio 2.42; 95% CI 1.24-4.73; P = 0.01) was the only significant risk factor associated with TRBO in multivariable analysis. The rates of adverse events were similar between the two groups (difference 0%; 95% CI -25% to 25%; P > 0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

During bilateral side-by-side deployment in MHBO, the use of metal stents appears to be preferable to plastic stents in terms of TRBO, despite a higher frequency of stent migration.

The Pierced Colon: When Biliary Stents Go the Wrong Way

Bowel perforation of biliary stents is a rare complication of biliary stenting. We report the successful endoscopic treatment of a 78-year-old man with a straight biliary plastic stent perforating the ascending colon without underlying structural abnormality in the affected segment. Perforation was detected incidentally during computed tomography; the patient had been under continued antibiotic therapy for liver abscess. Stent extraction was performed by using an endoscopic snare; the site of perforation was closed with through-the-scope clips. The patient remained asymptomatic. In addition, we reviewed published cases of perforated biliary stents and outlined that most perforations are caused by straight plastic stents.

Endoscopic treatment for duodenal perforation due to biliary stent dislocation: A case report and brief review of the literature

RATIONALE

Duodenal wall perforation by a dislocated biliary stent placed for biliary structure is rare but can be life-threatening. There are few reports on the management of stent-related duodenal perforation.

PATIENT CONCERNS

Three cases included in this study had undergone endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with placement of a plastic stent for biliary stricture. Two cases had symptoms (fever or abdominal pain), while other case showed no symptom after biliary stent placement.

DIAGNOSES

Dislocation of plastic stents was revealed on computed tomography or endoscopic images. Two patients were diagnosed with duodenal perforation due to distal migration of long stents with a straight shape on the distal side. One patient was diagnosed with fistula formation between the intrahepatic bile duct and duodenum due to perforation of a pigtail stent.

INTERVENTIONS

All cases could successfully be managed endoscopically with closure by hemoclips or stent replacement.

OUTCOMES

All 3 cases were improved after endoscopic treatment without any subsequent intervention.

LESSONS

Longer stents with a straight distal side are associated with a higher risk of duodenal perforation. Endoscopic management is appropriate as a first-line approach for a clinically stable patient. At the time of stent placement, we should pay attention to the length and type of stent.

Migration of a pancreatic duct stent into the peritoneal cavity during chemotherapy for pancreatic malignant lymphoma

A 68-year-old man with epigastric pain was admitted for acute pancreatitis and obstructive jaundice caused by Primary pancreatic malignant lymphoma. Computed tomography showed diffuse enlargement of the whole pancreas and dilation of the main pancreatic duct and bile duct. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed to decompress these dilated ducts. After two courses of chemotherapy, follow-up computed tomography incidentally revealed migration of the pancreatic duct stent, which had perforated the contralateral duodenal wall to enter the peritoneal cavity. In the present case, pancreatic duct stent deviation was attributed to tumor shrinkage resulting from chemotherapy. In addition, stent migration into the peritoneal cavity occurred due to repeated mechanical manipulation of the pancreatic duct stent, presumably leading to partial ulceration of the duodenal wall and delayed wound healing during chemotherapy. This case may provide valuable information on the migration of pancreatic duct stents as a rare, stent-related late complication during chemotherapy.