1
|
Wang L, Li XQ, Qu YF, Tan T, Fan KY, Xiang AY, Su W, Zhang YF, Xu CC, Liu ZQ, Chen WF, Li QL, Zhou PH, Hu H. Feasibility of a novel unassisted single-channel transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of appendiceal lesions (with video). Surg Endosc 2024:10.1007/s00464-024-11013-4. [PMID: 39174707 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11013-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transcolonic endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) is rapidly evolving and has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative to appendectomy. We aimed to characterize the feasibility and safety of a novel unassisted single-channel TEA. METHOD We retrospectively investigated 23 patients with appendicitis or appendiceal lesions who underwent TEA from February 2016 to December 2022. We collected clinicopathological characteristics, procedure‑related parameters, and follow‑up data and analyzed the impact of previous abdominal surgery and traction technique. RESULTS The mean age was 56.0 years. Of the 23 patients with appendiceal lesions, fourteen patients underwent TEA and nine underwent traction-assisted TEA (T-TEA). Eight patients (34.8%) had previous abdominal surgery. The En bloc resection rate was 95.7%. The mean procedure duration was 91.1 ± 45.5 min, and the mean wound closure time was 29.4 ± 18.6 min. The wounds after endoscopic appendectomy were closed with clips (21.7%) or a combination of clip closure and endoloop reinforcement (78.3%), and the median number of clips was 7 (range, 3-15). Three patients (13.0%) experienced major adverse events, including two delayed perforations (laparoscopic surgery) and one infection (salvage endoscopic suture). During a median follow-up of 23 months, no residual or recurrent lesions were observed, and no recurrence of abdominal pain occurred. There were no significant differences between TEA and T-TEA groups and between patients with and without abdominal surgery groups in each factor. CONCLUSION Unassisted single-channel TEA for patients with appendiceal lesions has favorable short- and long-term outcomes. TEA can safely and effectively treat appendiceal disease in appropriately selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Xiao-Qing Li
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Yi-Fan Qu
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Tao Tan
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
- School of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, 20092, China
| | - Ke-Yang Fan
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - An-Yi Xiang
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Wei Su
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Yi-Fei Zhang
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Chen-Chao Xu
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Zu-Qiang Liu
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Wei-Feng Chen
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Quan-Lin Li
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China
| | - Ping-Hong Zhou
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China.
| | - Hao Hu
- Shanghai Collaborative Innovation Center of Endoscopy, Endoscopy Center and Endoscopy Research Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, 20032, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fakhoury B, Alabdul Razzak I, Morin R, Krishnan S, Mahmood S. Combined endoscopic mucosal resection and full-thickness resection for large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Scand J Gastroenterol 2024; 59:798-807. [PMID: 38712699 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2024.2349641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Combined endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) with endoscopic Full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging technique that has been developed to target colorectal polyps larger than 2 cm. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this technique for the resection of large colorectal lesions. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive search of multiple electronic databases from inception through August 2023, to identify studies that reported on hybrid FTR. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the overall pooled technical success, macroscopic complete resection, free vertical margins resection rate, adverse events, and recurrence on follow up. RESULTS A total of 8 Study arms with 244 patients (30% women) were included in the analysis. The pooled technical success rate was 97% (95% CI 88%-100%, I2 = 79.93%). The pooled rate of macroscopic complete resection was achieved in 95% (95% CI 90%-99%, I2 = 49.98) with a free vertical margins resection rate 88% (95% CI, 78%-96%, I2 = 63.32). The overall adverse events rate was 2% (95% CI 0%-5%, I2 = 11.64) and recurrence rate of 6% (95% CI 2%-12%, I2=20.32). CONCLUSION Combined EMR with EFTR is effective and safe for resecting large, and complex colorectal adenomas, offering a good alternative for high surgical risk patients. Regional heterogeneity was observed, indicating that outcomes may be impacted by differences in operator expertise and industry training certification across regions. Comparative studies that directly compare combined EMR with EFTR against alternative methods such as ESD and surgical resection are needed.
Collapse
|
3
|
Iwasaki M, Okimoto K, Akizue N, Ota Y, Taida T, Matsumura T, Kato J, Kato N. Underwater modified strip biopsy for colorectal polyp invading into the appendiceal orifice. VIDEOGIE : AN OFFICIAL VIDEO JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2024; 9:344-347. [PMID: 39070680 PMCID: PMC11281918 DOI: 10.1016/j.vgie.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Miyuki Iwasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Okimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Akizue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Ota
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Taida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Matsumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Jun Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang YY, Lu JY, Wang Q, Yang AM. Resection of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice by combined endo-laparoscopic surgery: Two case reports. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1948-1952. [PMID: 38983360 PMCID: PMC11229993 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The management of polyps involving the appendiceal orifice (AO) presents notable challenges. Endoscopic resection is frequently hindered by operational complexities, a heightened risk of incomplete removal, and an elevated risk of procedural complications, including appendicitis. Conversely, surgical resection may entail unnecessary excision of intestinal segments, leading to potential morbidity. CASE SUMMARY Here, we reported two patients who presented with polyps deeply situated within the AO, with indistinct boundaries making it challenging to ensure completeness using traditional endoscopic resection. To overcome these challenges, we employed combined endo-laparoscopic surgery (CELS), achieving curative resection without postoperative complications. CONCLUSION The application of CELS in managing polyps involving the AO is emerging as a safe and effective treatment modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue-Yi Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jun-Yang Lu
- Department of General Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ai-Ming Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Diseases, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gibiino G, Binda C, Papparella LG, Spada C, Andrisani G, Di Matteo FM, Gagliardi M, Maurano A, Sferrazza S, Azzolini F, Grande G, de Nucci G, Cesaro P, Aragona G, Cennamo V, Fusaroli P, Staiano T, Soriani P, Campanale M, Di Mitri R, Pugliese F, Anderloni A, Cucchetti A, Repici A, Fabbri C. Technical failure during colorectal endoscopic full-thickness resection: the "through thick and thin" study. Endoscopy 2024. [PMID: 38754466 DOI: 10.1055/a-2328-4753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is an effective and safe technique for nonlifting colorectal lesions. Technical issues or failures with the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) system are reported, but there are no detailed data. The aim of our study was to quantify and classify FTRD technical failures. METHODS We performed a retrospective study involving 17 Italian centers with experience in advanced resection techniques and the required devices. Each center shared and classified all prospectively collected consecutive failures during colorectal EFTR using the FTRD from 2018 to 2022. The primary outcome was the technical failure rate and their classification; secondary outcomes included subsequent management, clinical success, and complications. RESULTS Included lesions were mainly recurrent (52 %), with a mean (SD) dimension of 18.4 (7.5) mm. Among 750 EFTRs, failures occurred in 77 patients (35 women; mean [SD] age 69.4 [8.9] years). A classification was proposed: type I, snare noncutting (53 %); type II, clip misdeployment (31 %); and type III, cap misplacement (16 %). Among endoscopic treatments completed, rescue endoscopic mucosal resection was performed in 57 patients (74 %), allowing en bloc and R0 resection in 71 % and 64 %, respectively. The overall adverse event rate was 27.3 %. Pooled estimates for the rates of failure, complications, and rescue endoscopic therapy were similar for low and high volume centers (P = 0.08, P = 0.70, and P = 0.71, respectively). CONCLUSIONS Colorectal EFTR with the FTRD is a challenging technique with a non-negligible rate of technical failure and complications. Experience in rescue resection techniques and multidisciplinary management are mandatory in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Gibiino
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Units, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, and Maurizio Bufalini Hosptial, Cesena, Italy
| | - Cecilia Binda
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Units, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, and Maurizio Bufalini Hosptial, Cesena, Italy
| | - Luigi Giovanni Papparella
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Policlinico Agostino Gemelli University, Rome, Italy
| | - Cristiano Spada
- Center for Endoscopic Research Therapeutics and Training (CERTT), Policlinico Agostino Gemelli University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Mario Gagliardi
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Gaetano Fucito, Mercato San Severino, Italy
| | - Attilio Maurano
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Ospedale Gaetano Fucito, Mercato San Severino, Italy
| | - Sandro Sferrazza
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Azzolini
- Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Endocopy, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Grande
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Germana de Nucci
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Garbagnate Milanese Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Cesaro
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aragona
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Ospedale "Guglielmo da Saliceto", Piacenza, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cennamo
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Paola Soriani
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL di Modena, Carpi, Italy
| | | | - Roberto Di Mitri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, ARNAS Civico Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Francesco Pugliese
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Niguarda Hospital, ASST Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Anderloni
- Department of Endoscopy, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy
- Endoscopy Unit, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Carlo Fabbri
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Units, Morgagni - Pierantoni Hospital, Forlì, and Maurizio Bufalini Hosptial, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nabi Z, Reddy DN. Endoscopic full thickness resection: techniques, applications, outcomes. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 18:257-269. [PMID: 38779710 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2024.2357611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) represents a pivotal advancement in the minimally invasive treatment of gastrointestinal lesions, offering a novel approach for the management of lesions previously deemed challenging or unreachable through conventional endoscopic techniques. AREAS COVERED This review discusses the development, methodologies, applications, and clinical outcomes associated with EFTR, including exposed and device-assisted EFTR, the integration of endoscopic mucosal resection with EFTR in hybrid techniques, and the collaborative approach between laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery (LECS). It encapsulates a comprehensive analysis of the various EFTR techniques tailored to specific lesion characteristics and anatomical locations, underscoring the significance of technique selection based on the lesion's nature and situational context. EXPERT OPINION/COMMENTARY The review underscores EFTR's transformative role in expanding therapeutic horizons for gastrointestinal tumors, emphasizing the importance of technique selection tailored to the unique attributes of each lesion. It highlights EFTR's capacity to facilitate organ-preserving interventions, thereby significantly enhancing patient outcomes and reducing procedural complications. EFTR is a cornerstone in the evolution of gastrointestinal surgery, marking a significant leap forward in the pursuit of precision, safety, and efficacy in tumor management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nabi Z, Samanta J, Dhar J, Mohan BP, Facciorusso A, Reddy DN. Device-assisted endoscopic full-thickness resection in colorectum: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc 2024; 36:116-128. [PMID: 37422920 DOI: 10.1111/den.14631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is emerging as an effective modality for mucosal and submucosal lesions in the colorectum. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to analyze the success and safety of device-assisted EFTR in the colon and rectum. METHODS A literature search was performed in the Embase, PubMed, and Medline databases for studies evaluating device-assisted EFTR between inception to October 2022. The primary outcome of the study was clinical success (R0 resection) with EFTR. Secondary outcomes included technical success, procedure duration, and adverse events. RESULTS In all, 29 studies with 3467 patients (59% male patients, 3492 lesions) were included in the analysis. The lesions were located in right colon (47.5%), left colon (28.6%), and rectum (24.3%). EFTR was performed for subepithelial lesions in 7.2% patients. The pooled mean size of the lesions was 16.6 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 14.9-18.2, I2 98%). Technical success was achieved in 87.1% (95% CI 85.1-88.9%, I2 39%) procedures. The pooled rate of en bloc resection was 88.1% (95% CI 86-90%, I2 47%) and R0 resection was 81.8% (95% CI 79-84.3%, I2 56%). In subepithelial lesions, the pooled rate of R0 resection was 94.3% (95% CI 89.7-96.9%, I2 0%). The pooled rate of adverse events was 11.9% (95% CI 10.2-13.9%, I2 43%) and major adverse events requiring surgery was 2.5% (95% CI 2.0-3.1%, I2 0%). CONCLUSION Device-assisted EFTR is a safe and effective treatment modality in cases with adenomatous and subepithelial colorectal lesions. Comparative studies are required with conventional resection techniques, including endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaheer Nabi
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| | - Jayanta Samanta
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Jahnvi Dhar
- Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, USA
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - D Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Figueiredo M, Yzet C, Wallenhorst T, Rivory J, Rostain F, Schaefer M, Chevaux JB, Leblanc S, Lépilliez V, Corre F, Rahmi G, Jacques J, Albouys J, Pioche M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of appendicular lesions is feasible and safe: a retrospective multicenter study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:634-638. [PMID: 37380005 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is challenging for appendicular lesions. We report the outcomes of ESD in this context. METHODS We collected data of ESD procedures for appendiceal neoplasia in a multicenter prospective registry. Main study endpoints were R0, en-bloc, and curative resection rates and adverse event rate. RESULTS One hundred twelve patients were included, 47 (42%) with previous appendectomy. Fifty-six (50%) were Toyonaga type 3 lesions (15 [13.4%] postappendectomy). En-bloc and R0 resection rates were 86.6% and 80.4%, respectively, with no significant difference associated with different grades of appendiceal invasion (P = .9 and P = .4, respectively) or previous appendectomy (P = .3 for both). The curative resection rate was 78.6%. Additional surgery was performed in 16 cases (14.3%), including 10 (62.5%) Toyonaga type 3 lesions (P = .04). This included the treatment of 5 cases (4.5%) of delayed perforation and 1 acute appendicitis. CONCLUSIONS ESD for appendicular lesions is a potentially safer and effective alternative to surgery for a significant proportion of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana Figueiredo
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Clara Yzet
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Timothée Wallenhorst
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | - Jérôme Rivory
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Florian Rostain
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Marion Schaefer
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Nancy University Hospital, Nancy, France
| | | | - Sarah Leblanc
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Vincent Lépilliez
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France
| | - Felix Corre
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Rahmi
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jérémie Albouys
- Department of Endoscopy and Gastroenterology, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Mathieu Pioche
- Endoscopy and Gastroenterology Unit, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meier B, Elsayed I, Seitz N, Wannhoff A, Caca K. Efficacy and safety of combined EMR and endoscopic full-thickness resection (hybrid EFTR) for large nonlifting colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 98:405-411. [PMID: 36990126 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) with a full-thickness resection device (FTRD) has become the standard technique for selected nonlifting colorectal adenomas, but tumor size is the major limitation. However, large lesions might be approached in combination with EMR. Herein, we report the largest single-center experience to date of combined EMR and EFTR (hybrid EFTR) in patients with large (≥25 mm) nonlifting colorectal adenomas not amenable to EMR or EFTR alone. METHODS This is a single-center retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent hybrid EFTR of large (≥25 mm) nonlifting colorectal adenomas. Outcomes of technical success (successful advancement of the FTRD with consecutive successful clip deployment and snare resection), macroscopic complete resection, adverse events, and endoscopic follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS Seventy-five patients with nonlifting colorectal adenomas were included. Mean lesion size was 36.5 mm (range, 25-60 mm), and 66.6% were located in the right side of the colon. Technical success was 100% with macroscopic complete resection in 97.3%. Mean procedure time was 83.6 minutes. Adverse events occurred in 6.7%, leading to surgical therapy in 1.3%. Histology revealed T1 carcinoma in 16%. Endoscopic follow-up was available in 93.3% (mean follow-up time, 8.1 months; range, 3-36) and showed no signs of residual or recurrent adenoma in 88.6%. Recurrence (11.4%) was treated endoscopically. CONCLUSIONS Hybrid EFTR is safe and effective for advanced colorectal adenoma that cannot be approached by EMR or EFTR alone. Hybrid EFTR expands the indication of EFTR substantially in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Meier
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Ismaeil Elsayed
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Nadine Seitz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Andreas Wannhoff
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology and Oncology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Obri M, Ichkhanian Y, Brown P, Almajed MR, Nimri F, Taha A, Agha Y, Jesse M, Singla S, Piraka C, Zuchelli TE. Full-thickness resection device for management of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open 2023; 11:E899-E907. [PMID: 37810898 PMCID: PMC10558260 DOI: 10.1055/a-2131-4891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims Endoscopic resection of lesions involving the appendiceal orifice is technically challenging and is commonly referred for surgical resection. However, post-resection appendicitis is a concern. Many studies have varying rates of post-procedure appendicitis. We aim to report the rate of post-resection appendicitis by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Studies that involved the use of a full-thickness resection device (FTRD) for management of appendiceal polyps were included. The primary outcome was appendicitis after FTRD and a subgroup analysis was performed on studies that only included FTRD performed at the appendiceal orifice. Results Appendicitis was encountered in 15% (95%CI: [11-21]) of the patients with 61% (95% CI: [44-76]) requiring surgical management. Pooled rates of technical success, histologic FTR, and histologic R0 resection in this sub-group (n=123) were 92% (95% CI: [85-96]), 98% (95% CI: [93-100]), and 72% (95% CI: [64-84%]), respectively. Post-resection histopathological evaluation revealed a mean resected specimen size of 16.8 ± 5.4 mm, with non-neoplastic pathology in 9 (7%), adenomas in 103 (84%), adenomas + high-grade dysplasia (HGD) in nine (7%), and adenocarcinoma in two (2%). The pooled rate for non-appendicitis-related surgical management (technical failure and/or high-risk lesions) was 11 % (CI: 7-17). Conclusions FTRD appears to be an effective method for managing appendiceal lesions. However, appendicitis post-resection occurs in a non-trivial number of patients and the R0 resection rate in appendiceal lesions is only 72%. Therefore, caution should be employed in the use of this technique, considering the relative risks of surgical intervention in each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Obri
- Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | | | - Patrick Brown
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | | | - Faisal Nimri
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Ashraf Taha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Yasmine Agha
- Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Michelle Jesse
- Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, United States
| | - Sumit Singla
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| | - Cyrus Piraka
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| | - Tobias E. Zuchelli
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Köhler F, Matthes N, Rosenfeldt M, Kunzmann V, Germer CT, Wiegering A. Neoplasms of the Appendix. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2023; 120:519-525. [PMID: 37282595 PMCID: PMC10534129 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2023.0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoplasms of the vermiform appendix are rare. They comprise a heterogeneous group of entities requiring differentkinds of treatment. METHODS This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochranedatabases. RESULTS 0.5% of all tumors of the gastrointestinal tract arise in the appendix. Their treatment depends on their histopathologicalclassification and tumor stage. The mucosal epithelium gives rise to adenomas, sessile serrated lesions, adenocarcinomas,goblet-cell adenocarcinomas, and mucinous neoplasms. Neuroendocrine neoplasms originate in neuroectodermal tissue. Adenomasof the appendix can usually be definitively treated by appendectomy. Mucinous neoplasms, depending on their tumorstage, may require additional cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (HIPEC). Adeno -carcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomas can metastasize via the lymphatic vessels and the bloodstream and should thereforebe treated by oncological right hemicolectomy. Approximately 80% of neuroendocrine tumors are less than 1 cm in diameterwhen diagnosed and can therefore be adequately treated by appendectomy; right hemicolectomy is recommended if the patienthas risk factors for metastasis via the lymphatic vessels. Systemic chemotherapy has not been shown to be beneficial forappendiceal neoplasms in prospective, randomized trials; it is recommended for adenocarcinomas and goblet-cell adenocarcinomasof stage III or higher, in analogy to the treatment of colorectal carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Köhler
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Niels Matthes
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Mathias Rosenfeldt
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
- Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Kunzmann
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
- Medical Clinic and Polyclinic II, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christoph-Thomas Germer
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
| | - Armin Wiegering
- Department of General, Visceral, Transplant, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Würzburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mun EJ, Wagh MS. Recent advances and current challenges in endoscopic resection with the full-thickness resection device. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:4009-4020. [PMID: 37476589 PMCID: PMC10354579 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i25.4009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2023] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) has emerged as a viable technique in the management of mucosal and subepithelial lesions of the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) not amenable to conventional therapeutic approaches. While various devices and techniques have been described for EFTR, a single, combined full-thickness resection and closure device (full-thickness resection device, FTRD system, Ovesco Endoscopy AG, Tuebingen, Germany) has become commercially available in recent years. Initially, the FTRD system was limited to use in the colorectum only. Recently, a modified version of the FTRD has been released for EFTR in the upper GIT as well. This review provides a broad summary of the FTRD, highlighting recent advances and current challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elijah J Mun
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| | - Mihir S Wagh
- Interventional Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nduma BN, Mofor KA, Tatang J, Amougou L, Nkeonye S, Chineme P, Ekhator C, Ambe S. Endoscopic Transcecal Appendectomy (ETA): A Literature Review on Risks and Benefits. Cureus 2023; 15:e40827. [PMID: 37363120 PMCID: PMC10287568 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.40827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Different colorectal lesions have attracted different procedures in their management. One of the novel approaches that have been documented in recent times is endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA). ETA is an endoscopic and less invasive approach to the excision of lesions within the appendix. The appendix is also completely resected in the process. The main aim of this paper is to establish some of the benefits and risks that come with ETA. The study was conducted from a systematic review perspective using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol, which governs the implementation of systematic reviews. Key considerations in the PRISMA framework used in this article include identifying the articles, screening them, and determining their eligibility and their final inclusion or exclusion based on the specified criteria. To arrive at relevant articles, some keywords were used in the various search engines of the databases that were consulted. Some of the keywords that were used included ETA, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), adverse events, risks, safety, efficacy, and the appendiceal orifice. It was established that the key benefits of the ETA include the ability to avoid postoperative appendicitis and residual lesions in tissue. On the other hand, some risks that could come with ETA were found to include potential tumor seeding and postoperative bleeding. However, the key study limitation is that most of the referenced studies in this literature review are retrospective case series and case reports that are prone to selection bias. Furthermore, most ETA procedures in this literature review were performed by a few experienced and highly skilled endoscopists, making the ability to make such results generalizable to all endoscopists and patient populations a debatable issue. In the future, there is a need for more multicenter and large studies to be conducted with longer follow-up periods to ascertain the results obtained in this review. This will ensure a more informed decision-making process for or against ETA implementation in real-world clinical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Basil N Nduma
- Department of Internal Medicine, Merit Health Wesley, Hattiesburg, USA
| | - Kelly A Mofor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Texas Tech Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, El Paso, USA
| | - Jason Tatang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA
| | - Loica Amougou
- Department of Gastroenterology, School of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, USA
| | - Stephen Nkeonye
- Department of Health and Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, USA
| | - Princess Chineme
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
| | - Chukwuyem Ekhator
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, New York Institute of Technology College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, USA
| | - Solomon Ambe
- Department of Neurology, Baylor Scott & White Health, McKinney, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Patel AP, Khalaf MA, Riojas-Barrett M, Keihanian T, Othman MO. Expanding endoscopic boundaries: Endoscopic resection of large appendiceal orifice polyps with endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:386-396. [PMID: 37274558 PMCID: PMC10236978 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i5.386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Large appendiceal orifice polyps are traditionally treated surgically. Recently, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have been utilized as alternative resection techniques.
AIM To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic resection techniques for the management of large appendiceal orifice polyps.
METHODS This was a retrospective observational study conducted to assess the feasibility and safety of EMR and ESD for large appendiceal orifice polyps. This project was approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board. Patients who underwent endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice polyps ≥ 1 cm from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary referral endoscopy center in the United States were enrolled. The main outcomes of this study included en bloc resection, R0 resection, post resection adverse events, and polyp recurrence.
RESULTS A total of 19 patients were identified. Most patients were female (53%) and Caucasian (95%). The mean age was 63.3 ± 10.8 years, and the average body mass index was 28.8 ± 6.4. The mean polyp size was 25.5 ± 14.2 mm. 74% of polyps were localized to the appendix (at or inside the appendiceal orifice) and the remaining extended into the cecum. 68% of polyps occupied ≥ 50% of the appendiceal orifice circumference. The mean procedure duration was 61.6 ± 37.9 minutes. Polyps were resected via endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and hybrid procedures in 5, 6, and 8 patients, respectively. Final pathology was remarkable for tubular adenoma (n = 10) [one with high grade dysplasia], sessile serrated adenoma (n = 7), and tubulovillous adenoma (n = 2) [two with high grade dysplasia]. En bloc resection was achieved in 84% with an 88% R0 resection rate. Despite the large polyp sizes and challenging procedures, 89% (n = 17) of patients were discharged on the same day as their procedure. Two patients were admitted for post-procedure observation for conservative pain management. Eight patients underwent repeat colonoscopy without evidence of residual or recurrent adenomatous polyps.
CONCLUSION Our study highlights how endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, and hybrid procedures are all appropriate techniques with minimal adverse effects, further validating the utility of endoscopic procedures in the management of large appendiceal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur P Patel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Mai A Khalaf
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt
| | | | - Tara Keihanian
- Department of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| | - Mohamed O Othman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pattarajierapan S, Takamaru H, Khomvilai S. Difficult colorectal polypectomy: Technical tips and recent advances. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29:2600-2615. [PMID: 37213398 PMCID: PMC10198056 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i17.2600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy has been shown to be an effective modality to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) development. CRC reduction is achieved by detecting and removing adenomas, which are precursors of CRC. Most colorectal polyps are small and do not pose a significant challenge for trained and skilled endoscopists. However, up to 15% of polyps are considered “difficult”, potentially causing life-threatening complications. A difficult polyp is defined as any polyp that is challenging for the endoscopist to remove owing to its size, shape, or location. Advanced polypectomy techniques and skills are required to resect difficult colorectal polyps. There were various polypectomy techniques for difficult polyps such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), underwater EMR, Tip-in EMR, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), or endoscopic full-thickness resection. The selection of the appropriate modality depends on the morphology and endoscopic diagnosis. Several technologies have been developed to aid endoscopists in performing safe and effective polypectomies, especially complex procedures such as ESD. These advances include video endoscopy system, equipment assisting in advanced polypectomy, and closure devices/techniques for complication management. Endoscopists should know how to use these devices and their availability in practice to enhance polypectomy performance. This review describes several useful strategies and tips for managing difficult colorectal polyps. We also propose the stepwise approach for difficult colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sukit Pattarajierapan
- Surgical Endoscopy Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Hiroyuki Takamaru
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan
| | - Supakij Khomvilai
- Surgical Endoscopy Colorectal Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zwager LW, Mueller J, Stritzke B, Montazeri NSM, Caca K, Dekker E, Fockens P, Schmidt A, Bastiaansen BAJ. Adverse events of endoscopic full-thickness resection: results from the German and Dutch nationwide colorectal FTRD registry. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 97:780-789.e4. [PMID: 36410447 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 11/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) is emerging as a minimally invasive alternative to surgery for complex colorectal lesions. Previous studies have demonstrated favorable safety results; however, large studies representing a generalizable estimation of adverse events (AEs) are lacking. Our aim was to provide further insight in AEs after eFTR. METHODS Data from all registered eFTR procedures in the German and Dutch colorectal full-thickness resection device registries between July 2015 and March 2021 were collected. Safety outcomes included immediate and late AEs. RESULTS Of 1892 procedures, the overall AE rate was 11.3% (213/1892). No AE-related mortality occurred. Perforations occurred in 2.5% (47/1892) of all AEs, 57.4% (27/47) of immediate AEs, and 42.6% (20/47) of delayed AEs. Successful endoscopic closure was achieved in 29.8% of cases (13 immediate and 1 delayed), and antibiotic treatment was sufficient in 4.3% (2 delayed). The appendicitis rate for appendiceal lesions was 9.9% (13/131), and 46.2% (6/13) could be treated conservatively. The severe AE rate requiring surgery was 2.2% (42/1892), including delayed perforations in .9% (17/1892) and immediate perforations in .7% (13/1892). Delayed perforations occurred between days 1 and 10 (median, 2) after eFTR, and 58.8% (10/17) were located on the left side. Other severe AEs were appendicitis (.4%, 7/1892), luminal stenosis (.1%, 2/1892), delayed bleeding (.1%, 1/1892), pain after eFTR close to the dentate line (.1%, 1/1892), and grasper entrapment in the clip (.1%, 1/1892). CONCLUSIONS Colorectal eFTR is a safe procedure with a low risk for severe AEs in everyday practice and without AE-related mortality. These results further support the position of eFTR as an established minimally invasive technique for complex colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselotte W Zwager
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Nahid S M Montazeri
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Karel Caca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Barbara A J Bastiaansen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Mueller J, Kuellmer A, Schiemer M, Thimme R, Schmidt A. Current status of endoscopic full-thickness resection with the full-thickness resection device. Dig Endosc 2023; 35:232-242. [PMID: 35997598 DOI: 10.1111/den.14425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) using the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is an integral part of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy. Since its market launch in Europe in 2014, its safety and effectiveness have been proven in numerous studies. Adaptations in design as well as new techniques, such as hybrid EFTR, expand the spectrum of the FTRD system. The following review is intended to provide an overview of the clinical application and current evidence of EFTR with the FTRD system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julius Mueller
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Moritz Schiemer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Robert Thimme
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pal P, Ramchandani M, Inavolu P, Reddy DN, Tandan M. Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY 2022. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.
Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.
Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.
Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Partha Pal
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Mohan Ramchandani
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Pradev Inavolu
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| | - Manu Tandan
- Department of Interventional Endoscopy, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ullah S, Liu BR. Endoscopic full-thickness resection for polyps involving the appendiceal orifice: not yet ready for prime time. Endoscopy 2022; 54:627. [PMID: 35613611 DOI: 10.1055/a-1770-4093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Ullah
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Bing-Rong Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Esophageal Cancer Prevention and Treatment, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Guo L, Ye L, Feng Y, Bethge J, Yang J, Schreiber S, Hu B. Endoscopic transcecal appendectomy: a new endotherapy for appendiceal orifice lesions. Endoscopy 2022; 54:585-590. [PMID: 34905794 PMCID: PMC9132730 DOI: 10.1055/a-1675-2625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic transcecal appendectomy (ETA) has been reported as a minimally invasive alternative procedure for lesions involving the appendiceal orifice. The aim of this case series study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of ETA for lesions at the appendiceal orifice. METHODS This retrospective study included consecutive patients with appendiceal orifice lesions who underwent ETA between December 2018 and March 2021. The primary outcome was technical success. The secondary outcomes included postoperative adverse events, postoperative hospital stay, and recurrence. RESULTS 13 patients with appendiceal orifice lesions underwent ETA during the study period. The median lesion size was 20 mm (range 8-50). Lesions morphologies were polypoid lesions (n = 5), laterally spreading tumors (n = 4), and submucosal lesions (n = 4). Technical success with complete resection was achieved in all 13 cases. There were no postoperative bleeding, perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess. The median length of hospital stay after ETA was 8 days (range 6-18). There was no tumor recurrence during a median follow-up of 17 months (range 1-28). CONCLUSIONS ETA is feasible, safe, and effective for complete resection of appendiceal orifice lesions. Larger, multicenter, prospective studies are needed to further assess this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linjie Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Liansong Ye
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Yilong Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| | - Johannes Bethge
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Juliana Yang
- The Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
| | - Stefan Schreiber
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | - Bing Hu
- Department of Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Falt P. Endoscopic treatment of early colorectal cancer. VNITRNI LEKARSTVI 2022; 68:355-362. [PMID: 36316196 DOI: 10.36290/vnl.2022.075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Early colorectal neoplasia is a localized precancerous lesion of the large intestine associated with negligible risk of lymphatic or systemic dissemination. Early neoplasia consists of adenoma with low- and high-grade dysplasia, intramucosal carcinoma and superficially invasive cancer without other high-risk features. In the majority of cases, early neoplastic lesions are detected by colonoscopy and treated by means of endoscopy resection replacing surgical treatment. Risk of invasive cancer should be stratified during diagnostic colonoscopy using morphological classifications and then, appropriate resection technique (endoscopic polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or full-thickness resection) is used. Success of endoscopic resection is assessed by histological examination of the resected specimen and in some cases, additional surgical resection with lymphadenectomy should be performed. Colonoscopic surveillance is needed due to the risk of local recurrence and metachronous lesions.
Collapse
|
23
|
Ichkhanian Y, Zuchelli T, Watson A, Piraka C. Evolving management of colorectal polyps. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 14:26317745211047010. [PMID: 34604745 PMCID: PMC8485258 DOI: 10.1177/26317745211047010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in endoscopic technology have led to increased success in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and polyp management, with reduction of CRC incidence and mortality. Despite these advances, CRC is still one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, and half of all CRC develops from lesions that were missed during colonoscopy while one-fifth of CRC arise from prior incomplete resection. Techniques to improve polyp detection are needed, along with optimization of complete resection of any abnormal lesions that are found. This article will review the currently available endoscopic resection techniques and will discuss where they fit in the management of polyps of different sizes and types, such as pedunculated versus nonpedunculated, and those with or without suspected invasion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tobias Zuchelli
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Andrew Watson
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Cyrus Piraka
- Section Chief-Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Güldener L, Jüllig A, Soto D, Pollmann S. Feature-Based Attentional Weighting and Re-weighting in the Absence of Visual Awareness. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:610347. [PMID: 33584229 PMCID: PMC7878679 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.610347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Visual attention evolved as an adaptive mechanism allowing us to cope with a rapidly changing environment. It enables the facilitated processing of relevant information, often automatically and governed by implicit motives. However, despite recent advances in understanding the relationship between consciousness and visual attention, the functional scope of unconscious attentional control is still under debate. Here, we present a novel masking paradigm in which volunteers were to distinguish between varying orientations of a briefly presented, masked grating stimulus. Combining signal detection theory and subjective measures of awareness, we show that performance on unaware trials was consistent with visual selection being weighted towards repeated orientations of Gabor patches and reallocated in response to a novel unconsciously processed orientation. This was particularly present in trials in which the prior feature was strongly weighted and only if the novel feature was invisible. Thus, our results provide evidence that invisible orientation stimuli can trigger the reallocation of history-guided visual selection weights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lasse Güldener
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Antonia Jüllig
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - David Soto
- Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science, Basque Center on Cognition, Brain, and Language (BCBL), San Sebastian, Spain
| | - Stefan Pollmann
- Department of Experimental Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of Experimental Psychology and Center of Behavioral Brain Science, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Learning and Cognition and School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|