1
|
Selnes O, Thorndal C, Hansen LØ, Eskemose SR, Koulaouzidis A. Conference Report: The FutuRE oF MinimalLy InvasivE GI and Capsule DiagnosTics (REFLECT) Nyborg, Denmark, October 2023. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:458. [PMID: 38472931 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14050458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The gastrointestinal (GI) tract, particularly the small bowel (SB), can be challenging for novel investigation tools [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ola Selnes
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
| | - Camilla Thorndal
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
| | | | | | - Anastasios Koulaouzidis
- Surgical Research Unit, Odense University Hospital, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
- Department of Medicine, OUH Svendborg Sygehus, 5700 Svendborg, Denmark
- Department of Social Medicine and Public Health, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-204 Szczecin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nagainallur Ravichandran S, Das D, Dayananda EK, Dey A, Banerjee A, Sun-Zhang A, Zhang H, Sun XF, Pathak S. A Review on Emerging Techniques for Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Invest 2024; 42:119-140. [PMID: 38404236 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2024.2315443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
Common detection methods in practice for diagnosing colorectal cancer (CRC) are painful and invasive leading to less participation of individuals for CRC diagnosis. Whereas, improved or enhanced imaging systems and other minimally invasive techniques with shorter detection times deliver greater detail and less discomfort in individuals. Thus, this review is a summary of the diagnostic tests, ranging from the simple potential use in developing a flexible CRC treatment to the patient's potential benefits in receiving less invasive procedures and the advanced treatments that might provide a better assessment for the diagnosis of CRC and reduce the mortality related to CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruthi Nagainallur Ravichandran
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| | - Diptimayee Das
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| | - Erica Katriel Dayananda
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| | - Amit Dey
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| | - Antara Banerjee
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| | - Alexander Sun-Zhang
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, BioClinicum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hong Zhang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Xiao-Feng Sun
- Division of Oncology, Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Surajit Pathak
- Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Kelambakkam, Chennai, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mascarenhas M, Martins M, Afonso J, Ribeiro T, Cardoso P, Mendes F, Andrade P, Cardoso H, Ferreira J, Macedo G. The Future of Minimally Invasive Capsule Panendoscopy: Robotic Precision, Wireless Imaging and AI-Driven Insights. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5861. [PMID: 38136403 PMCID: PMC10742312 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
In the early 2000s, the introduction of single-camera wireless capsule endoscopy (CE) redefined small bowel study. Progress continued with the development of double-camera devices, first for the colon and rectum, and then, for panenteric assessment. Advancements continued with magnetic capsule endoscopy (MCE), particularly when assisted by a robotic arm, designed to enhance gastric evaluation. Indeed, as CE provides full visualization of the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract, a minimally invasive capsule panendoscopy (CPE) could be a feasible alternative, despite its time-consuming nature and learning curve, assuming appropriate bowel cleansing has been carried out. Recent progress in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly in the development of convolutional neural networks (CNN) for CE auxiliary reading (detecting and diagnosing), may provide the missing link in fulfilling the goal of establishing the use of panendoscopy, although prospective studies are still needed to validate these models in actual clinical scenarios. Recent CE advancements will be discussed, focusing on the current evidence on CNN developments, and their real-life implementation potential and associated ethical challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Mascarenhas
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - Miguel Martins
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
| | - João Afonso
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - Tiago Ribeiro
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Cardoso
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - Francisco Mendes
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
| | - Patrícia Andrade
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - Helder Cardoso
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| | - João Ferreira
- Department of Mechanic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, 4200-065 Porto, Portugal;
- DigestAID—Digestive Artificial Intelligence Development, 455/461, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
| | - Guilherme Macedo
- Precision Medicine Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, São João University Hospital, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal; (M.M.); (J.A.); (T.R.); (P.C.); (F.M.); (P.A.); (H.C.); (G.M.)
- WGO Gastroenterology and Hepatology Training Center, 4200-047 Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-427 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tai FWD, McAlindon M, Sidhu R. Colon Capsule Endoscopy - Shining the Light through the Colon. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2023; 25:99-105. [PMID: 37022665 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-023-00867-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a non-invasive, wireless capsule endoscope. In this article, we review its current applications, compare its performance with optical colonoscopy (OC) and alternative imaging modalities like CT colonography (CTC), and highlight developments that may increase potential future use. RECENT FINDINGS By comparison to OC both CCE and CTC have a good sensitivity and specificity in detecting colonic polyps. CCE is more sensitive in detecting sub centimetre polyps. CCE is capable of detecting colonic inflammation and anorectal pathologies, commonly missed by CTC. However, rates of complete CCE examinations are limited by inadequate bowel preparation or incomplete colonic transit, whereas CTC can be performed with less bowel purgatives. Patients tolerate CCE better than OC, however patient preference between CCE and CTC vary. CCE and CTC are both reasonable alternatives to OC. Strategies to improve completion rates and adequacy of bowel preparation will improve cost and clinical effectiveness of CCE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Foong Way David Tai
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Room P13, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK.
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
| | - Mark McAlindon
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Room P13, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Unit of Gastroenterology, Room P13, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Glossop Road, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Semenov S, Costigan C, Ismail MS, McNamara D. Low Colon Capsule Endoscopy (CCE) False Negative Rate for Polyps Excluding Reader Error. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010056. [PMID: 36611348 PMCID: PMC9818729 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND CCE is a diagnostic tool lacking clinical data on false negative rates. We aimed to assess this rate and the reader/technical error breakdown. METHODS False negative CCEs were identified after comparing to a colonoscopy database. Missed pathology characteristics and study indications/quality were collated. Cases were re-read by experts and newly identified lesions/pathologies were verified by an expert panel and categorised as reader/technical errors. RESULTS Of 532 CCEs, 203 had an adequately reported comparative colonoscopy, 45 (22.2%) had missed polyps, and 26/45 (57.8%) reached the colonic section with missed pathology. Of the cases, 22 (84.6%) had adequate bowel preparation. Indications included 13 (50%) polyp surveillance, 12 (46%) GI symptoms, 1 (4%) polyp screening. CCE missed 18 (69.2%) diminutive polyps and 8 (30.8%) polyps ≥ 6 mm, 18/26 (69.2%) of these were adenomas. Excluding incomplete CCE correlates, colonoscopy total and significant polyp yield were 97/184 (52.7%) and 50/97 (51.5%), respectively. CCE total polyp and significant polyp false negative rate was 26.8% (26/97) and 16% (8/50), respectively. Following re-reading, reader and technical error was 20/26 (76.9%) and 6/26 (23.1%). Total and significant missed polyp rates were 20.6% (20/97) and 14% (7/50) for reader error, 6.2% (6/97) and 2% (1/50) for technical error. CONCLUSIONS False negative CCE rate is not insubstantial and should be factored into clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serhiy Semenov
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
- Correspondence:
| | - Conor Costigan
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, D24 NR0A Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mohd Syafiq Ismail
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Trinity Academic Gastroenterology Group, Trinity Centre, Tallaght Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, D02 R590 Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tallaght University Hospital, D24 NR0A Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The Effectiveness of a Very Low-Volume Compared to High-Volume Laxative in Colon Capsule Endoscopy. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 13:diagnostics13010018. [PMID: 36611310 PMCID: PMC9818960 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13010018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) is a promising modality for colonic investigations, but completion rates (CR) and adequate cleansing rates (ACR) must be improved to meet established standards for optical colonoscopy. Improvements should be made with patient acceptability in mind. We aimed to compare a very low-volume polyethylene glycol (PEG) laxative to a conventional high-volume laxative. We carried out a single-center retrospective comparative cohort study including patients referred for CCE. One hundred and sixty-six patients were included in the final analysis, with eighty-three patients in each group. We found a CR and ACR of 77% and 67% in the high-volume group and 72% and 75% in the very low-volume group, respectively. In the high-volume group, 54% had complete transit and adequate cleansing, whereas this was the case for 63% in the very low-volume group. No statistically significant difference in CR, ACR, or a combination of the two was found. A very low-volume bowel preparation regimen was non-inferior to a high-volume regimen before CCE in terms of CR and ACR.
Collapse
|
7
|
Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Diagnosis of Colon Polyps: Who Needs a Colonoscopy? Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12092093. [PMID: 36140494 PMCID: PMC9498104 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12092093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Revised: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Colon screening programs have reduced colon cancer mortality. Population screening should be minimally invasive, safe, acceptably sensitive, cost-effective, and scalable. The range of screening modalities include guaiac or immunochemical fecal occult blood testing and CT colonography and colonoscopy. A number of carefully controlled studies concur that second-generation capsule endoscopy has excellent sensitivity for polyp detection and a high negative predictive value. Colon capsules fulfill the screening expectation of safety, high sensitivity for polyp detection, and patient acceptance, and appear to straddle the divide between occult blood testing and colonoscopy. While meeting these criteria, there remains the challenges of scaling, capsule practitioner training, resource allocation, and implementing change of practice. Like CT colonography, capsule screening presents the clinician with a decision on the threshold for colonoscopy referral. Overall, colon capsules are an invaluable tool in polyp detection and colon screening and offer a filter that determines “who needs a colonoscopy?”.
Collapse
|
8
|
Oka P, McAlindon M, Sidhu R. Capsule endoscopy - a non-invasive modality to investigate the GI tract: out with the old and in with the new? Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:591-599. [PMID: 35695266 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2089113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Capsule endoscopy has had significant development since it was introduced into the field of medicine in 2000. It is non-invasive, well tolerated, does not require sedation and is a first-line small bowel investigative modality. As it transits through the entire gastrointestinal (GI) tract, it has the potential to provide a pan-enteric examination. AREAS COVERED In this review we will discuss the new diagnostic modalities along with traditional methods which have been used for examination of the gastro intestinal (GI) tract. The main focus of this review will be on the use of capsule endoscopy for pan-enteric examination. EXPERT OPINION Capsule endoscopy is an accepted first-line investigation for the small bowel. Diagnostic sensitivity of the colon capsule is comparable to colonoscopy in controlled trials and is being evaluated in high-risk patients in routine clinical practice in national programs. Preliminary data suggest that a magnetic-controlled examination of the upper GI tract could be developed to enable a complete upper GI examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priya Oka
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Mark McAlindon
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Reena Sidhu
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK.,Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Sousa Magalhães R, Chálim Rebelo C, Sousa-Pinto B, Pereira J, Boal Carvalho P, Rosa B, Moreira MJ, Duarte MA, Cotter J. CC-CLEAR (Colon Capsule Cleansing Assessment and Report): the novel scale to evaluate the clinical impact of bowel preparation in capsule colonoscopy - a multicentric validation study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:625-632. [PMID: 35068293 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2022.2026463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon Capsule Cleansing Assessment and Report (CC-CLEAR) is a novel quantitative bowel preparation scale for colon capsule. AIM The aim of this study is to validate the association between CC-CLEAR's classification and major CC outcomes: lesion detection rate, surveillance recommendations and post-CC endoscopic treatment. METHODS Multicentric cohort of consecutive CCs. An expert's panel decided post-CC recommendations. Data included CC-CLEAR and Leighton-REX scales. Major CC outcomes were associated with the different cleansing grades. RESULTS From 168 CC's included, findings were reported in 123 (73.2%), 67 (54.4%) of those being colorectal polyps. CC-CLEAR influenced CC's lesion detection (OR 1.25 95% IC [1.07-1.46], p-value .004) and polyp detection rate (OR 1.22 95% IC [1.04-1.43], p-value.014). Thirty-two (19%) post-CC colonoscopies were recommended, including 22 (68.75%) with at least one polypectomy. CC-CLEAR was associated with post-CC colonoscopy treatment (OR 1.40 95% IC [1.07-1.84], p-value .015). Regarding surveillance, CC-CLEAR influenced the decision for immediate CC repetition (OR 0.21 95% IC [0.12-0.36], p-value < .001) and the recommendation for CC in 3-5 years' time (OR 1.47 95% IC [1.50-1.86], p-value < .002). The Leighton-Rex scale was not correlated with major CC outcomes. CONCLUSION CC-CLEAR impacts major CC outcomes: lesion detection, surveillance recommendations and post-CC endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui de Sousa Magalhães
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Carolina Chálim Rebelo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, EPER, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Bernardo Sousa-Pinto
- MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,CINTESIS - Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - José Pereira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, EPER, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - Pedro Boal Carvalho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Bruno Rosa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Maria J Moreira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| | - Maria A Duarte
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo de Ponta Delgada, EPER, Ponta Delgada, Portugal
| | - José Cotter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hospital Senhora da Oliveira, Guimarães, Portugal.,Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.,ICVS/3B's, PT Government Associate Laboratory, Guimarães/Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|