[Psycho-Oncological Care for People with a Migration Background and their Relatives - Results of Semi-Structured Interviews with Physicians]

Awareness and use of psychosocial care among cancer patients and their relatives-a comparison of people with and without a migration background in Germany

PURPOSE

We examined how migration background is associated with awareness and usage of psycho-oncology services.

METHODS

Oncologists in community-based practices and outpatient clinics asked their patients and their relatives to complete a questionnaire. Migrants were purposely over-sampled. The questionnaire was provided in Arabic, English, Farsi, French, German, Hindi, Kurdish, Pashto, Russian, Somali, Turkish, Urdu, and Vietnamese.

RESULTS

From 9 collaborators, 177 participants were enrolled (130 with and 47 without migration background). The existence of outpatient cancer counselling centres was known to 38% of the participants without and 32% with migration background, self-help groups to 32 vs. 12%, and psychotherapy to 43 vs. 25%. Respondents from the Near and Middle East were less likely to know about psychotherapy (odds ratio (OR) 0.1, p = 0.01); those from the Commonwealth of the Independent States or former Yugoslavia were less often informed about self-help groups (OR 0.1, p = 0.06). Migrants retrieved information less frequently from the internet than non-migrants (10 vs. 25%). At least one service had been used by 27% of migrants and 42% of non-migrants (OR 0.5, p = 0.06). After adjusting for gender, age, education, and patient-relative status, there was no evidence for an association between migration background and service use.

CONCLUSIONS

Migrants should be better informed about psychotherapy and self-help groups, in particular the ones coming from the Near or Middle East and the Commonwealth of the Independent States or former Yugoslavia. The under-use of psychosocial services can largely be explained by confounding factors. Therefore, these factors must always be taken into account when analysing the use of psychosocial services in the aforementioned populations.

Linguistic barriers in communication between oncologists and cancer patients with migration background in Germany: an explorative analysis based on the perspective of the oncologists from the mixed-methods study POM

OBJECTIVE

We aimed at investigating the predictors of linguistic barriers among office-based haemato-oncologists during consultation with migrant cancer patients in Germany.

METHODS

Physicians from haemato-oncological practices were invited to participate in a cross-sectional study. Linguistic barriers and family factors were ascertained using a newly developed online-questionnaire with the scales "Overall linguistic barriers", "Self-perceived linguistic barriers" and "Family factors - antagonistic behaviour". Predictors of linguistic barriers were identified using multivariate ANOVA via step-wise backwards selection.

RESULTS

Fifty-five physicians participated in the study. Treating patients from Sub-Saharan Africa predicted higher overall and self-perceived linguistic barriers (F [2,46] = 4.51, p = .04; and F [3,45] = 5.44, p = .02, respectively). Working in an single practice (F [3,45] = 4.19; p = .05) predicted higher self-perceived linguistic barriers. Employees who could act as translators predicted lower barriers in form of antagonistic behaviour from relatives (F [2,48] = 6.12; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that linguistic barriers are affected by the level of linguistic concordance between patients and medical personnel. A temporary solution might be the presence of linguistically competent personnel in the practice. However, the results of this study highlight the need for greater availability of linguistic competent translators for consultations in haemato-oncological practices.

Financial difficulties in breast cancer survivors with and without migration background in Germany-results from the prospective multicentre cohort study BRENDA II

Purpose

We aimed to explore the trajectory of financial difficulties among breast cancer survivors in the German health system and its association with migration background.

Methods

In a multicentre prospective study, breast cancer survivors were approached four times (before surgery, before and after adjuvant therapy, five years after surgery) and asked about their migration history and financial difficulties.

Migrants were defined as born/resided outside Germany or having citizenship/nationality other than German. Financial difficulties were ascertained with the financial difficulties item of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Instrument (EORTC QLQ-C30) at each time-point (cut-off > 17). Financial difficulties were classified in trajectories: always (every time-point), never (no time-point), initial (first, not fourth), delayed (only fourth), and acquired (second and/or third, not first).

A logistic regression was conducted with the trajectories of financial difficulties as outcome and migration background as exposure. Age, trends in partnership status, and educational level were considered as confounders.

Results

Of the 363 participants included, 49% reported financial difficulties at at least one time-point.

Financial difficulties were reported always by 7% of the participants, initially by 5%, delayed by 10%, and acquired by 21%.

Migrants were almost four times more likely to report delayed (odds ratio [OR] = 3.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3, 10.5) or acquired (OR = 3.6; 95% CI 1.6, 8.4) financial difficulties compared to non-migrant participants.

Conclusion

Survivors with a migration background are more likely to suffer from financial difficulties, especially in later stages of the follow-up. A linguistically/culturally competent active enquiry about financial difficulties and information material regarding supporting services/insurances should be considered.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-07074-7.

["We knew it was going to be tough, but we didn't expect this!" Experiences with the inclusion of cancer patients with a migrant background and their relatives in the field of psycho-oncology]

Hintergrund

Der Prozess des Studieneinschlusses von Teilnehmenden ist ein wichtiger Bestandteil und oftmals aufwendiger Arbeitsschritt in wissenschaftlichen Forschungsprojekten. Aufgrund unterschiedlicher finanzieller, organisatorischer und ethischer Rahmenbedingungen stellt die fristgerechte Gewinnung von Teilnehmenden häufig eine Herausforderung dar. In diesem Beitrag berichten wir über unsere Erfahrungen hinsichtlich des Studieneinschlusses, die wir im Projekt „Psychoonkologische Versorgung von Krebspatienten mit Migrationshintergrund – eine Mixed-Methods-Studie“ (POM) gemacht haben.

Methode

Die Gewinnung von Teilnehmenden erfolgte über ambulante hämato-onkologische Schwerpunktpraxen. Patient*innen und Angehörige wurden in erster Linie durch die behandelnden Ärzt*innen auf das Projekt aufmerksam gemacht und für eine Teilnahme an qualitativen Interviews gewonnen.

Ergebnisse

Es wurden bundesweit neun Patient*innen und Angehörige in qualitativen Einzelinterviews befragt. Abgesehen von der COVID-19-Pandemie gab es weitere Herausforderungen beim Studieneinschluss. In vielen Fällen wurde eine Teilnahme von Patient*innen abgelehnt. Gründe hierfür waren u.a. „kein Interesse“, der Gebrauch der Begriffe „Psychoonkologie“ oder „Mensch mit Migrationshintergrund“, ein Verbot der Teilnahme durch die Angehörigen, kein persönliches Interview aufgrund der COVID-19-Pandemie sowie eine zu starke emotionale Belastung und Verschlechterung des Gesundheitszustands nach vorheriger Einwilligung.

Diskussion

Die Gewinnung von Studienteilnehmenden aus vulnerablen Gruppen für ein sensibles Thema wie der Psychoonkologie bringt vielfache Herausforderungen mit sich. Um dennoch einen erfolgreichen Studieneinschluss zu erlangen, erwies sich ein regelmäßiger telefonischer und schriftlicher Austausch mit den jeweils zuständigen Praxismitarbeitenden als hilfreich, wodurch ein Überblick über Herausforderungen erlangt und der Studieneinschluss evaluiert und zeitnah angepasst werden konnte.

Schlussfolgerung

In Forschungsprojekten mit vulnerablen Gruppen und zu sensiblen Themen sollten sowohl eine zielgruppenspezifische, feinfühlige und laienverständliche Ansprache als auch regelmäßige Rücksprachen mit den Personen erfolgen, die für den Studieneinschluss in Versorgungseinrichtungen verantwortlich sind, um ggf. im Laufe des Studieneinschlusses das bisherige Verfahren anzupassen. Basierend auf den Erfahrungen der POM-Studie werden Lösungsansätze für Versorgungsforschungsstudien mit vulnerablen Gruppen und bei sensiblen Themen aufgezeigt.