[Opacification of Intraocular Lenses]

[Hydrophobic surface properties of hydrophilic acrylic lenses do not protect against calcification]

BACKGROUND

Opacification through calcification of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses is a serious complication of cataract surgery, which usually results in explantation of the lens. In the process of calcification, the intraocular lens material plays a crucial role: calcification only occurs in hydrophilic acrylic lenses. Hydrophobic acrylic lenses show no crystal formation within the polymer. Hydrophilic acrylic lenses from some manufacturers have hydrophobic surface properties. The question arises as to what influence these surface properties have on the risk of calcification.

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether the hydrophobic surface properties of hydrophilic acrylic lenses can prevent calcification.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Using an electrophoretic in vitro model of calcification, two hydrophilic lenses with hydrophobic surface properties were compared to two hydrophilic lenses and a hydrophobic negative control to determine the risk of calcification. The lenses were then analyzed by optical microscopy, Alizarin Red and Von Kossa staining, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X‑ray spectroscopy (EDX).

RESULTS

All four hydrophilic lens models showed calcification within the polymer. No difference was found between the hydrophilic lenses and the hydrophilic lenses with hydrophobic surface properties in terms of crystal formation. The hydrophobic negative control showed no calcification.

CONCLUSION

The investigation conducted in this study under standardized conditions could show that hydrophobic surface properties of hydrophilic acrylic lenses do not protect against calcium phosphate crystal formation within the polymer. There also is a risk of calcification in these lens models.

Comparative analysis of in vitro accelerated glistening formation in foldable hydrophobic intraocular lenses

PURPOSE

To analyse and compare the propensity to form glistenings in 4 different types of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs): Alcon AcrySof ® MA60AC, HOYA iSert® PC-60AD, Bausch&Lomb enVista, and Kowa Avansee™ PU6A.

METHODS

We used an accelerated laboratory method to create glistenings. IOLs were first immersed in saline at 45 °C for 24 h and then at 37 °C for 2.5 h. Microvacuole (MV) density and size were documented and calculated using an image analysis program.

RESULTS

Median density of glistenings [MV/mm2] for Alcon AcrySof ® MA60AC was 623 (range 507-804), for HOYA iSert® PC-60AD 1358 (range 684-2699), for Bausch&Lomb enVista 2 (range 1-2), and for Kowa Avansee™ PU6A 1 (range 1-4). The prevailing MV size was: 0-5 µm for Hoya IOLs, 5-10 µm for Alcon IOLs, 20-50 µm for Bausch&Lomb IOLs, and 5-50 µm for Kowa IOLs.

CONCLUSIONS

Glistenings could be induced in all studied IOLs using the accelerated laboratory method. The Alcon AcrySof ® MA60AC and HOYA iSert® PC-60AD IOLs showed MV of high density, while the glistenings in the Hoya IOLs were smaller in size compared to the Alcon IOLs. The MV density was minimal in the Bausch&Lomb enVista and Kowa Avansee™ PU6A IOLs. The propensity of the Alcon AcrySof ® MA60AC IOLs to form glistenings in vitro correlated with the findings of clinical results that are already published.