Bewegungsförderung für Bewohner in Pflegeheimen

[DNVF Memorandum: Objectives and Methods of Physical Activity-Related Health Services Research]

The DNVF Memorandum: Objectives and Methods of Physical Activity-Related Health Services Research summarizes, for the first time, the highly interdisciplinary and interprofessional field of physical activity-based health care in the German healthcare system. In addition to providing a conceptual framework and definition of key measures and concepts in physical activity-related health care research, existing research gaps and needs are identified, and methods for advancing this relatively young field of research are described. A particular focus of this study is the relevant outcome parameters and their standardized assessment using established and valid measurement tools. The memorandum aims to establish a general understanding of the complex subject of promoting physical activity and sports therapy in the context of healthcare, to give an impulse to new research initiatives, and to integrate the currently available strong evidence on the effectiveness of physical activity and exercise into healthcare.

[The Lübeck Scale of Basic Mobility : Assessment of geriatric patients with severely impaired mobility]

BACKGROUND

In the geriatric assessment of mobility, the timed up and go (TUG) test is often used; however, many inpatients are unable to master this test. The Lübeck Scale of Basic Mobility (LSBM) was developed as a performance test for this target group.

OBJECTIVE

The study investigated the properties of the 7‑task LSBM, which has a scaling at item level based on the 5‑level assessment of impairments according to the ICF.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 77 patients who had not mastered the TUG test at acute geriatric hospital admission, the LSBM was completed at intervals of 7-18 days (t0, t1), including one rating by 2 investigators. For convergent validity, the De Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI) was used.

RESULTS

The LSBM score and DEMMI score were highly correlated (-0.880, p < 0.001). A floor effect did not occur with LSBM and occurred with DEMMI in 5 patients (6.5%). The predictive validity for predicting coping with TUG test at discharge based on the sum score at t0 was -0.577 for the LSBM, and 0.542 for the DEMMI (Spearman's correlation, p = 0.001). The interrater reliability of the LSBM was 0.983 (p < 0.001), the correlation between test and retest was 0.836 (p < 0.001) and the internal consistency via Cronbach's α was 0.876. The effect size as a measure of change sensitivity was Cohen's d 0.711.

CONCLUSION

The LSBM facilitates treatment goal setting and allows standardized documentation of even small improvements and deteriorations in patients with reduced basic mobility.

[Assessment of mobility/motor skills in old age : Based on the S1 guideline "Geriatric assessment level 2, living guideline"]

In addition to locomotion, mobility also includes any motor performance that serves other purposes and movements that are unplanned. This article presents the instruments mentioned in the S1 guideline "Geriatric assessment level 2, living guideline", as well as additional ones that are less known. The classification is into three categories: instruments that focus on the upper extremities, instruments without performance, which mainly focus on the functions and capabilities of the lower extremities, and those that do this using performance tests.